Labour is accused of creating 'loopholes for predators' with plans to 'make it easier to legally transition' by dropping need for people to prove they have lived as another gender for two years
Labour was accused of creating 'loopholes for predators' today over claims it will water down safeguards on legally changing gender.
The party is expected to propose removing the need for trans people to prove that they have lived in their preferred gender for two years.
The spouse of the applicant would also not be required to give consent for applications, which could be signed off by a single specialist doctor.
Currently people wishing to have a new gender legally recognised have to get a gender recognition certificate (GRC).
They are required to submit two years of evidence showing that they have been living in a new gender, such as utility bills, passports, or even supermarket loyalty cards.
However, according to The Times Labour will drop the provision in order to 'remove indignities for trans people who deserve recognition and acceptance'.
Labour expected to propose removing the need for trans people to prove that they have lived in their preferred gender for two years (Keir Starmer pictured in London on Saturday)
Instead, there would be a two-year 'cooling off period' before a GRC is approved by one specialist doctor, rather than a panel of doctors and lawyers.
The idea of a single GP signing of certificates has reportedly been dropped by Labour, after shadow health secretary Wes Streeting raised concerns about the impact on family doctors.
However, the policy is likely to heighten anger among critics at Labour's stance on gender identity issues.
Tory equalities minister Kemi Badenoch said: 'These proposals unravel all the protections in the current system designed to protect women and girls.
'This change creates more loopholes for predators and bad faith actors to infiltrate women-only spaces and put us at risk.
'Labour have never understood or cared about this issue or the vulnerable women impacted by their policies.
'As JK Rowling, a Labour supporter herself, has said, Labour show a 'dismissive and often offensive' approach to the concerns of women, illustrated by the contempt with which they treat their own MPs like Rosie Duffield.'
Labour was accused of 'ripping up' plans to ban schools from teaching gender ideology yesterdat.
Shadow education secretary Bridget Phillipson indicated that she will review proposed guidance on how the controversial issues should be addressed in schools.
Asked if she would ditch the proposed restriction on lessons about gender theories, Ms Phillipson said trans people's 'existence should be recognised'.
She acknowledged the importance of the guidance, adding teachers want 'clarity on how to manage what is a sensitive and difficult area for them'.
Education Secretary Gillian Keegan said the comments 'confirmed that a Labour Government would play politics with the lives of our children by ripping up guidance on Gender Questioning Children, effectively allowing contested gender ideology to be taught in the classroom'.
Shadow education secretary Bridget Phillipson indicated that she will review proposed guidance on how gender identity should be addressed in schools
JK Rowling renewed her attack on Labour's stance towards women on social media yesterday
Meanwhile, JK Rowling stepped up the pressure on Sir Keir over the party's approach to women.
In an excoriating article yesterday, Rowling slammed him for a 'dismissive and often offensive' approach to women's rights.
The Harry Potter author, who donated £1million to Labour under Gordon Brown, said she would struggle to vote for the party and lambasted its 'embrace of gender identity ideology'.
Sir Keir responded by telling reporters on the campaign trail that he was 'very proud of the progress' of past Labour governments, arguing they had made a 'material difference' to women's lives.
Posting a link to a story about the row on X yesterday, Rowling said: 'Labour giving the same energy as a man who's been shagging a woman from work but thinks his wife should be cool about it because he's always put the bins out.'
Touring broadcast studios this morning, Mr Streeting said he was 'pretty depressed' over JK Rowling's criticism.
'I have a lot of respect for JK Rowling both in terms of what she's done for children and literacy but also the work that she's done campaigning for women and in particular violence against women and girls,' he said.
'I think that we've clearly got more work to do to rebuild trust with people that we've lost on this issue.'
The shadow health secretary added: 'I think we can find a way through that both treats trans people with the dignity and respect that they deserve, and also treats women with the respect that they deserve, particularly protecting women's spaces, women's voices, and right to speak up.
'So, when women like JK Rowling do speak up, I think it's important we engage seriously with the arguments that she's making, with the concerns that she has.
'And also we listen to what trans people are saying about the everyday injustices and indignities that they're experiencing too, whether that's hate crime or poor provision in public services.'
On the schools guidance, Ms Phillipson told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: 'We absolutely do need to see guidance, the Labour government – if we win the trust of the British people – will make sure that happens, but let's make sure children's wellbeing is at the heart of this.
'Let's stop this being a political football. This is our children's lives, their wellbeing, it's too important to make this a culture wars issue on the front pages of newspapers. Let's take a more responsible approach, give schools the clear guidance that they need and make sure our young people are supported as well.'
Ms Phillipson said: 'Many aspects of the draft (guidance) had good and straightforward principles in it, other elements of it I think drifted far too much into partisan and unnecessary language that I think makes it harder for schools to navigate this.
'So if I were education secretary, I'd want to look at all of the responses we've received to the consultation.'
Ms Phillipson said school leaders have flagged areas they feel are 'still outstanding' within the draft guidance, adding: 'We would want to look at that, do it responsibly, work with parents, with young people and with the profession to get this right.
'Ministers have been rowing about this for months and months. That is not the way to deal with such a sensitive issue.'
On whether she would drop the proposed ban on teaching about the concept of gender identity, Ms Phillipson said: 'There are trans people within society and their existence should be recognised.
'This drifts sometimes into a slightly bizarre conversation. There are trans people, they have a right for their existence to be recognised, many trans people are vulnerable and are deserving of support.
'Alongside that we've got to make sure that schools have got clear guidance about how best to support children and young people that are experiencing distress and issues around their wellbeing.
Education Secretary Gillian Keegan said the comments 'confirmed that a Labour Government would play politics with the lives of our children by ripping up guidance on Gender Questioning Children, effectively allowing contested gender ideology to be taught in the classroom'
'That is not well served by ministers picking fights, seeking headlines.
'Let's take a more responsible approach, let's take the heat out of it, let's do this properly and seriously.'
The draft statutory guidance for England published last month states that sex education should be taught no earlier than year five, when pupils are aged nine, and that what is described as the 'contested topic of gender identity' should not be taught at all.
However, it was subject to a nine-week consultation ending on July 11 - which was interrupted by the snap election.
