Occupational Radiation Protection in the Uranium Mining and Processing Industry
By IAEA
()
About this ebook
Read more from Iaea
IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClimate Change and Nuclear Power 2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComprehensive Audits of Radiotherapy Practices: A Tool for Quality Improvement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdapting the Energy Sector to Climate Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Assessment of Climate, Land, Energy and Water Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Non-Invasive Cardiovascular Imaging: A Guide for the Practitioner Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Expert Group on Nuclear Liability (INLEX): A Collective View on the First Two Decades Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Occupational Radiation Protection in the Uranium Mining and Processing Industry
Titles in the series (25)
Ageing Management for Nuclear Power Plants: International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned (IGALL) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSafety Analysis and Licensing Documentation for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPeriodic Safety Review for Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign and Conduct of Indoor Radon Surveys Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgeing Management for Nuclear Power Plants: International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned (IGALL) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOccupational Radiation Protection in the Uranium Mining and Processing Industry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedical Management of Radiation Injuries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection and Safety in Veterinary Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Nuclear Safety Knowledge: National Approaches and Experience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Seismic Safety Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplication of Probabilistic Methods for the Safety Assessment and the Reliable Operation of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMulti-unit Probabilistic Safety Assessment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRegulatory Control of Exposure Due to Radionuclides in Building Materials and Construction Materials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRegulatory Oversight of Ageing Management and Long Term Operation Programme of Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPatient Radiation Exposure Monitoring in Medical Imaging Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection in Dental Radiology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSafe Use of Smart Devices in Systems Important to Safety in Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLicensing Process for the Construction, Commissioning and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssessment of High Wind and External Flooding (Excluding Tsunami) Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExposure due to Radionuclides in Food Other than During a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency: Part 1: Technical Material Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgeing Management for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUse of Periodic Safety Review for Long Term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplicability of IAEA Safety Standards to Non-Water Cooled Reactors and Small Modular Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Management of Depleted Uranium Used as Shielding in Disused Radiation Devices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Ionization Chamber Smoke Detectors: Approaches and Practical Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign and Conduct of Indoor Radon Surveys Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of National Infrastructure for the Uranium Production Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Radioactive Lightning Conductors and Their Associated Radioactive Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunication and Stakeholder Involvement in Radioactive Waste Disposal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatus and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Environmental Behaviour of Uranium Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection and Safety in Veterinary Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection in Dental Radiology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecific Considerations and Guidance for the Establishment of Ionizing Radiation Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProduction, Quality Control and Clinical Applications of Radiosynovectomy Agents Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStorage of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgeing Management for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnical Approaches for the Management of Separated Civilian Plutonium Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssessment of High Wind and External Flooding (Excluding Tsunami) Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaintenance, Testing, Surveillance and Inspection in Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFormat and Content of the Package Design Safety Report for the Transport of Radioactive Material Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeveloping Cost Estimates for Environmental Remediation Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeadership, Management and Culture for Safety in Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvisory Material for the IAEA Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Safeguards in the Design of Enrichment Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSafety of Uranium and Plutonium Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResearch Reactor Spent Fuel Management: Options and Support to Decision Making Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeismic Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPreparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency Involving the Transport of Radioactive Material Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadiation Protection and Radioactive Waste Management in the Design and Operation of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Power Resources For You
Electronics All-in-One For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5OFF-GRID PROJECTS: Essential Guide to Enhance DIY Skills for Self-Reliance Preppers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDIY Lithium Battery Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Grid: The Fraying Wires Between Americans and Our Energy Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind: Creating Currents of Electricity and Hope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Homeowner's DIY Guide to Electrical Wiring Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Emergency Preparedness and Off-Grid Communication Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Solar Power Demystified: The Beginners Guide To Solar Power, Energy Independence And Lower Bills Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Oil: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Off Grid And Mobile Solar Power For Everyone: Your Smart Solar Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnergy: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOFF-GRID PROJECTS: A Comprehensive Beginner's Guide to Learn All about OffGrid Living from A-Z and Live a Life of Self-Sufficiency Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSolar Power Your Home For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Station Blackout: Inside the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster and Recovery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ultimate Solar Power Design Guide Less Theory More Practice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Isaac Asimov Archives Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Geo Power: Stay Warm, Keep Cool and Save Money with Geothermal Heating & Cooling Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Solar Electricity Basics: Powering Your Home or Office with Solar Energy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Energy: A Human History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Illustrated Tesla (Rediscovered Books): With linked Table of Contents Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rare Metals War: the dark side of clean energy and digital technologies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How Do Electric Motors Work? Physics Books for Kids | Children's Physics Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreeing Energy: How Innovators Are Using Local-scale Solar and Batteries to Disrupt the Global Energy Industry from the Outside In Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUntapped: The Scramble for Africa's Oil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Photovoltaic Design and Installation For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Distribution of Electrical Power: Lecture Notes of Distribution of Electrical Power Course Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Occupational Radiation Protection in the Uranium Mining and Processing Industry
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Occupational Radiation Protection in the Uranium Mining and Processing Industry - IAEA
Occupational Radiation
Protection in the
Uranium Mining and
Processing Industry
SAFETY REPORTS SERIES No. 100
Occupational Radiation
Protection in the
Uranium Mining and
Processing Industry
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
VIENNA, 2020
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All IAEA scientific and technical publications are protected by the terms of the Universal Copyright Convention as adopted in 1952 (Berne) and as revised in 1972 (Paris). The copyright has since been extended by the World Intellectual Property Organization (Geneva) to include electronic and virtual intellectual property. Permission to use whole or parts of texts contained in IAEA publications in printed or electronic form must be obtained and is usually subject to royalty agreements. Proposals for non-commercial reproductions and translations are welcomed and considered on a case-by-case basis. Enquiries should be addressed to the IAEA Publishing Section at:
Marketing and Sales Unit, Publishing Section
International Atomic Energy Agency
Vienna International Centre
PO Box 100
1400 Vienna, Austria
fax: +43 1 26007 22529
tel.: +43 1 2600 22417
email: [email protected]
www.iaea.org/publications
© IAEA, 2020
Printed by the IAEA in Austria
April 2020
STI/PUB/1890
IAEA Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Names: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Title: Occupational radiation protection in the uranium mining and processing industry / International Atomic Energy Agency.
Description: Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency, 2020. | Series: IAEA safety reports series, ISSN 1020–6450 ; no. 100 | Includes bibliographical references.
Identifiers: IAEAL 20-01304 | ISBN 978–92–0–106919–1 (paperback : alk. paper) | 978–92–0–162019–4 (pdf)
Subjects: LCSH: Radiation — Safety measures. | Uranium mines and mining. | Industrial safety.
Classification: UDC 614.876:553.495 | STI/PUB/1890
FOREWORD
The Fundamental Safety Principles, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SF-1, and Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3, establish the principles and basic requirements for radiation protection and safety applicable to all activities involving radiation exposure, including exposure to natural sources of radiation. International radiation safety regulations have been applied at uranium mines for over forty years. Even though radiation safety regulations in many uranium producing countries are among the most comprehensive and stringent, there is still scope to enhance protection of occupationally exposed workers in terms of improving mechanisms to reduce occupational exposure, achieve informed personal behaviours and apply best engineered controls and other aspects.
Uranium mining companies take active steps to reduce radiation doses and to control exposures wherever they can. They often voluntarily adopt the most recent international requirements and recommendations on dose limits and occupational radiation protection before they become part of national regulations. Enhancing radiation protection of workers on an industry wide and global basis supports the implementation of internationally consistent standards and approaches with regard to the protection of workers.
In 2011, the IAEA initiated the Information System on Uranium Mining Exposure (UMEX) to enhance radiation protection of workers in uranium mining and processing. As a first step, the IAEA conducted a global survey to evaluate worldwide occupational radiation protection. Following an analysis of the results, the IAEA has been able to identify both good practices and opportunities for improvements. This publication presents the results of the questionnaire and identifies actions to assist industry, workers and regulatory bodies in implementing the principle of optimization of protection. This publication also presents information on uranium mining and processing methods, radiation protection considerations, monitoring, dose assessment and radiation protection programmes for the range of commonly used mining and processing techniques.
The IAEA is grateful to all who contributed to the drafting and review of this publication, in particular I. Ženatá (Czech Republic). The IAEA officers responsible for this publication were P.P. Haridasan and H.B. Okyar of the Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety.
EDITORIAL NOTE
Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this publication, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use.
This publication does not address questions of responsibility, legal or otherwise, for acts or omissions on the part of any person.
Guidance provided here, describing good practices, represents expert opinion but does not constitute recommendations made on the basis of a consensus of Member States.
The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries.
The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA.
The IAEA has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third party Internet web sites referred to in this book and does not guarantee that any content on such web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
The authoritative versions of the publications are the hard copies issued and available as PDFs on www.iaea.org/publications.To create the versions for e-readers, certain changes have been made, including the movement of some figures and tables.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
1.2. Objective
1.3. Scope
1.4. Structure
2. OVERVIEW OF THE URANIUM INDUSTRY AND GENERAL RADIATION PROTECTION
2.1. Global uranium production
2.2. Overall occupational exposure
2.3. Uranium mining and processing stages and techniques
3. GENERAL RADIATION PROTECTION CONSIDERATIONS IN URANIUM MINING AND PROCESSING
3.1. International safety standards
3.2. Scope of regulation
3.3. Responsibilities
3.4. Graded approach to regulation
3.5. Specific aspects of radionuclides in the uranium series
4. GENERAL METHODOLOGY FOR CONTROL
4.1. Occupational health and safety considerations
4.2. Hierarchy of control
4.3. Dose minimization
4.4. Exposure pathways
5. MONITORING AND DOSE ASSESSMENT
5.1. Objectives of a monitoring programme
5.2. Responsibility for the monitoring programme
5.3. Types of monitoring programme
5.4. General dose considerations
6. RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAMMES
6.1. Exploration
6.2. Underground mining
6.3. Surface mining
6.4. In situ leach mining and processing
6.5. Heap leaching
6.6. Processing facilities
6.7. Non-conventional uranium extraction
6.8. High grade ore mining and processing
6.9. Uranium tailings facilities
6.10. Material in transport
6.11. Decommissioning
Appendix I: SURVEY OF THE INFORMATION SYSTEM ON URANIUM MINING EXPOSURE (UMEX)
Appendix II: EXTERNAL EXPOSURE TO GAMMA RADIATION
Appendix III: RADON AN D RADON PROGENY
Appendix IV: INHALATION OF LONG LIVED RADIONUCLIDES I N AIRBORNE DUST
Appendix V: SURFAC E CONTAMINATION
Appendix VI: INGESTION, WOUND CONTAMINATION AND ABSORPTION
REFERENCES
Annex: IAEA QUESTIONNAIRE ON OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES IN URANIUM MINING AND PROCESSING
ABBREVIATIONS
CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
Natural uranium is the dominant fuel for global nuclear power programmes, and an increase in the momentum of the prospecting, mining and processing of uranium is inevitable in the future as more countries adopt national nuclear power programmes. The World Nuclear Association¹ reports:
"• In the last 60 years uranium has become one of the world’s most important energy minerals.
• It is mined and concentrated similarly to many other metals.
…….
Uranium is a naturally occurring element with an average concentration of 2.8 parts per million in the Earth’s crust. Traces of it occur almost everywhere. It is more abundant than gold, silver or mercury, about the same as tin and slightly less abundant than cobalt, lead or molybdenum.
The three main methods of producing uranium are underground mining, open pit mining and in situ leaching (ISL) (sometimes referred to as in situ recovery, ISR). Conventional mines, either underground or open pit, are usually associated with a mill, where the ore is crushed, ground and then leached² to dissolve the uranium and separate it from the host ore. At the mill of a conventional mine or at the treatment plant of an ISL operation, the uranium which is now in solution is then separated by ion exchange before being precipitated, dried and packed. The product, uranium oxide concentrate, is also referred to as yellow cake and mixed uranium oxide (U3O8, UO4).
Uranium can also be recovered as a by-product from phosphate fertilizer production and from the mining of other minerals, such as copper and gold, when the ores contain economically exploitable quantities of uranium. In such situations, the treatment process to recover uranium can be more complex.
During uranium mining and processing, workers may be exposed externally to gamma rays emitted from the ores, process materials, products and tailings. Internal exposure can arise from the inhalation of long lived radionuclide dust (LLRD) and radon and radon decay products (RDP), and through absorption, ingestion and wound contamination.
1.2. Objective
The objective of this publication is to provide detailed information to assist regulatory bodies and industry operators in implementing a graded approach to the protection of workers against exposures associated with uranium mining and processing. This information will also serve as the basis for creating a common understanding among various stakeholders (e.g. regulators, operators, workers and their representatives, health, safety and environmental professionals) about the radiological aspects of the various processes involved and the ways in which these aspects can be addressed appropriately and effectively.
1.3. Scope
This publication describes the methods of production in the uranium industry and provides practical information on the radiological risks to workers in exploring, mining and processing. This publication also describes the methods of assessing and controlling the radiological risks based on the application of the appropriate IAEA safety standards and good working practices. This information has been compiled from published literature, from unpublished data provided by the contributors to this publication and from numerous experts with extensive experience in the various sectors of the uranium mining and processing industry. Guidance provided here, describing good practice, represents expert opinion but does not constitute recommendations made on the basis of a consensus of Member States.
1.4. Structure
Section 2 provides an overview of the uranium industry and the general radiation protection aspects of various uranium mining and processing methods. Section 3 summarizes the radiation protection principles and considerations that apply to the industry and the application of the international standards, the graded approach to regulation and specific aspects of radionuclides in the uranium decay series. Section 4 addresses the general methodology for control with the introduction of occupational health and safety considerations, the hierarchy of control, dose reduction and exposure pathways. Section 5 explores the arrangements for monitoring and dose assessment of various exposure pathways, and Section 6 presents the occupational radiation protection programmes during the life cycle of different uranium mining and processing methods and stages. The six appendices begin with a description of the Information System on Uranium Mining Exposure (UMEX) survey, which is followed by the methods and analysis of the survey results, and concludes with technical details on the assessment and control of the major exposure pathways.
2. OVERVIEW OF THE URANIUM INDUSTRY AND GENERAL RADIATION PROTECTION
2.1. Global uranium production
With the current interest in nuclear power, there has been an increase in uranium exploration and in the development of new uranium mining and processing facilities in many countries. World uranium production was 55 975 tU as of 1 January 2015 [1, 2]. This uranium production occurred in 16 different countries at approximately 50 different mining and processing facilities. Uranium production has increased by 50% since 2007; and because of this increased demand, the numbers of workers in the uranium mining and processing industry is set to increase substantially within a few years.
In 2012, as part of UMEX, the IAEA developed a questionnaire that was distributed to 36 operators in uranium producing countries. The responses to this first questionnaire were received in 2013. The information in Appendix I is based on the analysis of the questionnaire results from the operating facilities, which comprises 18 operators and accounts for nearly 85% of the global uranium production, and it includes summaries of current practices for monitoring exposures and reporting doses.
Many ISL facilities (also known as uranium solution mining) have operated since the late 1960s (e.g. in Central Asia and the United States of America). In recent years, they have been producing almost half of worldwide uranium supplies, accounting for 48.7% of uranium mined in 2015 [2]. Most uranium mining in Kazakhstan, the United States of America and Uzbekistan is now conducted using ISL methods. ISL mining is also undertaken in Australia, China and the Russian Federation, and ISL operations are being considered in Mongolia and the United Republic of Tanzania [2]. Underground mining (27%), open pit mining (14%), co-product and by-product recovery from copper and gold operations (7%), heap leaching (<1%) and other methods (<1%) accounted for the remaining uranium production [2].
2.2. Overall occupational exposure
Occupational exposure is the exposure of workers in the course of their work, whether full time or part time, as either a company employee or contract worker. Occupational exposure arises mainly from external gamma radiation and the inhalation of LLRD and RDP.
The monitoring practices and dose calculation procedures and assumptions used to estimate worker doses vary according to operations and regulations. Doses can be assessed, for example, from area monitoring and estimates of occupancy times, or be based directly on individual dose measurements. The procedures and assumptions for dose assessment affect not only the estimation of dose by pathway but also the total dose. Thus, it is important to document any assumptions made in estimating and reporting the dose and the values of other key parameters used in calculating the dose. Figure 1 presents the average dose components from the UMEX survey of each pathway of exposure in different types of mining and processing.
The UMEX data for the various operations were combined into four mining methodologies: underground, open cut, ISL and other. Both the underground and open cut mining data were further separated into mining and processing personnel. The other category included exposures from uranium recovery from rehabilitation, wastewater treatment and toll milling. The results of the survey can be summarized as follows:
(a) General observations:
— The dominant uranium mining method was ISL, followed by underground and open cut methods.
— The main process for uranium extraction from ores was acid leaching, followed by alkali leaching.
(b) Assessment of external exposure:
— Most operators used thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) methods for the assessment of individual gamma doses.
— Most operators monitored each worker’s dose; the remainder monitored selected group averaging and selected individual monitoring to assess doses.
— Approximately half of operations did not use background subtraction, which can lead to a small overestimation of the occupational dose.
(c) Assessment of LLRD and dust sampling:
— Approximately half the operators used area dust sampling values to estimate doses; the remainder used personal dust sampling methods on individual workers.
— Most operators used gross alpha counting methods for assessing alpha activity.
— Most operators used periodic monitoring for the assessment of inhaled dust.
— Most operators did not use routine bioassay; however, some operators used urine analysis.
(d) Monitoring of inhalation of RDP:
— For monitoring RDP, most operators used area RDP monitoring with worker occupancy factors to estimate doses.
— The monitoring methodology used by most operators was workgroup averaging, followed by individual monitoring.
— Most operators did not use background subtraction, which can lead to a small overestimation of the measured dose.
(e) Dose assessment:
— For the dose calculations, most operators followed the time sheet method, while most of the remainder used electronic devices for time measurement.
— Different types of dose conversion factor (DCF) were used by operators for RDP and LLRD exposure pathways; with regard to RDP exposure, however, most operators followed the values recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) [ 3 ].
— The approach to DCFs needs to be harmonized, especially in the case of doses arising from RDP.
— To have an accurate LLRD dose estimate, factors such as the particle size distribution of the inhaled dust, solubility factors and radionuclide mixture need to be considered.
2.3. Uranium mining and processing stages and techniques
The life cycle of a uranium mining and processing operation is a complex process which can extend over decades. The life cycle stages include exploration, planning, construction and operation, decommissioning, handover and surveillance (see Fig. 2). The mining method and design parameters have a significant bearing on the occupational exposures, control measures and monitoring that will be necessary.
The design stage of the life cycle is a critical stage of the process in which the mining and processing method and the plant design is optimized. In addition, the design stage needs to take account of conventional and radiation safety requirements, the methods of waste management and the decommissioning approach. There are a range of mining options available, including underground, surface and in situ mining. Processing also has a large range of options and some are integrally linked to the mining method, such as ISL. The mining and processing are generally closely linked and collectively can be called the operational phase.
Occupational exposure is associated with all of the above stages except for the design stage. Poor decisions in the design phase can have major negative impacts on occupational exposure, and these can be difficult to correct during the operational phase. The choice of mining and processing technique is heavily dependent on the ore grade and the characteristics of the ore body. Other important factors include topography, hydrogeology, geotechnical aspects, logistics and the perspectives of interested parties (e.g. the public, indigenous people, regulatory bodies). Therefore, awareness of the impact of the design approach on the control of occupational exposures is a critical aspect.
2.3.1. Exploration
Exploration is characterized by operations in the field to discover and assess the uranium resource. In most cases, the occupational exposures during exploration are expected to be low, due to the limited amount of radioactive material being handled (a few tonnes) and the usually low ore grades involved in most operations. However, there are exceptions where significantly higher grade ores and quantities are involved and, in some cases, where exploration involves trial mining including underground operations. In the past, the radiation protection aspects of exploration have often been ignored. The modern approach is to assess potential radiation hazards and doses through a prospective assessment and then implement an appropriate radiation protection programme.
2.3.2. Underground mines
Underground mines are designed to facilitate the safe and economic extraction of a mineral resource, and the mining approach will in large part be dictated by the geological constraints of the deposit. Uranium mines face the same safety challenges as mines for other minerals, with the additional constraint of dealing with the radiation associated with the ore. However, except in the case of high grade uranium deposits, it is usually typical mining constraints, such as ground conditions and the size and orientation of the ore zone, and not radiation issues, that determine the optimal mining method. Nevertheless, factors associated with controlling radiation need to be incorporated into the design of the mine to extract the uranium ore safely. The exception is mine ventilation, where far more control of ventilation conditions is likely to be necessary than in conventional underground mines to prevent the buildup of radon concentrations.
The basic radiation protection approach of time–distance–shielding serves as a useful way to highlight some of the key issues that need to be considered in the design and operation of underground uranium mines. With regard to ‘time’, the goal is, to the extent possible, to minimize the amount of time workers are in direct contact with the ore. For low grade ore deposits, this design constraint is not as serious as it is for high grade deposits, where it can eliminate or at least severely restrict the use of some mining methods. Other strategies such as the use of remote controlled equipment and shielding (e.g. clean waste rock on