The Logic of Vegetarianism
()
About this ebook
Read more from Henry S. Salt
Animals’ Rights: Considered in Relation to Social Progress Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Animals' Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnimals' Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeventy Years among Savages Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeventy Years Among Savages Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Call of the Wildflower Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Logic of Vegetarianism: Essays and Dialogues Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Cambrian and Cumbrian Hills: Pilgrimages to Snowdon and Scafell Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Logic of Vegetarianism
Related ebooks
The Logic of Vegetarianism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Logic of Vegetarianism: Essays and Dialogues Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Plea for Vegetarianism: and Other Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe History of Salt: With Observations on the Geographical Distribution, Geological Formation, and Medicinal and Dietetic Properties Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe History of Salt: With Observations on the Geographical Distribution, Geological Formation, and Medicinal and Dietetic Properties Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVegetarianism and Occultism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe New Glutton Or Epicure Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVegetarianism and its occult meanings Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The A.B.-Z. of our own nutrition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVegetable Diet - As Sanctioned by Medical Men, and by Experience in All Ages Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCassell's Vegetarian Cookery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Comprehensive Guide-Book to Natural, Hygienic and Humane Diet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsValere Aude: Dare to Be Healthy, Or, The Light of Physical Regeneration Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection : Or, the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 6th Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedical Essays, 1842-1882 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSchool of Theosophy Volume 1: Vegetarianism and Occultism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVivisection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMessy Eating: Conversations on Animals as Food Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs Civilization a Disease? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Darwinian Hypothesis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAllopathy and Homoeopathy Before the Judgement of Common Sense! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays Upon Some Controverted Questions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn The Origin Of Species Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Something Out of Place: Women & Disgust Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Medical Women: Two Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAirVeda: Ancient & New Medical Wisdom, Digestion & Gas, Volume Two Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Scientific Evidences of Organic Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Origin of Species, 6th Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAirVeda: Ancient & New Medical Wisdom, Digestion & Gas, Volume One Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Modes of Origin of Lowest Organisms: Including a discussion of the experiments of M. Pasteur Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Vegetarian/Vegan For You
Eat Plants, B*tch: 91 Vegan Recipes That Will Blow Your Meat-Loving Mind Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Fiber Fueled Cookbook Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Anarchist Cookbook Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Plenty: Vibrant Vegetable Recipes from London's Ottolenghi Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plantifully Lean: 125+ Simple and Satisfying Plant-Based Recipes for Health and Weight Loss: A Cookbook Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Plant-Based Cookbook: Vegan, Gluten-Free, Oil-Free Recipes for Lifelong Health Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ultimate Mediterranean Cookbook Over 100 Delicious Recipes and Mediterranean Meal Plan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Forks Over Knives Plan: How to Transition to the Life-Saving, Whole-Food, Plant-Based Diet Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Vegan Reset: The 28-Day Plan to Kickstart Your Healthy Lifestyle Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The I Love Trader Joe's Vegetarian Cookbook: 150 Delicious and Healthy Recipes Using Foods from the World's Greatest Grocery Store Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sprout Book: Tap into the Power of the Planet's Most Nutritious Food Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lazy, Broke & Vegan Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Effective Plant-Based Air Fryer Cookbook Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Effective Vegan Diet: 50 High Protein Recipes for a Healthier Lifestyle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vegan Bible Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I Can Cook Vegan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBest Vegetarian Cookbook: Quick, healthy, and delicious vegetarian and vegan family recipes Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Cooking from the Spirit: Easy, Delicious, and Joyful Plant-Based Inspirations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRawesomely Vegan!: The Ultimate Raw Vegan Recipe Book Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fix-It and Forget-It Mediterranean Diet Cookbook: 7-Ingredient Healthy Instant Pot and Slow Cooker Meals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe $5 a Meal College Vegetarian Cookbook: Good, Cheap Vegetarian Recipes for When You Need to Eat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Veganize It!: Easy DIY Recipes for a Plant-Based Kitchen Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Logic of Vegetarianism
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Logic of Vegetarianism - Henry S. Salt
The Logic of Vegetarianism
The Logic of Vegetarianism
THE MORALIST AT THE SHAMBLES.
INTRODUCTORY
WHY VEGETARIAN
?
THE RAISON D'ÊTRE OF VEGETARIANISM
THE PAST AND PRESENT OFVEGETARIANISM
STRUCTURAL EVIDENCE
THE APPEAL TO NATURE
THE HUMANITARIAN ARGUMENT
PALLIATIONS AND SOPHISTRIES
THE CONSISTENCY TRICK
THE DEGRADATION OF THE BUTCHER
THE ÆSTHETIC ARGUMENT
THE HYGIENIC ARGUMENT
DIGESTION
CONDITIONS OF CLIMATE
FLESH MEAT AND MORALS
THE ECONOMIC ARGUMENT
DOUBTS AND DIFFICULTIES
BIBLE AND BEEF
THE FLESH-EATER'S KITH AND KIN
VEGETARIANISM AS RELATED TO OTHER REFORMS
CONCLUSION
FOOTNOTES:
Copyright
The Logic of Vegetarianism
Henry S. Salt
THE MORALIST AT THE SHAMBLES.
Where slaughter'd beasts lie quivering, pile on pile,
And bare-armed fleshers, bathed in bloody dew,
Ply hard their ghastly trade, and hack and hew,
And mock sweet Mercy's name, yet loathe the while
The lot that chains them to this service vile,
Their hands in hideous carnage to imbrue:
Lo, there!—the preacher of the Good and True,
The Moral Man, with sanctimonious smile!
Thrice happy beasts,
he murmurs, "'tis our love,
Our thoughtful love that sends ye to the knife
(Nay, doubt not, as ye welter in your gore!);
For thus alone ye earned the boon of life,
And thus alone the Moralist may prove
His sympathetic soul—by eating more."
INTRODUCTORY
It is the special purpose of this book to set forth in a clear and rational manner the logic of vegetarianism. To the ethical, the scientific, and the economic aspects of the system much attention has already been given by well-accredited writers, but there has not as yet been any organised effort to present the logical view—that is, the dialectical scope of the arguments, offensive and defensive, on which the case for vegetarianism is founded. I am aware that mere logic is not in itself a matter of first rate importance, and that a great humane principal, based on true natural instinct, will in the long run have fulfilment, whatever wordy battles may rage around it for a time; nevertheless, there is no better method of hastening that result than to set the issues before the public in a plain and unmistakable light. I wish, therefore, in this work, to show what vegetarianism is, and (a scarcely less essential point) what vegetarianism is not .
For though, owing to the propaganda carried on for the last fifty years, there has been an increasing talk of vegetarianism, and a considerable discussion of its doctrines, there are still very numerous misunderstandings of its real aims and meaning. In this, as in other phases of the great progressive movement of which vegetarianism is a part, to give expression to a new idea is to excite a host of blind and angry prejudices. The champions of the old are too disdainful to take counsel with the champions of the new; hence they commonly attribute to them designs quite different from those which they really entertain, and unconsciously set up a straw man for the pleasure of pummelling him with criticism. Devoid always of a sense of sympathy, and mostly of a sense of humour, they absurdly exaggerate the least vital points in their adversaries' reasoning, while they often fail to note what is the very core of the controversy. It is therefore of great concern to vegetarianism that its case should be so stated as to preclude all possibility of doubt as to the real issues involved. If agreement is beyond our reach, let us at least ascertain the precise point of our disagreement.
With a view to this result, it will be convenient to have recourse now and then to the form of dialogue, so as to bring into sharper contrast the pros and cons of the argument. Nor will these conversations be altogether imaginary, for, to avoid any suspicion of burlesquing the counter-case of our opponents by a fanciful presentment, I shall introduce only such objections to vegetarianism as have actually been insisted on—the stock-objections, in fact, which crop up again and again in all colloquies on food reform—with sometimes the very words of the flesh-eating disputant. It is not my fault if some of these objections appear to be foolish. I have often marvelled at the reckless way in which those who would combat new and unfamiliar notions step forth to the encounter, unprovided with intellectual safeguards, and trusting wholly to certain ancient generic fallacies, which, if we may judge from their appearance in all ages and climates, are indigenous in the human mind. Many of the difficulties which the flesh-eater to-day propounds to the vegetarian are the same, mutatis mutandis , as those which have at various times been cast in the teeth of the reformer by the apologists of every cruel and iniquitous custom, from slave-holding to the suttee.
To show the unreality of these sophisms, by clearing away the misconceptions upon which they rest, and to state the creed of vegetarianism as preached and practised by its friends rather than as misapprehended by its foes—such is the object of this work. To make conversions,
in the ordinary sense, is not my concern. What we have to do is to discover who are flesh-eaters by ingrained conviction, and who by thoughtlessness and ignorance, and to bring over to our side from the latter class those who are naturally allied to us, though by accident ranged in opposition. And this, once more, can only be done by making the issues unmistakable.
Incidentally, I hope these pages may suggest to our antagonists that vegetarians, perhaps, are not the weak brainless sentimentalists that they are so often depicted. It is, to say the least of it, entertaining when a critic who has just been inquiring (for example) what would become of the animals
if mankind were to desist from eating them, goes on to remark of vegetarians that their hearts are better than their heads.
Alas, we cannot truthfully return the compliment by saying of such a philosopher that his head is better than his heart! It cannot be too strongly stated that the appeal of vegetarianism, as of all humane systems, is not to heart alone, nor to brain alone, but to brain and heart combined, and that if its claims fail to win this double judgment they are necessarily void and invalid. The test of logic, no less than the test of feeling, is deliberately challenged by us; for it is only by those who can think as well as feel, and feel as well as think, that the diet question, or indeed any great social question, can ever be brought to its solution.
WHY VEGETARIAN
?
The term vegetarian,
as applied to those who abstain from all flesh food, but not necessarily from such animal products as eggs, milk, and cheese, appears to have come into existence over fifty years ago, at the time of the founding of the Vegetarian Society in 1847. Until that date no special name had been appropriated for the reformed diet system, which was usually known as the Pythagorean
or vegetable diet,
as may be seen by a reference to the writings of that period. Presumably, it was felt that when the movement grew in volume, and was about to enter on a new phase, with an organised propaganda, it was advisable to coin for it an original and distinctive title. Whether, from this point of view, the name vegetarian
was wisely or unwisely chosen is a question on which there has been some difference of opinion among food reformers themselves, and it is possible that adverse criticism would have been still more strongly expressed but for the fact that no better title has been forthcoming.
On the whole, the name vegetarian
seems to be fairly serviceable, its disadvantage being that it gives occasion for sophistry on the part of captious opponents. In all controversies such as that of which vegetarianism is the subject there are verbalists who cannot see beyond the outer shell of a word to the thing which the word signifies, and who delight to chop logic and raise small obstacles, as thus:
Verbalist: Why vegetarian
?
Vegetarian: Why not vegetarian
?
Verbalist: How can it be consistent with vegetarianism to consume, as you admit you do, milk, butter, cheese, and eggs, all of which are choice foods from the animal kingdom?
Vegetarian: That entirely depends on what is meant by vegetarianism.
Verbalist: Well, surely its meaning is obvious—a diet of vegetables only, with no particle of animal substance.
Vegetarian: As a matter of fact, such is not, and has never been, its accepted meaning. The question was often debated in the early years of the Vegetarian Society, and it was always held that the use of eggs and milk was not prohibited. To induce habits of abstinence from the flesh of animals (fish, flesh, fowl) as food
was the avowed aim of vegetarianism, as officially stated on the title-page of its journal.
Verbalist: But the word vegetarian
—what other meaning can it have than that which I have attributed to it?
Vegetarian: Presumably those who invented the word were the best judges of its meaning, and what they meant by it is proved beyond a doubt by the usage of the Society.
Verbalist: But had they a right thus to twist the word from its natural derivation?
Vegetarian: If you appeal to etymology, that raises another question altogether, and here, too, you will find the authorities against you. No one has a better right to speak on this matter than Professor J. E. B. Mayor, the great Latin scholar, and he states that, looking at the word etymologically, vegetarian
cannot mean an eater of vegetables.
It is derived from vegetus , vigorous,
and means, strictly interpreted, one who aims at vigour.
Mind, I am not saying that the originators of the term vegetarian
had this meaning in view, but merely that the etymological sense of the word does not favour your contention any more than the historical.
Verbalist: Well, what does vegetarian
mean, then? How do you explain it yourself?
Vegetarian: A vegetarian
is one who abstains from eating the flesh of animals, and whose food is mainly derived from the vegetable kingdom.
The above dialogue will show the absurdity and injustice of charging vegetarians, as the late Sir Henry Thompson did, with equivocal terms, evasion—in short, untruthfulness,
because they retain a title which was originally invented for their case. The statement that vegetarians have changed the meaning of their name, owing to inability to find adequate nourishment on purely vegetable diet, is founded on similar ignorance of the facts. Here are two specimens of Sir Henry Thompson's inaccuracy. In 1885 he wrote:
"It is high time that we should be spared the obscure language, or rather the inaccurate statement, to which milk and egg consumers are committed, in assuming a title