Fighting in the Sahel has forced 1.7m people from their homes
Jihadists are only partly to blame
WESTERN GOVERNMENTS have long debated whether the costs of intervening in dangerous parts of the world exceed the risks. In February the United States signed a peace deal with the Taliban in Afghanistan. But just as America extricates itself from one conflict, a power vacuum in Africa’s Sahel may drag it into another.
This article appeared in the Graphic detail section of the print edition under the headline “The next Afghanistan?”
More from Graphic detail
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240817_WOT721.png)
Our Carrie Bradshaw index: where Americans can afford to live solo in 2024
Compared with last year, rent on basic apartments looks more affordable
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240817_WOT704.png)
As usual, the medal tally at the Olympic games was lopsided
But overall more countries are tasting sporting glory
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240810_WOT939.png)
Cheap fixes could help 450m people stand taller and think quicker
Eat right, start young
What is the least liveable city in the world?
It has ranked at the bottom of the EIU index for 11 years
Which countries would be most affected by a second Trump term?
A ranking of America’s 70 largest trading partners
Why 2024 could become the hottest year on record
Global temperatures reach record highs twice in less than a week