Aims: We sought to identify person- and program-level factors distinguishing permanent supportive housing (PSH) residents with higher versus lower social integration; and higher versus lower instrumental functioning.
Methods: Among 60 PSH residents at Los Angeles' VA, surveys and medical records captured person-level factors. Using a median split, we dichotomized participants with higher versus lower social integration; and higher versus lower instrumental functioning. Recursive partitioning (RP) identified variables that best-differentiated these subgroups. Interviews with 26 participants captured their perceptions on social integration and instrumental functioning.
Results: Using RP, health-related quality of life, psychiatric symptoms and case management frequency best-differentiated the social integration subgroups. Few perceived that PSH affected social integration. RP did not yield a stable model to differentiate the instrumental functioning subgroups; participants perceived that PSH addressed most functional deficits.
Conclusions: Services that enhance social integration may benefit PSH residents with poor health; existing services may adequately address instrumental functioning.
Keywords: Veterans; functional status; homeless persons; housing; mental disorders; mental health recovery; social integration.
Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.