Briefing | Measuring the 1%

Economists are rethinking the numbers on inequality

An academic disagreement has big real-world implications

OVER A DECADE before thousands of protesters gathered in Zuccotti Park in New York in 2011, a little-known researcher in France sat down to write about income inequality in a new way. “The focus of our study consists in comparing the evolution of the incomes of the top 10%, the top 1%, the top 0.5%, and so on,” Thomas Piketty wrote in a paper in 1998. With his long-term co-author, Emmanuel Saez, Mr Piketty pioneered the use of tax data over survey data, thereby doing a better job of capturing the incomes of the richest. He revealed that “the 1%” had made out like bandits at the expense of “the 99%”. His research gave Occupy Wall Street its vocabulary.

This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline “Measuring the 1%”

Inequality illusions

From the November 28th 2019 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Briefing

Talent is scarce. Yet many countries spurn it

There is growing competition for the best and the brightest migrants

America’s “left-behind” are doing better than ever

But manufacturing jobs are still in decline


Swing-state economies are doing just fine

They would be doing even better if the Biden-Harris administration had been more cynical


Can Kamala Harris win on the economy?

A visit to a crucial swing state reveals the problems she will face

A shift in the media business is changing what it is to be a sports fan

Team loyalty is being replaced by “fluid fandom”