Is Neuroscience Rediscovering The Soul?
The transcendence of human into information is either almost here, a step in evolution — or an impossibility, a mad dream of people who can't accept the inevitability of death, says Marcelo Gleiser.
by Marcelo Gleiser
Apr 05, 2017
3 minutes
![](https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/18g9b8i0jk5sriwm/images/fileJ9XVRC33.jpg)
The idea that neuroscience is rediscovering the soul is, to most scientists and philosophers, nothing short of outrageous. Of course it is not.
But the widespread, adverse, knee-jerk attitude presupposes the old-fashioned definition of the soul — the ethereal, immaterial entity that somehow encapsulates your essence. Surely, this kind of supernatural mumbo-jumbo has no place in modern science. And I agree. The Cartesian separation of body and soul, the res extensa (matter stuff) vs. res cogitans (mind stuff) has long been discarded as untenable in a strictly materialistic description of natural phenomena.
After all, how would something
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days