Wrong Side of the Law: True Stories of Crime
By Edward Butts
4/5
()
About this ebook
Bestselling true crime author Edward Butts presents a rogues’ gallery of desperadoes whose crimes range from robbery to murder.
English bank robbers on the run turn up in Newfoundland. A legendary Nova Scotia detective matches wits with smugglers. In the West the Mounties track down bandits and rustlers. Vancouver police officers hunt down the bank-robbing Hyslop Gang in the 1930s. A decade later the Polka Dot Gang rampages across Southern Ontario. The Newton Brothers’ Gang, outlaws from Texas, engage in a gunfight with bank guards on the streets of Toronto, and a former Canadian Pacific Railway engineer masterminds a sensational kidnapping in Colorado.
No matter where the atrocities were committed and no matter what the circumstances, these individuals all had one thing in common: they lived on the wrong side of the law.
Edward Butts
Edward Butts is the author of numerous books, including Murder, Line of Fire, Running With Dillinger, True Canadian Unsolved Mysteries, and The Desperate Ones, which was nominated for the Arthur Ellis Award. He lives in Guelph, Ontario.
Read more from Edward Butts
Murder: Twelve True Stories of Homicide in Canada Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Desperate Ones: Forgotten Canadian Outlaws Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGhost Stories of Newfoundland and Labrador Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sheridan Nurseries: One Hundred Years of People, Plans, and Plants Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Running With Dillinger: The Story of Red Hamilton and Other Forgotten Canadian Outlaws Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Line of Fire: Heroism, Tragedy, and Canada's Police Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHenry Hudson: New World Voyager Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Wrong Side of the Law
Related ebooks
Wicked Western Slope: Mayhem, Michief & Murder in Colorado Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWicked Ridgefield, Connecticut Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJack the Ripper Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Willis Newton: The Last Texas Outlaw Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNotorious Murders of the Twentieth Century: Famous and Forgotten British Cases Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrue Crime: New Jersey: The State's Most Notorious Criminal Cases Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEvil Families: A History of Bad Blood Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFatal Intentions: True Canadian Crime Stories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMurder & Mayhem in Central Washington Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Maritime Murder: Deadly Crimes from the Buried Past Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bad Henry: The Murderous Rampage of ‘The Taco Bell Strangler' Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Midnight to Guntown: True Crime Stories from a Federal Prosecutor in Mississippi Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Crime and Punishment in Upper Canada: A Researcher's Guide Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mountain Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMurders, Mysteries and History of Crawford County, Pennsylvania 1800 – 1956 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrue Crime: Virginia: The State's Most Notorious Criminal Cases Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Grim Almanac of the Black Country Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wicked Terre Haute Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Murder in Linn County, Oregon: The True Story of the Legendary Plainview Killings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Kneeling Corpse Murders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrue Murder Mysteries of Southwestern Pennsylvania Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShipwrecks and Sailors of Prince Edward Island Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe McGlincy Killings in Campbell, California: An 1896 Unsolved Mystery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMurderess on the Loose: The 1922 Hammer Wrath of Clara Phillips (A Historical True Crime Short) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReturn to Guntown: Classic Trials of the Outlaws and Rogues of Faulkner Country Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Duchess of Palms: A Memoir Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJack the Ripper's Secret Confession: The Hidden Testimony of Britain's First Serial Killer Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Blue Puttee at War: The Memoir of Captain Sydney Frost, MC Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Selling Sex in Utah: A History of Vice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Con Artists & Hoaxes For You
My Friend Anna: The True Story of a Fake Heiress Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Go Down Together: The True, Untold Story of Bonnie and Clyde Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bitter Blood: A True Story of Southern Family Pride, Madness, and Multiple Murder Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Real Lolita: A Lost Girl, an Unthinkable Crime, and a Scandalous Masterpiece Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5After Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cults: Inside the World's Most Notorious Groups and Understanding the People Who Joined Them Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Get Rich or Lie Trying: Ambition and Deceit in the New Influencer Economy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEpstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Spy in Plain Sight: The Inside Story of the FBI and Robert Hanssen—America's Most Damaging Russian Spy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Billion Dollar Whale: the bestselling investigation into the financial fraud of the century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Playing Dead: A Journey Through the World of Death Fraud Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Practice to Deceive Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Son of Seven Mothers: A True Story by a 'Cult Survivor' Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hit List: An In-Depth Investigation into the Mysterious Deaths of Witnesses to the JFK Assassination Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5American Cults: Cabals, Corruption, and Charismatic Leaders Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Love Lies: A True Story of Marriage and Murder in the Suburbs Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Serial Killers Volume 1: 6 Horrific Serial Killers’ True Crime Stories: Six Bloody Fantasies, #1 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5100 Hoaxes & Mistakes That Fooled Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Manhattan Cult Story: My Unbelievable True Story of Sex, Crimes, Chaos, and Survival Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Deal with the Devil: The Dark and Twisted True Story of One of the Biggest Cons in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Madoff Talks: Uncovering the Untold Story Behind the Most Notorious Ponzi Scheme in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Digging Up Devils: The Search for a Satanic Murder Cult in Rural Ohio Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mailbox Conspiracy: The Inside Story of the Greatest Corruption Case in Hawai'i History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFatal Friends, Deadly Neighbors: Ann Rule's Crime Files Volume 16 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Wrong Side of the Law
2 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Wrong Side of the Law - Edward Butts
Library.
Introduction
Living on the wrong side of the law has never been an enviable existence. Those who have experienced it have often been among the first to warn juvenile offenders against falling into the trap of lawlessness — advice that they themselves failed to heed in their youth. Life on the run can certainly have moments of adrenaline-pumping excitement, but one can get the same thing from any number of legitimate challenges, from bungee-jumping to working as a professional in search-and-rescue operations.
There is nothing glamorous about being a fugitive from the law, no matter how much Hollywood romanticizes it. The highly successful organized-crime boss with a fine house and an offshore account full of tainted money is in many ways no different from the two-bit burglar who resides in cheap rooms and lives from one robbery to the next. Both live in fear of making a mistake, of being betrayed, or of any unforeseen clue that will bring the police to their door.
Of course, there is always the threat of punishment. In colonial Canada that could mean flogging, imprisonment, or being hanged and then having your body gibbeted as a warning to others. Over the years the more barbaric punishments were discarded as unfit for a civilized and enlightened nation. It was also obvious that they were ineffective as deterrents to crime.
Some people who live on the wrong side of the law are drawn by the prospect of easy money.
Like career criminal Micky McArthur, they might think that working is for fools. Or, like the outlaw Newton brothers, they might have seen how years of honest toil got their families and neighbours nowhere, and decided that armed robbery would be an acceptable method not only of survival, but also of financial success. As the Newtons put it, robbery was their business.
Such criminals don’t fear punishment because they don’t expect to get caught. They believe they are smart enough to always stay one jump ahead of the police.
Other people, like Sydney Lass, wander over to the wrong side of the law while they are still very young and never find their way back. Lass spent more time in prison than he did out of it and never learned to be anything but a thief. For Lass and many others like him, jail becomes an occupational hazard — part of the game. Harsh sentences meted out only to only punish do nothing to help them change their ways. If anything, they turn out criminals who are only more bitter and all the more seasoned in the cynicism of underworld life. Short-sighted get tough
policies of populist law and order
governments fill jails, but history has shown that they don’t do a thing to address the social problems that are at the root of crime.
This doesn’t mean that the criminal is absolved of all responsibility. No matter how dire an individual’s circumstances, it still comes down to a matter of choices. Verne Sankey could have pursued an honest career as an engineer for the CPR. He chose the wrong side of the law and became a bootlegger, bank robber, and kidnapper. The Newton boys in the 1920s, and Micky McArthur in the 1970s said that they only wanted money and didn’t intend to hurt anybody. We wasn’t thugs,
said Willis Newton. But the Newtons didn’t hesitate to shoot bank messengers during a holdup in downtown Toronto. McArthur was responsible for the shooting of four police officers. When a person uses a weapon to commit robbery, that person is a thug, whether or not physical harm is done to other people. The potential for extreme violence is always at hand, and tragedy can be but a heartbeat away, for those who live on the wrong side of the law.
Chapter 1
Newfoundland Desperadoes:
A Rogues’ Gallery
The recorded history of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador is the oldest of any part of Canada, predating even the earliest documented use of the word Canada . Lawlessness on the island of Newfoundland began early in the seventeenth century, when it was a base for pirates like Peter Easton and Henry Mainwaring. Later, the interior became a haven for the outlawed Masterless Men, escaped indentured servants and Royal Navy deserters who sought freedom in the wild.
Throughout their long colonial period, Newfoundlanders were subject to the same harsh laws as the common people of Britain. In the earliest years, the usual punishment for theft was hanging. It didn’t matter if the culprit had stolen a few shillings or a cow. In time, the number of crimes punishable by death was reduced, but penalties were still severe. They included whipping, branding with a hot iron, banishment, and the confiscation of property.
In 1777, for example, Lawrence Hallohan was hanged for forging a bill for eight pounds. That same year, Lawrence Dalton followed him to the gallows for forging bills for twenty shillings and seventeen shillings. However, when Patrick Knowlan was convicted of stealing an item valued at ten pence, he wasn’t sentenced to hang. Instead, he had a halter put around his neck and was dragged to whipping posts set up at various locations in St. John’s where he was given a total of sixty lashes on his back by the common whipper.
He forfeited all of his goods and property, was obliged to pay the court costs, and then was banished from the colony forever. If he returned to Newfoundland, he would be imprisoned and subjected to sixty lashes every Monday until passage on a ship could be found for him.
Offences such as public drunkenness, disorderly conduct, or sticking your tongue out at your employer could result in lashes or a day locked in the stocks, where you were an object of ridicule and the target for all the manure and other filth passersby wanted to throw at you. Most of the individuals subjected to these harsh punishments could hardly be considered hardened criminals. The existence of such measures is far more telling of the legal system that applied them than of the unfortunates who received them. Nonetheless, old time Newfoundland did have its share of ne’er-do-wells who were willing to risk everything for personal gain, and so slipped over to the wrong side of the law.
Downing and Malone
In 1832, Patrick Downing and Patrick Malone were working on the farm of Robert Crocker Bray at Harbour Grace. As they bent their backs to raising stumps with crowbars, Malone allegedly told Downing that following the recent fire that had destroyed much of Harbour Grace, he had carried a bag into Bray’s house. That bag, he said, had been buried to protect it from the fire because it contained money. Forty or fifty pounds! That was more money than either of them had ever seen. Malone said he slept in a room next to the one in which Bray kept the money bag, and that stealing it would be easy. Downing had no qualms about robbing Bray, but he thought the job would require four men. He wanted to bring his two brothers in on it. Malone said he didn’t trust them, and the matter was dropped for the time being.
The following spring, Malone went out on the ice for the annual seal hunt. That was a hazardous way to earn a few shillings and it had Malone thinking once again about the money in Bray’s house. He plotted with Downing, and they came up with a scheme that involved not just robbery, but murder. Malone said he had enlisted the Bray’s housemaid, Ellen Coombs, as an accomplice by promising to marry her.
One night in July 1833, Downing and Malone went into the Bray house. They killed Robert in the kitchen with two blows of a tomahawk. Mrs. Bray was out of town, but little Samuel Bray and Ellen Coombs were in an upstairs bedroom. Whether the housemaid was really involved in the plot would never be known, because she and the child were both hacked to death.
The murderers ransacked the house, but found no bag of money. They took whatever cash and valuables they could find; a total value between thirty and forty shillings. Then they started a fire in an upstairs bedroom and another one at the foot of the stairs before leaving the house.
Downing and Malone slipped off to Bear’s Cove, a little over a mile away, to hide their loot. They were certain that all evidence of the crime would be consumed by the flames. On their way back they met some men who told them the Bray house was on fire. They joined in spreading the alarm.
To the killers’ dismay, neighbours had gone into the house and put out the fires before the building could be engulfed. The butchered bodies had been found. Suspicion immediately fell on Malone, since he had been living in the house.
The Harbour Grace Magistrate, a doctor named Stirling, told Malone that if he confessed, he wouldn’t hang. In a signed statement, Malone placed the blame on Downing. He said that he had been sitting in the Bray house, rocking little Samuel, when Downing burst in and committed the murders. He admitted that he had helped hide the loot and disclosed the location. Downing was arrested, and both men were bound over for the next assize. Of course, Downing gave a different version of the crime, saying that Malone had done the killing.
The trial was held in St. John’s on January 3, 1834, and lasted nine hours. The presiding judge, Henry John Boulton, wouldn’t allow Malone’s statement to be read to the jury because it had been made after Malone had been told it would save his life. The accused men blamed each other. Boulton told the jury, I believe the confessions of the two culprits were fully much of the same tenor and character, only that each charged the other with being the actual murderer. They differed only as to which one did the bloody deed.
Amazingly, the judge also told the jury to disregard anything Downing had said against Malone, as he believed the evidence against Malone was very slight. It took the jury less than an hour to reach a verdict of guilty
for both men. Downing was condemned to death, but to the astonishment of all, Malone was sentenced to life in prison. His life may be spared,
Boulton said. He will never again be allowed to infest society with his presence.
At that time there was no process of appeal. Two days after the trial, Patrick Downing was publicly hanged on a scaffold set up on Market House Hill. According to the local press, he showed the most astonishing composure and fortitude.
The reporter also noted that, The execution was witnessed by an immense concourse of people, who behaved in the most decorous and orderly manner.
By the standards of the time, the Bray murders had been judiciously avenged. But there were some who felt that justice hadn’t been served. They believed that Malone had done the killing, and then made a spurious confession
to save his own life. By court order, Downing’s body was cut down and taken to Harbour Grace, the scene of the crime. There it was gibbeted — hung in chains — as a warning to would-be lawbreakers.
Some of Downing’s friends held Dr. Stirling responsible for a miscarriage of justice because he had illegally obtained Malone’s confession with a promise of clemency. One night, Downing’s decomposing corpse was cut down from the gibbet by persons unknown and the chains were removed. Dr. Stirling found the grisly remains on his doorstep the next morning. There was an accompanying note: "Dr. S. This is your man you were the cause of bringing him here take and bury him or Lookout should you be the cause of allowing him to be put up again we will mark you for it so Do your duty and put him out of sight. truly A friend from Carbonear. [sic]"
Dr. Stirling heeded the warning. He had the body placed in a coffin and buried in the yard of the Harbour Grace courthouse. It was never determined who really struck the blows that killed the three victims.
John Flood
Colonial Newfoundland was better known for pirates than highwaymen, but at least one Newfoundlander who lived on the wrong side of the law met his demise because of highway robbery. Today we associate the term highwayman with images of flamboyant mounted robbers like England’s Dick Turpin, romantically portrayed in verse and fiction as dashing knights of the road.
In fact most of them — including Turpin — were thugs, and they were as likely to be on foot as on horseback. Any petty holdup of a traveller on a public road was classified as highway robbery.
Because of missing documents, little is known of Newfoundland highwayman John Flood. Sometime in 1834, he robbed the stagecoach that ran between St. John’s and Portugal Cove, an important port for passenger vessels that served communities in Conception Bay. Flood stopped the coach on the Portugal Cove Road, in the vicinity of Kent’s Pond. It isn’t known if he called out the famous highwayman command, Stand and deliver!
Flood was soon arrested. On December 9, 1834, he was tried for robbery and assault, convicted, and sentenced to death. No documentation survives to confirm that the sentence was carried out. However, evidence indicates that a man who was hanged on January 12, 1835, was John Flood. The highwayman (if it was indeed he) was the last person to be publicly executed in Newfoundland.
Brady and Naughton
In January 1842, a pair of British criminals named Thomas Brady and William Naughton looted the Manchester branch of the Bank of England of nineteen thousand pounds — well over a hundred thousand dollars in today’s currency. While Scotland Yard detectives searched for them the length and breadth of Great Britain, the bandits were enjoying a luxurious Atlantic crossing on the steamer Britannia, the most famous passenger ship of the day. One of their fellow passengers was Charles Dickens. Brady and Naughton would later claim that they shared Dickens’s company at meals and took strolls around the deck with him. The truth of that is questionable, since Dickens was seasick for almost the entire voyage.
When the ship reached New York, Brady and Naughton were confident that they were beyond the long arm of British law. However, they soon learned from the newspapers that back home the police had discovered their identities and their means of escape. If they were found in New York, they’d be arrested and put on the first ship back to England.
Brady and Naughton went to the New York docks in search of a ship that would take them to any place they thought the police wouldn’t be likely to look for them. They found a vessel that was bound for Fogo, Newfoundland. Rather than pay for passage and leave a money trail, they signed aboard as deck hands.
At Fogo, Brady and Naughton helped unload the cargo. After being paid off, they took a schooner to St. John’s. Now they felt they had given Scotland Yard the slip. The colonial capital wasn’t New York, but it was still a place where a pair of crooks with a lot of money could enjoy themselves.
The bank robbers passed themselves off as debonair, well-educated gentlemen of means named Thomas Bradshaw and William O’Kelly. They were soon the toast of the small, elite social circle of St. John’s, and were invited to dine in the best homes. When they astounded listeners with the news that they had crossed the ocean with Charles Dickens, people pumped them with questions about the great man and about the fate of Little Nell, the heroine of the serialized novel, The Old Curiosity Shop.
Things were going well enough for the pair until they ran out of small currency and had to dip into the swag from the bank. They went into the Dublin Bookstore and asked the proprietor, Bernard Duffy, if he could change a one-hundred-pound note. Duffy was astonished to see a bill of such large denomination — and suspicious. He told them he didn’t have that much money on the premises. They agreed to leave the note with him, and come back after supper when he’d had time to gather up some cash.
As soon as they were gone, Duffy took the note to Bishop Michael Fleming, who sent him to the manager of the British Bank of North America. The manager had recently received some newspapers from England, and he recalled reading about the Manchester bank robbery. He sorted through the papers and found the article. It included a list of serial numbers of the stolen notes. The bill Bradshaw and O’Kelly
had given Duffy had one of those numbers. The manager immediately alerted the chief of police. The robbers were arrested in their room at Johnson’s Hotel, where the constables also found the loot.
News of the arrest swept through St. John’s. When the high society people heard it, they were shocked; not because their new friends had been exposed as criminals and imposters, but because they thought the police had made an incredible blunder. Several of them went to the jail on Signal Hill to vouch for the two and protest such undignified treatment of gentlemen.
A few days after the arrest, Brady and Naughton appeared in court for a preliminary hearing. They had hired a lawyer, John Little, who argued that a newspaper article was hardly strong enough evidence to keep them in jail. W.B. Rowe, Q.C., representing the Crown, countered that possession of a large amount of money that had been identified as stolen was indeed good enough reason for them to be held in custody, especially since they could not satisfactorily explain how they came to be travelling with such an incredible sum of money. The court ruled that the pair remain in jail until arrangements could be made to send them back to England. The editor of the St. John’s Times commented:
We are not, technically speaking, learned in the law; but we may be allowed to observe, that with the strong circumstantial evidence there is of their guilt, in addition to what is determined as newspaper information, their immediate release would not only defeat the ends of justice, but go for the encouragement of delinquency in others.
According to one story, a friend smuggled files to the prisoners in a cake. Whether or not that’s true, Brady and Naughton did manage to get out of their cell one foggy night and make a run for it. Naughton tripped and fell and a guard shot him in the leg. Brady kept running down the hill until he reached Maggoty Cove. He dove into the water and swam across the Narrows. He then made his way to a squatter community in the Southside Hills and vanished from documented history.
Naughton was recaptured and taken back to jail, where an army surgeon tended to his bullet wound. He finally admitted that he and his partner were the Manchester bank robbers, and said he intended to plead guilty when he got back to England. Soon after, Naughton was put aboard the Vesuvius for the voyage to England. His police escort, High Constable Finlay, also had charge of the stolen money.
In spite of an intense search, Brady was never found. It’s possible that he managed to slip off the island undetected. However, legend has it that the squatters hid him and he married a fisherman’s daughter and became a fisherman himself.
Philip Brady
For centuries, outlaws have been the inspiration for songs and legends. Real-life desperadoes like Billy the Kid, Jesse James, and Pretty Boy Floyd have been made into Robin Hood–like folk heroes, whether they deserved it or not. In Newfoundland, where it has been said that an event doesn’t officially become history until someone writes a song about it, one such inspiration was Philip Brady (not to be confused with the Manchester bank robber).
In September of 1906, eighteen-year-old Philip Brady, an immigrant from England, was sentenced to eighteen months in His Majesty’s Penitentiary in St. John’s for stealing money from a home in Holyrood. He stood just five foot four, and didn’t appear to be a person who would give the guards much trouble. But what Brady lacked in size, he made up for in nerve and resourcefulness. Brady had served about six weeks of his sentence when he decided he’d had enough of prison, with its harsh conditions and bad food. He and his cellmate, John Farrell, plotted an escape.
Brady managed to steal a coil of rope from the prison’s industrial room and hid it in a barrel of kitchen waste. Later, he was one of the prisoners who took the barrels to be emptied in a part of the yard that was used as a dump. Brady made sure the rope was covered with slops so the guards wouldn’t see it.
His Majesty’s Prison in St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador. Philip Brady became a local folk hero after his escape in 1906.
The Rooms Archives, St. John’s, Newfoundland.
At 5:45 p.m. on October 6, when all of the prisoners were in their cells and many of the guards had gone home for the night, Brady and Farrell asked to be taken to the toilet. A single guard escorted them to the privy. While he waited outside for them to answer nature’s call, they slipped out of the latrine area, made their way along a roof to the dump, and jumped down. They pulled the coil of rope out of the slops and scurried to the lower end of the prison yard where there was a turnip patch. Darkness was falling and the two lay low there until they thought it was safe for them to make their break.
Brady was the first to go over the wall. But by this time the guard at the privies had become suspicious and had raised an alarm. The prison dogs were turned loose and guards seized Farrell before he could clamber up the wall. Brady ran to Mount Carmel Cemetery where he hid until midnight. Then he disappeared into the darkness. Meanwhile, the warden ordered a thorough search of the prison and the surrounding area and alerted the police.
In the weeks that followed, little Phil Brady rose from being a lowly felon to a Newfoundland folk hero. Hard-working, law-abiding people who would never have condoned Brady’s crime of theft, nonetheless cheered him on as he made fools of the police who were trying to catch him.
There were repeated sightings of Brady everywhere, especially after the offer of a reward for information leading to his capture was posted. A farmer named Patrick Coughlan told police that Brady had broken into his house in the night and stolen food and clothing. As proof, he had Brady’s discarded prison uniform, which he’d found on the floor. Then Coughlan claimed that Brady had also stolen a can containing one hundred dollars. That part of Coughlan’s story was soon proven untrue. But it inspired one of the first songs in the saga of Phil Brady. Who Stole Paddy Coughlan’s Can?
became a popular humorous ditty.
Days passed, with police searching high