Finance & economics | Free exchange

This year’s Nobel prizes prompt soul-searching among economists

The rise of randomised controlled trials looks to some like a retreat from the biggest questions

NOBEL PRIZES are usually given in recognition of ideas that are already more or less guaranteed a legacy. But occasionally they prompt as much debate as admiration. This year’s economics award, given to Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer, was unusual both for the recency of the contributions it recognised and the relative youth of the recipients. (For a review of “Good Economics for Hard Times”, by Mr Banerjee and Ms Duflo, see Books and arts section.) Intentionally or not, it has inflamed arguments about the direction of the profession.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Works in progress”

Hong Kong in revolt

From the November 23rd 2019 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance & economics

Europe’s economic growth is extremely fragile

Risk is concentrated in one country: Germany

How vulnerable is Israel to sanctions?

So far, measures have had little effect. That could change


Why companies get inflation wrong

Bosses should pay less attention to the media


What is behind China’s perplexing bond-market intervention?

The central bank seems to think the government’s debt is too popular

How to invest in chaotic markets

Contrary to popular wisdom, even retail investors should pay attention to volatility