Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) Ruling
()
About this ebook
Related to Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) Ruling
Related ebooks
Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) Ruling Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Effects of Cybercrime in the U.S. and Abroad Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsE-Discovery and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCyber- An Era of Crime & Laws Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternet Explorer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChokepoints: Global Private Regulation on the Internet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNREN Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrivacy, Security, and Cyberspace, Revised Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Future of Cybersecurity: Guarding the Digital Frontier: Strategies, Tools, and Best Practices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDisability, Human Rights, and Information Technology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Fabric of Mobile Services: Software Paradigms and Business Demands Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElectronic and Mobile Commerce Law: An Analysis of Trade, Finance, Media and Cybercrime in the Digital Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDark Web Investigation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComputer Ethics, Revised Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Internet in Brazil: Origins, Strategy, Development, and Governance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLEGAL ASPECTS OF DATA PROTECTION Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Data, Ourselves: A Personal Guide to Digital Privacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComputers in the Workplace, Revised Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSecure Your Internet Use Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunication and Cyberspace, Revised Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKeeps Kids Out of Porn: The Governments Intentional Failure Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Internet Publicity Guide (Review and Analysis of Shiva's Book) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComputers in Science and Mathematics, Revised Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework: A pocket guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCyber Smarts for Students Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCryptography and Data Security Book 2: Best Practices for Cryptography and Data Security Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWe Have Root: Even More Advice from Schneier on Security Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stupid Ways People are Being Hacked! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLandscape of Cybersecurity Threats and Forensic Inquiry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Law For You
Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Source: The Secrets of the Universe, the Science of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Legal Words You Should Know: Over 1,000 Essential Terms to Understand Contracts, Wills, and the Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Win Your Case: How to Present, Persuade, and Prevail--Every Place, Every Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Legal Writing in Plain English: A Text with Exercises Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The LLC and Corporation Start-Up Guide: Your Complete Guide to Launching the Right Business Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Win In Court Every Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Wills and Trusts Kit For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Socratic Method: A Practitioner's Handbook Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Law For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Criminal Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe ZERO Percent: Secrets of the United States, the Power of Trust, Nationality, Banking and ZERO TAXES! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Everything Guide To Being A Paralegal: Winning Secrets to a Successful Career! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/58 Living Trust Forms: Legal Self-Help Guide Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Paralegal's Handbook: A Complete Reference for All Your Daily Tasks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Everything Executor and Trustee Book: A Step-by-Step Guide to Estate and Trust Administration Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Estate & Trust Administration For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSecrets of Criminal Defense Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Common Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Divorcing a Narcissist: The Lure, the Loss and the Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCritical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Think Like a Lawyer--and Why: A Common-Sense Guide to Everyday Dilemmas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Legal Writing: QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) Ruling
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) Ruling - United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) Ruling
EAN 8596547058106
DigiCat, 2022
Contact: [email protected]
Table of Contents
Cover
Titlepage
Text
Section 1721(b) of CIPA imposes conditions on a library's participation in the E-rate program. A library having one or more computers with Internet access may not receive services at discount rates,
CIPA Sec. 1721(b) (codified at 47 U.S.C. Sec. 254(h)(6)(A)(i)), unless the library certifies that it is enforcing a policy of Internet safety that includes the operation of a technology protection measure with respect to any of its computers with Internet access that protects against access through such computers to visual depictions that are (I) obscene; (II) child pornography; or (III) harmful to minors,
and that it is enforcing the operation of such technology protection measure during any use of such computers by minors.
CIPA Sec. 1721(b) (codified at 47 U.S.C. Sec. 254(h)(6)(B)). CIPA defines a technology protection measure
as a specific technology that blocks or filters access to visual depictions that are obscene, … child pornography, … or harmful to minors.
CIPA Sec. 1703(b)(1) (codified at 47 U.S.C. Sec. 254(h)(7)(I)).
To receive E-rate discounts, a library must also certify that filtering software is in operation during adult use of the Internet. More specifically, with respect to adults, a library must certify that it is enforcing a policy of Internet safety that includes the operation of a technology protection measure with respect to any of its computers with Internet access that protects against access through such computers to visual depictions that are (I) obscene; or (II) child pornography,
and that it is enforcing the operation of such technology protection measure during any use of such computers.
CIPA Sec. 1721(b) (codified at 47 U.S.C. Sec. 254(h)(6)(C)). Interpreting the statutory terms any use,
the FCC has concluded that CIPA makes no distinction between computers used only by staff and those accessible to the public.
In re Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service: Children's Internet Protection Act, CC Docket No. 96–45, Report and Order, FCC 01–120, 30 (Apr. 5, 2001). With respect to libraries receiving E-rate discounts, CIPA further specifies that [a]n administrator, supervisor, or other person authorized by the certifying authority … may disable the technology protection measure concerned, during use by an adult, to enable access for bona fide research or other lawful purpose.
CIPA Sec.1721(b) (codified at 47 U.S.C. Sec. 254(h)(6)(D)). 2. CIPA's Amendments to the LSTA Program Section 1712 of CIPA amends the Museum and Library Services Act (20 U.S.C. Sec. 9134(f)) to provide that no funds made available under the Act may be used to purchase computers used to access the Internet, or to pay for direct costs associated with accessing the Internet,
unless such library has in place
and is enforcing a policy of Internet safety that includes the operation of a technology protection measure with respect to any of its computers with Internet access that protects against access through such computers to visual depictions
that are obscene
or child pornography,
and, when the computers are in use by minors, also protects against access to visual depictions that are harmful to minors.
CIPA Sec. 1712 (codified at 20 U.S.C. Sec. 9134(f)(1)). Section 1712 contains definitions of technology protection measure,
obscene,
child pornography,
and harmful to minors,
that are substantially similar to those found in the provisions governing the E-rate program. CIPA Sec. 1712 (codified at 20 U.S.C. Sec. 9134(f)(7)); see also supra note 2.
As under the E-rate program, an administrator, supervisor or other authority may disable a technology protection measure … to enable access for bona fide research or other lawful purposes.
CIPA Sec. 1712 (codified at 20 U.S.C. Sec. 9134(f)(3)). Whereas CIPA's amendments to the E-rate program permit disabling for bona fide research or other lawful purposes only during adult use, the LSTA provision permits disabling for both adults and minors. 2. Identity of the Plaintiffs 1. Library and Library Association Plaintiffs Plaintiffs American Library Association, Alaska Library Association, California Library Association, Connecticut Library Association, Freedom to Read Foundation, Maine Library Association, New England Library Association, New York Library Association, and Wisconsin Library Association are non-profit organizations whose members include public libraries that receive either E-rate discounts or LSTA funds for the provision of Internet access. Because it is a prerequisite to associational standing, we note that the interests that these organizations seek to protect in this litigation are central to their raison d'ętre.
Plaintiffs Fort Vancouver Regional Library District, in southwest Washington state; Multnomah County Public Library, in Multnomah County, Oregon; Norfolk Public Library System, in Norfolk, Virginia; Santa Cruz Public Library Joint Powers Authority, in Santa Cruz, California; South Central Library System (SCLS
), centered in Madison, Wisconsin; and the Westchester Library System, in Westchester County, New York, are public library systems with branch offices in their respective localities that provide Internet access to their patrons. The Fort Vancouver Regional Library District, for over three years from 1999–2001, received $135,000 in LSTA grants and $19,500 in E-rate discounts for Internet access. The Multnomah County Public Library received $70,000 in E-rate discounts for Internet access this year, and has applied for $100,000 in E-rate discounts for the upcoming year. The Norfolk Public Library System received $90,000 in E-rate discounts for Internet access this year, and has received a $200,000 LSTA grant to put computer labs in eight of its libraries. The Santa Cruz Public Library Joint Powers Authority received $20,560 in E-rate discounts for Internet access in 2001–02. The SCLS received between $3,000 and $5,000 this year in E-rate discounts for Internet access. The Fort Vancouver Regional Library District Board is a public board whose members are appointed by elected county commissioners. The Multnomah County Library is a county department, whose board is appointed by the county chair and confirmed by the other commissioners. The SCLS is an aggregation of 51 independently governed statutory member public libraries, whose relationship to SCLS is defined by state law. The governing body of the SCLS is the Library Board of Trustees, which consists of 20 members nominated by county executives and ratified by county boards of supervisors. 2. Patron and Patron Association Plaintiffs
Plaintiffs Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, Friends of the Philadelphia City Institute Library, and the Pennsylvania Alliance for Democracy are nonprofit organizations whose members include individuals who access the Internet at public libraries that receive E-rate discounts or LSTA funds for the provision of public Internet access. We note for the purpose of associational standing that the interests that these organizations seek to protect in this litigation are germane to their purposes. Plaintiffs Emmalyn Rood, Mark Brown, Elizabeth Hrenda, C. Donald Weinberg, Sherron Dixon, by her father and next friend Gordon Dixon, James Geringer, Marnique Tynesha Overby, by her next friend Carolyn C. Williams, William J. Rosenbaum, Carolyn C. Williams, and Quiana Williams, by her mother and next friend Sharon Bernard, are adults and minors who use the Internet at public libraries that, to the best of their knowledge, do not filter patrons' access to the Internet. Several of these plaintiffs do not have Internet access from home. Emmalyn Rood is a sixteen-year-old who uses the Multnomah County Public Library. When she was 13, she used the Internet at the Multnomah County Public Library to research issues relating to her sexual identity. Ms. Rood did not use her home or school computer for this research, in part because she wished her searching to be private. Although the library offered patrons the option of using filtering software, Ms. Rood did not use that option because she had had previous experience with such programs blocking information that was valuable to her, including information relating to gay and lesbian issues.
Plaintiff Mark Brown used the Internet at the Philadelphia Free Library to research breast cancer and reconstructive surgery for his mother who had breast surgery. Mr. Brown's research at the library provided him and his mother with essential information about his mother's medical condition and potential treatments. 3. Web Publisher Plaintiffs Plaintiff Afraid to Ask, Inc., based in Saunderstown, Rhode Island, publishes a health education Web site, www.AfraidtoAsk.com. Dr. Jonathan Bertman, the president and medical director of Afraid to Ask, is a family practice physician in rural Rhode Island and a clinical assistant professor of family medicine at Brown University. AfraidtoAsk.com's mission is to provide detailed information on sensitive health issues, often of a sexual nature, such as sexually transmitted diseases, male and female genitalia, and birth control, sought by people of all ages who would prefer to learn about sensitive health issues anonymously, i.e., they are afraid to ask.
As part of its educational mission, AfraidtoAsk.com often uses graphic images of sexual anatomy to convey information. Its primary audience is teens and young adults. Based on survey data collected on the site, half of the people visiting the site are under 24 years old and a quarter are under 18. AfraidtoAsk.com is blocked by several leading blocking products as containing sexually explicit content.
Plaintiff Alan Guttmacher Institute has a Web site that contains information about its activities and objectives, including its mission to protect the reproductive choices of women and men. Plaintiff Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. (Planned Parenthood
) is a national voluntary organization in the field of reproductive health care. Planned Parenthood owns and operates several Web sites that provide a range of information about reproductive health, from contraception to prevention of sexually transmitted diseases, to finding an abortion provider, and to information about the drug Mifepristone. Plaintiff Safersex.org is a Web site that offers free educational information on how to practice safer sex. Plaintiff Ethan Interactive, Inc., d/b/a Out In America, is an online content provider that owns and operates 64 free Web sites for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered persons worldwide. Plaintiff PlanetOut Corporation is an online content provider for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered persons. Plaintiff the Naturist Action Committee (NAC
) is the nonprofit political arm of the Naturist Society, a private organization that promotes a way of life characterized by the practice of nudity. The NAC Web site provides information about Naturist Society activities and about state and local laws that may affect the rights of Naturists or their ability to practice Naturism, and includes nude photographs of its members.
Plaintiff Wayne L. Parker was the Libertarian candidate in the 2000 U.S. Congressional election for the Fifth District of Mississippi (and is running again in 2002). He publishes a Web site that communicates information about his campaign and that provides information about his political views and the Libertarian Party to the public. Plaintiff Jeffrey Pollock was the Republican candidate in the 2000 U.S. Congressional election for the Third District of Oregon. He operates a Web site that is now promoting his candidacy for Congress in 2002. 3. The Internet 1. Background As we noted at the outset, the Internet is a vast, interactive medium consisting of a decentralized network of computers around the world. The Internet presents low entry barriers to anyone who wishes to provide or distribute information. Unlike television, cable, radio, newspapers, magazines or books, the Internet provides an opportunity for those with access to it to communicate with a worldwide audience at little cost. At least 400 million people use the Internet worldwide, and approximately 143 million Americans were using the Internet as of September 2001. Nat'l Telecomm. & Info. Admin., A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet (February 2002), available at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/.
The World Wide Web is a part of the Internet that consists of a network of computers, called Web servers,
that host pages
of content accessible via the Hypertext Transfer Protocol or HTTP.
Anyone with a computer connected to the Internet can search for and retrieve information stored on Web servers located around the world. Computer users typically access the Web by running a program called a browser
on their computers. The browser displays, as individual pages on the computer screen, the various types of content found on the Web and lets the user follow the connections built into Web pages called hypertext links,
hyperlinks,
or links
to additional content. Two popular browsers are Microsoft Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator. A Web page
is one or more files a browser graphically assembles to make a viewable whole when a user requests content over the Internet. A Web page may contain a variety of different elements, including text, images, buttons, form fields that the user can fill in, and links to other Web pages. A Web site
is a term that can be used in several different ways. It may refer to all of the pages and resources available on a particular Web server. It may also refer to all the pages and resources associated with a particular organization, company or person, even if these are located on different servers, or in a subdirectory on a single server shared with other, unrelated sites. Typically, a Web site has as an intended point of entry, a home page,
which includes links to other pages on the same Web site or to pages on other sites. Online discussion groups and chat rooms relating to a variety of subjects are available through many Web sites.
Users may find content on the Web using engines that search for requested keywords. In response to a keyword request, a search engine will display a list of Web sites that may contain relevant content and provide links to those sites. Search engines and directories often return a limited number of sites in their search results (e.g., the Google search engine will return only 2,000 sites in response to a search, even if it has found, for example, 530,000 sites in its index that meet the search criteria). A user may also access content on the Web by typing a URL (Uniform Resource Locator) into the address line of the browser. A URL is an address that points to some resource located on a Web server that is accessible over the Internet. This resource may be a Web site, a Web page, an image, a sound or video file, or other resource. A URL can be either a numeric Internet Protocol or IP
address, or an alphanumeric domain name
address. Every Web server connected to the Internet is assigned an IP