Economists are rethinking the numbers on inequality
An academic disagreement has big real-world implications
OVER A DECADE before thousands of protesters gathered in Zuccotti Park in New York in 2011, a little-known researcher in France sat down to write about income inequality in a new way. “The focus of our study consists in comparing the evolution of the incomes of the top 10%, the top 1%, the top 0.5%, and so on,” Thomas Piketty wrote in a paper in 1998. With his long-term co-author, Emmanuel Saez, Mr Piketty pioneered the use of tax data over survey data, thereby doing a better job of capturing the incomes of the richest. He revealed that “the 1%” had made out like bandits at the expense of “the 99%”. His research gave Occupy Wall Street its vocabulary.
This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline “Measuring the 1%”
More from Briefing
The Chinese authorities are concealing the state of the economy
But the Communist Party’s internal information systems may also be flawed
“Hell on earth”: satellite images document the siege of a Sudanese city
El-Fasher, until recently a place of refuge, is under attack
The ripple effects of Sudan’s war are being felt across three continents
It is a sign of growing global impunity and disorder
Anarchy in Sudan has spawned the world’s worst famine in 40 years
Millions are likely to perish
Kamala Harris has revealed only the vaguest of policy platforms
Her record suggests she would be a pragmatist
Talent is scarce. Yet many countries spurn it
There is growing competition for the best and the brightest migrants