Ideas and the Novel
4/5
()
About this ebook
“He had a mind so fine that no idea could violate it.”
So begins Mary McCarthy’s fascinating critical analysis of the novel (and its practitioners) from her double-edged perspective as both reader and writer. The bestselling author of The Group takes T. S. Eliot’s quote about Henry James, written in 1918, as a jumping-off point to discuss how the novel has evolved—or not—in the last century. In this lively, erudite book, McCarthy throws down the gauntlet: Why did the nineteenth century produce novels of ideas while the twentieth century is so lacking in serious fiction? She winnows out the underachieving (read: overhyped) authors from the geniuses, explores why Jean Valjean personifies man’s conscience in Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables, and shows how Stendhal’s The Red and the Black “illustrates the evil effects of reading.” She also tackles the role of the omniscient narrator and analogizes novels to air travel.
With its exploration of authors from Balzac to D. H. Lawrence, Ideas and the Novel holds inviolate the idea of the novel as a means ultimately of liberating ideas.
This ebook features an illustrated biography of Mary McCarthy including rare images from the author’s estate.
Mary McCarthy
Mary McCarthy (1912-1989) was an American critic, public intellectual, and author of more than two dozen books, including her New York Times bestseller, The Group. After graduating from Vassar in 1933 McCarthy moved to New York City and garnered attention as a cutting theater and book critic, contributing to a wide range of publications, such as the Nation, the New Republic, Harper's Magazine, and the New York Review of Books. She served on the editorial staff of the Partisan Review from 1937 to 1948. During the 1940s and 1950s she was a vocal opponent of both McCarthyism and communism. She wrote liberal critiques of culture and power to the end of her life, opposing the Vietnam War in the 1960s and covering the Watergate scandal hearings in the 1970s. In addition to The Group, her other novels include The Company She Keeps and Memories of a Catholic Girlhood. McCarthy also proved herself to be one of literature's greatest traveling companions with the publication of Venice Observed and The Stones of Florence. For her work, McCarthy won a number of awards, including two Guggenheim Fellowships. She died on October 25, 1989.
Read more from Mary Mc Carthy
The Group: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Groves of Academe: A Novel Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Collected Novels Volume One: The Group, The Company She Keeps, and Birds of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Memories of a Catholic Girlhood Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Charmed Life: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Birds of America: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Venice Observed Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Cast a Cold Eye: Stories Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Stones of Florence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mary McCarthy's Italy: The Stones of Florence and Venice Observed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How I Grew Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cannibals and Missionaries: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Vietnam Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Company She Keeps: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Intellectual Memoirs: New York, 1936–1938 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Collected Essays Volume Two: Mary McCarthy's Theatre Chronicles, 1937–1962 and On the Contrary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Writing on the Wall: And Other Literary Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMary McCarthy's Collected Memoirs: Memories of a Catholic Girlhood, How I Grew, and Intellectual Memoirs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMary McCarthy's Theatre Chronicles, 1937–1962 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Collected Novels Volume Two: A Charmed Life, The Groves of Academe, and Cannibals and Missionaries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOccasional Prose Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Venice Observed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On the Contrary: Articles of Belief, 1946–1961 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Stones of Florence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Collected Essays Volume One: Occasional Prose, The Writing on the Wall, and Ideas and the Novel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Contrary: Articles of Belief, 1946-1961 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Pilgrimage of Hope: A Story of Faith and Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Ideas and the Novel
Related ebooks
On the Contrary: Articles of Belief, 1946–1961 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Writing on the Wall: And Other Literary Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA European Education Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Seven Poor Men of Sydney Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBorder Country Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Amy Lowell Among Her Contemporaries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Generation: My Lost City, The Crack-Up, Pasting It Together, Handle with Care, Afternoon of an Author, Early Success Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Prime of Miss Jean Brodie: A Novel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMixedbloods Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTransit of Venus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Mason & Dixon Companion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Essential Henry James Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Parisian Bourgeois' Sunday and Other Stories Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Shark Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCannonball Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Indian Summer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Last Chronicle of Barset Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conversations with Jay Parini Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Letty Fox: Her Luck Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Auguries of Lost Innocence: A Critical Probe into J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNostromo Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Once a Jailbird: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meanwhile There Are Letters: The Correspondence of Eudora Welty and Ross Macdonald Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Perfection of Things Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrance: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Man in Antibes: Getting to Know Graham Greene Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Company She Keeps: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dear Time's Waste Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Letters of Robert Giroux and Thomas Merton Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Woman Who Lost Her Soul Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Literary Criticism For You
A Reader’s Companion to J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Seduction: by Robert Greene | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/512 Rules For Life: by Jordan Peterson | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 48 Laws of Power: by Robert Greene | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Letters to a Young Poet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As I Lay Dying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dare to Lead: Brave Work. Tough Conversations. Whole Hearts.by Brené Brown | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Man's Search for Meaning: by Viktor E. Frankl | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Book of Virtues Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Untethered Soul: The Journey Beyond Yourself by Michael A. Singer | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Killers of the Flower Moon: by David Grann | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Lincoln Lawyer: A Mysterious Profile Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking by Susan Cain | Conversation Starters Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis | Conversation Starters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOne Hundred Years of Solitude: A Novel by Gabriel Garcia Márquez | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Behold a Pale Horse: by William Cooper | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Ideas and the Novel
3 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Ideas and the Novel - Mary McCarthy
Ideas and the Novel
Mary McCarthy
To Sonia Orwell, with gratitude
Contents
1
2
3
4
A Biography of Mary McCarthy
1
HE HAD A MIND so fine that no idea could violate it.
T. S. Eliot writing of Henry James in The Little Review of August, 1918. I offer it to you as a motto or, rather, counter-motto for the reflections that follow, which will take exception, not to the truth of Eliot’s pronouncement (he was right about James), but to the set of lofty assumptions calmly towering behind it.
The young Eliot’s epigram summed up with cutting brevity a creed that for modernists appeared beyond dispute. Implicit in it is the snubbing notion, radical at the time but by now canon doctrine, of the novel as a fine art and of the novelist as an intelligence superior to mere intellect. In this patronizing view, the intellect’s crude apparatus was capable only of formulating concepts, which then underwent the process of diffusion, so that by dint of repetition they fell within anybody’s reach. The final, cruel fate of an idea was to turn into an idée reçue. The power of the novelist insofar as he was a supreme intelligence was to free himself from the work-load of commentary and simply, awesomely, to show: his creation was beyond paraphrase or reduction. As pure work of art, it stood beautifully apart, impervious to the dry rot affecting the brain’s constructions and to the welter of factuality.
Thus the separation was perceived as twofold. The reform program for the novel—soon to be promulgated in a position-paper like Jacob’s Room (1922)—aimed at correcting not only the errors of the old practitioners, who were prone to philosophize in their works, but also the Victorian slice of life
theory still admitted by Matthew Arnold and later, permissive notions of the novel as a spongy tract
(Forster) or large loose bag into which anything would fit. Obviously novels of the old, discredited schools—the historical novel, the novel of adventure, the soap-box or pulpit novel—continued and continue to be written despite the lesson of the Master. Indeed they make up a majority, now as before, but having no recognized aesthetic willing to claim them, they tend to be treated by our critical authorities as marginal—examples of backwardness if they come from the East (Solzhenitsyn) or of deliberate archaizing if they come from the West (say, Iris Murdoch). The pure novel, the quintessential novel, does not acknowledge any family relation with these distant branches. It is a formal, priestly exercise whose first great celebrant was James. The fact that there are no Jamesian novels being produced any more—if there ever were, apart from the Master’s own—does not alter the perspective. The Jamesian model remains a standard, an archetype, against which contemporary impurities and laxities are measured.
The importance of James lies not so much in his achievements as in the queerness of them. He did not broaden a way for his successors but closed nearly every exit as with hermetic sealing tape. It is undeniable that this American author, almost single-handed, invented a peculiar new kind of fiction, more refined, more stately, than anything known before, purged, to the limit of possibility, of the gross traditional elements of suspense, physical action, inventory, description of places and persons, apostrophe, moral teaching. When you think of James in the light of his predecessors, you are suddenly conscious of what is not there: battles, riots, tempests, sunrises, the sewers of Paris, crime, hunger, the plague, the scaffold, the clergy, but also minute particulars such as you find in Jane Austen—poor Miss Bates’s twice-baked apples, Mr. Collins’ Collins,
the comedy of the infinitely small. It cannot have been simply a class limitation or a limitation of experience that intimidated his pen. It was a resolve, very American, to scrape his sacred texts clean of the material factor. And it was no small task he laid on himself, since his novels, even more than most maybe, dealt with material concerns—property and money—and unrolled almost exclusively in the realm of the social, mundane by definition. Nevertheless, he succeeded, this American prodigy. He etherealized the novel beyond its wildest dreams and perhaps etherized it as well.
To take a pleasant example, he managed in The Spoils of Poynton to relate a story of a contest for possession of some furniture in immense detail without ever indicating except in the vaguest way what the desirable stuff was. We gather that quite a lot is French—Louis Quinze and Louis Seize are mentioned once each (the sweetest Louis Seize
)—but we also hear of Venetian velvet and of a great Italian cabinet
in the red room, though with no specifics of place, period, inlays, embossment, and of a little Spanish ivory crucifix. When you think of what Balzac would have made of the opportunity...! Actually The Spoils of Poynton is a Balzacian drama done with the merest hints of props and stage setting. James’s strategy was to abstract the general noun, furniture, from the particulars of the individual pieces, also referred to as things.
He gives us a universal which we can upholster according to our own taste and antiquarian knowledge. In short, he gives us an Idea. The Spoils of Poynton is not a novel about material tables and chairs; it is a novel about the possession and enjoyment of an immaterial Idea, which could be any old furniture, all old furniture, beautiful, ugly, or neither—it makes no difference, except that if it is ugly the struggle over it will be more ironic. James, however, is not an ironist; no Puritan can be. And the fact that with this novel we can supply real
tables and chairs from our own imagination makes The Spoils of Poynton, to my mind, more true to our common experience, hence more classic, than most of his fictions.
But that, for the moment, is beside the point. What I should like to bring out now is another peculiarity: that though James’s people endlessly discuss and analyze, they never discuss the subjects that people in society usually do. Above all, politics. It is not true that well-bred people avoid talk of politics. They cannot stay away from it. Outrage over public events that menace, or threaten to menace, their property and privilege has devolved on them by birthright (though it can also be acquired), and they cannot help sharing it when more than two meet, even in the presence of outsiders, which in fact seems to act as a stimulant. This has surely been so from earliest times, and James’s time was no exception, as we know from other sources. But from his fictions (forgetting The Princess Casamassima, where he mildly ventured into the arena), you could never guess that whispers—or shouts—ever burst out over the tea table regarding the need for a firm hand, for making an example of the ringleaders, what are things coming to, and so on. Dickens’ Mr. Bounderby, although no gentleman, put the position in a nutshell with The turtle soup and the gold spoon,
his own blunt résumé of the trade unionist’s unmistakable goals. As James’s people are constantly telling each other how intelligent they are, more subtlety than this might be expected of them, but we can only hope it. What were Adam Verver’s views on the great Free Trade debate, on woman suffrage, on child labor? We do not know. It is almost as if James wanted to protect his cherished creations from our knowledge of the banalities they would utter if he once let us overhear them speak freely.
Or let us try art. These people are traveled and worldly and often in a state of rapture over the museums and galleries they visit, the noble façades of mansions and dear quaint crockets of cathedrals. Yet they rarely come away from a morning of sightseeing with as much as a half-formed thought. They never dispute about what they have looked at, prefer one artist to another, hazard generalizations. In real life, they would certainly have had their ideas about the revolutions that were occurring in painting and sculpture. In Paris, if only out of curiosity, they would have rushed to see the Salon des Indépendants. Wild horses could not have kept them away. A bold pair, armed with a letter from Lady Sackville or Isabella Stewart Gardner, might have penetrated Rodin’s studio. His bronze statue of Balzac in a dressing-gown, shown at the Salon des Beaux Arts, would already have led the travelers to take sides, some finding it disgusting