The disturbing new relevance of theories of nuclear deterrence
Lessons from the work of Thomas Schelling
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20220319_FND000_0.jpg)
SIXTY YEARS ago, a dispute over the placement of Soviet missiles in Cuba pushed Washington and Moscow perilously close to all-out war. The crisis provided history’s most extreme example yet of nuclear brinkmanship, situations in which governments repeatedly escalate a very dangerous situation in an attempt to get their way. It also demonstrated the extraordinary value of the work of Thomas Schelling, an economist then at Harvard University, who used the relatively new tools of game theory to analyse the strategy of war. The war in Ukraine has made Schelling’s work, for which he shared the economics Nobel prize in 2005, more relevant than ever.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “War games”
Finance & economics March 19th 2022
- Globalisation and autocracy are locked together. For how much longer?
- Will China’s covid lockdowns add to strains on supply chains?
- Can foreign-currency reserves be sanction-proofed?
- The inflationary consequences of Russia’s war will spread
- A nickel-trading fiasco raises three big questions
- Governments are proposing windfall taxes on energy firms
- Sanctions-dodgers hoping to use crypto to evade detection are likely to be disappointed
- The disturbing new relevance of theories of nuclear deterrence
More from Finance & economics
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240817_FNP002.jpg)
Europe’s economic growth is extremely fragile
Risk is concentrated in one country: Germany
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240817_FNP502.jpg)
How vulnerable is Israel to sanctions?
So far, measures have had little effect. That could change
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240817_FND000.jpg)
Why companies get inflation wrong
Bosses should pay less attention to the media
What is behind China’s perplexing bond-market intervention?
The central bank seems to think the government’s debt is too popular
How to invest in chaotic markets
Contrary to popular wisdom, even retail investors should pay attention to volatility
Vladimir Putin spends big—and sends Russia’s economy soaring
How long can the party last?