RICHARD FAUSSET and MOLLY HENNESSY-FISKE, Los Angeles Times
NEW ORLEANS -- Inside New Orleans' federal courthouse Monday, a judge was deliberating the points of law that could determine the fate of the Obama administration's six-month moratorium on deep-water drilling.
Outside, Lucy Lailhengue was marching up and down Poydras Street with a sign that offered a more blunt line of reasoning: "If you support the moratorium, stop using oil and gas!"
Lailhengue, 52, says she can smell the spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico from her home in suburban Chalmette, and she worries about the crude despoiling nearby wetlands. Yet on the whole, the oil industry has been good to Lailhengue -- very good. With a high-school degree, she pulls down white-collar money as a title analyst for a drilling company. It's a common story in a state where the offshore oil and gas industry alone has an estimated $3 billion economic impact.
"I just think it's ridiculous to shut down a whole industry and ruin thousands of lives to punish one company," she said. "...We've had a lot of fatalities on the bridges. You don't see them shutting down the bridges."
That argument, echoed by Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, the oil industry, and a multitude of regular Gulf-dwelling folk living close to the disaster, is at the heart of a lawsuit challenging the moratorium, which was filed earlier this month by companies that provide ships and supplies to the offshore rigs.
The plaintiffs, led by marine company Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC, argue that the government overstepped its bounds in issuing the May 28 moratorium that halted work on 33 deep-water rigs. They also argue that there is nothing to suggest that deepwater drilling "is more dangerous today than it was on the day immediately preceding the tragic incident involving the Deepwater Horizon."
Angry lawmakers blister BP chief over Gulf spill
Marine life flees oil spill, gathers in Gulf shallows near shore
Obama calls BP reckless, vows it will pay for spill; GOP critical
Obama inflates hopes for making BP pay to clean up: Fact Check
BP rivals struggle to explain similar response plans
BP used less-reliable, but cheaper drilling method on Deepwater Horizon
Oil spill oversight? Offshore drillers around world largely regulate themselves on safety
More Gulf Coast news reports about oil spill, environment, cleanup
Latest newspaper updates: New Orleans
In a two-hour hearing Monday morning, U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman weighed those arguments as well as rebuttals from environmental groups. He is expected to decide whether to issue an injunction overturning the moratorium by Wednesday morning.
Whatever Feldman's decision, it will likely make waves far beyond Louisiana. Overturning the moratorium would be an embarrassing setback for an Obama administration that has been criticized for not moving aggressively enough to solve the oil spill, and hammered by conservative critics for what are perceived to be bullying, anti-business tactics across a range of industries.
Upholding the moratorium could mean even more economic pain for states such as Louisiana already reeling from the blow to their seafood and tourism industries. A friend-of-the-court brief filed Sunday by Jindal and attorney General James D. "Buddy" Caldwell asserts that the moratorium could persuade big oil companies to move their rigs out of the gulf to Brazil or Africa, with "little chance of their immediate return."
Such a wholesale flight from the Gulf would result, directly and indirectly, in the loss of about 11,000 Louisiana jobs, from businesses such as contract employment, shipping and transport, tool rental, equipment servicing -- even grocery stores and restaurants, the officials said.
Plaintiffs also note that Louisiana stands to lose "enormous" revenue, since federal law entitles it to a 32 percent cut of all mineral revenues generated in 8 million acres recently opened for drilling in the Gulf.
Outside the courthouse Monday, plaintiff Donald T. "Boysie" Bollinger, 60, said he was already feeling the pain. As owner of Bollinger Shipyards in nearby Lockport, he has seen business fizzle in the wake of the moratorium. Bollinger, a former state campaign finance chairman for President George W. Bush, said he has lost three contracts for deepwater support vessels, and he fears he will lose more as it drags on.
"When the rigs quit working, they don't need the boats," said Bollinger, whose tanned face gleamed above a seersucker suit. 'Never before has the government shut us down."
In their complaint, the plaintiffs argue that Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's decision to issue the moratorium was "arbitrary," and made despite "an absence of facts concerning the risks presented by drilling at water depths that exceed 500 feet." They also argue that the government violated federal laws that mandate a balancing of environmental protection and resource development.
Government lawyers counter that the secretary has every right to issue the moratorium, and assert the lawsuit is invalid because the plaintiffs failed to provide a required a 60-day notice. The moratorium, they noted, is meant to give the Interior Department time to implement new proposed safety regulations for rigs, including rules governing undersea blowout preventers such as the one that apparently failed to stop the blowout on the Deepwater Horizon.
Across from the courhouse, New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu hosted his sister, Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., and more than a dozen fellow mayors from the Gulf region and beyond for lunch at the Bon Ton Cafe.
Mith Landrieu, who was wearing a "Save Our Coast" T-shirt, called continuing the moratorium as-is for six months, "catastrophic." He and the other mayors said they support a compromise: allow drilling to continue as new safety rules are enforced, but require workers to stop before they hit and extract oil.
"We have to make sure that we do it safely, but we have to protect the livelihoods of the people that do it," Landrieu said. "A lot of folks here have seen the symbiotic relationship between the oil workers and the fishermen. When the people who are regulating understand that, they will craft a better moratorium. We hope Secretary Salazar understands and that they craft it with a scalpel."
Monica Reimer, and attorney with Earthjustice, said the compromise Landrieu suggested would not satisfy her group's concerns about drilling safety, because some of the riskiest drilling is done before workers reach the so-called "pay zone."
"Historically, the blowouts happen on the exploratory rigs because they don't know what they're getting into," she said. "So the risks would continue."
Lailhengue, meanwhile, said she thought Obama was capitalizing on the crisis to advance his environmental agenda, including a cap and-trade bill governing greenhouse gas emissions, without taking into account the human cost. And despite her general fondness for the oil business, she feels betrayed by BP.
"It's not a moratorium," the other side of her sign read. "It's a moronotorium." It featured photos of Obama, Salazar and BP chief Tony Hayward.
------
(Hennessy-Fiske reported from New Orleans, and Fausset reported from Atlanta.)
------
(c) 2010, Los Angeles Times.
Visit the Los Angeles Times on the Internet at http://www.latimes.com/
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.