Forests, people, fire: Integrating the sciences to build capacity for an “All Lands” approach to forest restoration
Interest in landscape-scale approaches to fire management and forest restoration is growing with the realization that these approaches are critical to maintaining healthy forests and protecting nearby communities. However, coordinated planning and action across multiple ownerships have been elusive because of differing goals and forest management styles among landowners. Scientists with the Pacific Northwest Research Station and their colleagues recognized that working at the landscape scale requires integrating the biophysical, social, and economic dimensions of the problem, and this necessitates collecting new types of information and inventing new tools.
To accomplish this, the study team included widely diverse expertise and worked closely with stakeholders in central Oregon throughout the process. The team gathered information from private, state, federal, and tribal landowners about their current forest and fire management practices and then built a computer model that can be used to facilitate collaborative decision making about forest management in fire-prone environments. The model allows stakeholders to compare alternative management scenarios to see how various approaches affect wildfire behavior, risk, and the associated delivery of valued ecosystem services. The model is now being used with two forest collaborative groups in central Oregon to help stakeholders understand the potential tradeoffs associated with management options.
Citation
Oliver, Marie; Charnley, Susan; Spies, Thomas; Kline, Jeff; White, Eric. 2017. Forests, people, fire: Integrating the sciences to build capacity for an All Lands approach to forest restoration. Science Findings 200. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 5 p.
People
-
Person
Susan Charnley
Research Social Scientist -
Person
Thomas Spies
Emeritus Scientist -
Person
Jeffrey D. Kline
Research Forester -
Person
Eric M. White
Research Quantitative Social Scientist
For Further Reading:
- Susan Charnley, Melissa R. Poe, Alan A. Ager, Thomas A. Spies, Emily K. Platt, Keith A. Olsen. 2015. A burning problem: social dynamics of disaster risk reduction through wildfire mitigation
- Susan Charnley, Thomas A. Spies, Ana M. G. Barros, Eric M. White, Keith A. Olsen. 2017. Diversity in forest management to reduce wildfire losses: implications for resilience
- Jeffrey D. Kline, Eric M. White, A Paige Fischer, Michelle M. Steen-Adams, Susan Charnley, Christine S. Olsen, Thomas A. Spies, John D. Bailey. 2017. Integrating social science into empirical models of coupled human and natural systems
External Publications
-
Spies, T.; Scheller, R. Bolte, J., eds. 2017. Adaptation in fire-prone landscapes: interactions of policies, management, wildfire, and social networks in Oregon, USA. Special feature in Ecology and Society. 22(1). https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ issues/view.php?sf=117t.
-
Spies, T.A.; White, E.M.; Ager, A.A., et al. 2017. Using an agent-based model to examine forest management outcomes in a fire-prone landscape in Oregon, USA. Ecology and Society. 22 (1): 25. https://doi. org/10.5751/ES-08841-220125.