A Field Guide to the Birds of Hawaii and the Tropical Pacific
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
This is the first field guide to the identification of the birds of the islands of the tropical Pacific, including the Hawaiian Islands, Fiji, Samoa, Tonga, southeastern Polynesia, and Micronesia. It is intended both as a reference for the expert and as an introduction to birding in the region for the novice. Small enough to be carried afield, it contains much previously unpublished information about behavior, vocalizations, ecology, and distribution. The forty-five color plates depict all plumages of all bird species that breed in the islands, as well as of those that regularly visit them and the surrounding oceans, and of most species believed to be extinct on the islands. Black-and-white figures show many of the rarer visitors.
Introductory sections discuss the tropical Pacific as an environment for birds, problems of birding on islands, and bird conservation. Appendixes include maps of the island groups and a thorough bibliography.
Related to A Field Guide to the Birds of Hawaii and the Tropical Pacific
Related ebooks
Trees of Panama and Costa Rica Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Birds of New Guinea: Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flight of the Huia: Ecology and conservaton of New Zealand's Frogs, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBirds of Peru: Revised and Updated Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Key to Pacific Grasses Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Fishmeal Revolution: The Industrialization of the Humboldt Current Ecosystem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaterpillars of Eastern North America: A Guide to Identification and Natural History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBirds of New Guinea: Distribution, Taxonomy, and Systematics Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5American Tropics: The Caribbean Roots of Biodiversity Science Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Dragonflies and Damselflies of the East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommon Mosses of the Northeast and Appalachians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Amphibians and Reptiles of La Selva, Costa Rica, and the Caribbean Slope: A Comprehensive Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Seeds of Amazonian Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCoral Whisperers: Scientists on the Brink Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDogs: Their Fossil Relatives & Evolutionary History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plant and Animal Endemism in California Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNaturalized Parrots of the World: Distribution, Ecology, and Impacts of the World's Most Colorful Colonizers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRhea and Other Ratites: Large Flightless Birds of the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Florida Scrub Jay: Demography of a Cooperative-Breeding Bird Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFlight Ways: Life and Loss at the Edge of Extinction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Megafauna: Giant Beasts of Pleistocene South America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMetapopulations and Wildlife Conservation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Fall and Rise of the Wetlands of California's Great Central Valley Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReptiles of North Carolina Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Serengeti Lion: A Study of Predator-Prey Relations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Amphibians and Reptiles of Michoacán, México Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnts of Africa and Madagascar: A Guide to the Genera Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmphibians and Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia, 2nd Ed Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Nature For You
Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lucky Dog Lessons: Train Your Dog in 7 Days Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal, Vegetable, Miracle - 10th anniversary edition: A Year of Food Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Encyclopedia of 5,000 Spells Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Silent Spring Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why Fish Don't Exist: A Story of Loss, Love, and the Hidden Order of Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Desert Solitaire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Forager's Harvest: A Guide to Identifying, Harvesting, and Preparing Edible Wild Plants Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5SAS Survival Handbook, Third Edition: The Ultimate Guide to Surviving Anywhere Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Foraging for Survival: Edible Wild Plants of North America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOther Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mother of God: An Extraordinary Journey into the Uncharted Tributaries of the Western Amazon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wabi Sabi: Japanese Wisdom for a Perfectly Imperfect Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Family and Other Animals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Scout's Guide to Wild Edibles: Learn How To Forage, Prepare & Eat 40 Wild Foods Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5World of Wonders: In Praise of Fireflies, Whale Sharks, and Other Astonishments Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shelter: A Love Letter to Trees Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5First, We Make the Beast Beautiful: A New Journey Through Anxiety Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You Are Here: Poetry in the Natural World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sapiens: A Graphic History, Volume 2: The Pillars of Civilization Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Floriography: An Illustrated Guide to the Victorian Language of Flowers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Solace of Open Spaces: Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Norwegian Wood: Chopping, Stacking, and Drying Wood the Scandinavian Way Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for A Field Guide to the Birds of Hawaii and the Tropical Pacific
11 ratings1 review
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As the name suggests this guide covers Hawaii and the tropical Pacific -- the northernmost Hawaiian islands, extending north of the Tropic of Cancer, and a handful of Polynesian islands straggling south of the Tropic of Capricorn are the only exceptions. It thus includes, in its own words, "tropical Polynesia, Fiji, and Micronesia". Easter Island is excluded (probably because it's covered by Chilean guides, and it's not tropical anyway), despite the fact that it would add only about four species.There is a lot of useful ancillary information, such as a description of island habitats (many of which are likely to be unfamiliar to non-tropical birders, like the "lowland dry forest" and "mamane forest" of Hawaii.) There are also two pages in the back of color photos of relevant plants (one of Hawaiian plants, one covering the rest of the Pacific), again useful for non-tropical birders like me who can recognize a pine tree when looking for crossbills but not an ohia tree when looking for honeycreepers. There are also six separate checklists for different island groups, with each of those further broken down by island. The maps of the island groups aren't directly useful, but it's nice to see the islands as more than just as list of disconnected names, and they could aid in the identification of potential vagrants.The bulk of the book -- nearly 300 pages -- is devoted to the species accounts. These are in taxonomic order. They're quite detailed and include every species of bird reliably documented in the tropical Pacific, including those which haven't been seen since Captain Cook's voyage and are certainly long extinct. There isn't any noticeable North American bias in which rarely occuring birds are illustrated -- the book is just as likely to refer you to an Australian or Eurasian guide as a North American one for rare stragglers.Illustrations, showing only birds which occur more regularly or which went extinct (or, rather, were thought to go extinct) a short enough time ago that they may still persist, are separate from the species accounts, and ordered sensibly, albeit inconsistently -- seabirds, shorebirds, and other widespread non-passerines are in taxonomic order, while the more geographically limited passerines are separated by island group, to minimize both duplicate illustrations and birds from different islands appearing together. Introduced birds are also illustrated all in a group. There is still some duplication, but not as much as if the authors had pictured White-tailed Tropicbird (or House Sparrow, for that matter) separately for every island group where it occurs.The illustrations are clear and show male, female, and juvenile plumages when different, as well as showing geographic variation. The illustration style is strongly reminiscent of the NGS guide. This isn't surprising, since Pratt (who illustrated this volume) was a contributing artist to the NGS guide as well. There are a number of extinct birds illustrated -- personally, I'd prefer that they were left out and the remaining illustrations enlarged, though I can see the arguments in favor (that there still could be a few hiding out -- several species have been rediscovered, some after decades). At least they could have given a clear visual indicator, such as a differently-colored background, to show that a species is thought to be extinct. There are no distribution maps; almost all of the islands are small enough that naming the island and the habitat are adequate, and when this is not the case the region is described in the text (e.g. the Hawaiian Crow: "higher slopes of Mauna Loa above Kealakekua Bay".)Field marks are not pointed out on the illustrations, and flipping between plates and text is necessary (though each indicates the page number of the other, making that pretty painless). My main quibble is that distribution isn't indicated on the illustration pages for the more widespread birds (the seabirds etc.), which I suspect will necessitate a lot of flipping pages. It may just be my impression, but it seems that birds with a global distribution, such as shorebirds, are not covered as well for identification purposes as birds limited to the tropical Pacific. This does make sense, but means that if you really want to be sure you can identify migrating shorebirds in the area you'd need another book.
Book preview
A Field Guide to the Birds of Hawaii and the Tropical Pacific - H. Douglas Pratt
A FIELD GUIDE TO THE BIRDS OF HAWAII AND THE TROPICAL PACIFIC
SPONSORED BY THE
HAWAII AUDUBON SOCIETY
A FIELD GUIDE TO
The Birds of
Hawaii and the
Tropical Pacific
BY H. DOUGLAS PRATT
PHILLIP L. BRUNER AND
DELWYN G. BERRETT
ILLUSTRATED BY
H. DOUGLAS PRATT
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS
Copyright © 1987 by the Hawaii Audubon Society and H. Douglas Pratt
Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street,
Princeton, New Jersey 08540
In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press,
Chichester, West Sussex
All Rights Reserved
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data will be
found on the last printed page of this book
ISBN 0-691-08402-5
ISBN 0-691-02399-9 (pbk.)
This book has been composed in Linotron Baskerville
Princeton University Press books are printed on acid-free paper and meet the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources
Fourth printing, 1989
http://pup.princeton.edu
Printed in the United States of America
10
ISBN-13: 978-0-691-02399-1 (pbk.)
ISBN-10: 0-691-02399-9 (pbk.)
TO DR. ROBERT J. NEWMAN
Curator Emeritus,
Louisiana State University Museum of Zoology
Teacher, Mentor, and Friend
CONTENTS
LIST OF COLOR PLATES AND TABLES ix
PREFACE xi
INTRODUCTION xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xix
I. HOW TO USE THIS BOOK
Color Plates 3
Species Accounts 3
Scientific Names 5
Taxonomy 6
English Names 7
Other Pacific Languages 8
New Island Names 10
Terminology 10
II. A BIRDER’S-EYE VIEW OF THE TROPICAL PACIFIC 15
Continental vs. Oceanic Islands 15
Kinds of Oceanic Islands 17
Tropical Pacific Habitats 20
Island Birding 30
Conservation 35
III. SPECIES ACCOUNTS 45
APPENDIX A. HYPOTHETICAL, ENIGMATIC, AND TEMPORARILY ESTABLISHED SPECIES 321
APPENDIX B. REGIONAL CHECKLISTS 329
1. Hawaiian Islands 330
2. Micronesia (High Islands only) 338
3. Central Pacific Islands 334
4. Central Polynesia 348
5. Southeastern Polynesia 351
6. Fiji 355
APPENDIX C. REGIONAL MAPS 359
Hawaiian Islands 360
Micronesia 361
Central Pacific 362
South-Central Pacific 363
Southeastern Polynesia 364
Palau 365
Mariana Islands 366
Truk 367
Samoa 367
Fiji 368
Tonga 369
Cook Islands 370
Society Islands 371
Marquesas Islands 372
GLOSSARY 373
BIBLIOGRAPHY 379
INDEX 389
LIST OF COLOR PLATES AND TABLES
COLOR PLATES
1. Albatrosses and Frigatebirds
2. Dark-bodied Shearwaters and Petrels
3. Shearwaters and Petrels (dark above; white below)
4. Shearwaters and Larger Petrels
5. Smaller Gadfly-Petrels
6. Storm-Petrels
7. Tropicbirds, Boobies, and Cormorant
8. Long-legged Wading Birds
9. Ducks I
10. Ducks II
11. Birds of Prey
12. Francolins, Quails, and Sandgrouse
13. Larger Wildfowl
14. Megapodes, Gallinules, Coots, and Goose
15. Rails
16. Shorebirds I: Plovers, Pratincole, and Turnstone
17. Shorebirds II: Stilt, Curlews, Godwits, and Large Sandpipers
18. Shorebirds III: Stints and Smaller Sandpipers
19. Shorebirds IV: Various Medium-sized Species
20. Terns
21. Micronesian Land Birds I: Pigeons and Doves
22. Micronesian Land Birds II: Various Nonpasserines
23. Micronesian Land Birds III: Widespread Species and Marianas Endemics
24. Micronesian Land Birds IV: Small Land Birds of Palau and Yap
25. Micronesian Land Birds V: Small Land Birds of the Eastern Carolines
26. Polynesian Land Birds I: Pigeons and Doves of Central Polynesia
27. Polynesian Land Birds II: Pigeons and Doves of Southeastern Polynesia
28. Polynesian Land Birds III: Cuckoos, Parrots, and Kingfishers of Central Polynesia
29. Polynesian Land Birds IV: Parrots and Kingfishers of Southeastern Polynesia
30. Polynesian Land Birds V: Smaller Insectivorous Birds
31. Polynesian Land Birds VI: Trillers, Thrushes, and Woodswallow
32. Polynesian Land Birds VII: Whistlers, White-eyes, and Other Small Birds
33. Polynesian Land Birds VIII: Shrikebills, Starlings, and Larger Honeyeaters
34. Polynesian Land Birds IX: Reed-warblers and Monarchs
35. Hawaiian Native Birds I: Thrushes, Warbler, and Elepaio
36. Hawaiian Native Birds II: Crow and Honeyeaters
37. Hawaiian Native Birds III: Drepanidine Finches
38. Hawaiian Native Birds IV: Red, Black, and Yellow Honeycreepers
39. Hawaiian Native Birds V: Yellow, Green, and Brown Honeycreepers
40. Introduced Birds I: Cardinals, Tanagers, Bulbuls, and Doves
41. Introduced Birds II: Magpie, Mynas, Laughing-thrushes, and Others
42. Introduced Birds III: Finches and Other Small Passerines
43. Introduced Birds IV: Estrildid Finches
44. Plants Important to Birds and Birders I: Hawaiian Native Trees
45. Plants Important to Birds and Birders II: Various Pacific Plants
TABLES
1. The 20 Largest Islands of the Tropical Pacific
2. Highest Peaks of the Tropical Pacific
3. Scientific Names of Plants Mentioned in This Book
4. Distribution and Status of Little Green Birds in Hawaii
5. Extinct Bird Species of the Tropical Pacific
6. Endangered and Threatened Breeding Birds of the Tropical Pacific
PREFACE
THE idea for this guide originated in discussions between Pratt and Bruner while they were graduate students under the late George H. Lowery, Jr., at Louisiana State University. Berrett, who had also studied under Lowery, later joined the effort. The authors have conducted extensive field work in all parts of the tropical Pacific. Berrett resided for many years in Hawaii and began the growing ornithological collections of Brigham Young University-Hawaii Campus with expeditions to Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga. Bruner, a nearly life-long Hawaii resident, lived for a year in French Polynesia and has worked extensively in the Society Islands, the Tuamotus, and the Marquesas. He recently made observations in the Tubuai Islands (1984) and the Marquesas (1985) that provided the most up-to-date information on these remote islands. Pratt first visited the tropical Pacific in 1974, and has returned almost annually since then for field work. The three authors together conducted a major research expedition to Micronesia in 1976, and Bruner and Pratt carried out a similar effort in Samoa and Fiji in 1977. The latter two have returned to Micronesia several times since, with independent visits to Guam, Yap, and Palau. Berrett is now at Ricks College in Rexburg, Idaho, and Bruner is Assistant Professor of Biology and Director of the Museum of Natural History at Brigham Young University—Hawaii Campus in Laie, Hawaii. Pratt resides in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, where he is a free-lance artist and Staff Research Associate of the Louisiana State University Museum of Zoology.
The production of this book has truly been a cooperative effort of the three authors, who shared about equally in the research phase and each of whom read and criticized the others’ writing. Of course, there had to be some division of labor. Pratt has served as the overall editor and final arbiter of points of disagreement (which were few). He also had primary responsibility for writing the introductory sections and appendices; the facing-page notes to the color Plates; many of the species accounts including all of those for Hawaiian birds, shorebirds, kingfishers, and swifts; notes on taxonomy and nomenclature; and the general accounts of families and genera. Pratt also prepared all of the illustrations and maps. Bruner and Berrett wrote most of the remaining species accounts. Berrett and Pratt compiled the distributional checklists.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors’ field work in the Pacific has been supported by several agencies and institutions. These include Brigham Young University-Hawaii Campus, the Frank M. Chapman Memorial Fund of the American Museum of Natural History, and Louisiana State University Museum of Zoology. Since 1979 the project has been sponsored by the Hawaii Audubon Society, which subsidized Pratt’s work on the color Plates, provided insurance coverage of them, and assumed responsibility for getting the book published. The Society’s support was crucial and the authors are grateful to the various members who have been helpful. We particularly thank Sheila Conant, Norris Henthorne, Robert L. Pyle, C. John Ralph, and Robert J. Shallenberger.
Logistical support for field work was generously provided by many people. We wish particularly to acknowledge the assistance of Robert P. Owen, John Engbring, and John Kochi at Palau; Robin Mercer and Al Hoffiens in Fiji; Edwin Kamauoha, Sr., in Western Samoa; Patoa Benioni in American Samoa; Chunio Nimwes at Truk; and Gilles Gooding, Frideane Gooding, Kisan Chancet, Rony Tumahai, Maco Tevane, and Raymond Dehors in French Polynesia. In Hawaii, a host of individuals provided lodging, field assistance, and moral support. These include Tim Burr, Tonnie L. C. Casey, Sheila Conant, Peter Donaldson, James D. Jacobi, C. J. and Carol P. Ralph, J. Michael Scott, Annarie and R. J. Shallenberger, John Sincock, Charles van Riper III, and David W. Woodside.
Many institutions have provided research assistance and access to collections. For such services we thank Alan C. Ziegler and Robert L. Pyle (Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu); Edwin C. Bryan (Pacific Scientific Information Center, Honolulu); John Farrand, Stuart Keith, Mary LeCroy, François Vuilleumier, and Robert J. Dickerman (American Museum of Natural History, New York); James L. Gulledge (Library of Natural Sounds, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca); George W. Watson, Storrs L. Olson, Roger B. Clapp, Richard C. Banks, and Richard L. Zusi (National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution); Charles G. Sibley (Yale Peabody Museum); Raymond A. Paynter (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard); Frank B. Gill (Philadelphia Academy of Sciences); Ned K. Johnson (Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California at Berkeley); and James V. Remsen (Louisiana State University Museum of Zoology).
The personnel of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Hawaii have been of immense help in keeping us abreast of research developments and providing us with prepublication access to the results of their recent surveys in Hawaii and Micronesia. Special thanks are due John Engbring, J. Michael Scott, Stephen R. Mountainspring, and Peter Pyle.
Pratt’s work on the illustrations has been greatly aided by discussions with other artists and ornithologists, some of whom graciously provided unpublished field notes and photographs of difficult species. Especially helpful were Jon Dunn, Wayne Hoffman, Joseph R. Jehl, David S. Lee, Ron Naveen, John O’Neill, Dennis Paulson, Peter Pyle, and Don Roberson.
We also wish to express our appreciation to Andrea Bruner, who translated much of the French literature and typed a major portion of the original manuscript. Judith May of Princeton University Press was instrumental in persuading us to publish with them, and has been very helpful in the final preparation of the book.
1 May 1985
H. Douglas Pratt
Phillip L. Bruner
Delwyn G. Berrett
INTRODUCTION
THE study of birds has become one of the world’s most popular pastimes. Birdwatchers, or birders
as they are commonly called today, are increasingly becoming world travelers and their infectious interest has spread to many new areas where birding has not been a tradition. This development is a welcome one, because birders have always formed the vanguard of environmental concern. Their activities inevitably lead to better appreciation and protection of the natural world. If this book makes even a small contribution to environmental awareness in the tropical Pacific, our purpose will have been met. Many Pacific island cultures held birds in high regard. For example, ancient Hawaii had a kapu (taboo) that protected some of the birds whose feathers were used in adornments of the ali‘i (royalty). Such traditions have died out in many places. We hope this book will help to rekindle the ancient reverence for birdlife among Pacific island peoples. We have written the book with them, as well as the traveler, in mind. This guide is designed to allow an observer unfamiliar with birds to identify those seen. We avoid lengthy descriptions, and rely instead on illustrations and a text that emphasizes those essential characteristics (field marks
) that set one species apart from others. Our system is modeled after that originated by Roger Tory Peterson in his now-classic field guides, but we have made modifications for the island context.
This book has four interrelated parts: an introductory section devoted to birding techniques in general and special features of birding in the tropical Pacific; color Plates with accompanying thumbnail notes; species accounts; and a group of appendices including regional checklists, regional maps, and a glossary.
The geographic area covered (see map) encompasses most of the islands of the tropical Pacific and the adjacent open seas. It covers all of the Hawaiian Islands, Micronesia, central Polynesia, and Fiji. Polynesia is traditionally defined as a triangular area with apices at Hawaii, Easter Island (Rapa Nui), and New Zealand. Fiji straddles the boundary between Polynesia and Melanesia and can with justification be included in either. We include Fiji because of its close political and transportational links to the nations of central Polynesia. Since New Zealand is already adequately served by bird guides (see Bibliography), we have not included it, nor do we cover the Chilean possession of Easter Island. Thus our area can be defined roughly as tropical Polynesia, Micronesia, and Fiji. The only subtropical islands covered are the southern Tubuai Islands and the Pitcairn group just south of the Tropic of Capricorn, and those islands of the Hawaiian chain that extend northwestward beyond the Tropic of Cancer.
All bird species that have been recorded in the above area are covered. Not all species are illustrated, however. Any species that nests on or regularly visits the islands of the tropical Pacific or regularly migrates through the surrounding oceans is shown on the color Plates. The color Plates also include, for comparison, a few of the rarer visitors to the area. Also shown are most of the species thought to be extinct. Extinct birds are included so that, for example, a birder on Oahu will know that the mostly dark bird he has seen is not an Oahu Oo, and also because we are hopeful that some of these birds may turn up again in remote, little-visited places. Bishop’s Oo was found on Maui after a lapse in sightings of almost eighty years. In Fiji, the Long-legged Warbler and Fiji Petrel have also been found after long lapses (138 years in the latter case!). Thus our hope may not be in vain. Another reason for showing supposedly extinct birds is to emphasize to the observer how much has already been lost, and how great is the need to preserve what remains. Some species not included in the color Plates are shown as black and white figures in the text but others are not illustrated at all. Most of these are rare migratory visitors or occasional stragglers to the tropical Pacific from Siberia, North America, Australasia, or the southern oceans. We believe that illustrating such rarities would be distracting and counterproductive, because the average birder in the tropical Pacific would encounter only a few such birds in a lifetime. Many stragglers may never be found in the region again, and some others that have not yet been recorded may be equally likely to turn up. The birder wishing to pursue rarities should have field guides to surrounding areas as well as this one. Particularly important in this regard would be any of several recent references on the birds of North America and a good book on seabirds of the world. Birders in Micronesia will want sources on the birds of eastern Asia and Australia. For birds that are not illustrated here, we have often included citations of published illustrations elsewhere. These and others are listed in the Bibliography.
ABBREVIATIONS
THE primary compass directions (N, S, E, W) and combinations thereof (NE, SW, etc.) are written as capital letters without periods (except when part of a proper name such as N. America). Lowercase directional letters, followed by periods, should be read as the adjectival form (e., eastern; nw., northwestern; etc.). Two exceptions to the foregoing are W. Samoa (Western Samoa) and NW Hawaiian Is. (Northwestern Hawaiian Islands). American Samoa is abbreviated A. Samoa. The words island,
islands,
and archipelago
are abbreviated only when part of a proper name as I.,
Is.,
and Arch.
respectively. Central
is abbreviated c.
Several organizations and publications are designated by special acronyms or abbreviations as follows:
In the references that accompany the species accounts, as well as in the Bibliography, we have adopted the following standard abbreviations:
In the facing-page notes for the color Plates, we abbreviate adult (ad.), subadult (subad.), immature (imm.), juvenile (juv.), breeding (br.), and nonbreeding (nonbr.).
A FIELD GUIDE TO THE BIRDS OF HAWAII AND THE TROPICAL PACIFIC
I. HOW TO USE THIS BOOK
COLOR PLATES
The color Plates and their accompanying notes are the heart of this guide. One should be familiar with them before going afield and should always consult them first when making an identification. In most cases, the illustration plus the thumbnail comment on the facing page will be sufficient to identify the bird seen. Further information when needed, as well as comments on voice, distribution, and status, will be found in the cross-referenced species accounts.
The Plates are organized so that birds likely to be seen together are close together in the illustrations. Some nonpasserines (seabirds, shorebirds, freshwater birds, birds of prey, etc.) are arranged in more or less taxonomic sequence because many are widespread in the tropical Pacific. Those that are not widespread must be compared with those that are. Island land birds, however, are usually very sedentary and are often endemic (found only on one island or group). Thus, even though the Elepaio of Hawaii is closely related to the Tinian Monarch of the Marianas and the Slaty Flycatcher of Fiji, it does not appear with them in the Plates but rather with other Hawaiian forest birds. We believe this arrangement will be more practical for birders than a strictly taxonomic one. The Plates also include photographs of some of the plants that a birder in the tropical Pacific will need to know.
SPECIES ACCOUNTS
The species accounts are arranged in taxonomic or phylogenetic sequence. Such an arrangement groups closely related birds together, but to the beginner may appear bewilderingly arbitrary. A little work with the field guide will familiarize one with the sequence. Our phylogenetic order follows that adopted in 1983 by the American Ornithologists’ Union for its checklist of North American birds. Taxa that do not appear in that list are inserted where appropriate. The only exception to the AOU classification of higher categories is our treatment of the Australo-Papuan insect-eaters (Pachycephalidae), which we regard as not closely related to the Muscicapidae.
The species accounts follow a standard format with subheadings for the various kinds of information. Subheadings are sometimes combined, and for very rare or little-known birds only a single paragraph is given. A typical account will have the following subheadings:
APPEARANCE: The two numbers in parentheses are the total length of the bird in inches and centimeters. These are provided to give an idea of a bird’s relative size, but such measurements are inherently imprecise and do not take into account the range of individual variation. Use them with care. After the size we give important descriptive information for distinguishing the species in question. These descriptions are written as supplements to the illustrations, which should always be consulted first.
HABITS: Here we give information about habitat, feeding behavior, diet, displays, or even nesting behavior where such is useful for identification.
VOICE: Bird vocalizations are very difficult to transcribe in words. One man’s chuck is another man’s tchick. We hope our pioneering effort to describe voices of Pacific island birds will be useful. Only a few of them have been previously described, often inadequately. We have often borrowed particularly apt vocal descriptions from others. If published, we cite the source; otherwise we credit the individual.
IDENTIFICATION: This section tells how to distinguish the bird in question from similar species with which it might be confused. For those species that are distinctive and unmistakable, this subheading is omitted.
OCCURRENCE: This term covers status (see Terminology, below), distribution (both geographic and elevational), and such information as whether the species is endemic, the origin and dates of introduction of exotics, and other pertinent historical facts. Geographic distribution is given by island group (printed in all capitals) with island details given in parentheses unless the bird is found on only a single island in a group, in which case the single island name is in all capitals and the group in parentheses. The larger Caroline Islands (Palau, Yap, Truk, Pohnpei, Kosrae) are usually considered separate entities. Thus a distribution might read HAWAIIAN IS. (Midway, Laysan), SAIPAN (Mariana Is.), and YAP.
This bird would be found in the Hawaiian Islands only on the two named islands, on Saipan only in the Marianas, and on Yap. Portions of a bird’s range outside the area covered by this guide are always written in lower case.
REFERENCES: Where such are available, we cite books and articles published through mid-1985 that provide further information that may be useful to the birder. These references do not include regional faunal works, and are not repeated in the Bibliography. We have been highly selective in these listings, which are not intended to be exhaustive. We apologize to those authors whose works we have either overlooked or underappreciated.
OTHER NAMES: We list only names that have appeared in recent major publications. Old names long in disuse and most native-language names, except the widely used Hawaiian ones, are not listed. We include all alternative names given in three of the most recent worldwide bird checklists (Clements 1981; Howard and Moore 1980; Walters 1980).
NOTE: This section is used for miscellaneous data or comments not appropriate for other headings. In particular, we have used this section to discuss our taxonomy where it differs from that in other publications.
SCIENTIFIC NAMES
Birds, as well as other organisms, have two kinds of names: the scientific name based on classical Greek and Latin, and the vernacular or common names in various modern languages. Scientific names have two parts. A surname
called the genus (plural genera) appears first and is always capitalized. A second word, never capitalized, is called the species epithet. The species name should never be used alone; it has meaning only when attached to a generic name. On the other hand, the species name is much more stable through time than the generic designation. Species can be, and often are, transferred from one genus to another as we learn more about them. Scientific names are the best means of identifying a species under discussion. They are used universally by ornithologists of all nationalities.
TAXONOMY
Taxonomy, the science of classifying and naming living things, is a rather esoteric field that the average birder probably would just as soon ignore. However, a little knowledge of its principles will help greatly in understanding why birds are classified as they are. Birds belong to the Class Aves, one of seven classes of vertebrate animals (the others are mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and three groups of fishes). Classes are subdivided into orders, which in the case of birds always end in -iformes. Orders are made up of families (which end in -idae), and these may or may not have recognized subfamilies (-inae). Finally, families comprise one or more genera. All of these groupings are artificial. They express relationships but are still abstract concepts. Species, however, ideally are real entities in nature, and therefore their delineation is of some importance.
A species is defined biologically as a group of populations that actually or potentially interbreed freely. The test of whether two populations are the same species is not whether they can interbreed, but whether they would interbreed under natural conditions. Thus hybrids formed in zoos tell us nothing about species limits because they were produced in an unnatural situation. When two similar birds share the same island (that is, are sympatric) without interbreeding, they are clearly different species. But what if two slightly different populations live on different islands (are allopatric)? In those cases, ornithologists must decide whether the differences are great enough to prevent interbreeding if the two should become sympatric. If the researcher thinks the differences are insufficient to prevent interbreeding, the two populations are considered the same species (i.e. conspecific), and are referred to as subspecies or races. Subspecies are indicated in the scientific name by addition of a third word after the species epithet. The first subspecies to be named (the nominate
) usually repeats the species epithet. Thus the Tahiti Kingfisher (Halcyon venerata) on Tahiti is called Halcyon venerata venerata while the population on Moorea is Halcyon venerata youngi. In discussions of subspecies, the genus and species may be abbreviated as initials (as in H. v. venerata) if the name has been written out previously in the account.
The species status of allopatric populations is, at best, difficult to determine. Whether the populations are several distinct species or only races of a widespread species cannot often be verified. When the birds are well known biologically, a consensus can usually be reached. But when few data are available, as is the case with many Pacific island populations, controversy often arises. We have explained reasoning in those cases where our taxonomy differs from that published elsewhere. In most cases, our innovations are based on our own field experience.
ENGLISH NAMES
Of more immediate concern to the birder, but much less meaningful than the scientific names, are the English vernacular names of birds. Such names are subject to no universally accepted rules and vary widely from place to place, from book to book, or even from person to person. A few attempts have recently been made to standardize English names of birds internationally, but none has really succeeded. The best efforts have been those regional works that have viewed their area’s names in a worldwide context. Particularly noteworthy are King and Dickinson’s Field Guide to the Birds of South-East Asia (1975) and the 1983 AOU Check-list with its 1985 Supplement. The AOU Check-list now covers the Hawaiian Islands, and we have followed it in most cases for English names. In the 12 cases where we prefer a name different from that used in the AOU Check-list, we give the AOU name parenthetically in the species heading. In some of these cases (e.g. Green-backed Heron, Ringnecked Pheasant) the AOU name seems to be in conflict with the organization’s own guidelines. In others, we believe the less preferable of alternatives was chosen. We hope our notes on names will influence future supplements to the AOU Check-list. We have particularly striven to suggest names that enhance international nomenclatural agreement, and therefore have often recommended names in use in Australia and New Zealand over AOU names, especially when the former are more suitable. In the case of seabirds, we hope to bring AOU names into line with those used in the several recent publications on seabirds of the world (Harrison 1983; Lofgren 1984; Tuck 1980; Tuck and Heinzel 1978).
We have avoided name innovations as much as possible. However, for most birds unique to the tropical Pacific no consensus on English names exists, and the names in use in other publications are often unsuitable for a variety of reasons. Because these names have not appeared in a great many publications, we believe that this field guide is as good a place as any to begin the renovation and standardization of English names for birds in the region. We have tried to suggest names that are memorable and informative as well as accurate. Explanations and comments are given under the Note heading in the species accounts where necessary.
OTHER PACIFIC LANGUAGES
Native residents of virtually all islands of the tropical Pacific speak one or another European language (usually English or French). Interisland travelers need not know the indigenous languages to get along.
But some brief acquaintance with the rules of pronunciation of native languages will greatly enhance the visitor’s enjoyment. Even in places where the native tongue is now rarely used conversationally, as in Hawaii, native terms are ubiquitous and appear in names of birds, plants, and places. The following brief discussions are intended only to enable the English-speaking visitor to pronounce the native-language words encountered. Space does not permit a discussion of all native languages, but the following ones require some explanation.
POLYNESIAN LANGUAGES (HAWAIIAN, SAMOAN, TAHITIAN, ETC.). These languages are all closely related and have similar rules of pronunciation. Spelling is phonetic, with consonants more or less as in English and vowels as in Romance languages such as Spanish. In Hawaiian, the letter w is pronounced as the English w before u or o, as the English v before i or e, and either way before a. In Samoan, the letter g is pronounced as ng (e.g. Pago Pago sounds like Pango Pango). Otherwise, consonants are fairly straightforward except for the glottal stop(‘), a letter
not found in European alphabets. It resembles the stoppage of sound in the interjection oh-oh, and functions as a consonant, not as a mark of punctuation. Unfortunately, English-speaking immigrants did not appreciate this point and the glottal stop has been deleted from the spelling of many words. In this book, we use it only for island names such as Niuafo‘ou that have not yet been so corrupted in spelling as those in Hawaii and American Samoa. Otherwise, in the interest of international consistency we write the island names without glottal stops.
Stress in Polynesian languages falls on the next-to-last syllable and alternating preceding syllables except for five-syllable words, which are stressed on the first and fourth. Some words have irregular stress indicated by a macron (¯) over the stressed vowel. Thus Akiapolaau (written ‘akia-pō-lā‘au in Hawaiian) is pronounced ah-kee-ah-PO-LA-ow, not ah-kee-ah-puh-LAU. In cases where a bird name is likely to be mispronounced otherwise, we give the Hawaiian orthography in the Other Names section of the species account.
FIJIAN. TWO different spelling systems are in use for Fijian. Both use Romance language phonetics for vowels. A new system follows, more or less, English pronunciation of all consonants. The older system, and the one most often seen in Fiji itself, has the following special case consonants:
b is pronounced as the mb in limber
c is pronounced as the th in this
d is pronounced as the nd in windy
g is pronounced as the ng in singer
q is pronounced as the ng in anger
We have chosen to use the old system. A few examples of how the two differ are: Buca (Mbutha), Gau (Ngau), Kadavu (Kandavu), Beqa (Mbengga).
I-KIRIBATI (FORMERLY GILBERTESE). The only peculiarity of the language of Kiribati that must be pointed out here is that the combination ti is pronounced much like the English s, and the r is rolled and not very different from the sound of English l. Thus neither Kiribati (Gilberts) nor Kiritimati (Christmas) sounds as different from the English words each represents as the spelling may seem to indicate.
NEW ISLAND NAMES
Many newly independent Pacific island nations have recently adopted new names for islands or island groups. Many of these are not really new, but are reversions to native language names (e.g. Banaba) or are spelling corrections based on more accurate transliterations of native names (e.g. Kosrae). Others are nativizations of colonial names (e.g. Kiritimati). The following are the new island names that appear in this book, with their older equivalents:
The Republic of Palau has recently decided to retain that name (at least in English) rather than change to Belau, a more accurate spelling. The spelling of Palau’s largest island has never been standardized (Babelthuap, Babeldaob, Babeldaop). We use the first spelling, but as we go to press the other, more phonetically accurate, spellings are being increasingly used, and one may be officially adopted before long.
TERMINOLOGY
TOPOGRAPHY. Figure 1 illustrates the topographical and anatomical terms used to describe birds. Most of these terms are not repeated in the Glossary.
MOLT. Birds replace their feathers periodically in what is called molt. Because the actual molt sequence is not known for many birds in the tropical Pacific, we have adopted a simple, functional terminology for that sequence, rather than one of the more technically precise systems. Our system is thus purposely imprecise. A bird’s first full feathering is called juvenile plumage,
and birds in that stage are called juveniles.
We avoid the term juvenal.
The term immature
is used for any plumage stage other than adult. Some birds, once mature, do not visibly alter their plumage except by feather wear (ornithologists call this the definitive plumage). Others go through annual cycles with a breeding (alternate, nuptial) plumage and a nonbreeding (basic, winter) one. Obviously the seasonal terms are inappropriate in the tropics. We use them occasionally, however, for birds that breed in temperate regions.
STATUS. Our terminology for status is necessarily imprecise because often no good quantitative population data are available for birds of the region. For resident birds, we use several general terms. Abundant
and common
are used for birds that are so numerous and conspicuous in their proper range and habitat that they would be hard for an observer to miss. Those that are uncommon
are present in lower numbers and are seen regularly, but may be difficult to find on a given day. Rare
birds have low populations and require special efforts for an observer to see them. Very rare
or nearly extinct
birds may be reported only once in several decades, even when competent observers have been searching for them. We do not consider any bird extinct that has been reliably reported since 1966. Birds are always unevenly distributed, so even a very rare one may be locally common,
as would be the case if only 50 individuals survived but all lived within one hectare.
For migrants, we use the above terms as well as others. A casual
visitor has been found several times, but has no predictable pattern of occurrence. Such birds can be expected to turn up again, but not every year. Regular
and fairly regular
imply annual and nearly annual occurrence respectively. Birds may be both rare
and regular
if they are annually present in very low numbers.
The capitalized terms Endangered Species
and Threatened Species
are used only for those populations officially so designated under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. When not capitalized, such terms reflect our own judgment or that of nongovernmental agencies such as the ICBP. That organization also uses the designation vulnerable
for species likely to become endangered unless preventive measures are taken. It is roughly equivalent to the U.S. Threatened
category. For further explanation of these and other terms of status, see Table 6.
FIGURE 1: Avian Topography.
II. A BIRDER’S-EYE VIEW OF THE TROPICAL PACIFIC
THE Pacific Ocean occupies over one-third of the earth’s surface, an area greater than that of all the land areas combined. Within this vast expanse of water are scattered over 10,000 relatively small islands. They are concentrated in the central and southwestern parts of the ocean, with a broad band in the northern and eastern sectors entirely devoid of land. The Hawaiian Islands are the closest to North America, but are separated from that continent by about 4025 km (2500 mi.) of open ocean. Similar distances separate them from significant land masses in all directions; they are the world’s most isolated archipelago. The other islands of the tropical Pacific are somewhat closer to larger land masses, but are rather isolated nevertheless.
None of the islands in the area covered by this guide is large. Hawaii and Viti Levu are the largest, and are slightly smaller than Jamaica, about twice the size of the State of Delaware, and half the size of Wales. Size drops off rapidly (see Table 1) after the three largest islands. Hawaii, for example, is larger than all the other Hawaiian islands combined. Despite the vastness of the region, the total land area of all the islands is only 46,632 sq. km (18,000 sq. mi.), over half of which is contributed by the three largest.
CONTINENTAL VS. OCEANIC ISLANDS
Islands have long been classified as either continental or oceanic, but the meaning of these terms differs among academic disciplines. Zoogeographers consider an island oceanic if it has not been attached to a continent during the history of the group of organisms being studied. Continental islands have had such connections (often called land bridges
in the past). The distinction, from the point of view of animal dispersal, is obvious and important. All of the islands covered here are oceanic in this sense. Thus their indigenous faunas lack such continental elements as terrestrial mammals; only those groups of animals capable of over-water dispersal are represented.
TABLE 1. THE 20 LARGEST ISLANDS OF THE TROPICAL PACIFIC
Geographers and geologists use a slightly different way of distinguishing oceanic from continental islands that is based on position relative to the earth’s tectonic Plates. Some Plates are themselves called continental, and islands that rise from them are therefore called continental islands whether they have had an above-water connection with a continent or not. Most of the islands in the tropical Pacific (as defined here) rise from the Pacific Plate, which forms the floor of the central and northern Pacific Ocean, and are thus oceanic. Fiji rises from a fragment of a Plate that once was part of the Australian continental mass. It is thus continental in one sense, but oceanic in the faunistic sense. Other faunistically oceanic islands such as Tonga, Yap, Palau, and the Marianas lie along Plate boundaries.
The movement of the Pacific Plate toward the northwest helps explain why many Pacific islands lie in roughly parallel northwest-southeast arcs. Because of a tectonic shift in direction, older archipelagoes like the Line and Marshall islands have a more vertical orientation than the younger ones such as the Hawaiian and Society islands. The youngest islands tend to be at the southeastern end of each archipelago, as is the case with Hawaii and Tahiti. In Samoa, this generalization appears to be reversed, but other forces have come into play there because of the proximity of a Plate boundary.
KINDS OF OCEANIC ISLANDS
Although islands can be classified on the basis of their physiography and mode of formation, it is important to understand that the forces that form them are ongoing and dynamic. Many islands are intermediate in type. From the point of view of bird distribution, islands fall into two broad categories: atolls and high islands. The latter can be further divided into three types.
ATOLLS. Atolls are rings of low sandy islets (called motus in Polynesia) that surround a central saltwater lagoon. Such islands form as ocean levels rise or a former island mass sinks to become a seamount. The fringing reef of the original island continues to grow if the changes