Conventions of Literal Writing
()
About this ebook
This book is designed for use in English composition courses. It focuses on the generally accepted practices by those writers who attempt to present the unvarnished truth. Unlike the literary writer, one who writes on a literal level does not wish to suspend reality but rather to present his thoughts without literary embellishments. His central purpose is to inform and not to entertain.
I chose to title this book "Conventions of Literal Writing" and its companion book "Conventions of Literary Writing" as a sensible division of the writing genres. The course title "Creative Writing' has always left the unfortunate impression that literal writing lacks creativity. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, some of the most creative and imaginative writing is done on a literal level. One has only to look at the works of great scientists to see how creative a literal representation of reality can be. Isaac Newton and Charles Darwin and Albert Einstein, to name only a few, had no interest in word play or in spinning fantasies; yet their creative ideas revolutionized our understanding of the nature of reality.
In this book, I have covered many widely accepted rules of literal writing. These conventions have been developed over the history of writing and publishing, and they are certainly not carved in stone. E-publishing, for example, is currently requiring a considerable revision in the way that author's present their work. Due to the nature of the medium, an e-book can never look just like a printed version of the same book
The writing assignments cover a variety of sub-categories: diaries, letters, reports, essays, etc. They are all structured in terms of the writing process. I provide students with a model of the paper that they are being asked to write and a series of questions to use in analyzing that model. Then I present the assignment along with somewhat detailed instructions as to how to write their own paper. Even though the last phases of the writing process are repetitive, I tag them on to each assignment as I wish to emphasize the importance of this methodical approach. Of particular importance, I require students to make their work semi-public by asking their parents and their friends to review and to react to their papers. There is nothing more important for a writer than to seek and to receive feedback from an audience.
The lessons in the book ask students review the practices and concepts that were presented in two companion books in this series: "Conventions of (American) English" and "Conventions of Thinking." The first book deals with linguistics. The central thrust of the second book is revealed in its sub-title: "An Introduction to Critical Thinking." Becoming a proficient writer requires above all that he become an effective thinker. If a writer's compositions are to achieve acclaim (or even an A+), they must be unified, coherent, original, believable, and significant. If their works follows generally accepted language standards, the readers are less likely to be distracted and annoyed by errors in spelling and grammar and usage.
Douglas Patterson
With the exception of a three year stint in the U.S.Army, I have spent my life in and around the public schools. My parents were both teachers, and I have taught language arts courses at the high school level for a total of 37 years. I was born during the great depressions and grew up in Southern Idaho (both literally and figuratively) just north of Poverty Flat. I lived in the very small town of Bellevue, Idaho, that had a population of some 500 people and an equal number of dogs. In this rural environment, I enjoyed a Tom Sawyer like life, not on the Mississippi but rather on the Woodriver where my friends and I fished an swam and roamed the riverbottom and the surrounding hills from morning til night. My parents never locked the doors to our house, and we never worried much about it being burglarized. (For you skiers,Sun Valley is seventeen miles north of this town.) After graduating from Hailey(now Woodriver) High School,I enrolled at the University of Oregon at a time when the school had a student body of 5,000 students and the football team rarely won a game. After graduation, I spent a marvelous tour of duty with the U.S. Army which took me to Europe. I was stationed in Germany for a couple of glorious years and became a dedicated Europhile. After I was discharged, I started my teaching career in the small town of New Plymouth, Idaho, near the Oregon border. After three years, I moved to Yakima, Washington, where I worked as an English and German teacher for the next 34 years. After retiring,I quickly grew bored and began writing books primarily for my own amusement. Four of the books that I am publishing with Smashbooks are language arts textbooks focusing on linguistics, critical thinking, and literal and literary composition. The other two deal with self-improvment and very basic economics. Because breaking into the traditional publishing business has always been such a long shot,I was very pleased to see ebook publishing develop into a platform for people like me who are looking for an inexpensive way to offer their materials to the public. Since they say that confession is good for the sould, I must admit that my picture was taken by a yearbook photographer at least twenty-five years ago. I have no defense except to say, "Vanity thy name is not woman alone!"
Read more from Douglas Patterson
Educational Planning (Idealism Tempered in Reality's Forge) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Coping with the Human Predicament - Living an Examined, a Disciplined and a Charitable Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConventions of (American) English Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEntitlements - An Economics Primer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConventions of Thinking - An Introduction to Critical Thinking Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConventions of Literary Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Conventions of Literal Writing
Related ebooks
Fundamentals Of Good Writing - A Handbook Of Modern Rhetoric Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRhetoric of Literate Action, A: Literate Action Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConventions of Literary Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAbracadabra: Creative Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSay Something!: Writing Essays that Make the Grade Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsToolbox for Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInvention in Rhetoric and Composition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriting Like a Journalist Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5About Writing Right: About Writing Right, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTalks on Writing English. First Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntrospection and Boldness In Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriting Spelled Out Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat You Need To Know About Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPunctuation Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Art of Writing Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Get it Right: A cranky editor's no-frills easy-to-understand tips for usage, style and punctuation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriting Fiction Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Writer's Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRearticulating Writing Assessment for Teaching and Learning Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Perilous Path: A Writer's Journey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTop Ten Steps to Research Like a Pro: Top Ten Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRefiguring Prose Style: Possibilities For Writing Pedagogy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTips for Novice Fiction Writers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Last Techniques I Learned Before Selling Fiction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow To Write And Sell Short Stories: A Fiction Writing Guide For Writers: Books for Writers and Authors, #5 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNovel To Success: How to Write a Good Novel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Life in Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriters' & Artists' Guide to How to Write: How to plan, structure and write your novel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGroovy Cool Writing Techniques: Writing is Fun, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Teaching Methods & Materials For You
Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Financial Feminist: Overcome the Patriarchy's Bullsh*t to Master Your Money and Build a Life You Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jack Reacher Reading Order: The Complete Lee Child’s Reading List Of Jack Reacher Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Writing Well, 30th Anniversary Edition: An Informal Guide to Writing Nonfiction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The 5 Love Languages of Children: The Secret to Loving Children Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inside American Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dance of Anger: A Woman's Guide to Changing the Patterns of Intimate Relationships Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speed Reading: Learn to Read a 200+ Page Book in 1 Hour: Mind Hack, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Principles: Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Writing to Learn: How to Write - and Think - Clearly About Any Subject at All Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A study guide for Frank Herbert's "Dune" Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in the Age of the Quick Fix (10th Anniversary, Revised Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anxious Generation - Workbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Take Smart Notes. One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Personal Finance for Beginners - A Simple Guide to Take Control of Your Financial Situation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Divided Mind: The Epidemic of Mindbody Disorders Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of Making Friends: Helping Socially Challenged Teens and Young Adults Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Learn French - Parallel Text - Easy Stories (English - French) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Conventions of Literal Writing
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Conventions of Literal Writing - Douglas Patterson
Conventions of Literal Writing
By Douglas D. Patterson
Copyright 2011 by Douglas D. Patterson
Smashwords Edition
This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return it to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.
Table of Contents
(automatic)
Introduction
Part I – Literal Conventions
Lesson 1 - Point of View
Lesson 2 – Language
Lesson 3 – Description
Lesson 4 – Reasoning
Lesson 5 – Quotation
Lesson 6 – Organizational Patterns
Lesson 7 – The Writing Process
Part 2 – Publication (Books and Term Papers)
Lesson 8 – Printing Technology
Lesson 9 – Bindings and Preliminary Pages
Lesson 10 – The Text
Lesson 11 – Back Matter
Part 3 – Models and Assignments
Section A – Personal Compositions
Private Composition 1 – Dear Diary
Private Composition 2 – Personal Letters
Private Composition 3 – Journal
Section B – Personal Business Letters
Letter 1 - Inquiry
Letter 2 - Redress
Letter 3 - Application and Resume’
Section C - Literal Reports
Report 1- Personal Narrative
Report 2 - News
Report 3 - Speech
Report 4 - Interview
Report 5 - Survey
Report 6 – Scientific Study
Report 7 - History
Report 8 – Prediction
Second D – Literal Commentaries
Commentary 1 – Personal Essay
Commentary 2 – Biography
Commentary 3 – Literary Criticism
Commentary 4 – Moral Debate
Commentary 5 – Prediction
Commentary 6 – Scientific Debate
Commentary 7 – Social Scientific Debate
Commentary 8 – Lessons of History
Commentary 9 – Instructions
Commentary 10 – Informal Policy Argument
Introduction
Literal writing serves much more mundane purposes than literary writing does. Generally, a writer of literal material wishes to communicate information, to give instructions, to convince his reader of a thesis, or to advance a political cause.
An effective writer expresses himself with clarity but, unlike the poet, he does not agonize over rhetoric. He pays less attention to rhythms and rhymes and the melody lines of his sentences than the poet does, and he uses relatively few rhetorical figures.
Above all, of course, the literal writer deals with real world subjects. He does not create imaginary characters and events and settings. He does not personify animals or breathe life into the inanimate world.
He focuses instead on real people and real events in a real world, and he does his best to show them as they actually exist. The journalist tells his readers about the events of the day. The historian attempts to describe and to interpret the historical past. The scientist explores cause/effect relationships and attempts to describe immutable principles of the universe. The businessman writes letters in which he discusses the ins and outs of his financial transactions.
Writing on a literal level is not as easy as it may sound. One reason is that we often have difficulty disciplining our emotions and our imaginations. Drawing a clear line between thoughts which reflect reality and those that are figments of our imaginations is difficult at best. We are also never totally successful in viewing the world through lenses unclouded by emotion. One who sets out to reflect the unvarnished truth can never succeed entirely; but unlike the literary writer who revels in emotion and flights of fancy, the literal writer holds his emotions and his imagination in check, and he focuses his attention more fully on the world as it actually exists than the literary writer does.
This textbook follows a lead expressed by English philosopher and diplomat Francis Bacon in his brief essay titled On Studies.
Reading maketh a full man; conference a ready man; and writing an exact man. - Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
If you have ever sat staring at an empty page, your problem may be that you have not adequately studied the subject that you are planning to write about. The best writers are people who have lived interesting lives, who are avid readers, and who converse regularly with others about topic(s) of interest. As Bacon suggests, writing about topics refines your thoughts and helps you to establish exactly what you think about a subject.
Furthermore, most successful writers focus on a particular field of interest: sports, science, business, the arts, etc. They steep themselves in the knowledge and the lore of their chosen field so that they become authorities in that area. The more they study their chosen field, the less likely they are to spend much time staring at blank pieces of paper.
Back to Table of Contents
(automatic)
Part 1 – Literal Conventions
The literal writer approaches composition in a fundamentally different way from that of the literary writer. He tends to avoid rather than employ those conventions of writing which give works a literary flair. Instead he disciplines his perceptions, his thoughts, and his emotions in an effort to communicate information, conclusions and imperatives unambiguously.
Students often tend to view literal writing with disdain because it inhibits their creativity. Schools have institutionalized this attitude by naming literary writing courses Creative Writing.
Actually, some of the most creative communication of all is done on the literal level. Scientists and journalists and businessmen and engineers and historians and other professionals have improved our understanding of the world in which we live and have raised our standard of living in this country to a very high level. They could not have accomplished what they have done, had they been unable to communicate information and ideas and directions in accurate and understandable and creative ways.
Examples of highly influential compositions that take a largely literal approach are many and varied. Here are some prominent ones, some of which we will read as models in the lessons that follow. (These books are listed along with the URLs where they may be downloaded at no cost.)
(Hyperlinks are automatic.)
The Histories by Tacitus
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/16927.
Voyage of the Beagle by Charles Darwin
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3704
Decline and fall of the Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/731
An Essay on the Principle of Population by Thomas Malthus
http://www.esp.org/books/malthus/population/malthus.pdf
The Social Contract by Jon Jacques Rousseau
http://www.constitution.org/jjr/socon.htm
The Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson
http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/doi/text.html
Self Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson
http://www.bartleby.com/5/104.html
Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau
http://www.transcendentalists.com/civil_disobedience.htm
The Second Inaugural Address by President Abraham Lincoln
http://showcase.netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/inaug2.htm
The field of literal writing is so vast and so varied that a small selection such as this cannot be held forth as a representative sample of the entire field. Works such as these are, however, the stuff on which an educated mind nourishes itself.
Writers who can communicate in simple, clearly understood literal language are essential members of the business and the engineering and the scientific and social scientific communities whose concerns are more practical than aesthetic. While literary writing may appeal more to the young writer, his chances of making a living in this much broader field are greater.
Back to Table of Contents
(automatic)
Lesson 1 - Point of View
Literal writers employ much more restricted points of view than literary authors do; but they need not be as restricted as one might think.
Person
First
There is a generally accepted assumption that one loses objectivity when he refers to himself. One of the cannons of journalism is, of course, that a reporter must avoid personalizing his reports by using the pronouns "I" or "we."
While it is true that personalizing experience may tend to warp our perceptions, a reporter who is writing about an event in which he was involved sounds curiously stilted when he refers to himself as this reporter. Scientists and engineers and other people who talk about projects in which they were deeply involved sometimes struggle with this rhetorical straightjacket as well.
Albert Einstein was certainly justified in referring to himself in the first person when talking about his theory of relativity. The rest of us, however, should probably discuss his theory in the third person. To do otherwise might be considered hubris.
Writing in the third person when the first person would be more natural actually does far less to insure objectivity and to guarantee accuracy than other factors do.
Third
Literal writers generally write in the 3rd person, and they are right in distancing themselves from their subjects.
Journalists tell stories; but if they are true to their craft, they recognize that they are seldom part of the story. The reporter’s job is to describe what happened in the affairs of the community. He is generally an observer and not a participant in the events.
Scientists try to avoid becoming ego involved in their research - often without complete success. When a man’s fame and fortune depends on the outcome of an experiment, it may be challenging for him not to take things personally. Thinking and speaking and writing of his work in the third person may aid in that effort; but this rhetorical approach by no means eliminates all personal bias.
The laws of nature are immutable, and they do not bend to the needs of an individual scientist for professional advancement or fame. Scientists, all too often, invest vast energy and many years in projects, only to find that their hypotheses were invalid. Who would not be disappointed when he feels the golden ring slipping from his fingers?
In the end a scientist who does not take other more effective measures for insuring objectivity and balance in his work fools no one by expressing himself from an impersonal point of view. Generally speaking, however, convention requires that he distance himself rhetorically from his subject.
Emotional Control
Literal writer expresses themselves with reserve. They tend not to display love or hatred or fear or any of the other emotions that literary authors are fond of expressing. A literal writer chooses his words more to communicate information than to evoke strong emotional responses in his readers.
At the same time, we humans can never remain totally neutral emotionally. The left and the right lobes of our brains are connected, and they interact constantly. In fact, there is good reason to believe that a healthy interaction of intellect and emotion is essential to sound thought; but we should never allow our right lobe to overpower the left one.
The literal writer certainly wishes to move his reader; but he prefers not to overwhelm him emotionally.
Objectivity
The literal writer, since he is attempting to deal with reality, does not allow his imagination free reign. He describes real people and real events and not fictional characters involved in contrived plots.
Above all he does not invoke the literary writer's powers of omniscience and omnipresence. He does not hold himself forward as an always present, all seeing, all knowing observer. Unlike the literary writer, he reports only what his subjects look like, what they say, and what they do. He does not report their perceptions or thoughts or feelings.
He also does not follow people through time and space and report everything that has ever happened to them. Instead, he works in the much more restricted world of human perception, thought, and understanding. His frame of reference is the real and not an imaginary world.
It is difficult - if not impossible - to draw a sharp line between a literary and a literal point of view, but in an effort to communicate with real people about real events, the writer of literal prose must learn to recognize and to control his emotions and his most flamboyant flights of fancy.
Assignment 1
Select a short story written in the third person. The Outcasts of Poker Flat
by Bret Harte would be a good choice. http://www.online-literature.com/bret-harte/1688/) Examine the point of view from which the story is written. Then look for a report of such an event in your local newspaper and examine how the journalist has reported what happened. Compare and contrast the ways in which the journalist’s treatment differs from that of the short story writer. Using the events described in the short story, write a journalistic report of the same events - for publication, perhaps, in the Poker Flat Gazette.
Assignment 2
Select a short story in which the author describes the events from an omniscient point of view. A Piece of String
by the Guy de Maupassant might be a good choice. You will find it at this URL: http://www.eastoftheweb.com/short-stories/UBooks/PiecStri.shtml Rewrite a portion of this story on a more objective level. Report the events without weaving them into a dramatic a plot? Avoid reporting the perceptions the thoughts and the feelings of the characters. What impact do these restrictions on the point of view have on the way that a reader experiences the story?
Assignment 3
Find an article which describes a scientific study. A good place to look might be The Scientific American. Read the article and analyze the commentator's point of view. Did he write in the first or the third person?
Did he express himself with emotional reserve? Did he report only those events which were observable to the naked eye – aided perhaps by telescopes or microscopes? Did he employ figurative language or other conventions of imaginative literature? Did he describe in detail the procedures that he followed in conducting his research and in drawing his conclusions? Explain your evaluations!
Back to Table of Contents
(automatic)
Lesson 2 – Language
A writer of literal material is more interested in communicating useful information and conclusions than he is in writing immortal verse or gripping stories. As a result, he is more business-like than the literary writer in the way that he approaches his task.
As Lawrence Perrine puts it (perhaps a bit too universally) in his textbook Sound and Sense, the literal writer focuses primarily on the intellectual dimension of language, whereas the literary writer is intensely interested in the sensuous, the emotional and the imaginative dimensions as well.
Appeals to the Intellect
We can, of course, never disconnect our intellect from our sensory experiences and our emotions and our imaginations; but the literal writer, as Mr. Perrine suggests, does place greater emphasis on the intellectual than on the other three dimensions of language.
Since he is trying to communicate real life experiences and information and ideas, a literal writer focuses less on the art of writing than poet does. He uses figures of speech less frequently, he is less concerned with rhythms and rhymes and other musical values, and he engages less freely in flights of fancy.
Like the literary writer, a composer of prose is often concerned with depicting experiences, but he is more likely to focus on actual rather than imaginary happenings. He also restricts his compositions to observable events and does not report the perceptions, the thoughts and the feelings of others.
The literal writer employs certain language resources much more fully than the literary writer does. Whereas poets and story writers communicate only rarely using numbers and mathematical concepts, writers