Schools

What Lawyers Got For Hinsdale D86 Ouster

The law firm also attended a closed meeting in which the board suspended the superintendent.

Hinsdale High School District 86 board paid $56,187 for Chicago-based law firm Robbins Schwartz to oust Superintendent Tammy Prentiss.
Hinsdale High School District 86 board paid $56,187 for Chicago-based law firm Robbins Schwartz to oust Superintendent Tammy Prentiss. (David Giuliani/Patch)

HINSDALE, IL – Less than two weeks after taking control, the new Hinsdale High School District 86 majority hired a law firm to help with its first mission: Fire Superintendent Tammy Prentiss.

Last week, the district released the law firm's costs. It paid the Chicago-based law firm Robbins Schwartz $56,187 in May and June to accomplish the goal of ousting Prentiss.

The board approved hiring Robbins Schwartz at its May 15 meeting.

Find out what's happening in Hinsdale-Clarendon Hillswith free, real-time updates from Patch.

In fact, the district paid the firm $457 to prepare for the meeting, even though it had not been hired yet. The firm also charged $1,200 for its services during the meeting.

That night, the board decided in a closed session to suspend Prentiss and name an interim superintendent, actions that it announced the next day.

Find out what's happening in Hinsdale-Clarendon Hillswith free, real-time updates from Patch.

State law requires public bodies to make decisions in open meetings. Patch has filed a complaint with the attorney general's office, which said it would look into the matter.

At Thursday's board meeting, member Debbie Levinthal revived her year-old request for the board to review its options for law firms. Its main firm has long been Itasca-based Hodges Loizzi.

Interim Superintendent Linda Yonke said it's recommended that school boards request proposals from prospective law firms after a certain number of years. Such a process, she said, may result in sticking with the same firm.

In 2021, Levinthal and board member Peggy James locked horns with Hodges Loizzi after the district relied on the firm's advice to deny their public records request for board members' emails about a 2021 contract with "antiracist" consultants.

The two later filed a complaint with the attorney general, as did Patch. The district prevailed.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.