Drugs

'Time that we right these wrongs': Biden pardons thousands for marijuana use and possession

In 2020, Joe Biden campaigned on pardons or commutations for non-violent drug offenders — and in 2022, he pardoned thousands of federal offenses for simple possession of marijuana. More news came on Friday morning, December 22, when the president announced that he was "commuting the sentences of 11 people who are serving disproportionately long sentences for non-violent drug offenses."

Biden added that "following my pardon of prior federal and D.C. offenses of simple possession of marijuana, I am issuing a Proclamation that will pardon additional offenses of simple possession and use of marijuana under federal and D.C. law."

"Criminal records for marijuana use and possession have imposed needless barriers to employment, housing, and educational opportunities," Biden wrote. "Too many lives have been upended because of our failed approach to marijuana. It's time that we right these wrongs."

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to hold office again?

Former President Donald Trump, in contrast, has campaigned on expanding the death penalty to include drug trafficking.

Axios' Emma Hurt, reporting on Biden's December 22 proclamation, notes that although the president has been quite proactive when it comes to pardons and commutations for nonviolent marijuana convictions, he "has stopped short of endorsing efforts to legalize marijuana at the federal level — except for medical use."

"Many Democrats and advocates have long pushed for legalization of marijuana," Hurt explains. "The ACLU, for example, has argued criminalization has fueled mass incarceration and disproportionately affected people of color. The House voted in 2022 to decriminalize cannabis on the federal level and allow for the expungement of some marijuana convictions. Legalization efforts have stalled in the Senate, however, despite support from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)."

The wave of pardons comes as the national mood toward marijuana use has softened. As of December 2023, there are 24 states as well as Washington, DC that have legalized small amounts of marijuana either by ballot referendum or legislative action. Ohio — a state Donald Trump won twice whose legislature is under GOP control — was the latest state to legalize it following a ballot initiative in November.

READ MORE: 'Be realistic': Conservative slams Republicans calling for military action against Mexico

Illegal drugs 'produced in Mexico and sold in the United States' are top national security threat: report

Illegal drugs "produced in Mexico and sold in the United States" are the top national security threat facing the American people, according to a Department of Homeland Security assessment released on Thursday.

"While terrorists pose an enduring threat to the Homeland, drugs kill and harm far more people in the United States annually," DHS states, stressing in its report that the flow of illicit substances is "supporting violent criminal enterprises, money laundering, and corruption that undermines the rule of law."

ABC News correspondents Luke Barr and Sarah Beth Hensley note that "DHS said it expects illegal drugs produced in Mexico and sold in the United States will continue to kill more Americans than any other threat" and that "in the past year, traffickers have contributed to more lethal mixes of fentanyl — an already deadly drug — on the market and driving an increase in overdose deaths in the US. It is expected that fentanyl will remain the leading cause of narcotics-related deaths in the US in 2024."

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to hold office again?

Barr and Hensley explain that "more than 100,000 people died from drug overdoses in the US during the last year, according to preliminary data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 75% of those overdose deaths are from synthetic opioids such as fentanyl."

They add, "DHS said it has invested in stopping these dangerous and illegal drugs from entering the country — seizing more fentanyl, and arresting more people for fentanyl-related crimes in the last two years than in the previous five years combined, DHS said in a statement to ABC News."

Meanwhile, DHS warns that "during the next year, we assess that the threat of violence from individuals radicalized in the United States will remain high, but largely unchanged, marked by lone offenders or small group attacks that occur with little warning. Foreign terrorist groups like al-Qa'ida and ISIS are seeking to rebuild overseas, and they maintain worldwide networks of supporters that could seek to target the Homeland."

DHS also cited domestic terrorists as a risk to public safety, pointing out, "These actors will continue to be inspired and motivated by a mix of conspiracy theories; personalized grievances; and enduring racial, ethnic, religious, and anti-government ideologies, often shared online."

READ MORE: 'Be realistic': Conservative slams Republicans calling for military action against Mexico

View Barr's and Hensley's analysis at this link.

'As biased as possible': Ohio Republicans attempting to 'rig' November ballot proposals

Although President Barack Obama carried Ohio in both 2008 and 2012, the Buckeye State has since been a frequent source of frustration for Democrats. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) was reelected in 2018, yet Ohio has been trending Republican in recent years.

One of the ways Ohio Democrats have been fighting back is via ballot measure proposals. But according to Talking Points Memo's Kate Riga, Republicans have been looking for ways to "rig" November's ballot measures on everything from recreational marijuana use to abortion to redistricting.

Route Fifty's Daniel C. Vock notes that Republicans in the Ohio State Legislature were hoping to change the state's constitution so that it would be harder to get ballot measures passed. That effort failed, however, and according to Riga, Ohio Republicans have a Plan B: distorting measures that make it to the ballot.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to hold office again?

Democratic Ohio State Rep. Elliot Forhan told Talking Points Memo (TPM) that Republicans "know that they have to put their thumb — and all their fingers, and their elbows and knees — on their side of the scale to make it as biased as possible in order to have any chance at winning."

Forhan added, "It goes to the bigger picture of why are we here at all — because we have a democracy in the state of Ohio that is not reflective of the will of the voters."

In Ohio, Democrats are proposing, via ballot initiatives, legalizing recreational marijuana use and enshrining abortion rights in the state's constitution. And Republicans are trying to undermining the abortion measure by altering the language in it — for example, "unborn child" instead of "fetus."

Vock notes that the marijuana proposal "before voters" in Ohio "is on whether to create a state law, not an amendment to the state's constitution."

READ MORE: Republicans facing 'a no-win conundrum' after Ohio ballot measure fails: report

Forhan said that although most Ohio voters have made up their minds about these proposals, he worries about those who haven't.

The Democrat told Talking Points Memo, "Look, most voters will already know what they're gonna do. But not all of them."

READ MORE: Ohio's GOP secretary of state brutally mocked after his amendment goes down in flames

Find Talking Points Memo's full report at this link and Route Fifty's complete article here.

'They will end up stone-cold dead': DeSantis endorses lethal force against cartels and suspected smugglers

Florida governor and 2024 Republican presidential candidate Ron DeSantis said in Iowa on Thursday that he is open to bombing drug cartels in Mexico to combat smuggling, NBC News correspondent Alex Tabet reports.

"We will absolutely reserve the right if they're invading our country and killing our people," DeSantis replied to a voter. "I said I would use whatever force we need to defend the country," he later confirmed to NBC. "We'd be willing to lean in against them, and we reserve the right to defend our country."

DeSantis, who has failed to close polling gaps between himself and the GOP's frontrunner, twice-impeached thrice-indicted former President Donald Trump, promoted "deadly force" at the border.

READ MORE: 'This is an outrage': Suspended Florida state attorney fires back at 'weak dictator' DeSantis

"We're authorizing deadly force. They try to break into our country? They will end up stone-cold dead," DeSantis pledged to his supporters. He further boasted about deploying Florida National Guard troops to Texas and helping fly unsuspecting migrants to so-called "sanctuary cities" like Martha's Vineyard.

DeSantis' comments expanded upon his telling NBC's Amanda Terkel on Monday that authorities should rely on racial profiling to assess if an individual is attempting to sneak contraband into the United States.

"Same way a police officer would know," DeSantis said. "Same way somebody operating in Iraq would know. You know, these people in Iraq at the time, they all looked the same. You didn't know who had a bomb strapped to them. So those guys have to make judgments."

Meanwhile, federal agencies calculated that foreign nationals are not the primary source of illicit substances entering the country.

READ MORE: 'Joe Biden’s the president': DeSantis says 'of course' Trump 'lost' in 2020

The Associated Press noted in 2021 that "US citizens were apprehended nearly seven times more often than Mexican citizens between October 2020 and March 31 for trying to smuggle drugs in vehicles, US Customs and Border Protection data shows. In the 2018 and 2019 fiscal years, Americans were caught roughly twice as often as Mexicans."

Additionally, USA Today explained in July 2023 that "according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection statistics, 90 percent of heroin seized along the border, 88 percent of cocaine, 87 percent of methamphetamine, and 80 percent of fentanyl in the first 11 months of the 2018 fiscal year was caught trying to be smuggled in at legal crossing points."

READ MORE: 'Fascist' and 'tyrant': DeSantis blasted for ousting another elected Democratic state attorney

View Tabet's report at this link.

Supreme Court pauses Purdue Pharma’s OxyContin bankruptcy settlement amid legal challenge: report

The United States Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear the United States Department of Justice's legal challenge to OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma's bankruptcy settlement for the extensive harm that its pain-relieving drug caused, Reuters correspondents John Kruzel and Andrew Chung report. The case is scheduled for December.

"Purdue filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2019 to address its debts, nearly all of which stemmed from thousands of lawsuits alleging that OxyContin helped kickstart an opioid epidemic that has caused more than 500,000 U.S. overdose deaths over two decades," Kruzel and Chung recall.

"Purdue's owners under the settlement," Kruzel and Chung write, "would receive immunity in exchange for paying up to $6 billion to settle thousands of lawsuits filed by states, hospitals, people who had become addicted and others who have sued the Stamford, Connecticut-based company over its misleading marketing of the powerful pain medication OxyContin."

READ MORE: 'Cynical political ploy': Experts slam GOP’s 'unequivocally false' claim that Biden is behind opioid crisis

But President Joe Biden's administration is now questioning "whether US bankruptcy law allows Purdue's restructuring to include legal protections for the members of the Sackler family, who have not filed for personal bankruptcy," Kruzel and Chung explain.

The reporters note that "in a court filing, the administration told the Supreme Court that Purdue's settlement is an abuse of bankruptcy protections meant for debtors in 'financial distress,' not people like the Sacklers. According to the administration, Sackler family members withdrew $11 billion from Purdue before agreeing to contribute $6 billion to its opioid settlement."

Purdue, however, maintains that the new suit will "single-handedly delay billions of dollars in value that should be put to use for victim compensation, opioid crisis abatement for communities across the country and overdose rescue medicines."

Kruzel and Chang add that a group "comprising more than 60,000 people who have filed personal injury claims stemming from their exposure to Purdue opioid products" told the Supreme Court that "Regardless of how one feels about the role of the Sackler family in the creation and escalation of the opioid crisis, the fact remains that the billions of dollars in abatement and victim compensation funds hinge on confirmation and consummation of the existing plan."

READ MORE: Impeached Texas attorney general partnered with troubled businessman to push opioid program

Kruzel's and Chung's analysis is available at this link.

'Cynical political ploy': Experts slam GOP’s 'unequivocally false' claim that Biden is behind opioid crisis

Republican leaders' attempt to blame President Joe Biden's immigration policies for an increase in fentanyl deaths is a "cynical political ploy" according to critics, The Guardian reports.

Per The Guardian:The Guardian:

The speaker of the House of Representatives, Kevin McCarthy, tied the sharp increase in fentanyl seizures and deaths to the record number of undocumented migrants entering the US last year, and blamed the White House for letting them in. So did Congresswoman Mary Miller when she claimed that Biden and the homeland security secretary, Alejandro Mayorkas, 'opened our borders and flooded our streets with fentanyl.'

Furthermore, according to the report, "Republicans held a congressional hearing in July into the Biden administration's 'open border policies' after the party's members on the homeland security committee released a report accusing Mayorkas of a 'dereliction of duty.'"

READ MORE: Lawmakers readying bipartisan bills to authorize Pentagon resources to combat fentanyl: report

However, Mayorkas deems the Republicans' claims "unequivocally false," according to The Guardian. "The vast, vast majority is thought to be smuggled through the ports of entry and tractor-trailer trucks and passenger vehicles."

The Guardian notes 2024 Republican candidate and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has also blamed the public health crisis on Biden, and previously "brought dozens of sheriffs from across the US together in Arizona in June to peer into Mexico and claim that the president's easing of [former President] Donald Trump's restrictions on migrants seeking asylum had opened the door to a flood of the drug killing about 200 Americans a day."

The news outlet reports "Ninety of" the sheriffs "signed a letter praising the Florida governor's position as Republicans increasingly link the growing toll from opioids to 'Biden's open border'"

Criticizing the GOP leaders' claims, U.S. Rep. Raúl Grijalva (R-Arizona) said DeSantis' border visit "was motivated by hate and fearmongering 'to pander to the same old race baiting anti-immigrant extremist politicians and officials in southern Arizona,'" according to The Guardian.

READ MORE: O’Rourke condemns Texas migrant traps: Biden 'must step in' because Abbott 'has blood on his hands'

University of Texas, El Paso Center for Law and Human Behavior Director Victor M. Manjarrez Jr., told NPR last year while "it's true that fentanyl is crossing the border," the drug is "not coming over on the backs of migrants, who are often turning themselves in to seek asylum."

READ MORE: Survey cites gun violence as America’s top health threat

The Guardian's full report is available at this link. NPR's report is here.

Ohio Court discards Black man’s conviction over judge’s 'troubling' remarks: report

A Cincinnati court of appeals has discarded the 10 1/2 year-prison sentence for Leron Liggins, a Black man, over "troubling" comments made by the presiding judge over his case, Reuters reports.

Per Reuters, U.S. District Judge Stephen Murphy of Detroit, Michigan, a white man, exhibited "frustration with delays in Liggins' case, which had been pending since 2018" over drug charges.

According to the report, after Liggins "expressed dissatisfaction with two different court-appointed lawyers and changed his mind about pleading guilty," during a 2020 hearing for his case, Murphy "said he was 'tired of this defendant,' who was giving him the 'runaround,'" and asked Liggin's then-attorney "What do you want me to do? This guy looks like a criminal to me. This is what criminals do. This isn't what innocent people, who want a fair trial do."

READ MORE: These MAGA Republicans are determined to expand the failed drug war: report

Representing a three-judge panel, Reuters reports, U.S. Circuit Judge Eric Clay said Murphy's "troubling" comments "called into question his partiality."

Murphy "apologized for getting upset at Liggins, saying he made a 'mistake' and had 'lost my head,' but he declined to let the case be re-assigned, saying 'just because I got mad does not mean I'm biased.'"

Still, Clay wrote, "We are highly concerned by this remark, especially when directed toward Liggins, an African American man. Even if one were to assume a lack of racial bias on the part of the district judge, the remark nevertheless raises the specter of such bias."

Liggin's attorney Wade Fink, said the decision represents the fact that "No matter who you are, no matter what you look like, victims and defendants alike you should be treated with dignity, respect, and, above all, complete even-handed fairness."

READ MORE: 'Time to reverse course': NYT Editorial Board endorses ending the War on Drugs

Reuters' full report is available at this link (subscription required).

Jury takes 45 minutes to convict woman of beheading lover in meth-fueled sexual attack: report

A Wisconsin jury found Taylor Schabusiness guilty of murdering and decapitating her lover in what was described as a "meth-fueled" sexual attack, The Daily Beast reported on Wednesday.

"Taylor Schabusiness, 25, was convicted of all charges against her, including first-degree intentional homicide, mutilating a corpse, and third-degree sexual assault in connection with the February 2022 murder of her lover, Shad Thyrion," reported Pilar Melendez. "The verdict came after Brown County Circuit Court jurors deliberated for just 45 minutes."

"Throughout the three-day trial, jurors heard harrowing allegations against Schabusiness, who they say fatally strangled Thyrion on Feb. 22, 2022, in the basement of his mother’s Green Bay home," the report continued. "Prosecutors argued that after smoking methamphetamine and engaging in a sexual encounter, Schabusiness fatally strangled Thyrion before mutilating the 24-year-old’s body for hours."

Schabusiness had already confessed to police that after dismembering Thyrion, she put his head and genitals "in a five-gallon bucket with a beach towel before leaving," after which the gruesome remains were later found by his mother.

The trial was punctuated by drama in February after Schabusiness assaulted her own lawyer in open court shortly after the judge agreed to delay the case. The lawyer, Quinn Jolly, withdrew from the case, leaving her to find new counsel.

Another detail that emerged at trial was Schabusiness' apparent fascination with Jeffrey Dahmer, the serial killer notorious for sexually abusing and eating his victims' corpses. Former Green Bay police lieutenant Jena Luberda testified that Schabusiness' phone search history included terms like "Jeffrey Dahmer, Jeff Boyardee, Jeffrey Dahmer’s butt, [and] Jeffrey Dahmer walking into court all sexy."

Fox hosts: Bombing Mexico 'a good idea' because shoplifting is 'terrorist activity'

During the Wednesday, July 25, segment of Fox News' The Five, the conservative co-hosts Jesse Watters, Jeanine Pirro, Dana Perino and Greg Gutfeld suggested Mexican drug cartels are behind a shoplifting surge in America, and to combat the alleged issue — the U.S. military should bomb them.

Host Jesse Watters began the conversation saying, "While the liberal media gets a crash course on crime, we're learning that Mexican drug cartels are fueling America's shoplifting surge. They're selling the stolen stuff online and then laundering the profits through, guess where? Chinese brokers. So, Dana, CNN finally discovered crime is a crisis in San Francisco."

Dana Perino replied, "This is after they made fun of us for pointing it out last year...On this point, I think that finding out that there are Mexican cartels behind this, makes me feel maybe there's hope that we could figure out a way to do something about it. So the state attorneys general are banding together and they're like let's go after it. But also they need help from the retailers. The retailers don't want to be looted like this either. But the problem, to me, is that all this stuff gets taken and then it's resold online. Like on Amazon, for example. So can Amazon help us out? Somehow, can they figure out a way to track them? We've got AI, we've got all these other tools. There must be a way to try to prevent all of this from happening."

READ MORE: Donald Trump complains that 'somebody leaked' his plans to launch Patriot missiles at Mexican cartels

In April, CNN interviewed Mission Local managing editor Joe Eskenazi about San Francisco's surge in crime, and the editor noted, "There is crime in downtown San Francisco, but there always has been. I think the notion that these businesses were driven out by crime is frankly dishonest. That's always been a factor."

Eskenazi later added, "San Francisco also has lots of property crime because there's a great divergence of wealth and people steal things. But San Francisco’s violent crime rate is at a near historic low right now."

Watters then said, "You can put up the task force, maybe with the FBI, bring in the DEA, make it transnational Greg, since the cartels are involved."

Greg Gutfeld replied, "It's weird to see these cartels diversify. They're almost like Amazon now. They're doing drugs, smuggling and theft, pretty soon they're gonna have their own podcast. There's another thing that we said a long time ago and I bet we don't -- bombing the car-- remember we said we were talking about bombing the cartels? And people were going, 'No, no, no, that's an act of war, that's in another country.' Yeah, but we do that to terrorists as well, and this is kind of a terrorist activity. And the thing is, now, we see this at least on the Republican side, a lot of candidates are talking about doing it and I think it's a good idea. I think we need to elect a president who values a border. That's the important thing. Bomb these. And there's, like, one cartel we can cooperate with, let them kill the rest. Encourage them to kill the rest."

READ MORE: MTG says U.S. should be 'bombing Mexican cartels' and 'Antifa BLM rioters' instead of 'aiding' Ukraine

Watters then asked Pirro, "Remember when the Chinese were ripping off our DVDs and we sent the entire federal government after them and we actually were pretty effective. This is pretty similar in terms of now it's shoplifting.

She said, "Yeah, and I remember prosecuting a case for the Motion Picture Association because what they were doing was people were going in and they were just making copies of movies," to which Watters replied, "I've watched a few movies like that where the guy just holds the camcorder and the finger? I mean, my friend watched it."

Pirro added, "This is part of a, you know, global organized criminal activity. The problem is that this organization is not just doing retail theft. They're also doing human trafficking. They're doing fentanyl. They're doing all kinds of crime and so they're expanding their criminal network. And now they're going to be so powerful, I don't know if we're ever going to be able to defeat them. Because we've got a president right now, who, you know, with the border -- and they're in charge at the border -- there is nothing going on that's preventing the fentanyl from coming in. We hear about an arrest every now and then. It's usually the locals making the arrests, not the federal government. But the issue is whether or not these criminals are being prosecuted. That guy walked out, right, and then the person in the store says it's a police state for everyone. So for the victims it's a police state, with the criminal, it's not a police state. That's the actual problem. It's low risk and it's high reward. Low risk because the employee's not gonna punch you out, you're not gonna get arrested, you're gonna make a fortune. You're gonna start this business and you're gonna launder your money through China. And unless we get serious about this, whether it's bombing or whatever -- you have to come up with something. These organizations are dangerous. They are absolutely dangerous. And for everybody at home, your insurance is gonna go up because of it. The cost of retail and consumer products are gonna go up. You're paying for this."

The New York Times' Maggie Haberman reported last year that "President Donald J. Trump in 2020 asked Mark T. Esper, his defense secretary, about the possibility of launching missiles into Mexico to “destroy the drug labs” and wipe out the cartels, maintaining that the United States’ involvement in a strike against its southern neighbor could be kept secret, Mr. Esper recounts in his upcoming memoir. When Mr. Esper raised various objections, Mr. Trump said that 'we could just shoot some Patriot missiles and take out the labs, quietly,' adding that 'no one would know it was us.'"

READ MORE: 'Bomb the Mexicans' is the GOP’s new 'build the wall': columnist

However, Haberman wrote experts argue that, "Patriot missiles are the primary surface-to-air missile used by the U.S. military, which is designed as anti-aircraft and anti-ballistic missile interceptors. As there are no reports of airborne drug labs in Mexican air space.

Trump supporter U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) complained earlier this year that American is "not bombing the Mexican cartels who are poisoning Americans every single day. And I know that sounds extreme. I'm not talking about the Mexican government or the Mexican people. I'm talking about the cartels. They're murdering Americans."

Miami Herald columnist Jean Guerrero notes the "Calls for U.S. attacks on Mexican drug cartels, recently discussed in secret if at all, have become a loudly expressed talking point for Republicans who are trying to exploit the violent rhetoric for political gain," highlighting Trump's 2024 GOP opponent and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' "recent promises to deploy the military against drug cartels, along with his support for executing smugglers and his assertion that 'you absolutely can use deadly force.'"

She argues, "Republicans aren't making a good faith argument, and that their rhetoric has more to do with racism than finding solutions to the ongoing opioid crisis."

Axios reports earlier this year, Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) said, "If my colleagues were serious about addressing the cartels, they would start with addressing guns here in America," noting that the cartels "are able to outgun Mexican local law enforcement because of American guns."

READ MORE: 'Time to reverse course': NYT Editorial Board endorses ending the War on Drugs

Watch Media Matters' video below or at this link.

READ MORE: Lawmakers readying bipartisan bills to authorize Pentagon resources to combat fentanyl: report

CNN's full report is available at this link. Axios' report is here.

'Hunter Biden could crush Fox News' for 'actual malice': ex-GOP congressman

Last Wednesday, a man named Ray Epps who voted for former President Donald Trump twice, participated in the January 6th, 2021 insurrection at the United States Capitol, and subsequently became the face of a Fox News conspiracy theory sued the outlet and its erstwhile chief instigator Tucker Carlson for defamation.

"Carlson and Fox settled on Epps as a 'villain' who could serve as a distraction from the network's own 'culpability for stoking the fire that led to the events of January 6th,'" The New York Timesreported. Epps' complaint said that Carlson "became 'fixated on Epps' and began the promoting the idea that Epps and the federal government were responsible for the Capitol riots."

Fox's scapegoating of Epps is not the only spurious narrative that has come back to bite Fox. Fox famously settled a defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems, which resulted in a massive fine and preceded Carlson's firing. Nonetheless, Fox continues to push unfounded claims about President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and that pattern of behavior was a topic of discussion on Saturday's edition of MSNBC's Ayman.

READ MORE: Man whom Fox News scapegoated in January 6th conspiracy theory sues network for defamation: report

Guest host Michael Steele recalled of Fox's fake Epps story:

The thing that's interesting to me is it wasn't just Fox and Tucker Carlson making these claims. You had individuals like Ted Cruz, Marjorie Taylor Greene, also making Epps a target. This was, you know, this guy's a diehard Trump supporter whose life has been destroyed by the very right-wing conspiracy theories that he was out promoting. Then shouldn't this be like a cautionary tale for Republicans and loyal Fox watchers that, guess what? Yeah, they could come for you too.

Ex-Congressman David Jolly (R-Florida) agreed:

You're exactly right, Michael. Cautionary tale for different reasons. Politically, Republicans are showing that they're not focused on the economy and healthcare and transportation and ladders of opportunity like Joe Biden are [sic], and so they're outta step with the American people. But for Fox News, critically for their financial stability, I think what Dominion ushered in this question of actual malice, and we saw the $800 million settlement has really ripped open, if you will, the opportunity for others to go at Fox News. So Ray Epps is following a similar trajectory saying, look, as Cynthia says, it doesn't have to be actual malice in the case of Ray Epps.

Jolly then envisioned what another round of justice would look like:

But I'll give you a wild card here on Saturday night, Michael Steele. And it's this, I think Hunter Biden could crush Fox News. Financially, I think what Dominion showed us — the discovery involved in Dominion — is that actual malice has occurred within the editorial decisions of Fox News. Dominion got an $800 million settlement. Smartmatic wants theirs. Ray Epps wants theirs.

Who have they targeted more than anybody else? I guarantee you discovery of Fox News' editorial notes and emails and conversations would suggest that they have engaged in actual malice against Hunter Biden. The most judicious irony of all of this would be of Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son, is the one that cripples Fox News financially.

Steele loved Jolly's idea:

Put a pin in that one, folks, where the hunted becomes the Hunter. I love Saturday night.

READ MORE: Fox’s Pirro asks 'Why is Hunter Biden always in our face?' while network averages 30 references per day

Watch the clip below or at this link.

READ MORE: 'Up is down': McCarthy claims DOJ indictment of House GOP 'informant' makes Hunter Biden case even 'stronger'

From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web

Fox’s Pirro asks 'Why is Hunter Biden always in our face?' while network averages 30 references per day

Fox News host “Judge” Jeanine Pirro on Thursday’s edition of “The Five” demanded to know why President Joe Biden’s son gets so much attention.

In a segment titled, “Cocaine ‘Cover Up’,” Pirro and her right-wing compatriots were criticizing the U.S. Secret Service’s investigation into a small bag of cocaine that was found in a heavily-trafficked guest area of the White House. The investigation proved inconclusive, with agents unable to determine who left the drug.

“There was no surveillance video footage found that provided investigative leads or any other means for investigators to identify who may have deposited the found substance in this area,” the Secret Service said in a statement, ABC News reports. “Without physical evidence, the investigation will not be able to single out a person of interest from the hundreds of individuals who passed through the vestibule where the cocaine was discovered. At this time, the Secret Service’s investigation is closed due to a lack of physical evidence.”

READ MORE: House Ethics Committee Re-Opens Investigation Into Matt Gaetz: Report

The agency added it “did not develop latent fingerprints and insufficient DNA was present for investigative comparisons.”

Republicans are outraged that the owner of the small amount of the illegal substance could not be identified.

“And to say that they don’t know who it is, to me, somebody should lose their job over this,” Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) said. “This thing’s a trash can. Everybody wants to pick and choose. They need to shut the whole thing down put the garden hose to it and clean it out.”

Congressman Burchett has said that Congress has no role to play in stopping school shootings. “We’re not going to fix it. Criminals are going to be criminals.”

ABC reports Congressman Burchett said members of Congress who receive a briefing today were told the amount of cocaine was less than one gram.

According to Statista, the street price for one gram of cocaine in 2020 was $120.

Many on the right, ignoring previous First Families, suggested or even insisted the cocaine belonged to Hunter Biden, despite any evidence.

After asking about security cameras, Pirro demanded to know, “Where are the canines? Why don’t you know everyone who’s gone through there?”

“It’s all hogwash,” she continued. “You vacated the building, it was so dangerous when you saw that, what you thought might be anthrax. And now you don’t have anything to say about it.”

READ MORE: ‘Like a 007 Movie’: Dem Slams Republicans Working With ‘Villain’ Indicted on Arms Trafficking, Foreign Agent Charges

“So it’s either a cover up, they’re inept. And in addition to drug testing the staffers I think they got to stop lying to us and coming out and saying – We know Hunter was there,” she baselessly added.

“The reason this is so important is Hunter doesn’t get the plea deal if they can pin this on him,” Pirro continued, despite the White House specifying no member of the First Family had been in that area – in fact, the Biden family had spent that weekend at Camp David.

“And finally, why is Hunter Biden always in our face?” Pirro also demanded to know.

“Why is this guy at the White House? Why is he on Air Force One? Why is he in Ireland? Why is his [sic] idiot State Department dinners? This guy is either a drug addict or a reformed drug addict. We shouldn’t have to deal with him constantly in our face.”

Hunter Biden is a member of America’s First Family. Pirro and Fox News never asked why Donald Trump Jr. was at the White House or traveling with President Trump. They did not ask why Eric Trump was at the White House or traveling with President Trump.

As many on social media noted, “Fox News” is the answer to “why is Hunter Biden always in our face?”

A quick Google search for the term “Hunter Biden” at the FoxNews.com website returned over 90,000 results. But at MSNBC.com, “Hunter Biden” produced just 14,500 results. USAtoday.com? 8770 results. At Rupert Murdoch’s right-wing Wall Street Journal? 205,000 results. And at Murdoch’s NYPost.com, 32,400 results.

Mediaite adds that Fox News has mentioned “Hunter Biden” nearly 400 times in the past two weeks.

“According to the results of a search of Fox News transcripts in the television database TVEyes, Pirro’s reference to ‘Hunter Biden’ was the 393rd such instance in July. That is an average of 30 times a day as of the evening of July 13.”

Watch Pirro below or at this link.

'They pump him up': Trump claims Biden 'on cocaine' to give speeches

The discovery of a small container of cocaine at the White House sparked a flurry of right-wing conspiracy theories — many being promulgated by Donald Trump himself.

The former president first graduated from claiming that it might have belonged to Hunter Biden — who has struggled with substance abuse previously but was at Camp David when the bag was most likely dropped — to special counsel Jack Smith, even saying he "looks like a crackhead." Then Trump started claiming President Joe Biden himself was "probably" on drugs — and took it one step further in an interview with far-right talk radio host Wayne Allyn Root on Wednesday, suggesting, with absolutely no evidence, that Biden is given cocaine by his staffers to keep him alert enough to give speeches.

"What is your reaction when you see cocaine in the White House?" asked Root. "Can you even believe that's possible?"

"Well, you saw I put out a Truth," said Trump. "I know most of your people are on Truth because I think Truth is better than anything out there. But I put out a Truth. It's in my opinion, it's Hunter and probably Joe, because, you know, you watch Joe at the beginning of his speech and he's got a little life, not much, but he's got a little life by the end of the speech, he's a disaster. He can't even find his way off the — so there's something going on there. And I wouldn't be surprised if it was for both of them. I think it's for both of them. But that's my opinion.'

"I said, great minds think alike," said Root. "I said that on my TV show just this morning. I said it's either Hunter or it's Joe because he's so bad that before each speech and interview they probably need to give him something to juice him up. Do you think they pump him up?"

"No, I think they pump them up," Trump agreed. "And I think, and we can't have a president that's on cocaine. When you're dealing with nuclear weapons and everything else, you know? We're dealing, and you've heard me say this, President Xi, all these guys, these are at the top of their game. These are smart, whether you like them or their country or their, their policies, you know, which are pretty tough policies."

Watch below or click the link.

Trump claims Biden uses cocaine to do speechesyoutu.be

'You’re too stupid!' Rudy Giuliani berates his radio listeners over White House cocaine 'cover-up'

Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said only "stupid" people believe that the White House is not covering up the origins of a small amount of cocaine found last weekend.

"Biden never tells the truth. It's almost useful when they say something when somebody like that little lying press secretary that he has, the one who's now given us three different places [for] the cocaine," he said on Sunday. "I mean, they're a mouthpiece — they're a mouthpiece for the crooked White House. How can you possibly say the day after that you just found out about the crime that's not — you're not going to solve it...Can you imagine if there's a murder this morning, and the acting police commissioner shows up and says let me think about this? This may never be solved."

Giuliani said anyone who believed the White House explanation was "too stupid" to listen to his show.

"It this is a damn lie, and it tells you right away there's a cover-up," he insisted. "You gotta be — I'm going to tell you this. If you don't realize this is a cover-up, you're too stupid to listen to this show. Go listen to some other show. Go listen to CNN or MSNBC and make yourself happy, but you obviously don't have a critical intellect."

Watch the video clip below or at this link.

Powder prompting White House evacuation may be cocaine: report

On Sunday night, July 2, the White House was briefly evacuated after a white powder was found inside. The Washington, D.C. Fire Department, however, found that the powder was not a type of explosive and that no one was in any physical danger.

According to Washington Post sources, a preliminary test indicated that the powder was cocaine.

Post reporters Peter Hermann and Tyler Pager explain, "A spokesman for the Secret Service, Anthony Guglielmi, said the substance is undergoing further testing to determine what it is, and authorities are looking into how it got into the White House. He said the D.C. Fire Department determined the substance did not present a threat. The discovery prompted an elevated security alert and a brief evacuation of the executive mansion, Guglielmi said."

READ MORE: Biden launches major initiative to protect LGBTQ community ahead of massive White House Pride celebration

Guglielmi told the Post that President Joe Biden was not inside the White House when the powder was found and said that "an investigation into the cause and manner" of how the powder got into the White House is being conducted.

READ MORE: Biden White House blasts Manchin-GOP push for Social Security 'death panel'

Read the Washington Post's full report at this link.

DeSantis continues to convince New Hampshire it does not want to be Florida

GOP governor Ron DeSantis, running for president but struggling to get out from under Donald Trump’s poll numbers, is spending a few days in New Hampshire where he once again tried to convince Republicans in the Granite State they should want to be just like Florida.

His “Make America Florida” campaign is not translating well to New Hampshire.

“At his first town-hall event in New Hampshire, Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida talked on Tuesday about illegal immigration in Texas, crime in Chicago, disorder on the streets of San Francisco and the wonders of nearly every aspect of Florida — a state he mentioned about 80 times,” The New York Times reports. “Roughly an hour into the event, Mr. DeSantis finally got around to saying ‘New Hampshire.'”

At a town hall, candidates get asked questions, and generally are expected to answer them.

And while “DeSantis’s comments seemed to especially resonate when he connected his actions at home to issues of importance to New Hampshire residents, like the flood of fentanyl and other deadly drugs into their communities,” The Times notes, “his self-confident lecture about his record as Florida’s governor left the distinct impression that he believes Republican voters need what he is offering them more than he is interested in what he could learn from their questions.”

READ MORE: Trump, DeSantis, Haley to Speak at Anti-Government Extremists’ ‘Joyful Warriors’ Summit

Questions, like one from a teenager who did not get his question answered, but instead got interrogated up front: “Are you in high school?” was DeSantis’ initial, rapid-fire response.

The teen, who answered yes, said he goes to school in nearby Vermont but lives in New Hampshire, and came to see the Florida governor.

“Do you believe that Trump violated the peaceful transfer of power, a key principle of American democracy that we must uphold?” the student asked.

“Well, thank you for the question,” DeSantis replied, after asking if he was a student. “So, here’s what I know. If this election is about Biden’s failures, and our vision for the future, we are going to win. If it’s about re-litigating things that happened two, three years ago, we’re going to lose. And so I can tell you this. I can tell you this. I can point you to Tallahassee, Florida on, I believe, January 5, 2023. We had a transition of power from my first administration to my second ’cause I won re-election in a historic fashion and at the end of the day, you know, we need to win, and we need to get this done.”

“So I wasn’t anywhere near Washington that day. I have nothing to do with what happened that day,” the Florida governor declared. “Obviously, I didn’t enjoy seeing, you know, what would happen, but we’ve got to go forward on this stuff. We cannot be looking backwards and be mired in the past.”.

Joe Walsh, the former Republican and former U.S. Congressman from Illinois, blasted DeSantis — not his response, but DeSantis himself.

READ MORE: Supreme Court Rejects Fringe Trump-Backed Election Theory – Experts Say ‘Huge Victory for Democracy’ But Only ‘For Now’

Literally pointing to the video of DeSantis on Twitter, Walsh wrote: “What a chickenshit. Not at all a profile in courage.”

HuffPost White House correspondent S.V. Dáte also weighed in, saying, “Is it that hard to say: I would never attempt a coup. Coups are un-American and wrong and a crime.”

On Monday, Politico reported, “in the month since DeSantis formally entered the presidential race, he’s stumbled in the first-in-the-nation primary state.”

“He got dragged into a tit-for-tat endorsement battle with Trump that generated some media attention but little measurable increase in support. His first visit to the state as a presidential candidate drew more headlines for what he didn’t do — take questions from voters — than the retail politicking he did. And that’s on top of polls that had already swung back in Trump’s favor.”

Indeed, DeSantis continues to get slammed in the New Hampshire polls. The latest, from St. Anselm, puts Trump at 47% and DeSantis at 19% – a 10-point drop from late March, when DeSantis came in with 29% to Trump’s 42%.

It gets worse for the Florida governor.

“The New Hampshire Federation of Republican Women released a statement Thursday slamming DeSantis for planning an event at the same time as their annual fundraising lunch — an event Trump is headlining. The group asked him to reschedule,” Politico notes.

“’It has always been a New Hampshire hallmark to be considerate when scheduling events,’ the group’s events director, Christine Peters, said in a statement. ‘To have a candidate come in and distract from the most special event [the women’s group] holds in the year is unprecedented.’”

Politico spoke to “an adviser to a rival candidate granted anonymity to speak freely.”

“If there’s one thing you don’t do in New Hampshire, it’s piss off the grassroots women,” they said. “Don’t mess with them, they remember everything. Rookie move.”

Watch the video above or at this link.

'No, no, no': Trump stumped by Fox host recalling his proposal to execute drug dealers

Editor's note: The Baier-Trump interview aired on Monday, June 19th, 2023. This article was corrected with the proper date.

Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly called for convicted drug dealers to be executed dating back to at least 2018, when he was still in the White House. But on Monday, Trump failed to grasp the real-world implications of his proposal during an interview with Fox News host Bret Baier.

"As an example, a woman who you know very well was in jail. She had twenty-four more years to serve. She served for twenty-two years," Trump reminisced.

"Alice Johnson. She was in the Super Bowl," Baier noted of the woman whom Trump pardoned in 2020.

READ MORE: 'False and unsubstantiated': Georgia elections board clears 2 poll workers of Trump-backed fraud claims

"She had twenty — high quality. Oh yeah. I said, 'How many years?' And she was on a telephone call and they were involved in selling marijuana, mostly marijuana. And she got like fifty years in jail," said Trump.

"But she'd be killed under your plan," Baier pointed out.

Trump was stumped.

"Huh?" a befuddled Trump asked.

READ MORE: 'What an idiot': Trump critics say he 'admitted' to withholding 'docs from grand jury' in Fox News interview

"Aa drug dealer?" emphasized Baier, trying to stir Trump's memory.

Trump meandered through a response.

"No, no, no. Under my, oh, under that. Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, it would depend on the severity. It would depend on the severity," Trump stated.

"She's technically a former drug dealer. She the, she had a multi-million dollar cocaine ring," Baier recalled.

"Any drug dealer — look," an agitated Trump replied.

"So even Alice Johnson in that ad?" Baier pressed.

"She can't do it, okay?" crowed Trump, who then declared, "By the way, if that was there, no, she wouldn't be killed. It would start as of now. So you wouldn't go to the past? No."

Watch the clip below or at this link.

READ MORE: Trump gets trial date in classified documents case

Impeached Texas attorney general partnered with troubled businessman to push opioid program

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

A year after persuading Texas lawmakers to buy millions of child identification kits that had no proven record of success, a businessman with a troubled history found an in with the state's attorney general.

Last fall, Kenny Hansmire was tapped by Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton to be part of a coalition to combat opioid abuse that Paxton declared would “be the largest drug prevention, education, abatement and disposal campaign in U.S. history.”

Riffing off the name of a popular book about Texas football, Paxton announced the Friday Night Lights Against Opioids coalition and pilot program. The initiative would distribute 3.5 million packets at high school football games that contain a powder capable of destroying opioids when mixed with water.

Paxton didn’t provide a price tag for the effort or explain Hansmire’s exact role, but he said a partnership with the businessman’s National Child Identification Program would be important to the program’s success.

A former NFL player, Hansmire has persuaded leaders in multiple states to spend millions of dollars purchasing inkless fingerprinting kits on the promise that they could help find missing children. Texas alone allocated $5.7 million for kits over the past two years. An investigation published last month by ProPublica and The Texas Tribune found little evidence of the kits’ effectiveness and showed that the company exaggerated missing child statistics in its marketing.

The investigation also revealed that Hansmire has twice pleaded guilty to felony theft and was sanctioned by banking regulators in Connecticut in 2015 for his role in an alleged scheme to defraud or mislead investors.

Paxton has been a key ally for Hansmire. In 2020, he signed a letter to then-President Donald Trump urging him to get behind ultimately unsuccessful legislation that would approve the use of federal money to pay for the child identification kits. Hansmire later honored the attorney general at a Green Bay Packers game for his support.

For the opioid initiative, Paxton worked to connect Hansmire with Texas Comptroller Glenn Hegar, who oversees the distribution of hundreds of millions of dollars the state is set to receive after settling lawsuits with pharmaceutical companies over their roles in the opioid crisis.

Paxton discussed the initiative with Hegar, asking him to speak with its leaders, including Hansmire. On multiple occasions, Hansmire “called Comptroller Hegar to ask for funding for the Friday Night Lights program,” said the comptroller’s spokesperson, Chris Bryan.

Hegar, a Republican former state legislator who served with Paxton in the Texas Senate, declined to entertain Hansmire’s requests and explained that funding decisions will follow a formal approval process that is still being developed, Bryan said. He did not respond to additional questions.

Hansmire’s financial stake in the opioid initiative is unclear. He did not respond to questions about his role or about his requests for funding from the comptroller. He has previously defended himself and his company, asserting that the fingerprinting kits have made a difference in missing child investigations and that he resolved his financial and legal troubles.

Over the years, Hansmire has successfully leveraged his relationships with professional and college football teams in promoting his fingerprinting kits, honoring allied lawmakers and attorneys general at high-profile events such as football games.

While unveiling the opioid program last October, Paxton stood flanked by Hansmire and other former NFL players. Among them: NFL Hall of Famers Mike Singletary, who played for the Chicago Bears, and Randy White, a former Dallas Cowboy. White later participated in the launch of a similar program in Delaware alongside the state’s lieutenant governor. And last month, Mississippi’s attorney general announced the distribution of 500 free “Family Safety Kits.” Each included a child ID kit from Hansmire’s company and a drug disposal packet, which was provided by North Carolina-based DisposeRX. The company, which is also involved in the Texas and Delaware programs, lists Hansmire’s National Child ID Program as an official partner on its website.

Neither Singletary nor representatives for White or DisposeRX responded to requests for comment.

Paxton also did not respond to multiple requests for comment and to detailed questions from ProPublica and the Tribune. The news organizations requested records from Paxton’s office that could show the cost of the opioid initiative, the scope of the work and the breakdown of compensation for the companies involved. In response, the attorney general’s office released some emails, including one that contained an August 2022 letter from Paxton to Hansmire proposing to partner on the initiative. The office has fought the disclosure of other records that include communications with a lawmaker about potential legislation and claimed that it has no record of written agreements or expenditures related to the Friday Night Lights Against Opioids program.

Last month, the attorney general became one of only three state officials in Texas history to be impeached. He has been temporarily suspended while he awaits a trial in the Texas Senate on charges that include bribery, conspiracy and obstruction of justice. (Those charges are not related to the opioid program.)

The impeachment vote in the Texas House was the culmination of a probe by the lower chamber’s General Investigating Committee. In a memorandum, the panel said the inquiry was initiated by Paxton’s request for $3.3 million to cover a negotiated settlement he announced in February with four former top aides.

Those aides sued Paxton in 2020 under the state’s whistleblower law, arguing that they were illegally fired after reporting their boss to the FBI for alleged misdeeds, including bribery and leveraging the power of his office to help a political donor.

Paxton has denied wrongdoing and has dismissed his impeachment as politically motivated.

“Slower Approach”

The week after Paxton announced the proposed settlement of the suit against him, state Sen. Donna Campbell, a New Braunfels Republican, filed a bill that would transfer $10 million to the attorney general from the opioid settlement fund.

Also a supporter of Hansmire’s, Campbell authored legislation in 2021 that led to the approval of $5.7 million to provide child ID kits to elementary and middle school students across the state. (State lawmakers had been set to approve additional money this year to purchase kits, but budget negotiators nixed the funding following publication of the ProPublica-Tribune investigation.)

In this case, Campbell’s bill would direct funding to Paxton that he could use “for the purpose of prevention, education, and drug disposal awareness campaigns to include providing at-home drug disposal kits and abatement tools for children- and youth-focused populations across this state.”

A new 14-member council led by Hegar is responsible for doling out the bulk of the opioid settlement funding, though lawmakers can allocate some of the money through legislation.

A week before Campbell filed her opioid bill, Hansmire’s longtime business partner, Mark Salmans, registered a new company with the state called Friday Night Lights LLC. Little information is publicly available about the company.

Campaign finance records show Salmans has donated $6,500 to Paxton and his wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, since late 2019. That includes a $1,000 donation to the attorney general the week after the Friday Night Lights Against Opioids announcement. He has not donated to Campbell, according to records from the same time period. Salmans and the Paxtons did not respond to questions about the new entity or their roles in the program.

Campbell also didn’t respond to questions. Her bill, which died in committee, came after both Paxtons publicly criticized Hegar for being slow to distribute the opioid settlement money. Neither Paxton mentioned the Friday Night Lights Against Opioids initiative while doing so.

“My main concern is that if we wait to use that money, we’re missing the opportunity to help people that need the help and we’re missing the opportunity to really save lives,” Ken Paxton said at a hearing in response to questions from Campbell less than two weeks before she filed her bill. Hegar has defended the pace, noting that the nature of the council’s work is unprecedented and that it needs to establish a clear, fair and transparent process to get the money out.

At a legislative hearing in late January, Hegar pointed to the sweeping corruption scandal that plagued the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas during its first few years as a reason to ensure a more deliberate process. The state agencycame under fire a decade ago for doling out tens of millions of dollars in grants to politically connected applicants through a process that lacked proper scientific review. The scandal, which raised concerns about conflicts of interest and lax oversight, resulted in various resignations and reforms.

“The point is, we’re taking a slower approach to make sure we get it right,” Hegar told Angela Paxton. “That entire board was wiped away because the process that was put into place was not very thorough, and all of their reputations were tarnished.”

Opioids and Missing Children

At the October news conference where Paxton announced the Friday Night Lights Against Opioids initiative, Hansmire explained that it would employ the model pioneered by his child identification company, which got its start by distributing kits at college and professional football games.

He also linked the initiative to his child identification company by repeating the incorrect statistic he’s used to promote the company’s fingerprinting kits. Hansmire asserted that, “out of 800,000 children that are reported missing every year, 200,000 of those have an opioid issue.”

He didn’t cite a source for the figures, but they appear to come from an old Department of Justice study that was co-authored by David Finkelhor, the director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire. Finkelhor previously told ProPublica and the Tribune that the 800,000 figure Hansmire was using from the 24-year-old study was no longer accurate and overstated the scale of the missing children problem, in part because it included children who were missing for benign reasons such as spending the night at a friend’s house or coming home late from school. Using the inflated and outdated figure to then suggest that a quarter of those children have opioid-related problems is simply wrong, Finkelhor said.

The Department of Justice study estimated that 292,000 children who ran away or were kicked out of their homes in 1999 were “using hard drugs.” Finkelhor said the study referred to anything aside from marijuana — not just opioids — as a hard drug. He said he is not aware of anyone who formally tracks “opioid issues” among missing or runaway children.

Experts say that beyond being premised on incorrect statistics, the promotion of disposal packets as a solution for the opioid epidemic is a misguided use of resources, in large part because prescription opioids can be safely disposed of in multiple ways. According to the Food and Drug Administration, the best way to dispose of most medications, including opioids, is to drop them off at a drug take-back site. If that’s not an option, they should either be flushed down the toilet or be thrown in the trash, depending on whether they are on the FDA’s flush list.

Pushing disposal packets is a good way for a politician or legislator “to appear to be addressing the opioid crisis without actually doing anything that would upset industry,” said Dr. Andrew Kolodny, medical director for the Opioid Policy Research Collaborative at Brandeis University.

Paxton and Hansmire didn’t respond to questions about the effectiveness of the packets. But Paxton said during the October news conference that it was his “hope and prayer that this program will aid in fighting the opioid epidemic that has claimed far too many young lives across our great state.”

The attorney general’s original plan was to distribute the 3.5 million disposal packets at high school football programs across Texas in the latter part of last year. But Brian Polk, chief operating officer of the Texas High School Coaches Association, said the inaugural distribution was smaller than envisioned.

Polk, whose organization partnered with Paxton on the initiative, couldn’t remember exact numbers but said in an interview that about 10 school districts received 3,000 packets each. A much larger distribution is expected this fall, but plans are still being finalized, Polk said.

Paxton did not respond to questions about Polk’s comments or whether unsuccessful efforts to tap opioid settlement money contributed to the smaller-than-planned distribution.

What's the endgame for the party of violence?

Sunday morning we all woke up to the news that an explosion and fire beneath I-95 in Philadelphia had snarled traffic for miles, disrupting both travel and commerce.

My first thought went to Congressman Clay Higgins’ (R-Putin) tweet days earlier calling for armed America-haters to:

“1/50K know your bridges.”

Military maps, particularly those describing military installations in the US, are standardized to a scale of 1:50,000, like this one of Ft. Rucker in Alabama or this one of Ft. Campbell in Tennessee. It’s referred to as “1/50K.”

The last time America was attacked by home-grown fascists — the Confederacy during the Civil War — blowing up bridges to create chaos and stop the advance of American forces was a common tactic.

Similarly, the last time terrorists aimed assault rifles at federal police, successfully standing them down, was when Cliven Bundy’s defenders took a bridge near Bunkerville, Nevada on April 12, 2014 and threatened to fire down onto the federal and state agents below. (The gunman later ran for office as a MAGA Republican.)

In the bible of the white supremacist movement, The Turner Diaries, when the hero begins his war to exterminate Black people and Jews and the US government fights back, one of their main strategies to bring down the US government and replace it with a fascist white Christian ethnostate was taking out power substations and strategic bridges:

“Five later explosions closed the Houston airport, destroyed the city's main power-generating station, and collapsed two strategically located overpasses and a bridge, making two of the most heavily traveled freeways in the area impassable. Houston became an instant disaster area, and the Federal government rushed in thousands of troops — as much to keep an angry and panic-stricken public under control as to counter the Organization.

“The Houston action … thoroughly dispelled the growing notion that our revolution had been stifled. And, after Houston, there was Wilmington, then Providence, then Racine. … It became apparent to us … that the revolution had entered a new and more decisive phase.”

We’ve already seen multiple power substations in different parts of the country attacked and taken out of commission by right-wing terrorists in the past year, and now a bridge connecting one of America’s largest and most important thoroughfares has gone up.

In his tweet, Higgins referred to Trump as “rPOTUS” or the “real President of the United States” and told his followers, “This is a perimeter probe from the oppressors.”

Turner Diaries also contains numerous references to perimeters being defended or breached (I’ve already quoted too much from it); “perimeter probe” is military-speak for testing the strength and resilience of an enemy’s lines.

Tim McVeigh was both a huge fan of the Turner Diaries as well as an evangelist for the cause, giving out copies of the book to friends and acquaintances and selling them at Waco during the Branch Davidian siege.

When he blew up the Federal Building in Oklahoma City, he was following the playbook of that novel, when the hero kicks off the modern-day civil war by blowing up a federal building with a truck bomb.

The collapse of the I-95 bridge was the result of a horrible accident, but violent destruction of America’s infrastructure is still solidly within the goals of Trump’s most fervent followers: America and American democracy are currently under attack on a multi-pronged and multi-faceted basis.

Higgins’ tweet and the bridge explosion were followed by Jim Jordan appearing on CNN to recite a litany of lies, accusing President Biden of orchestrating a political hit job on Trump just to win the 2024 election.

This is exactly the sort of rhetoric that will motivate individuals to violence and McVeigh-like attacks on American infrastructure, and Jordan knows it. Clearly, like Higgins, he’s fine with it.

In Jordan’s bizarre replay of Trump’s CNN town hall, the lies and false accusations came so fast and furious that Bash couldn’t keep track of them and therefore ended up, essentially, humiliated by Jordan. (Which is why many media outlets have stopped inviting known GOP inciters-to-violence on their air.)

What all this demonstrates is that fascism is the political system now most vigorously embraced by the GOP, from rigging elections to using naked threats of violence and even the murder of a police officer (and attempted murder of the Vice President) to try to stop the peaceful transfer of the presidency from Trump to Biden on January 6th.

Over the weekend, both Donald Trump and Congressman Andrew Clyde (R-Confederacy) publicly named Jack Smith’s wife, Katy Chevigny, putting a target on her back and implicitly encouraging her harassment or even murder.

As former Secretary of State Madeline Albright wrote in her book Fascism: A Warning:

“Decades ago, George Orwell suggested that the best one-word description of a Fascist was ‘bully.’”

If we don’t take on bullies — particularly fascist bullies — they keep going further and further until either they win or you fight back and defeat them.

The best political example of this writ large was Hitler. He pushed around most of Europe and they kept giving in or trying to appease him, thinking at some point he’d have gotten enough.

Neville Chamberlain thought he could negotiate with a bully and came back from his meetings with Hitler believing he’d achieved “peace in our time.” But, of course, you can never actually negotiate with a bully: you can only contain or defeat them. Which is what FDR, Churchill, and Stalin ended up having to do.

From that experience, Europe learned a lesson about dealing with fascist bullies, which is why the governments of the continent are united in their support of Ukraine against the murderous bullying of Russia’s fascist leader.

It’s also why Germany today uses the legal violence of the state — arrests and prosecutions — to stop today’s fascists who persist in unveiling Nazi flags, using Nazi memes, or intimidating gays and Jews the way the Nazis did.

Bullies never stop until they’re confronted with greater violence than they have at their own disposal. Giving in to their demands only creates a newer and more elaborate set of demands, as Dana Bash found on Sunday with Jim Jordan and we are seeing played out in real time with Donald Trump and his followers.

Therefore, before today’s fascist movement starts intentionally blowing up bridges or returns to exploding federal buildings, it’s imperative that the US government use its own legal violence — police and prisons — against this growing movement.

They must, however, do so within clear and transparent constraints, lest our government become what it’s trying to stop.

When I was in SDS at MSU in 1968, the state used violence against us by imprisoning 13 members on trumped-up drug charges. This illegitimate use of state violence was, as John Ehrlichman famously said, the explicit strategy of the Nixon administration.

“You want to know what this was really all about? The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and Black people. Do you understand what I’m saying?

“We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news.

“Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.“

That persecution of both SDS and the Black community was totally unjustified and revealed the fascist streak buried deep within the psyche of both Nixon and the GOP. America must be rigorous about never repeating it (and ending the phony “war on drugs,” which is still sending people to prison in Red states for minor marijuana offenses).

That said, when some of my peers split off from SDS and formed the Weather Underground, bombing buildings and killing people, the legalized violence of the state to find, arrest, prosecute, and imprison them was entirely justified.

When illegitimate movements use violence, the only option of a nation that wants to remain democratic is to employ legal violence against them.

This becomes particularly problematic and confusing for many citizens when a political party itself embraces state violence — legal persecution, as Donald Trump tried to get his justice department to do against the Clinton foundation throughout his presidency — as a political weapon.

Tragically, persecution and violence have been at the heart of the fascist movement within the GOP since Nixon pioneered it in the 1960s.

On May 1, 1970, then-Governor Ronald Reagan called students protesting the Vietnam war across America “brats,” “freaks” and “cowardly fascists,” adding, as The New York Times noted at the time:

“If it takes a bloodbath, let’s get it over with. No more appeasement!”

Four days later, on May 5, 1970, Reagan got his bloodbath at Kent State University.

During the George W. Bush administration, the government prepared two reports on violent movements within the US. The first, released in 2001, dealt with left-wing and Black political violence with emphasis on the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front. A later report in 2008 delved into Black and politically-motivated “socialist” terrorism. Nobody objected.

When the FBI’s report on right-wing terror was released during President Obama’s first year in office (having been written during Bush’s last year), however, the GOP freaked out so loudly that Obama, in a tragic and cowardly move, withdrew the report.

Had it been taken seriously, the extraordinary level of coordination around January 6th involving rightwing militia groups, leading to the recent successful prosecutions of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, may not have happened.

Instead, government efforts to infiltrate, monitor, or stop right-wing violent movements across America were largely put on hold for over a decade.

Thus, the calls for violence from the right are getting louder every day. Just this past week Kari Lake threatened our nation, saying:

“I have a message tonight for Merrick Garland, and Jack Smith, and Joe Biden. And the guys back there in the fake news media, you should listen up as well, this one’s for you.

“If you want to get to President Trump, you’re going to have to go through me, and you’re going to have to go through 75 million Americans just like me.

“And I’m going to tell you, most of us are card-carrying members of the NRA. That’s not a threat, that’s a public service announcement.”

Clearly it was a threat, and a threat of violent death at the hands of gun owners.

The Republican Party continues to refuse to excise the cancer of violence and violent rhetoric designed to incite stochastic (lone wolf) terrorism from its ranks.

Given the First Amendment’s free-speech protections, this throws America into a crisis: only members of our political class and the media can adequately challenge such incitement without violations of the Bill of Rights.

So far, the majority of elected Republicans are not only are the failing at that, but media groups like CNN are platforming such calls and the lies that inflame them.

If we continue to allow those who incited violence (like Trump and the politicians who stood with him on that stage on January 6th) to walk free, and tolerate the spread of violent rhetoric through the American body politic, we stand a very real chance of losing our republic.

These MAGA Republicans are determined to expand the failed drug war: report

Critics of the War on Drugs are found all over the political spectrum, from Black Lives Matter to the libertarian Cato Institute and former Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas). And those critics cite a long list of reasons why it has been an abysmal failure, including mass incarceration, the militarization of police and innocent victims killed during botched no-knock drug raids.

In California, the War on Drugs did a lot to increase the prison population and promote the growth of prison gangs such as the Aryan Brotherhood and the Mexican Mafia. But for all the draconian sentences, overcrowded prisons and militarized drug raids1, hard drug use hasn't gone away; addicts have been flocking to Philadelphia's Kensington and Boston's so-called "Methadone Mile" in huge numbers.

In a scathing report for The New Republic published on June 11, journalist Ana Marie Cox describes the ways in which Republicans in Florida and Texas are trying to expand the War on Drugs.

READ MORE: 'Time to reverse course': NYT Editorial Board endorses ending the War on Drugs

"The Texas governor has pledged to sign a recently passed bill that would reclassify overdoses as 'poisonings,' clearing the way for murder charges against anyone who provides a lethal dose — whether that provider was a friend, dealer, or person who happened to be in the same room," Cox explains. "Still seeking top place in the cruelty contest, Florida passed a law allowing prosecutors to seek the death penalty for drug-induced homicide, or DIH, cases — again regardless of the supplier's role. The Florida law also opens a new front in the criminalization of being around drugs: A non-fatal overdose could catch the supplier a second-degree felony."

Former President Donald Trump has been campaigning on expanding the death penalty to include drug trafficking. Trump proposed, "We're going to be asking everyone who sells drugs, gets caught selling drugs, to receive the death penalty for their heinous acts. Because it's the only way."

Cox notes that in February, some GOP senators — including Florida's Marco Rubio, Texas' Ted Cruz and Missouri's Josh Hawley — "reintroduced legislation to treat distributing fentanyl that results in an overdose as a first-degree felony murder."

"In practice," Cox observes, "such laws look like this: Three Memphis teens overdosed in the parking lot of a high school, hours before graduation. One 17-year-old survived. She's been charged with second-degree murder. In Texas, at least two counties appear to have taken Abbott's endorsement of the coming state law as license to go ahead and use traditional murder statutes against teenagers for selling drugs to other teens."

READ MORE: Lawmakers readying bipartisan bills to authorize Pentagon resources to combat fentanyl: report

These laws, Cox emphasizes, ignore the fact that "arresting your way out of a drug problem has never worked."

"Lord knows, if it worked, given the number of Americans arrested in this war, we would know that by now," the journalist argues. "But it doesn't. You just wind up with more poor people, non-white people, and addicts in prison, which — ah, I see. That might be the point."

READ MORE: Convicted 'Team America' DEA agent says the War on Drugs is 'unwinnable'

Ana Marie Cox's full report for The New Republic is available at this link.

'Worst' Trump-appointed judge set to oversee $1.8 billion dollar case that could bankrupt Planned Parenthood

One of the "worst" Trump-appointed judges is set to oversee a case involving a $1.8 billion dollar lawsuit against Planned Parenthood, according to VOX.

In the report, VOX's Ian Millhiser offered a brief overview of Kacsmaryk's history of ruling on abortion-related cases.

"A longtime opponent of abortion, birth control, and homosexuality, Kacsmaryk has handed down decisions attacking the right to birth control and attempting to nullify the federal ban on LGBTQ discrimination by health providers," Millhiser wrote. "His opinion trying to ban mifepristone faulted the FDA for failing to consider a 'study' which found that 77 percent of women who submitted anonymous blog posts to a website called 'Abortion Changes You' reported a 'negative change.'”

READ MORE: 'She knows what she’s doing': Democrat likens Marjorie Taylor Greene attack to 'why Emmett Till was killed'

Millhiser also challenged Kacsmaryk's distortion of the laws.

"Kacsmaryk seems to be uniquely incapable of distinguishing what the law actually says from what he wishes that it says," Millhiser wrote. "And now he will hear an attack on Planned Parenthood that only gets more ridiculous the deeper one digs into the Doe case."

Per the news outlet, "The case, known as Doe v. Planned Parenthood, alleges that Planned Parenthood and its affiliates in Texas and Louisiana engaged in a years-long scheme to defraud those states’ Medicaid systems."

Millhiser went on to explain how the lawsuit's damages were calculated, totaling a staggering $1.8 billion.

"When you add up the money the reproductive health provider allegedly owes, plus the various fines and penalties they could be hit with, Planned Parenthood estimates that they could be ordered to pay as much as $1.8 billion, more than enough to bankrupt Planned Parenthood Federation of America — the national organization that unites Planned Parenthood’s local affiliates — and wipe out its affiliates in Texas and Louisiana," he explained.

READ MORE: 'Embarrassing': Chris Sununu slams GOP and undecided voters' behavior during Trump Town Hall

Millhiser argued that the lawsuit lacks merit as he explained why "no sensible judge" would entertain the case.

"No sensible judge would hold that a litigant can be bankrupted because it acted consistently with a federal court order while that order was in effect," he But this case is being heard by Matthew Kacsmaryk, who’s spent his brief time on the bench acting as a rubber stamp for virtually any conservative litigant who comes to him seeking a court order."

READ MORE: Massachusetts donors have been paying Kyrsten Sinema’s Boston Marathon expenses: report

‘Like a switch had flipped’: Researchers probe if Ozempic treats a 'whole range of addictive' behaviors

Anyone who watches a lot of MSNBC and CNN has been inundated with pharmaceutical ads, including pitches for semaglutide — which is known for treating Type 2 diabetes and is also used as an anti-obesity medication. Cable news largely appeals to older Baby Boomer and Gen-X viewers, who pharma companies reason are more likely to become semaglutide customers.

Semaglutide is sold under brand names that include Rybelsus, Wegovy and Ozempic (whose jingle is based on the 1975 Pilot hit "Magic").

According to Atlantic science/medical writer Sarah Zhang, semaglutide has uses beyond treating diabetes and obesity — including discouraging addictive behaviors in general.

READ MORE: Weight loss drug has this potential fatal side effect

In an article published by The Atlantic on May 19, Zhang explains, "As semaglutide has skyrocketed in popularity, patients have been sharing curious effects that go beyond just appetite suppression. They have reported losing interest in a whole range of addictive and compulsive behaviors: drinking, smoking, shopping, biting nails, picking at skin. Not everyone on the drug experiences these positive effects, to be clear, but enough that addiction researchers are paying attention. And the spate of anecdotes might really be onto something."

Zhang adds, "For years now, scientists have been testing whether drugs similar to semaglutide can curb the use of alcohol, cocaine, nicotine, and opioids in lab animals — to promising results."

It isn't hard to understand why there would be a heavy demand for drugs used to treat Type 2 diabetes, which has become increasingly common in the United States in recent decades. The term "diabesity" has come to describe a combination of diabetes and obesity.

Semaglutide was developed to address a common problem, and according to Zhang, researchers are finding that it affects the brain along with the pancreas.

READ MORE: Ruling by Texas GOP judge could imperil millions of Americans

"Originally developed for diabetes, semaglutide prompts the pancreas to release insulin by mimicking a hormone called GLP-1, or glucagon-like peptide 1," Zhang notes. "First-generation GLP-1 analogs — exenatide and liraglutide — have been on the market to treat diabetes for more than a decade. And almost immediately, doctors noticed that patients on these drugs also lost weight — an unintended but usually not unwelcome side effect…. Experts now believe GLP-1 analogs affect more than just the pancreas."

Zhang continues, "The exact mechanism in weight loss is still unclear, but the drugs likely work in multiple ways to suppress hunger, including but not limited to slowing food's passage through the stomach and preventing ups and downs in blood sugar. Most intriguing, it also seems to reach and act directly on the brain."

READ MORE: GOP debt limit bill could out over 10 million at risk of losing Medicaid: analysis

Read The Atlantic's full report at this link (subscription required).

@2024 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.