The Economist explains

Why is free trade good?

Donald Trump is in a stand-off with Adam Smith

By A.F.

PROTECTIONISM is back. On March 8th President Donald Trump signed into law tariffs of 25% on steel imports and 10% on aluminium, to come into effect two weeks later. It is unclear which countries will be hit. Even if exemptions are expanded beyond Mexico and Canada, this is still a big step for the president to take. Mr Trump tweets that this is for the best. By levying these tariffs, the story goes, the American economy will be better off because jobs in the steel and aluminium sectors will return to the homeland from foreign countries that have “stolen” them. Such thinking has traditionally been known as “mercantilism” and it is easy to see why it appeals. We buy things from that country, instead of making them ourselves. If we made them ourselves, we would have more jobs and this would make us better off. So why is the mercantilist argument wrong?

More from The Economist explains

What is a carry trade?

Borrowing cheaply to buy high-yielding assets is popular, but risky

The significance of liquid water on Mars

There could be an ocean’s worth deep underground


Why Russian troops are attacking on motorbikes

New conditions give rise to new tactics


What is “two-tier” policing?

The conspiratorial belief has spread online, fuelling disorder in Britain

Would legal doping change the Olympics?

The impact would be smaller—and worse—than proponents of drug-taking claim

Do vice-presidential picks matter?

If they have any effect on an election’s result, it is at the margins