When is it OK to shoot a child soldier?
Canada writes rules for troops who face armed nine-year-olds
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/sites/default/files/images/2017/03/articles/main/20170401_amp001.jpg)
ONE of the worst dilemmas soldiers face is what to do when they confront armed children. International law and most military codes treat underage combatants mainly as innocent victims. They offer guidance on their legal rights and on how to interrogate and demobilise them. They have little to say about a soul-destroying question, which must typically be answered in a split second: when a kid points a Kalashnikov at you, do you shoot him? Last month Canada became the first country to incorporate a detailed answer into its military doctrine. If you must, it says, shoot first.
This article appeared in the The Americas section of the print edition under the headline “When to shoot a child soldier”
More from The Americas
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240817_AMP502.jpg)
A bold plan to close the deadly Darién Gap unravels
America and Panama struggle to control surging migration
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240817_AMP503.jpg)
Peru’s crazy drivers offer a data deluge for self-driving cars
A startup sees value in the chaos of the country’s streets
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240810_AMP504.jpg)
Colombia prepares for a vanilla boom
Purveyors of scented products and posh ice-creams take note
How the mad, bad Maduro regime clings to power
Behind-the-scenes negotiations seek to ease him out of office
After protests over a stolen election, the goons crack heads
Yet the brazenness of Nicolás Maduro’s theft crosses a line
The plight of Brazil’s indigenous groups worsens
Blame illegal miners, ranchers, loggers, traffickers and an unsympathetic Congress