The Federalist Regained
()
About this ebook
An American writer offers a riposte to Alexander Hamilton and a fresh interpretation of the Bill of Rights.
Author's note: As of 18 July 2012, I have slightly modified this piece to emphasize the view that corporations cannot be considered citizens and therefore should not be able to claim constitutional protections (under the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment's due-process and equal-protection clauses) clearly intended for citizens, i.e. human individuals. The test, I believe, should be whether you can vote. If you can vote (or have a realistic prospect of being able to vote at some point, i.e. when you turn 18 or pass a citizenship test) then those protections apply to you. If not, they don't. Pretty straightforward. Are you following along at home, you justices of the U.S. Supreme Court?
Paul Reidinger
Paul Reidinger is the author of several novels, including The Best Man, Good Boys, The City Kid, and The Bad American. His other books include a memoir, Lions in the Garden, a collection of essays and criticism Patchwork, and The Federalist Regained, an essay on the Constitution. He grew up in Wisconsin, was educated at Stanford University and the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and lives in San Francisco.
Read more from Paul Reidinger
Good Boys Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The City Kid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best Man Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Better Read: A General Theory of Democracy, Literacy and Participation in America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeft at the Bay of Pigs and Other Sorrows: The Roots and Branches of the Kennedy Assassination Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHipsters of the Civil War: Essays in American History and Culture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDouble Jeopardy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerican Empty: Nine Lamentations for the Republic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Winceworthys Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Agony and the Irony: Reflections and Speculations on the Christian Conundrum Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAutumnal, Eternal: A Reminiscence of Four Northern California Painters, 1992-2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPatchwork: Essays and Criticism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Varieties of Erotic Experience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Roujet Symphony: An American Revelation in Four Movements Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Varieties of Erotic Experience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bad American Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLions in the Garden: A Canine Meditation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Federalist Regained
Related ebooks
Death Grip: Loosening the Law's Stranglehold over Economic Liberty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWas Frankenstein Really Uncle Sam? Vol Ix: Notes on the State of the Declaration of Independence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Death of the Rule of Law: A Companion Guide to Guilty at Gunpoint Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Alert Citizen - Analyzing the Issues Within the Patriot Act Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Government 9-1-1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The American Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow the Bill of Rights and a Lack of Virtue are Destroying America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTaking the Constitution Away from the Courts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What Prohibition Has Done to America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGrassroots Tyranny: The Limits of Federalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnderstanding the Rights of the Accused Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCorrupted by Power: The Supreme Court and the Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe U.S. Constitution and Related Documents Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Government in the United States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Peril: The Life and Death Struggle for Our Constitution and Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBen Franklin's Web Site Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Sustaining Liberty: And Reclaiming Limited Government in America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReconstructing the National Bank Controversy: Politics and Law in the Early American Republic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom of Association Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Delegates of 1849: Life Stories of the Originators of California's Reputation as a Bold and Independent State Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSave Tax Dollars: Reduce Costs; Merge and Organize Governments Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Handbook of Natural Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConsent of the Governed: The People's Guide to Holding Government Accountable Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Knight's Code Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLand of Oppression Instead of Land of Opportunity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Politics For You
Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unhumans: The Secret History of Communist Revolutions (and How to Crush Them) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on the U.S.-Israeli War on the Palestinians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ever Wonder Why?: And Other Controversial Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Humanity Archive: Recovering the Soul of Black History from a Whitewashed American Myth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for The Federalist Regained
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Federalist Regained - Paul Reidinger
The Federalist Regained
By Paul Reidinger
Published by Paul Reidinger at Smashwords
copyright 2012 by Paul Reidinger
Cover art: Patriotic Gesture,
oil on canvas, copyright ©2000 by Jack Freeman. Used by permission.
We hold these truths to be self-evident ... .
--Thomas Jefferson, The Declaration of Independence
Table of Contents
Introduction
Mr. Tax
The Great American Question: Why?
The Bill of Rights Tells a Story
What Happened?
An American Reformation
Introduction
The subject of this essay is what I call the idea of the Bill of Rights. In what follows, I argue for a fresh reading of the Bill on the ground that the document as a whole – as a bill – has not been properly understood, despite (or is that because of?) several centuries of pronouncements about it by the U.S. Supreme Court and other agents of the judicial and legal elites. My discussion touches on aspects of American history, law and politics, but at its heart it is psychological.
Some might regard as, shall we say, rather bold my claim that the Bill has long been misunderstood by generation after generation of legal minds and legal academics. Maybe so. But boldness is one of life’s important spices, and I do believe that my reading is supported by what law students know as the plain meaning rule,
i.e. the acknowledgement of the obvious and natural meaning of the language in a piece of legal writing.
Even legal writing can have obvious and natural meanings. We forget this. The Bill of Rights might have been drafted by lawyers, but it wasn’t drafted for lawyers. It was meant to be read and understood by the citizenry, by people with no special training in law or legalese who nonetheless were expected to participate in the country’s civic life and to govern themselves. This is the most basic assumption in American life. This is the essence of the experiment. The first three words of the Constitution itself are We the people.
In that same spirit, this essay is not pitched to and for legal elites but for the laity, the public at large, the people.
The idea that an important document of government, though drawn up by lawyers, was meant to be accessible to ordinary citizens must seem almost naive to us latter-day folk. Lawyers in our time are generally obscurantists who use the peculiar language of their profession, Latin-heavy and crowded with awkward nouns, to cloud, confuse and distract. Legalese is meant to, and does, exclude.
It is perhaps the greatest misfortune to befall the Bill of Rights that it ended up in the possessive hands of lawyers, who argue endlessly among themselves about its meaning and application while seldom troubling to speak plainly to the lay public about what’s going on.
Such a pattern becomes self-perpetuating. As the discussion about the Bill has grown more elaborately arcane over time and as its phrasings have been crusted over by layer after layer of opaque language in judicial opinions, like soot building up in a chimney, the gulf between the controlling elite and the great mass of the people has widened. The result is that the people have become estranged from a meaningful understanding of and relationship with the document whose plain and central purpose, in my view, was to protect their right to participate in the country’s political life and, beyond that, ensure that the people remain the ultimate source of political legitimacy in our system.
I have not concerned myself with what various constitutional interpreters, mainly judges and academics, have had to say about the charter down the years. Whole careers can and have been made in arguing points of constitutional minutiae. I have not been concerned with what those first disputants, the Framers themselves, said and thought about their work, and, as I explain later, I have particularly not been concerned with that bible of undergraduate political-science courses, The Federalist.
I have been interested, instead, in the language of the document itself. Law students know this approach as the four corners
rule, which teaches that the meaning of a legal document is contained within the four corners of the document. Everything else, from media interviews given by the drafters of the document to material in the legislative record, is ephemera and effluvia – what we call spin.
Spin is irrelevant here. The document – the Bill of Rights, in this case – is assumed to be self-explanatory. This piece is