Briefing | Measuring the 1%

Economists are rethinking the numbers on inequality

An academic disagreement has big real-world implications

OVER A DECADE before thousands of protesters gathered in Zuccotti Park in New York in 2011, a little-known researcher in France sat down to write about income inequality in a new way. “The focus of our study consists in comparing the evolution of the incomes of the top 10%, the top 1%, the top 0.5%, and so on,” Thomas Piketty wrote in a paper in 1998. With his long-term co-author, Emmanuel Saez, Mr Piketty pioneered the use of tax data over survey data, thereby doing a better job of capturing the incomes of the richest. He revealed that “the 1%” had made out like bandits at the expense of “the 99%”. His research gave Occupy Wall Street its vocabulary.

This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline “Measuring the 1%”

Inequality illusions

From the November 30th 2019 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Briefing

The Chinese authorities are concealing the state of the economy

But the Communist Party’s internal information systems may also be flawed

“Hell on earth”: satellite images document the siege of a Sudanese city

El-Fasher, until recently a place of refuge, is under attack


The ripple effects of Sudan’s war are being felt across three continents

It is a sign of growing global impunity and disorder


Anarchy in Sudan has spawned the world’s worst famine in 40 years

Millions are likely to perish

Kamala Harris has revealed only the vaguest of policy platforms

Her record suggests she would be a pragmatist

Talent is scarce. Yet many countries spurn it

There is growing competition for the best and the brightest migrants