Related to The Drama
Related ebooks
Gale Researcher Guide for: Shakespeare's Company, Theaters, and Rivals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTHE ART OF BIOGRAPHY Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShakespeare the Player: A Life in the Theatre Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Behind Closed Doors: Her Father's House and Other Stories of Sicily Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAstonish Me!: First Nights That Changed the World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Wild Ass's Skin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaptain Dreyfus (One Act Play by Jacob Gordin) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBurning Man: The Trials of D. H. Lawrence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fra Angelico Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTroilus and Cressida (SparkNotes Literature Guide) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMusic, Late and Soon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJohn Constable: A Portrait Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn ideal husband Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShakespeare's Book: The Story Behind the First Folio and the Making of Shakespeare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEdith Wharton in France Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Travels of Benjamin Zuskin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNarcissus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn Dog Years I'm Dead: Growing Old (Dis)Gracefully Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5A Dreary Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Theatre Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Souls of Others Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Shylock Is Shakespeare Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cruise of the Little Dipper, and Other Fairy Tales Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Diaries of Adam and Eve Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In Praise of Folly by Erasmus (Book Analysis): Detailed Summary, Analysis and Reading Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Betrothed Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMontaigne: Complete Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Hazard of New Fortunes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWartime Kiss: Visions of the Moment in the 1940s Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBecause the Future Matters: Let's Stop Letting Modern Economics and Our Energy Addiction Ruin Almost Everything! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for The Drama
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Drama - Henry Irving
The Project Gutenberg eBook, The Drama, by Henry Irving
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: The Drama
Author: Henry Irving
Release Date: September 17, 2004 [eBook #13483]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DRAMA***
E-text prepared by Jonathan Ingram, Lisa Reigel,
and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team
THE DRAMA
Addresses by
HENRY IRVING
WITH A FRONTISPIECE BY WHISTLER
CONTENTS
The Stage as it is
The Art of Acting
I. The Occasion
II. The Art of Acting
III. Practice of the Art
IV. The Rewards of the Art
Four Great Actors
The Art of Acting
LECTURE
SESSIONAL OPENING
PHILOSOPHICAL INSTITUTION
EDINBURGH
8 NOVEMBER 1881
THE STAGE AS IT IS.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN,
You will not be surprised that, on this interesting occasion, I have selected as the subject of the few remarks I propose to offer you, The Stage as it is.
The stage—because to my profession I owe it that I am here, and every dictate of taste and of fidelity impels me to honor it; the stage as it is—because it is very cheap and empty honor that is paid to the drama in the abstract, and withheld from the theatre as a working institution in our midst. Fortunately there is less of this than there used to be. It arose partly from intellectual superciliousness, partly from timidity as to moral contamination. To boast of being able to appreciate Shakespeare more in reading him than in seeing him acted used to be a common method of affecting special intellectuality. I hope this delusion—a gross and pitiful one as to most of us—has almost absolutely died out. It certainly conferred a very cheap badge of superiority on those who entertained it. It seemed to each of them an inexpensive opportunity of worshipping himself on a pedestal. But what did it amount to? It was little more than a conceited and feather-headed assumption that an unprepared reader, whose mind is usually full of far other things, will see on the instant all that has been developed in hundreds of years by the members of a studious and enthusiastic profession. My own conviction is, that there are few characters or passages of our great dramatists which will not repay original study. But at least we must recognize the vast advantages with which a practised actor, impregnated by the associations of his life, and by study—with all the practical and critical skill of his profession up to the date at which he appears, whether he adopts or rejects tradition—addresses himself to the interpretation of any great character, even if he have no originality whatever. There is something still more than this, however, in acting. Every one who has the smallest histrionic gift has a natural dramatic fertility; so that as soon as he knows the author's text, and obtains self-possession, and feels at home in a part without being too familiar with it, the mere automatic action of rehearsing and playing it at once begins to place the author in new lights, and to give the personage being played an individuality partly independent of, and yet consistent with, and rendering more powerfully visible, the dramatist's conception. It is the vast power a good actor has in this way which has led the French to speak of creating a part when they mean its being first played; and French authors are so conscious of the extent and value of this co-operation of actors with them, that they have never objected to the phrase, but, on the contrary, are uniformly lavish in their homage to the artists who have created on the boards the parts which they themselves have created on paper.
I must add, as an additional reason for valuing the theatre, that while there is only one Shakespeare, and while there are comparatively few dramatists who are sufficiently classic to be read with close attention, there is a great deal of average dramatic work excellently suited for representation. From this the public derive pleasure. From this they receive—as from fiction in literature—a great deal of instruction and mental stimulus. Some may be worldly, some social, some cynical, some merely humorous and witty, but a great deal of it, though its literary merit is secondary, is well qualified to bring out all that is most fruitful of good in common sympathies. Now, it is plain that if, because Shakespeare is good reading, people were to give the cold shoulder to the theatre, the world would lose all the vast advantage which comes to it through the dramatic faculty in forms not rising to essentially literary excellence. As respects the other feeling which used to stand more than it does now in the way of the theatre—the fear of moral contamination—it is due to the theatre of our day, on the one hand, and to the prejudices of our grandfathers on the other, to confess that the theatre of fifty years ago or less did need reforming in the audience part of the house. All who have read the old controversy as to the morality of going to the theatre are familiar with the objection to which I refer. But the theatre of fifty years ago or less was reformed. If there are any, therefore, as I fear there are a few, who still talk on this point in the old vein, let them rub their eyes a bit, and do us the justice to consider not what used to be, but what is. But may there be moral contamination from what is performed on the stage? Well, there may be. But so there is from books. So there may be at lawn tennis clubs. So there may be at dances. So there may be in connection with everything in civilized life and society. But do we therefore bury ourselves? The anchorites secluded themselves in hermitages. The Puritans isolated themselves in consistent abstinence from everything that anybody else did. And there are people now who think that they can keep their children, and that those children will keep themselves in after life, in cotton wool, so as to avoid all temptation of body and mind, and be saved nine-tenths of the responsibility of self-control. All this is mere phantasy. You must be in the world, though you need not be of it; and the best way to make the world a better community to be in, and not so bad a place to be of, is not to shun, but to bring public opinion to bear upon its pursuits and its relaxations. Depend upon two things—that the theatre, as a whole, is never below the average moral sense of the time; and that the inevitable demand for an admixture, at least, of wholesome sentiment in every sort of dramatic production brings the ruling tone of the theatre, whatever drawback may exist, up to the highest level at which the general morality of the time can truly be registered. We may be encouraged by the reflection that this is truer than ever it was before, owing to the greater spread of education, the increased community of taste between classes, and the almost absolute divorce of the stage from mere wealth and aristocracy. Wealth and aristocracy come around the stage in abundance, and are welcome, as in the time of Elizabeth; but the stage is no longer a mere appendage of court-life, no longer a mere mirror of patrician vice hanging at the girdle of fashionable profligacy as it was in the days of Congreve and Wycherley. It is now the property of the educated people. It has to satisfy them or pine in neglect And the better their demands the better will be the supply with which the drama will respond. This being not only so, but seen to be so, the stage is no longer proscribed. It is no longer under a ban. Its members are no longer pariahs in society. They live and bear their social part like others—as decorously observant of all that makes the sweet sanctities of life—as gracefully cognizant of its amenities—as readily recognized and welcomed as the members of any other profession. Am I not here your grateful guest, opening the session of this philosophical and historic institution? I who am simply an actor, an interpreter, with such gifts as I have, and such thought as I can bestow, of stage plays. And am I not received here with perfect cordiality on an equality, not hungrily bowing and smirking for patronage, but interchanging ideas which I am glad to express, and which you listen to as thoughtfully and as kindly as you would to those of any other student, any other man who had won his way into such prominence as to come under the ken of a distinguished institution such as that which I have the honor to address? I do not mince the matter as to my personal position here, because I feel it is a representative one, and marks an epoch in the estimation in which the art I