The Eyes of Max Carrados
By Ernest Bramah and David Stuart Davies
5/5
()
About this ebook
Max Carrados is one of the most unusual detectives in all fiction. He is blind – and yet he has developed his other faculties to such an amazing degree that they more than compensate for his lack of sight.‘Lose one sense and the others, touch, taste, smell, hearing improve…with a little dedicated training.’ Carrados can read a newspaper headline with the touch of his fingers, detect a man wearing a false moustache because ‘he carries a five yard aura of spirit gum’ and shoot a villain by aiming at the sound of his beating heart.
Assisted by his sharp-eyed manservant, Parker, Carrados is the mystery-solver par excellence. Here is a collection of the best of Max Carrados, a set of stories featuring a series of baffling puzzles to challenge the greatest of detectives. They are written by Ernest Bramah with great wit, style and panache. This is vintage crime fiction at its best.
Ernest Bramah
Ernest Bramah (1868–1942) was an English author of detective fiction.
Read more from Ernest Bramah
THE GREATEST BRITISH DETECTIVES - Boxed Set: 190+ Murder Mysteries, Thrillers & Crime Stories (Illustrated Edition): Tales & Cases of Legendary Sleuths and Investigators - Sherlock Holmes, Father Brown, Hercule Poirot, Martin Hewitt, Dr. Thorndyke, Bulldog Drummond, Max Carrados, Tommy and Tuppence and more Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Best Max Carrados Detective Stories Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Max Carrados Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Kai Lung Unrolls His Mat Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFour Max Carrados Detective Stories Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Eyes of Max Carrados Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMax Carrados (A Collection of Classic Detective Stories) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFour Max Carrados Detective Stories (A Collection of Classic Detective Stories) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Four Max Carrados Detective Stories Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Max Carrados Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wallet of Kai Lung Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Eyes of Max Carrados Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKai Lung's Golden Hour Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKai Lung's Golden Hours Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bravo of London Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Coin of Dionysius (A Classic Short Story of Detective Max Carrados) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Tragedy at Brookbend Cottage (A Classic Short Story of Detective Max Carrados) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Knight's Cross Signal Problem (Fantasy and Horror Classics) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Eyes of Max Carrados
Titles in the series (32)
The Haunted Hotel & Other Stories Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Monk Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In Ghostly Company Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Haunter of the Dark: Collected Short Stories Volume Three Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The King in Yellow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Horror in the Museum: Collected Short Stories Volume Two Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Lair of the White Worm & The Lady of the Shroud Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Strange Tales Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Tales of Unease Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lurking Fear: Collected Short Stories Volume Four Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Phantom of the Opera Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Whisperer in Darkness: Collected Stories Volume One Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mystery of the Yellow Room Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Children of the Night: Classic Vampire Stories Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Voodoo Tales: The Ghost Stories of Henry S Whitehead Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Collected Ghost Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Varney, the Vampyre Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Terror by Night: Classic Ghost & Horror Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Complete Four Just Men Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Dead of Night: The Ghost Stories of Oliver Onions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Woman in White Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Night Terrors: The Ghost Stories of E.F. Benson Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Casefiles of Mr J. G. Reeder Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In A Glass Darkly Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Eyes of Max Carrados Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Italian Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gothic Short Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Haunter of the Ring & Other Tales Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Ghost Stories of Henry James Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Right Hand of Doom & Other Tales of Solomon Kane Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related ebooks
The Casefiles of Mr J. G. Reeder Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Death's Old Sweet Song Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Case of the Russian Cross: A Ludovic Travers Mystery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCrossword Mystery Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5John Thorndyke's Cases related by Christopher Jervis and edited by R. Austin Freeman Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTen Trails to Tyburn Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Case of the Corporal's Leave: A Ludovic Travers Mystery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFelo de Se? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Death of A Beauty Queen Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5And A Bottle of Rum Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Case of the Chinese Gong: A Ludovic Travers Mystery Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5In the Still of the Night: Tales to Lock Your Doors By Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeath in Desolation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mystery of the Skeleton Key Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Return Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Clue of the Artificial Eye: crime classics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Eyes of Max Carrados Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Case of the Three Lost Letters: A Ludovic Travers Mystery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Penrose Mystery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rasp Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mystery Villa Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Case of the Missing Men: A Ludovic Travers Mystery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complete, Annotated Man in the Brown Suit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThere Came Both Mist and Snow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Adventures of Martin Hewitt Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Best Martin Hewitt Detective Stories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Murders near Mapleton: An Anthony Bathurst Mystery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSuicide Excepted Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Case of the Prodigal Daughter: A Ludovic Travers Mystery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Horror Fiction For You
It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pet Sematary Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Misery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Stories of Ray Bradbury Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Leave the World Behind: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Pretty Girls: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Am Legend Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Brother Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Annihilation: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Good Indians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hidden Pictures: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Complete Short Stories Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ocean at the End of the Lane: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Whisper Man: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Hollow Places: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Have Always Lived in the Castle Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Slewfoot: A Tale of Bewitchery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Troop Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Watchers: a spine-chilling Gothic horror novel now adapted into a major motion picture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Revival: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Needful Things Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Holly Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Outsider: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hell House: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Best Friend's Exorcism: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dracula Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Different Seasons Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bradbury Stories: 100 of His Most Celebrated Tales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5H. P. Lovecraft Complete Collection Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Eyes of Max Carrados
1 rating1 review
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ernest Bramah’s The Eyes of Max Carrados, a brick-sized entry in the Wordsworth “Tales of Mystery and the Supernatural” series, collects all 26 Max Carrados mysteries, originally published in several volumes during the first quarter of the 20th century. Max Carrados is one of the truly unique detectives in the entire genre: he is blind, but has compensated for that impairment by some remarkable enhancements to his other senses - a very subtle, but very effective, array of superpowers that give him an edge in solving his baffling cases. The basic setup of the stories is that Louis Carlyle, an inquiry agent, functions as Carrados’s associate, bringing each of the cases to him. Carrados zeroes in on the most obscure details to find relevant clues. And the urbane and witty interplay between Carrados and Carlyle is quite engaging, with suspects, clues, and motives duly bantered about. Most of the stories are fun and intriguing, though some do tend to drag a bit. Highly recommended, particularly for aficionados of vintage Edwardian mysteries.
Book preview
The Eyes of Max Carrados - Ernest Bramah
The Eyes of Max Carrados
Ernest Bramah
with an Introduction by
David Stuart Davies
The Eyes of Max Carrados first published by
Wordsworth Editions Limited in 2013
Published as an ePublication 2013
ISBN 978 1 84870 314 8
Wordsworth Editions Limited
8B East Street, Ware, Hertfordshire SG12 9HJ
Wordsworth® is a registered trademark of
Wordsworth Editions Limited
Wordsworth Editions
is the company founded in 1987 by
MICHAEL TRAYLER
All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publishers.
Readers interested in other titles from Wordsworth Editions are invited to visit our website at
www.wordsworth-editions.com
For our latest list of printed books, and a full mail-order service contact
Bibliophile Books, Unit 5 Datapoint,
South Crescent, London E16 4TL
Tel: +44 020 74 74 24 74
Fax: +44 020 74 74 85 89
www.bibliophilebooks.com
For my husband
ANTHONY JOHN RANSON
with love from your wife, the publisher
Eternally grateful for your
unconditional love
Introduction
The success of the Sherlock Holmes stories in the Strand magazine in the early 1890s opened the floodgates for a whole tribe of eccentric, idiosyncratic sleuths to appear on the pages of the many periodicals one could find on the bookstalls at the time. Enthusiastic writers wanted to emulate this success and indeed the wealth that Arthur Conan Doyle had accrued with his tales featuring the hawk-nosed sleuth hound of Baker Street.
There were a number of pale Holmes copycats, like Sexton Blake, nick-named the office boys’ Sherlock Holmes, and Arthur Morrison’s Arthur Hewitt who, while adopting the same methods of deduction as Holmes, was himself rather a flat, colourless character. However, some writers strove to create a detective who was as odd and individualistic as Holmes without attempting to imitate him. For example, there was William Hope Hodgson’s Carnacki, the ghost detective with all his scientific paraphernalia which was used to capture or destroy malevolent forces from the world beyond; and the Old Man in the Corner, Baroness Orczy’s brilliant armchair detective who could solve complex cases without leaving his table in a London teashop. (He was a precursor of Rex Stout’s elephantine sleuth Nero Wolf who functioned in New York in the 1930s in very much the same way – never leaving the confines of his brownstone building.)
However, perhaps the most innovative detective of them all was Max Carrados, created by Ernest Bramah. This author went to the extreme of making his detective blind. Interestingly, there were other blind detectives on the scene around the time the Carrados stories first appeared. For example, Isabel Ostrander created blind detective Damon Gaunt for her novel At One-Thirty (1915) and Clinton H. Stagg’s Thornley Colton, ‘man about town, club member, musician, whose recreation is the solving of problems that baffle other men’, appeared in some short stories in People’s Ideal Fiction Magazine in early 1913, but which weren’t collected in book form until 1915, while Max Carrados appeared in various periodicals in 1913, and then in book form in 1914. In reality, any of the three might have been the original sightless sleuth of fiction, although Max Carrados was the first in book publication.
This Wordsworth edition contains all the Carrados short stories. There were three collections: Max Carrados (1914); The Eyes of Max Carrados (1923); Max Carrados Mysteries (1927). There is also the addition of one stray short story, ‘The Bunch of Violets’, which appeared in The Specimen Case (1924), a volume containing a variety of other tales.
The framework of Bramah’s stories and the nature of Carrados’ ability to overcome his blindness and become the most acute and perceptive detective is set up in the very first story, ‘The Coin of Dionysius’, which also demonstrates the author’s knowledge of numismatics, one of his passions. In this tale we are introduced to Louis Carlyle, an ex-solicitor who now functions as an inquiry agent. (He is at pains to stress that he is not a private detective.) It is he who brings a case for consideration to Carrados, thus creating a pattern that continues through the remaining saga. Carrados is enthusiastic about the sleuthing business: ‘Do you know, Louis, I’ve always had a secret ambition to be a detective myself . . . ’ He sees the role now as ‘the blind tracking the alert’. He then goes on to explain how, as a blind man, he has trained his other senses to over-compensate for his lack of sight. As Carlyle observes: ‘You seem so sure and self-reliant. Your eyes are full of expression . . . ’ Blindness for Carrados is ‘a new world to explore, new experiences, new powers awakening; strange new perceptions; life in the fourth dimension.’
In this first tale Max explains that he was made financially independent by a rich American cousin who left him a fortune won by doctoring his crop reports, on condition that he adopt the surname Carrados. He was blinded some twelve years before, as a result of an accident while out horse-riding with a friend when a twig from an errant bush caught Max in the eye. From this he was blinded by an illness called amaurosis.
To cut off one of an individual’s vital senses was dramatic and drastic, but taken with a large pinch of salt, Bramah made this disability work in favour of the detective’s deductive powers.
Concerning Carrados’ blindness, Barmah stated: ‘ . . . but so far from crippling his interests in life or his energies, it has merely impelled him to develop those senses which in most of us lie dormant and practically unused. Thus you will understand that while he may be at a disadvantage while you are at an advantage, he is at an advantage while you are at a disadvantage.’
As a result of his loss of sight, Max Carrados has developed many extraordinary aptitudes: he can, for instance, convince the unknowing that he can see quite well and use a typewriter effectively. Perhaps his most impressive attribute is his ability to read the large type on a newspaper by letting his sensitive finger tips run gently over the print. It is interesting to note the progress of Carrados’s reading ability. Initially we find him reading the large letters of newspaper headlines. Gradually through the stories it emerges that he can finger-read the small print too, ‘though not with the same facility’; in subsequent stories he extends his range to handwriting and even the print on playing cards. Introducing Best Max Carrados Detective Stories (Dover, 1972), E. F. Bleiler not unjustly called him ‘a blind man who can see perfectly well’.
It is clear that Bramah was conscious that at times that he was to some extent over-egging the pudding by allowing his sightless detective hero to be so omniscient. The Eyes of Max Carrados opens with a somewhat defensive essay which chronicles astonishing feats achieved by blind people in order to demonstrate that his hero was in no way unique. Most of the anecdotes he uses come from an 1820 book of blind notables but he also makes mention of Helen Keller who, blind, deaf and unable to speak, overcame these terrible drawbacks to communicate with the world and achieve greatness.
However, apart from his own unique powers, Carrados has, in essence, ‘another pair of eyes’ in the form of his manservant Parkinson, who has a remarkable facility for observation and the notation of trivia, which often become of great importance to the case. Bramah said of this stoical character: ‘It is doubtful if anyone has plumbed the exact limits of this worthy fellow’s real capacity.’
Max Carrados is rich, urbane and witty, and seems to enjoy the kind of high life style reminiscent of that led by Dorothy L. Sayers’ Lord Peter Wimsey. But in the overall format of these tales there is a greater comparison with the Sherlock Holmes stories, their clever mysteries, the even cleverer unravelling of the puzzle and the quixotic and apparent eccentricity of the protagonist. Take, for instance, the cunning ‘The Tragedy at Brookbend Cottage’. In this tale we have the client visiting Carrados at his quarters where the blind detective assures him that ‘we have occasionally found trifles of significance’ which seems to echo Holmes’s claim that ‘there is nothing so important as the observation of trifles’. Once at the scene of the potential murder, Carrados behaves in a typically Sherlockian fashion, examining the room closely in his own strange way, even, ‘kneeling down on the bedroom floor and for a full minute pressing his ear to the sheet metal that had already engaged his attention’. The climax with its midnight vigil is reminiscent of similar episodes in the Holmes canon such as ‘The Speckled Band’ and ‘The Red-Headed League’.
Also, like Holmes, Carrados becomes involved in the affairs of the State in ‘The Kingsmouth Spy Case’ where, as in the Sherlock stories, ‘The Bruce Partington Plans’ and ‘The Naval Treaty’, ‘an attempt is being successfully made on behalf of a another Power to obtain naval information of vital importance.’ This plot anticipates a great deal that was to follow in fiction several decades later, with its political cover-up (for the sake of entente) of the awkward fact that the ‘enemy’ spy is in fact a supposed ally. Carrados himself offers the mature suggestion that it’s only sensible for allies to keep track of each other’s defence plans:
Mr Carrados looked extremely mysterious and half-reluctant for a moment. Then he spoke: ‘Do you know, Louis, of any great secret military camp where a surprise fleet of dirigibles and flying machines of a new and terrible kind is being formed by a far-seeing Government as a reserve against the day of Armageddon?’
‘No,’ admitted Mr Carlyle . . .
‘Nor do I.’
As this story helps to demonstrate, it is the breadth and variety of these tales that make them refreshing and entertaining to read. What gives added interest to Carrados as a detective is that his perceptions actually allow him to anticipate a clue. It is one thing for a detective to observe a clue and interpret it as such and then make illuminating deductions about it, but there is an extra level of cleverness in determining the clue will be there in the first place, especially when you cannot see it. Carrados does this with great aplomb.
Bramah’s detective tales tend to have greater scope than some of his contemporaries. He is not afraid to introduce suggestions of the supernatural, as in ‘The Secret of Dunstan’s Tower’ where an ancient curse concerning a transient pool of blood threatens the life of the head of the Aynosforde family. The story is a wonderful blend of the gothic and Wodehousian whimsy. Similarly in ‘The Ghost of Massingham Mansions’ Carrados investigates strange lights in a locked room which has all the implications of a haunting. Over the whole Carrados canon there is never a suggestion of repetition of slackening of invention. If anything the stories grow more entertaining.
Ernest Bramah Smith (1868–1942) is as fascinating a character as his detective creation. He was a man of many talents and interests: having knowledge of chemistry, physics, law, philosophy, the classics, literature, the occult and ordnance, and being an expert in a branch of numismatics. Apart from his crime fiction tales, his humorous works were ranked with Jerome K. Jerome, and W. W. Jacobs, his politico-science fiction with H. G. Wells and his supernatural stories with Algernon Blackwood. George Orwell acknowledged that Bramah’s book What Might Have Been (1907) influenced his Nineteen Eighty-Four. Bramah also created the character Kai Lung, an itinerant Chinese storyteller who can be generally relied upon to come up with a weird and fascinating tale full of quotable one liners recounted in mock-oriental style such as: ‘Should a person on returning from the city discover his house to be in flames, let him examine well the change which he has received from the chair-carrier before it is too late; for evil never travels alone.’
Born in a Manchester suburb, Bramah seems to have been mainly self-taught for he dropped out of high school and tried farming as a profession. He gave this up after making a series of financial losses over a period of three years. This experience supplied material for his first book, English Farming and Why I Turned It Up (1894). He then became a journalist, starting as a correspondent on a provincial newspaper before moving to London as Jerome K. Jerome’s secretary, later joining the editorial staff of Jerome’s periodical, To-Day. He then became editor of a new publication, The Minster; but when that folded he devoted his full time to writing.
Apart from the quality and variety of his literary output and his wide-ranging knowledge, Bramah is interesting also because of his obsession with privacy. While his writings were extremely popular during his lifetime, very little is known about the personal and private world of this writer. He was secretive and was regarded by some as a recluse. Bramah himself provided no information about himself even to prestigious reference volumes such as Who’s Who in which he was listed. His sparse entry gives nothing more than a list of his works and the address of his literary agent. Bramah once wrote: ‘I am not fond of writing about myself, and only to a lesser degree about my work. My published books are about all I care to pass on to the reader.’
The author’s desire for privacy resulted in a long-held belief by the public that Ernest Bramah did not actually exist, that he was, in fact, a well-known literary figure employing a pseudonym, or, according to one myth, that he was a hoax figure created by several English detective story writers. To refute these rumours he wrote in the preface of The Specimen Case: ‘Either I am to have no existence, or I am to have decidedly too much: on one hand banished into space as a mythical creation; on the other regarded askance as a leader of a double (literary) life.’
Ernest Bramah’s desire for anonymity goes some way to explain why he and his work is not better known today. There has always been an interest in the Carrados stories among diehard detective fiction fans, but one hopes this new collection containing all the short stories will reach a wider audience.
Certainly, the occasional critic has complained that Max Carrados is indistinguishable from a sighted person, failing as he does to exhibit even the slightest handicap brought about by his blindness, nor does he induce solicitous assistance from characters whom he encounters. But this tremendous facility helps to make him so fascinating. Such critics refuse to suspend disbelief and will not accept that such a fellow wouldn’t stumble over chairs or walk into walls without the assistance of a guide-dog or cane. They have a valid point of course, but with all great detectives, from Holmes to Poirot, from Wimsey to Morse, we always need to hold a little of our rationality in check in order to relish the storytelling and the great flourish of explanation we receive at the dénouement of the case. I know that Superman cannot really fly, that Sherlock Holmes probably cannot tell the difference between 140 varieties of tobacco and that Max Carrados cannot really read a newspaper with his fingers – but I want to believe they can. And that’s what really matters.
David Stuart Davies
Max Carrados
The Coin of Dionysius
It was eight o’clock at night and raining, scarcely a time when a business so limited in its clientèle as that of a coin dealer could hope to attract any customer, but a light was still showing in the small shop that bore over its window the name of Baxter, and in the even smaller office at the back the proprietor himself sat reading the latest Pall Mall. His enterprise seemed to be justified, for presently the door bell gave its announcement, and throwing down his paper Mr Baxter went forward.
As a matter of fact the dealer had been expecting someone and his manner as he passed into the shop was unmistakably suggestive of a caller of importance. But at the first glance towards his visitor the excess of deference melted out of his bearing, leaving the urbane, self-possessed shopman in the presence of the casual customer.
‘Mr Baxter, I think?’ said the latter. He had laid aside his dripping umbrella and was unbuttoning overcoat and coat to reach an inner pocket. ‘You hardly remember me, I suppose? Mr Carlyle – two years ago I took up a case for you – ’
‘To be sure. Mr Carlyle, the private detective – ’
‘Inquiry agent,’ corrected Mr Carlyle precisely.
‘Well,’ smiled Mr Baxter, ‘for that matter I am a coin dealer and not an antiquarian or a numismatist. Is there anything in that way that I can do for you?’
‘Yes,’ replied his visitor; ‘it is my turn to consult you.’ He had taken a small wash-leather bag from the inner pocket and now turned something carefully out upon the counter. ‘What can you tell me about that?’
The dealer gave the coin a moment’s scrutiny.
‘There is no question about this,’ he replied. ‘It is a Sicilian tetradrachm of Dionysius.’
‘Yes, I know that – I have it on the label out of the cabinet. I can tell you further that it’s supposed to be one that Lord Seastoke gave two hundred and fifty pounds for at the Brice sale in ’94.’
‘It seems to me that you can tell me more about it than I can tell you,’ remarked Mr Baxter. ‘What is it that you really want to know?’
‘I want to know,’ replied Mr Carlyle, ‘whether it is genuine or not.’
‘Has any doubt been cast upon it?’
‘Certain circumstances raised a suspicion – that is all.’
The dealer took another look at the tetradrachm through his magnifying glass, holding it by the edge with the careful touch of an expert. Then he shook his head slowly in a confession of ignorance.
‘Of course I could make a guess – ’
‘No, don’t,’ interrupted Mr Carlyle hastily. ‘An arrest hangs on it and nothing short of certainty is any good to me.’
‘Is that so, Mr Carlyle?’ said Mr Baxter, with increased interest. ‘Well, to be quite candid, the thing is out of my line. Now if it was a rare Saxon penny or a doubtful noble I’d stake my reputation on my opinion, but I do very little in the classical series.’
Mr Carlyle did not attempt to conceal his disappointment as he returned the coin to the bag and replaced the bag in the inner pocket.
‘I had been relying on you,’ he grumbled reproachfully. ‘Where on earth am I to go now?’
‘There is always the British Museum.’
‘Ah, to be sure, thanks. But will anyone who can tell me be there now?’
‘Now? No fear!’ replied Mr Baxter. ‘Go round in the morning – ’
‘But I must know tonight,’ explained the visitor, reduced to despair again. ‘Tomorrow will be too late for the purpose.’
Mr Baxter did not hold out much encouragement in the circumstances.
‘You can scarcely expect to find anyone at business now,’ he remarked. ‘I should have been gone these two hours myself only I happened to have an appointment with an American millionaire who fixed his own time.’ Something indistinguishable from a wink slid off Mr Baxter’s right eye. ‘Offmunson he’s called, and a bright young pedigree-hunter has traced his descent from Offa, King of Mercia. So he – quite naturally – wants a set of Offas as a sort of collateral proof.’
‘Very interesting,’ murmured Mr Carlyle, fidgeting with his watch. ‘I should love an hour’s chat with you about your millionaire customers – some other time. Just now – look here, Baxter, can’t you give me a line of introduction to some dealer in this sort of thing who happens to live in town? You must know dozens of experts.’
‘Why, bless my soul, Mr Carlyle, I don’t know a man of them away from his business,’ said Mr Baxter, staring. ‘They may live in Park Lane or they may live in Petticoat Lane for all I know. Besides, there aren’t so many experts as you seem to imagine. And the two best will very likely quarrel over it. You’ve had to do with expert witnesses
, I suppose?’
‘I don’t want a witness; there will be no need to give evidence. All I want is an absolutely authoritative pronouncement that I can act on. Is there no one who can really say whether the thing is genuine or not?’
Mr Baxter’s meaning silence became cynical in its implication as he continued to look at his visitor across the counter. Then he relaxed.
‘Stay a bit; there is a man – an amateur – I remember hearing wonderful things about some time ago. They say he really does know.’
‘There you are,’ exclaimed Mr Carlyle, much relieved. ‘There always is someone. Who is he?’
‘Funny name,’ replied Baxter. ‘Something Wynn or Wynn something.’ He craned his neck to catch sight of an important motor car that was drawing to the kerb before his window. ‘Wynn Carrados! You’ll excuse me now, Mr Carlyle, won’t you? This looks like Mr Offmunson.’
Mr Carlyle hastily scribbled the name down on his cuff.
‘Wynn Carrados, right. Where does he live?’
‘Haven’t the remotest idea,’ replied Baxter, referring the arrangement of his tie to the judgment of the wall mirror. ‘I have never seen the man myself. Now, Mr Carlyle, I’m sorry I can’t do any more for you. You won’t mind, will you?’
Mr Carlyle could not pretend to misunderstand. He enjoyed the distinction of holding open the door for the transatlantic representative of the line of Offa as he went out, and then made his way through the muddy streets back to his office. There was only one way of tracing a private individual at such short notice – through the pages of the directories, and the gentleman did not flatter himself by a very high estimate of his chances.
Fortune favoured him, however. He very soon discovered a Wynn Carrados living at Richmond, and, better still, further search failed to unearth another. There was, apparently, only one householder at all events of that name in the neighbourhood of London. He jotted down the address and set out for Richmond.
The house was some distance from the station, Mr Carlyle learned. He took a taxicab and drove, dismissing the vehicle at the gate. He prided himself on his power of observation and the accuracy of the deductions which resulted from it – a detail of his business. ‘It’s nothing more than using one’s eyes and putting two and two together,’ he would modestly declare, when he wished to be deprecatory rather than impressive, and by the time he had reached the front door of ‘The Turrets’ he had formed some opinion of the position and tastes of the man who lived there.
A man-servant admitted Mr Carlyle and took in his card – his private card with the bare request for an interview that would not detain Mr Carrados for ten minutes. Luck still favoured him; Mr Carrados was at home and would see him at once. The servant, the hall through which they passed, and the room into which he was shown, all contributed something to the deductions which the quietly observant gentleman was half unconsciously recording.
‘Mr Carlyle,’ announced the servant.
The room was a library or study. The only occupant, a man of about Carlyle’s own age, had been using a typewriter up to the moment of his visitor’s entrance. He now turned and stood up with an expression of formal courtesy.
‘It’s very good of you to see me at this hour,’ apologized the caller.
The conventional expression of Mr Carrados’s face changed a little.
‘Surely my man has got your name wrong?’ he exclaimed. ‘Isn’t it Louis Calling?’
The visitor stopped short and his agreeable smile gave place to a sudden flash of anger or annoyance.
‘No, sir,’ he replied stiffly. ‘My name is on the card which you have before you.’
‘I beg your pardon,’ said Mr Carrados, with perfect good-humour. ‘I hadn’t seen it. But I used to know a Calling some years ago – at St Michael’s.’
‘St Michael’s!’ Mr Carlyle’s features underwent another change, no less instant and sweeping than before. ‘St Michael’s! Wynn Carrados? Good heavens! it isn’t Max Wynn – old Winning
Wynn?’
‘A little older and a little fatter – yes,’ replied Carrados. ‘I have changed my name, you see.’
‘Extraordinary thing meeting like this,’ said his visitor, dropping into a chair and staring hard at Mr Carrados. ‘I have changed more than my name. How did you recognize me?’
‘The voice,’ replied Carrados. ‘It took me back to that little smoke-dried attic den of yours where we – ’
‘My God!’ exclaimed Carlyle bitterly, ‘don’t remind me of what we were going to do in those days.’ He looked round the well-furnished, handsome room and recalled the other signs of wealth that he had noticed. ‘At all events, you seem fairly comfortable, Wynn.’
‘I am alternately envied and pitied,’ replied Carrados, with a placid tolerance of circumstance that seemed characteristic of him. ‘Still, as you say, I am fairly comfortable.’
‘Envied, I can understand. But why are you pitied?’
‘Because I am blind,’ was the tranquil reply.
‘Blind!’ exclaimed Mr Carlyle, using his own eyes superlatively. ‘Do you mean – literally blind?’
‘Literally . . . I was riding along a bridle-path through a wood about a dozen years ago with a friend. He was in front. At one point a twig sprang back – you know how easily a thing like that happens. It just flicked my eye – nothing to think twice about.’
‘And that blinded you?’
‘Yes, ultimately. It’s called amaurosis.’
‘I can scarcely believe it. You seem so sure and self-reliant. Your eyes are full of expression – only a little quieter than they used to be. I believe you were typing when I came . . . Aren’t you having me?’
‘You miss the dog and the stick?’ smiled Carrados. ‘No; it’s a fact.’
‘What an awful infliction for you, Max. You were always such an impulsive, reckless sort of fellow – never quiet. You must miss such a fearful lot.’
‘Has anyone else recognized you?’ asked Carrados quietly.
‘Ah, that was the voice, you said,’ replied Carlyle.
‘Yes; but other people heard the voice as well. Only I had no blundering, self-confident eyes to be hoodwinked.’
‘That’s a rum way of putting it,’ said Carlyle. ‘Are your ears never hoodwinked, may I ask?’
‘Not now. Nor my fingers. Nor any of my other senses that have to look out for themselves.’
‘Well, well,’ murmured Mr Carlyle, cut short in his sympathetic emotions. ‘I’m glad you take it so well. Of course, if you find it an advantage to be blind, old man – ’ He stopped and reddened. ‘I beg your pardon,’ he concluded stiffly.
‘Not an advantage perhaps,’ replied the other thoughtfully. ‘Still it has compensations that one might not think of. A new world to explore, new experiences, new powers awakening; strange new perceptions; life in the fourth dimension. But why do you beg my pardon, Louis?’
‘I am an ex-solicitor, struck off in connexion with the falsifying of a trust account, Mr Carrados,’ replied Carlyle, rising.
‘Sit down, Louis,’ said Carrados suavely. His face, even his incredibly living eyes, beamed placid good-nature. ‘The chair on which you will sit, the roof above you, all the comfortable surroundings to which you have so amiably alluded, are the direct result of falsifying a trust account. But do I call you Mr Carlyle
in consequence? Certainly not, Louis.’
‘I did not falsify the account,’ cried Carlyle hotly. He sat down, however, and added more quietly: ‘But why do I tell you all this? I have never spoken of it before.’
‘Blindness invites confidence,’ replied Carrados. ‘We are out of the running – human rivalry ceases to exist. Besides, why shouldn’t you? In my case the account was falsified.’
‘Of course that’s all bunkum, Max,’ commented Carlyle. ‘Still, I appreciate your motive.’
‘Practically everything I possess was left to me by an American cousin, on the condition that I took the name of Carrados. He made his fortune by an ingenious conspiracy of doctoring the crop reports and unloading favourably in consequence. And I need hardly remind you that the receiver is equally guilty with the thief.’
‘But twice as safe. I know something of that, Max . . . Have you any idea what my business is?’
‘You shall tell me,’ replied Carrados.
‘I run a private inquiry agency. When I lost my profession I had to do something for a living. This occurred. I dropped my name, changed my appearance and opened an office. I knew the legal side down to the ground and I got a retired Scotland Yard man to organize the outside work.’
‘Excellent!’ cried Carrados. ‘Do you unearth many murders?’
‘No,’ admitted Mr Carlyle; ‘our business lies mostly on the conventional lines among divorce and defalcation.’
‘That’s a pity,’ remarked Carrados. ‘Do you know, Louis, I always had a secret ambition to be a detective myself. I have even thought lately that I might still be able to do something at it if the chance came my way. That makes you smile?’
‘Well, certainly, the idea – ’
‘Yes, the idea of a blind detective – the blind tracking the alert – ’
‘Of course, as you say, certain faculties are no doubt quickened,’ Mr Carlyle hastened to add considerately, ‘but, seriously, with the exception of an artist, I don’t suppose there is any man who is more utterly dependent on his eyes.’
Whatever opinion Carrados might have held privately, his genial exterior did not betray a shadow of dissent. For a full minute he continued to smoke as though he derived an actual visual enjoyment from the blue sprays that travelled and dispersed across the room. He had already placed before his visitor a box containing cigars of a brand which that gentleman keenly appreciated but generally regarded as unattainable, and the matter-of-fact ease and certainty with which the blind man had brought the box and put it before him had sent a questioning flicker through Carlyle’s mind.
‘You used to be rather fond of art yourself, Louis,’ he remarked presently. ‘Give me your opinion of my latest purchase – the bronze lion on the cabinet there.’ Then, as Carlyle’s gaze went about the room, he added quickly: ‘No, not that cabinet – the one on your left.’
Carlyle shot a sharp glance at his host as he got up, but Carrados’s expression was merely benignly complacent. Then he strolled across to the figure.
‘Very nice,’ he admitted. ‘Late Flemish, isn’t it?’
‘No. It is a copy of Vidal’s Roaring lion
.’
‘Vidal?’
‘A French artist.’ The voice became indescribably flat. ‘He, also, had the misfortune to be blind, by the way.’
‘You old humbug, Max!’ shrieked Carlyle, ‘you’ve been thinking that out for the last five minutes.’ Then the unfortunate man bit his lip and turned his back towards his host.
‘Do you remember how we used to pile it up on that obtuse ass Sanders and then roast him?’ asked Carrados, ignoring the half-smothered exclamation with which the other man had recalled himself.
‘Yes,’ replied Carlyle quietly. ‘This is very good,’ he continued, addressing himself to the bronze again. ‘How ever did he do it?’
‘With his hands.’
‘Naturally. But, I mean, how did he study his model?’
‘Also with his hands. He called it seeing near
.’
‘Even with a lion – handled it?’
‘In such cases he required the services of a keeper, who brought the animal to bay while Vidal exercised his own particular gifts . . . You don’t feel inclined to put me on the track of a mystery, Louis?’
Unable to regard this request as anything but one of old Max’s unquenchable pleasantries, Mr Carlyle was on the point of making a suitable reply when a sudden thought caused him to smile knowingly. Up to that point he had, indeed, completely forgotten the object of his visit. Now that he remembered the doubtful Dionysius and Mr Baxter’s recommendation he immediately assumed that some mistake had been made. Either Max was not the Wynn Carrados he had been seeking or else the dealer had been misinformed; for although his host was wonderfully expert in the face of his misfortune, it was inconceivable that he could decide the genuineness of a coin without seeing it. The opportunity seemed a good one of getting even with Carrados by taking him at his word.
‘Yes,’ he accordingly replied, with crisp deliberation, as he recrossed the room; ‘yes, I will, Max. Here is the clue to what seems to be a rather remarkable fraud.’ He put the tetradrachm into his host’s hand. ‘What do you make of it?’
For a few seconds Carrados handled the piece with the delicate manipulation of his finger-tips while Carlyle looked on with a self-appreciative grin. Then with equal gravity the blind man weighed the coin in the balance of his hand. Finally he touched it with his tongue.
‘Well?’ demanded the other.
‘Of course I have not much to go on, and if I was more fully in your confidence I might come to another conclusion – ’
‘Yes, yes,’ interposed Carlyle, with amused encouragement.
‘Then I should advise you to arrest the parlourmaid, Nina Brun, communicate with the police authorities of Padua for particulars of the career of Helène Brunesi, and suggest to Lord Seastoke that he should return to London to see what further depredations have been made in his cabinet.’
Mr Carlyle’s groping hand sought and found a chair, on to which he dropped blankly. His eyes were unable to detach themselves for a single moment from the very ordinary spectacle of Mr Carrados’s mildly benevolent face, while the sterilized ghost of his now forgotten amusement still lingered about his features.
‘Good heavens!’ he managed to articulate, ‘how do you know?’
‘Isn’t that what you wanted of me?’ asked Carrados suavely.
‘Don’t humbug, Max,’ said Carlyle severely. ‘This is no joke.’ An undefined mistrust of his own powers suddenly possessed him in the presence of this mystery. ‘How do you come to know of Nina Brun and Lord Seastoke?’
‘You are a detective, Louis,’ replied Carrados. ‘How does one know these things? By using one’s eyes and putting two and two together.’
Carlyle groaned and flung out an arm petulantly.
‘Is it all bunkum, Max? Do you really see all the time – though that doesn’t go very far towards explaining it.’
‘Like Vidal, I see very well – at close quarters,’ replied Carrados, lightly running a forefinger along the inscription on the tetradrachm. ‘For longer range I keep another pair of eyes. Would you like to test them?’
Mr Carlyle’s assent was not very gracious; it was, in fact, faintly sulky. He was suffering the annoyance of feeling distinctly unimpressive in his own department; but he was also curious.
‘The bell is just behind you, if you don’t mind,’ said his host. ‘Parkinson will appear. You might take note of him while he is in.’
The man who had admitted Mr Carlyle proved to be Parkinson.
‘This gentleman is Mr Carlyle, Parkinson,’ explained Carrados the moment the man entered. ‘You will remember him for the future?’
Parkinson’s apologetic eye swept the visitor from head to foot, but so lightly and swiftly that it conveyed to that gentleman the comparison of being very deftly dusted.
‘I will endeavour to do so, sir,’ replied Parkinson, turning again to his master.
‘I shall be at home to Mr Carlyle whenever he calls. That is all.’
‘Very well, sir.’
‘Now, Louis,’ remarked Mr Carrados briskly, when the door had closed again, ‘you have had a good opportunity of studying Parkinson. What is he like?’
‘In what way?’
‘I mean as a matter of description. I am a blind man – I haven’t seen my servant for twelve years – what idea can you give me of him? I asked you to notice.’
‘I know you did, but your Parkinson is the sort of man who has very little about him to describe. He is the embodiment of the ordinary. His height is about average – ’
‘Five feet nine,’ murmured Carrados. ‘Slightly above the mean.’
‘Scarcely noticeably so. Clean-shaven. Medium brown hair. No particularly marked features. Dark eyes. Good teeth.’
‘False,’ interposed Carrados. ‘The teeth – not the statement.’
‘Possibly,’ admitted Mr Carlyle. ‘I am not a dental expert and I had no opportunity of examining Mr Parkinson’s mouth in detail. But what is the drift of all this?’
‘His clothes?’
‘Oh, just the ordinary evening dress of a valet. There is not much room for variety in that.’
‘You noticed, in fact, nothing special by which Parkinson could be identified?’
‘Well, he wore an unusually broad gold ring on the little finger of the left hand.’
‘But that is removable. And yet Parkinson has an ineradicable mole – a small one, I admit – on his chin. And you a human sleuth-hound. Oh, Louis!’
‘At all events,’ retorted Carlyle, writhing a little under this good-humoured satire, although it was easy enough to see in it Carrados’s affectionate intention – ‘at all events, I dare say I can give as good a description of Parkinson as he can give of me.’
‘That is what we are going to test. Ring the bell again.’
‘Seriously?’
‘Quite. I am trying my eyes against yours. If I can’t give you fifty out of a hundred I’ll renounce my private detectorial ambition for ever.’
‘It isn’t quite the same,’ objected Carlyle, but he rang the bell.
‘Come in and close the door, Parkinson,’ said Carrados when the man appeared. ‘Don’t look at Mr Carlyle again – in fact, you had better stand with your back towards him, he won’t mind. Now describe to me his appearance as you observed it.’
Parkinson tendered his respectful apologies to Mr Carlyle for the liberty he was compelled to take, by the deferential quality of his voice.
‘Mr Carlyle, sir, wears patent leather boots of about size seven and very little used. There are five buttons, but on the left boot one button – the third up – is missing, leaving loose threads and not the more usual metal fastener. Mr Carlyle’s trousers, sir, are of a dark material, a dark grey line of about a quarter of an inch width on a darker ground. The bottoms are turned permanently up and are, just now, a little muddy, if I may say so.’
‘Very muddy,’ interposed Mr Carlyle generously. ‘It is a wet night, Parkinson.’
‘Yes, sir; very unpleasant weather. If you will allow me, sir, I will brush you in the hall. The mud is dry now, I notice. Then, sir,’ continued Parkinson, reverting to the business in hand, ‘there are dark green cashmere hose. A curb-pattern key-chain passes into the left-hand trouser pocket.’
From the visitor’s nether garments the photographic-eyed Parkinson proceeded to higher ground, and with increasing wonder Mr Carlyle listened to the faithful catalogue of his possessions. His fetter-and-link albert of gold and platinum was minutely described. His spotted blue ascot, with its gentlemanly pearl scarfpin, was set forth, and the fact that the buttonhole in the left lapel of his morning coat showed signs of use was duly noted. What Parkinson saw he recorded but he made no deductions. A handkerchief carried in the cuff of the right sleeve was simply that to him and not an indication that Mr Carlyle was, indeed, left-handed.
But a more delicate part of Parkinson’s undertaking remained. He approached it with a double cough.
‘As regards Mr Carlyle’s personal appearance; sir – ’
‘No, enough!’ cried the gentleman concerned hastily. ‘I am more than satisfied. You are a keen observer, Parkinson.’
‘I have trained myself to suit my master’s requirements, sir,’ replied the man. He looked towards Mr Carrados, received a nod and withdrew.
Mr Carlyle was the first to speak.
‘That man of yours would be worth five pounds a week to me, Max,’ he remarked thoughtfully. ‘But, of course – ’
‘I don’t think that he would take it,’ replied Carrados, in a voice of equally detached speculation. ‘He suits me very well. But you have the chance of using his services – indirectly.’
‘You still mean that – seriously?’
‘I notice in you a chronic disinclination to take me seriously, Louis. It is really – to an Englishman – almost painful. Is there something inherently comic about me or the atmosphere of The Turrets?’
‘No, my friend,’ replied Mr Carlyle, ‘but there is something essentially prosperous. That is what points to the improbable. Now what is it?’
‘It might be merely a whim, but it is more than that,’ replied Carrados. ‘It is, well, partly vanity, partly ennui, partly’ – certainly there was something more nearly tragic in his voice than comic now – ‘partly hope.’
Mr Carlyle was too tactful to pursue the subject.
‘Those are three tolerable motives,’ he acquiesced. ‘I’ll do anything you want, Max, on one condition.’
‘Agreed. And it is?’
‘That you tell me how you knew so much of this affair.’ He tapped the silver coin which lay on the table near them. ‘I am not easily flabbergasted,’ he added.
‘You won’t believe that there is nothing to explain – that it was purely second-sight?’
‘No,’ replied Carlyle tersely; ‘I won’t.’
‘You are quite right. And yet the thing is very simple.’
‘They always are – when you know,’ soliloquized the other. ‘That’s what makes them so confoundedly difficult when you don’t.’
‘Here is this one then. In Padua, which seems to be regaining its old reputation as the birthplace of spurious antiques, by the way, there lives an ingenious craftsman named Pietro Stelli. This simple soul, who possesses a talent not inferior to that of Cavino at his best, has for many years turned his hand to the not unprofitable occupation of forging rare Greek and Roman coins. As a collector and student of certain Greek colonials and a specialist in forgeries I have been familiar with Stelli’s workmanship for years. Latterly he seems to have come under the influence of an international crook called – at the moment – Dompierre, who soon saw a way of utilizing Stelli’s genius on a royal scale. Helène Brunesi, who in private life is – and really is, I believe – Madame Dompierre, readily lent her services to the enterprise.’
‘Quite so,’ nodded Mr Carlyle, as his host paused.
‘You see the whole sequence, of course?’
‘Not exactly – not in detail,’ confessed Mr Carlyle.
‘Dompierre’s idea was to gain access to some of the most celebrated cabinets of Europe and substitute Stelli’s fabrications for the genuine coins. The princely collection of rarities that he would thus amass might be difficult to dispose of safely but I have no doubt that he had matured his plans. Helène, in the person of Nina Bran, an Anglicised French parlourmaid – a part which she fills to perfection – was to obtain wax impressions of the most valuable pieces and to make the exchange when the counterfeits reached her. In this way it was obviously hoped that the fraud would not come to light until long after the real coins had been sold, and I gather that she has already done her work successfully in several houses. Then, impressed by her excellent references and capable manner, my housekeeper engaged her, and for a few weeks she went about her duties here. It was fatal to this detail of the scheme, however, that I have the misfortune to be blind. I am told that Helène has so innocently angelic a face as to disarm suspicion, but I was incapable of being impressed and that good material was thrown away. But one morning my material fingers – which, of course, knew nothing of Helène’s angelic face – discovered an unfamiliar touch about the surface of my favourite Euclideas, and, although there was doubtless nothing to be seen, my critical sense of smell reported that wax had been recently pressed against it. I began to make discreet inquiries and in the meantime my cabinets went to the local bank for safety. Helène countered by receiving a telegram from Angiers, calling her to the death-bed of her aged mother. The aged mother succumbed; duty compelled Helène to remain at the side of her stricken patriarchal father, and doubtless The Turrets was written off the syndicate’s operations as a bad debt.’
‘Very interesting,’ admitted Mr Carlyle; ‘but at the risk of seeming obtuse’ – his manner had become delicately chastened – ‘I must say that I fail to trace the inevitable connexion between Nina Brun and this particular forgery – assuming that it is a forgery.’
‘Set your mind at rest about that, Louis,’ replied Carrados. ‘It is a forgery, and it is a forgery that none but Pietro Stelli could have achieved. That is the essential connexion. Of course, there are accessories. A private detective coming urgently to see me with a notable tetradrachm in his pocket, which he announces to be the clue to a remarkable fraud – well, really, Louis, one scarcely needs to be blind to see through that.’
‘And Lord Seastoke? I suppose you happened to discover that Nina Brun had gone there?’
‘No, I cannot claim to have discovered that, or I should certainly have warned him at once when I found out – only recently – about the gang. As a matter of fact, the last information I had of Lord Seastoke was a line in yesterday’s Morning Post to the effect that he was still at Cairo. But many of these pieces – ’ He brushed his finger almost lovingly across the vivid chariot race that embellished the reverse of the coin, and broke off to remark: ‘You really ought to take up the subject, Louis. You have no idea how useful it might prove to you some day.’
‘I really think I must,’ replied Carlyle grimly. ‘Two hundred and fifty pounds the original of this cost, I believe.’
‘Cheap, too; it would make five hundred pounds in New York today. As I was saying, many are literally unique. This gem by Kimon is – here is his signature, you see; Peter is particularly good at lettering – and as I handled the genuine tetradrachm about two years ago, when Lord Seastoke exhibited it at a meeting of our society in Albemarle Street, there is nothing at all wonderful in my being able to fix the locale of your mystery. Indeed, I feel that I ought to apologize for it all being so simple.’
‘I think,’ remarked Mr Carlyle, critically examining the loose threads on his left boot, ‘that the apology on that head would be more appropriate from me.’
The Knight’s Cross Signal Problem
‘Louis,’ exclaimed Mr Carrados, with the air of genial gaiety that Carlyle had found so incongruous to his conception of a blind man, ‘you have a mystery somewhere about you! I know it by your step.’
Nearly a month had passed since the incident of the false Dionysius had led to the two men meeting. It was now December. Whatever Mr Carlyle’s step might indicate to the inner eye it betokened to the casual observer the manner of a crisp, alert, self-possessed man of business. Carlyle, in truth, betrayed nothing of the pessimism and despondency that had marked him on the earlier occasion.
‘You have only yourself to thank that it is a very poor one,’ he retorted. ‘If you hadn’t held me to a hasty promise – ’
‘To give me an option on the next case that baffled you, no matter what it was – ’
‘Just so. The consequence is that you get a very unsatisfactory affair that has no special interest to an amateur and is only baffling because it is – well – ’
‘Well, baffling?’
‘Exactly, Max. Your would-be jest has discovered the proverbial truth. I need hardly tell you that it is only the insoluble that is finally baffling and this is very probably insoluble. You remember the awful smash on the Central and Suburban at Knight’s Cross Station a few weeks ago?’
‘Yes,’ replied Carrados, with interest. ‘I read the whole ghastly details at the time.’
‘You read?’ exclaimed his friend suspiciously.
‘I still use the familiar phrases,’ explained Carrados, with a smile. ‘As a matter of fact, my secretary reads to me. I mark what I want to hear and when he comes at ten o’clock we clear off the morning papers in no time.’
‘And how do you know what to mark?’ demanded Mr Carlyle cunningly.
Carrados’s right hand, lying idly on the table, moved to a newspaper near. He ran his finger along a column heading, his eyes still turned towards his visitor.
‘ The Money Market. Continued from page 2. British Railways
,’ he announced.
‘Extraordinary,’ murmured Carlyle.
‘Not very,’ said Carrados. ‘If someone dipped a stick in treacle and wrote Rats
across a marble slab you would probably be able to distinguish what was there, blindfold.’
‘Probably,’ admitted Mr Carlyle. ‘At all events we will not test the experiment.’
‘The difference to you of treacle on a marble background is scarcely greater than that of printers’ ink on newspaper to me. But anything smaller than pica I do not read with comfort, and below long primer I cannot read at all. Hence the secretary. Now the accident, Louis.’
‘The accident: well, you remember all about that. An ordinary Central and Suburban passenger train, non-stop at Knight’s Cross, ran past the signal and crashed into a crowded electric train that was just beginning to move out. It was like sending a garden roller down a row of handlights. Two carriages of the electric train were flattened out of existence; the next two were broken up. For the first time on an English railway there was a good stand-up smash between a heavy steam-engine and a train of light cars, and it was bad for the coo
.’
‘Twenty-seven killed, forty something injured, eight died since,’ commented Carrados.
‘That was bad for the Co.,’ said Carlyle. ‘Well, the main fact was plain enough. The heavy train was in the wrong. But was the engine-driver responsible? He claimed, and he claimed vehemently from the first and he never varied one iota, that he had a clear
signal – that is to say, the green light, it being dark. The signalman concerned was equally dogged that he never pulled off the signal – that it was at danger
when the accident happened and that it had been for five minutes before. Obviously, they could not both be right.’
‘Why, Louis?’ asked Mr Carrados smoothly.
‘The signal must either have been up or down – red or green.’
‘Did you ever notice the signals on the Great Northern Railway, Louis?’
‘Not particularly. Why?’
‘One winterly day, about the year when you and I were concerned in being born, the engine-driver of a Scotch express received the clear
from a signal near a little Huntingdon station called Abbots Ripton. He went on and crashed into a goods train and into the thick of the smash a down express mowed its way. Thirteen killed and the usual tale of injured. He was positive that the signal gave him a clear
; the signalman was equally confident that he had never pulled it off the danger
. Both were right, and yet the signal was in working order. As I said, it was a winterly day; it had been snowing hard and the snow froze and accumulated on the upper edge of the signal arm until its weight bore it down. That is a fact that no fiction writer dare have invented, but to this day every signal on the Great Northern pivots from the centre of the arm instead of from the end, in memory of that snowstorm.’
‘That came out at the inquest, I presume?’ said Mr Carlyle. ‘We have had the Board of Trade inquiry and the inquest here and no explanation is forthcoming. Everything was in perfect order. It rests between the word of the signalman and the word of the engine-driver – not a jot of direct evidence either way. Which is right?’
‘That is what you are going to find out, Louis?’ suggested Carrados.
‘It is what I am being paid for finding out,’ admitted Mr Carlyle frankly. ‘But so far we are just where the inquest left it, and, between ourselves, I candidly can’t see an inch in front of my face in the matter.’
‘Nor can I,’ said the blind man, with a rather wry smile. ‘Never mind. The engine-driver is your client, of course?’
‘Yes,’ admitted Carlyle. ‘But how the deuce did you know?’
‘Let us say that your sympathies are enlisted on his behalf. The jury were inclined to exonerate the signalman, weren’t they? What has the company done with your man?’
‘Both are suspended. Hutchins, the driver, hears that he may probably be given charge of a lavatory at one of the stations. He is a decent, bluff, short-spoken old chap, with his heart in his work. Just now you’ll find him at his worst – bitter and suspicious. The thought of swabbing down a lavatory and taking pennies all day is poisoning him.’
‘Naturally. Well, there we have honest Hutchins: taciturn, a little touchy perhaps, grown grey in the service of the company, and manifesting quite a bulldog-like devotion to his favourite 538.’
‘Why, that actually was the number of his engine – how do you know it?’ demanded Carlyle sharply.
‘It was mentioned two or three times at the inquest, Louis,’ replied Carrados mildly.
‘And you remembered – with no reason to?’
‘You can generally trust a blind man’s memory, especially if he has taken the trouble to develop it.’
‘Then you will remember that Hutchins did not make a very good impression at the time. He was surly and irritable under the ordeal. I want you to see the case from all sides.’
‘He called the signalman – Mead – a lying young dog
, across the room, I believe. Now, Mead, what is he like? You have seen him, of course?’
‘Yes. He does not impress me favourably. He is glib, ingratiating, and distinctly greasy
. He has a ready answer for everything almost before the question is out of your mouth. He has thought of everything.’
‘And now you are going to tell me something, Louis,’ said Carrados encouragingly.
Mr Carlyle laughed a little to cover an involuntary movement of surprise.
‘There is a suggestive line that was not touched at the inquiries,’ he admitted. ‘Hutchins has been a saving man all his life, and he has received good wages. Among his class he is regarded as wealthy. I dare say that he has five hundred pounds in the bank. He is a widower with one daughter, a very nice-mannered girl of about twenty. Mead is a young man, and he and the girl are sweethearts – have been informally engaged for some time. But old Hutchins would not hear of it; he seems to have taken a dislike to the signalman from the first and latterly he had forbidden him to come to his house or his daughter to speak to him.’
‘Excellent, Louis,’ cried Carrados in great delight. ‘We shall clear your man in a blaze of red and green lights yet and hang the glib, greasy
signalman from his own signal-post.’
‘It is a significant fact, seriously?’
‘It is absolutely convincing.’
‘It may have been a slip, a mental lapse on Mead’s part which he discovered the moment it was too late, and then, being too cowardly to admit his fault, and having so much at stake, he took care to make detection impossible. It may have been that, but my idea is rather that probably it was neither quite pure accident nor pure design. I can imagine Mead meanly pluming himself over the fact that the life of this man who stands in his way, and whom he must cordially dislike, lies in his power. I can imagine the idea becoming an obsession as he dwells on it. A dozen times with his hand on the lever he lets his mind explore the possibilities of a moment’s defection. Then one day he pulls the signal off in sheer bravado – and hastily puts it at danger again. He may have done it once or he may have done it oftener before he was caught in a fatal moment of irresolution. The chances are about even that the engine-driver would be killed. In any case he would be disgraced, for it is easier on the face of it to believe that a man might run past a danger signal in absentmindedness, without noticing it, than that a man should pull off a signal and replace it without being conscious of his actions.’
‘The fireman was killed. Does your theory involve the certainty of the fireman being killed, Louis?’
‘No,’ said Carlyle. ‘The fireman is a difficulty, but looking at it from Mead’s point of view – whether he has been guilty of an error or a crime – it resolves itself into this: First, the fireman may be killed. Second, he may not notice the signal at all. Third, in any case he will loyally corroborate his driver and the good old jury will discount that.’
Carrados smoked thoughtfully, his open, sightless eyes merely appearing to be set in a tranquil gaze across the room.
‘It would not be an improbable explanation,’ he said presently. ‘Ninety-nine men out of a hundred would say: People do not do these things.
But you and I, who have in our different ways studied criminology, know that they sometimes do, or else there would be no curious crimes. What have you done on that line?’
To anyone who could see, Mr Carlyle’s expression conveyed an answer.
‘You are behind the scenes, Max. What was there for me to do? Still I must do something for my money. Well, I have had a very close inquiry made confidentially among the men. There might be a whisper of one of them knowing more than had come out – a man restrained by friendship, or enmity, or even grade jealousy. Nothing came of that. Then there was the remote chance that some private person had noticed the signal without attaching any importance to it then, one who would be able to identify it still by something associated with the time. I went over the line myself. Opposite the signal the line on one side is shut in by a high blank wall; on the other side are houses, but coming below the butt-end of a scullery the signal does not happen to be visible from any road or from any window.’
‘My poor Louis!’ said Carrados, in friendly ridicule. ‘You were at the end of your tether?’
‘I was,’ admitted Carlyle. ‘And now that you know the sort of job it is I don’t suppose that you are keen on wasting your time over it.’
‘That would hardly be fair, would it?’ said Carrados reasonably. ‘No, Louis, I will take over your honest old driver