Blasphemy and Mystery
5/5
()
About this ebook
Read more from Vincent Cheung
The Parables of Jesus Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Systematic Theology Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Commentary On Colossians Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Commentary On Ephesians Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Commentary On Galatians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Commentary On Philippians Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Reflections On Second Timothy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Commentary On Malachi Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Sermon On the Mount Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Biblical Healing Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Born Again Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Commentary On First Peter Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Commentary On 1 & 2 Thessalonians Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ultimate Questions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Reflections On First Timothy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Presuppositional Confrontations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sermonettes, Volume 7 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Renewing the Mind Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Apologetics In Conversation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Prayer and Revelation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Invincible Faith Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Light of Our Minds Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ministry of the Word Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Godliness With Contentment Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Samson and His Faith Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Captive to Reason Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sermonettes, Volume 2 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sermonettes, Volume 5 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Doctrine and Obedience Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sermonettes, Volume 6 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to Blasphemy and Mystery
Related ebooks
Invincible Faith Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The View from Above Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Captive to Reason Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Skepticism: The Case against Christianity? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Good and Evil Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Pure Religion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sermonettes, Volume 5 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Light of Our Minds Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sermonettes, Volume 3 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sermonettes, Volume 2 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sermonettes, Volume 4 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Doctrine and Obedience Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Prayer and Revelation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Author of Sin Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Divine Christology of the Apostle Paul: Retrospect and Prospect Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSermonettes, Volume 6 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sermonettes, Volume 1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Private Commentary on the Bible: Galatians Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Presuppositional Confrontations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Galatians: Justified by Faith in Jesus Christ: Pauline Epistles, #6 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRenewing the Mind Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Christmas Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGiver of Truth Biblical Commentary-Vol. 1: Old Testament Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Augustine Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSermonettes, Volume 7 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5True Bible Study - Abraham Genesis 12-25 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Private Commentary on the Bible: Jude Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Private Commentary on the Book of Hebrews Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Seven Shades of Sin: unmasking temptation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnder the Old Covenant Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Religion & Spirituality For You
A Grief Observed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gay Girl, Good God: The Story of Who I Was, and Who God Has Always Been Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry Into Values Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mere Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Screwtape Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Course In Miracles: (Original Edition) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Love Dare Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Calendar of Wisdom: Daily Thoughts to Nourish the Soul, Written and Se Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Abolition of Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5THE EMERALD TABLETS OF THOTH THE ATLANTEAN Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unwanted: How Sexual Brokenness Reveals Our Way to Healing Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Upon Waking: 60 Daily Reflections to Discover Ourselves and the God We Were Made For Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Warrior of the Light: A Manual Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gospel of Mary Magdalene Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5You Were Born for This: Astrology for Radical Self-Acceptance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Billion Years: My Escape From a Life in the Highest Ranks of Scientology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5NRSV, Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible: Bringing to Life the Ancient World of Scripture Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Hindu View Of Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Weight of Glory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jesus and Buddha: The Parallel Sayings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Celebration of Discipline, Special Anniversary Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Blasphemy and Mystery
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
Blasphemy and Mystery - Vincent Cheung
BLASPHEMY AND MYSTERY
Copyright © 2007 by Vincent Cheung
http://www.vincentcheung.com
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted without the prior permission of the author or publisher.
Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION. Copyright 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved.
CONTENTS
Preface
1. Atheism as Non-Belief
2. The Easter Bunny Trap
3. The Hitler Ad Hominem
4. In God We Trust
5. Graded Absolutism
6. Double Graded Absolutism
7. Blinded by Atheism
8. Blasphemy and Mystery in Theology
9. A Culture of Irreverence
10. God's Holiness and Evil Thoughts
11. God Passive Only Relative to Himself
12. Whosoever Will May Come
13. Typical Reformed Theology
14. The Arminianism Within
15. Association with Unbelievers
16. Internal Change and External Conduct
17. Love and Emotion
18. Pragmatism and the Curriculum
19. Not in Word, but in Power
20. Acupuncture, Dim-Mak, and Science
21. Corporal Punishment
22. Suicide
23. Extraterrestrial Life
Preface
Most of the articles in this collection are written in response to objections raised against various aspects of Christianity. Although some of these objections come from unbelievers, several are from professing Christians who have been critical of the consistently God-centered system of theology, philosophy, and apologetics expounded in my writings. The truth is that they resent God and the Scripture, but are too proud and dishonest to admit it.
As these articles demonstrate, the objections from professing believers against our biblical system exhibit patterns of reasoning that are remarkably similar to those found in unbelievers, including some of the intellectual habits and assumptions that underlie atheism.
In connection with this, several of the articles examine some of the most treasured and ingrained doctrines that professing believers have invented in order to soften or even subvert the teachings of Scripture on the sovereignty of God and the coherence of Scripture. They show that these traditional doctrines are not only unbiblical, but nonsensical, irrational, and often even blasphemous. Therefore, rather than submitting to the pressure to conform, we must denounce these doctrines and condemn them in the harshest terms possible.
Because these are supplements to the core body of writings previous released, they often do not repeat but rather assume materials and arguments that have been presented elsewhere. For this reason, a careful reading of several works is recommended. They include my Systematic Theology, Ultimate Questions, Presuppositional Confrontations, Apologetics in Conversation, The Author of Sin, Captive to Reason, Commentary on Ephesians, and The Sermon on the Mount.
1. Atheism as Non-Belief
I debate many atheists…. Some of them insist that atheism is just non-belief in God. And they deny that man is inherently religious. But my main obstacle is to prove that atheism is not simple non-belief.
If it is not settled after some initial attempts, it could be misdirected effort to insist on arguing out whether atheism is one thing or another. Whatever they wish to call it, just let them tell you what they believe and then refute it. An accurate description of the belief is essential, but the name is not. If you are stuck on arguing about what they should call their position, or given what they call it, stuck on arguing what their position should be, then you might never engage what they believe. You will be spending all your time trying to match their position with the appropriate label.
The relevant issue is the claim that their position is mere non-belief,
or a lack of belief in God as opposed to a definite assertion that there is no God. This is what you must address. Their tactic might be that if they could turn their position into a phantom, into something nebulous, then it will become difficult for you to attack. However, what they affirm is in fact definite and concrete – you only need to take one step closer. In reality their position is that non-belief in God is rational or correct. In other words, even if there is such a thing as mere non-belief about God, underlying this is a positive belief that this non-belief is the correct position. This is something that you can confront and refute with ease.
Of course, one response is to argue that their position is not mere non-belief about God in the first place, but we do not need to mention this right away. We can begin by taking them at their word for the moment, and deal with them from that angle. What is their reason for non-belief? Is this non-belief rational and justified? If the non-belief is justified based on a lack of evidence, then what is evidence, and why is this kind of evidence correct or relevant? And since they claim that there is a lack of evidence, a lack of rational justification, they must also refute all the arguments that Christians present to them. Once they commit themselves to the stance that atheism is mere non-belief, seize it and beat on it again and again. Rain fire and brimstone on it. Kill it, resuscitate it, then kill it again. Analyze it from every angle, so that even they become sick of it. And then do it some more.
We can go further. Besides confronting their position that non-belief is correct and justified, you may also attack them for taking such a position. After so many centuries of philosophy and science, including thousands of guesses, speculations, and random musings, this is as far as they got? As the people of God, we have been sure of the truth for thousands of years – indeed, since the beginning of the world – and there was never any need to change our answer.
What unbelievers call progress
is just a nice word for revising previous answers. Such progress does not denote advance in knowledge, but it indicates that they never had any to begin with. Continual progress
in this sense means only that they are moving from one error to another. But with God, truth is one, constant, and forever. So what is wrong with them? Do they lack the intellectual courage to commit to a position? Do they lack the competence to attain an answer to anything at all? And is atheism nothing more than non-belief in God? Good, then it also means that atheists are nothing more than cowards and idiots. They have been so since the beginning, and by their admission, nothing has changed after all these years.
Logic textbooks will tell you that personal attack is a fallacy. However, if Christians accept this without qualification or a proper understanding of why and when it is a fallacy, then they must also call the Bible itself a book of fallacies, since it constantly accuses and attacks sinners in its arguments. In fact, in teaching apologetics, many Christians have blasphemed Scripture on precisely this point because they have accepted an anti-biblical standard for debate and discussion. And so they urge believers to never employ personal attacks. But this is to betray a vital aspect of preaching, of evangelism and apologetics.
Personal attack is a fallacy only if the person is irrelevant to the topic. The fallacy (when it is a fallacy) is not in attacking the person, but in saying something irrelevant to the debate. However, when confronting non-Christians, we are indeed interested in talking about who and what they are before God. So at some point in the conversation, we must make it our topic to talk about them. Once we have done this, personal attacks are not fallacious, that is, if the attacks are accurate.
Of course, in saying this, we also open ourselves to being attacked by them. We welcome this, since if they fail to make accurate accusations that they can support with sound arguments or to use rationally justified standards in making these accusations, then their attacks will backfire against them, and serve to illustrate what we assert about their competence and character.
It is inadvisable to insist that atheism is religious
or to say that man is inherently religious, although this language is sometimes used by both Christians and non-Christians. Rather, Scripture declares that every person has an innate knowledge and awareness of God, with enough content to condemn him as a sinner to everlasting extreme torture in a fiery hell. This is different from saying that man is inherently religious
– such language is rather weak and imprecise. In our intellectual confrontations with unbelievers, we should charge ahead with a bolder and more specific thrust. The Christian system is able to back it up and put down all oppositions against it.
2. The Easter Bunny Trap
I have been talking with an atheist and he brings up an issue that I am not sure how to answer. He asks if I can show that the Easter Bunny is not real. It seems that there are problems with any answer that I could give. If I say that it is not real, then he will ask me how I know this. So how should I reply?
Since I lack the context, it is difficult to guess where he intends to go with this. There are several possibilities. Perhaps if you are unable to prove that the Easter Bunny is not real but nevertheless consider it rational to believe that it is not real, then he will say the same thing about God. That is, he can then take the position that, although he cannot disprove the existence of God, it is still rational to disbelieve in his existence simply because of a lack of empirical evidence. This way, he gets you to commit to the idea that it is irrational to believe in something that one cannot see or has not seen. At this point, it does not matter whether there is indeed a lack of empirical evidence for God's existence, or whether we can know anything by empiricism, since we are just speculating about the kind of argument that this atheist is setting up, and this might be what he is attempting.
As with many objections against Christianity, this one suffers from irrelevance. Although this lack of relevance is not as obvious as some of the other objections, it is still easy to perceive. Metaphysically, God is in a class by himself. Unlike the Easter Bunny, whose existence would not necessarily affect other things that are equally insignificant to the construction and operation of the universe, God is necessarily related to everything in the universe, for he is the creator and sustainer of them all.
With this in mind, consider classical and evidential apologetics. Forgetting about their fatal deficiencies for now, their