Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Farthing
Farthing
Farthing
Ebook371 pages5 hours

Farthing

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

One summer weekend in 1949—but not our 1949—the well-connected "Farthing set", a group of upper-crust English families, enjoy a country retreat. Lucy is a minor daughter in one of those families; her parents were both leading figures in the group that overthrew Churchill and negotiated peace with Herr Hitler eight years before.

Despite her parents' evident disapproval, Lucy is married—happily—to a London Jew. It was therefore quite a surprise to Lucy when she and her husband David found themselves invited to the retreat. It's even more startling when, on the retreat's first night, a major politician of the Farthing set is found gruesomely murdered, with abundant signs that the killing was ritualistic.

It quickly becomes clear to Lucy that she and David were brought to the retreat in order to pin the murder on him. Major political machinations are at stake, including an initiative in Parliament, supported by the Farthing set, to limit the right to vote to university graduates. But whoever's behind the murder, and the frame-up, didn't reckon on the principal investigator from Scotland Yard being a man with very private reasons for sympathizing with outcasts…and looking beyond the obvious.

As the trap slowly shuts on Lucy and David, they begin to see a way out—a way fraught with peril in a darkening world.



At the Publisher's request, this title is being sold without Digital Rights Management Software (DRM) applied.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateAug 8, 2006
ISBN9781429944403
Farthing
Author

Jo Walton

JO WALTON won the Hugo and Nebula Awards for her novel Among Others and the Tiptree Award for her novel My Real Children. Before that, she won the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer, and her novel Tooth and Claw won the World Fantasy Award. The novels of her Small Change sequence—Farthing, Ha'penny, and Half a Crown—have won acclaim ranging from national newspapers to the Romantic Times Critics' Choice Award. A native of Wales, she lives in Montreal.

Read more from Jo Walton

Related to Farthing

Related ebooks

Science Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for Farthing

Rating: 3.8881932411449016 out of 5 stars
4/5

559 ratings64 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Big pacing issue and almost no surprise to the book
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I really loved this book. It does such a good job of showing an England that is not as strongly anti-Hitler, is deeply antisemitic, and has fascist impulses. This book has aged very well. It is a tale that has become that much scarier given the current political situation of countries moving further and further to the right in places like the UK and the USA, where I live. The murder mystery element to this book is also very well done. It does not feel separate from the political but another piece of that puzzle and it also serves as a way to see how this England is different from our own. I like that this book is not super explicit about the changes that make this an alternate history novel and that the reader has to pick up on the changes through the context of the story. I really liked our two main characters, Lucy and Carmichael. They felt very fleshed out and extremely realistic. I was especially drawn to Carmichael as I found his struggle to keep up his morals while protecting himself and his loved ones to be very interesting. I have a lot of books I own that I need to read so it will probably be a little while before I pick up the next book in this series but I am definitely very interested to see what happens next in this world.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    READ THIS BOOK.

    No, really, that's all I have to say.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I stumbled on the series with Ha'penny which I found very enjoyable, exceptionally well written. Walton is a gifted writer. Decided to go back to there series' opener. I'm disappointed, the ending much darker, that perhaps was Walton's intent. Perhaps that trajectory should give one hope.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I couldn't see how Walton could do a novel about Athena and Apollo setting up an experiment to implement Plato's ideal city (The Just City), and yet I loved the result. Walton has done it again with an alternate history novel, a genre of low interest for me, and yet another one about Nazi Germany. In this variant, England has made a truce with Hitler, and, eight years later, it appears to be holding its own while Jews die in concentration camps and Hitler battles the Bolsheviks. But the novel is not about that, at least initially, but is a well-done Dorothy Sayers homage, with murder at the manor. Chapters alternate between the first-person diary of a rebellious, smart, but somewhat insulated rich heroine, and the third-person detective tale of Inspector Peter Carmichael -- whose name presumably connects Sayers' Lord Peter Wimsey with his best known portrayer, Ian Carmichael. Another character is named Angela Thirkie, a tip of the hat I assume to Angela Thirkell. I'm sure there are a zillion other such tidbits I missed. Mixing a cosy mystery with Nazis, anti-Semitism, and homophobia, shouldn't have worked, but it does brilliantly.Highly recommended.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Jo Walton! I'm coming to realize that she can make any kind of story captivating. I devour her books. I especially always appreciate the left-wing, feminist, anti-racist, pro-lgbt elements in her work. I just feel like she gets it, and that's basically the most important aspect of an author for me.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Disappointing.

    I wanted to admire this book, but the frequent missteps in tone and fact (mainly in the parts dealing with the British upper class) prevented me from paying attention to the plot. The dialogue is consistently off, giving the effect of nails scraping down a blackboard. There is also an inadequate grasp of British society and government, which is not adequately explained by the alternate history setting.

    The author seems an intelligent and reasonable person but the mistakes are so jarring that I cannot enjoy this series. Two years after reading this novel it still bothers me.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    At first, this seemed like it was going to be a pretty straightforward English manor house mystery, complete with upstairs/downstairs intrigue.Then, I realized that it was more interesting than that, because the mystery is set in an alternate history where Britain made peace with Hitler and split up France's colonies, and anti-Semitism is a major part of European culture. Then it gets even more interesting as it explores the rise of fascism.The book switches first-person points of view between the detective and the wife of the primary suspect. As with any murder mystery, most of the characters are terrible people, but the main characters are very likable and sympathetic. The story is engaging.I'm looking forward to reading the rest of the series.I listened to the audiobook, and the narrators are very good.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In 1949 in an alternate England, Hitler is in control of all of western Europe. After the Battle of Britain, Churchill was overthrown and England made peace with Hitler, largely due to the efforts of the “Farthing Set.” Newlywed Lucy is the daughter of prominent members of the Farthing Set. She married her Jewish husband, David, against her parents' wishes. Although England isn't under Hitler's control, antisemitism is on the rise. Lucy and David are surprised to receive an invitation to her parents' weekend house party. Things turn ugly when one of the guests is discovered dead in his room on Sunday morning. When clues turn up pointing to David as the killer, Lucy is certain that he's being framed for murder. So is the Scotland Yard detective assigned to the case. With pressure mounting for David's arrest and quick closure of the investigation, to what length will Lucy go to protect her husband?In Farthing, Jo Walton gives readers an alternate form of the Golden Age mystery – my favorite genre. I loved the points of similarity, but I found the differences unsettling. I find it satisfying to read about the righting of wrongs and the triumph of justice in Golden Age mysteries. It provides an escape from real life, when all too often crimes go unsolved or the guilty go free on technicalities. In this way the alternate history of Farthing is more like the real world than the world of the Golden Age mystery.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Well I guess I am late to the party on this book. My sister raved about the series years ago and I bought this first book in the series almost 8 years ago. Then it sat on my bookshelf waiting for me to get around to reading it. Now that I've finally read it I am kicking myself for waiting so long. I have the second book and it will be read in short order, I can promise. The title comes from the Farthing Group, an elite subgroup of the Conservative Party in Great Britain. And the group got its name from the country estate that two of the group's members own. This is not the Great Britain that we know. In the second world war a peace was brokered with the Nazis that left them in control of continental Europe and the British safe from invasion. Lucy is the daughter (and now sole heir since the death of her brother in the war) of the Farthing household but her parents, especially her mother, disapprove of her marriage to a Jew, David Kahn. So she cannot understand why they have been invited to Farthing for a country weekend with the Farthing Group. When prominent politican James Thirkie is found dead in his bed with a yellow star affixed to him David is suspected of the murder and Lucy wonders if that was why they were invited. CI Peter Carmichael of Scotland Yard isn't convinced that David is guilty but he has to put him under house arrest because of circumstantial evidence against him.A few days later he learns who is responsible but he is directed to arrest David by his superiors. David and Lucy have no choice but to flee to Canada. This is an alternate history that is all too probable especially when one looks at the recent political decisions.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Summary: Lucy Kahn and her husband David were surprised to be invited to her parents' country estate for a summer retreat in 1949: Her parents are party of the elite "Farthing set," a party of upper-class British politicians, and they've never approved of her marriage to David, who is a Jew. They do their best to blend in, Lucy slipping more or less easily back into the wealth and priviledge with which she grew up... until on the first night of the party, one of the Farthing Set's most prominent men is murdered. It immediately becomes clear that David intended to be framed for the murder, as the scene involved several elements that indicated that a Jewish conspiracy was involved. Now it's up to Lucy, and to Inspector Carmichael from Scotland Yard, to prove that David is innocent, or else the political and social consequences could be devastating... because while the 1949 England of Farthing is largely the same as the 1949 England we're familiar with, the small change is that the Allies did not in fact win World War II, and the members of the Farthing Set were responsible for brokering peace with Herr Hitler.Review: This book made me intensely uncomfortable, but uncomfortable in the best way possible. Everything about this book is sharp - the writing, the mystery, the pacing, and most of all the social commentary. So sharp that it manages to cut to the bone before you're even aware of what's happened. It starts out like a more-or-less standard murder mystery, where you're thinking "okay, Lucy's parents are a little bit racist, but that probably wasn't unusual for upper-class Brits at the time," and then gradually you start to accumulate hints that something's gone wrong, something's not quite right about this world and about these people, as Walton keeps filling in little details about how the world got to be the way it is. This subtle wrongness is accentuated with a horrifying (but equally slowly building) sense of just how close this world is to our world. How easy it is to slide from "normal" prejudice into outright fascism, and how few people would actually stand to oppose it, if they recognized what was happening at all. It's incisive social commentary, masterfully handled so that it's never spelled out (and thus never runs the risk of getting preachy), and trusts the reader enough to understand the point and draw the parallels on their own.I do wonder how this book would have read when it first came out a decade ago. Reading it last summer, it was, as I said, equal parts horrifying and cutting and fascinating, and certainly relevant. But as much as I enjoyed it (maybe not the right word, it's too uncomfortable-making to really be "enjoyed"), after the U.S. Presidential election in November, I couldn't bring myself to listen to the next books in the series... it seems like we are now even closer to the world of Farthing, and it had gone from uncomfortable to anxiety-inducing just how thin the veil that separates us from them had now become. I'm working myself back up to it, though, because this really was an excellent book, in spite of (or in addition to?) how sharply it cuts. The characters are interesting and compelling and sympathetic (Lucy, David, and the inspector, at any rate), the mystery is well constructed, and it's easy to read and incredibly easy to get absorbed in; I tore through the audiobook in only a few days, needing to find out what happened next. I did have a bit of a problem keeping some of the names of some of the secondary character straight (one that probably would have been alleviated if I'd read the paper version rather than the audiobook, so it would be easier to flip back and check.) I also think there's probably some subtleties regarding British politics and their parliamentary system that went over my head, that might have made things even more complex. But even so, this book was an incredible read, and one that sticks with you, haunts you, long after you've read it. And even when you might want to just dismiss it as just speculative fiction, alternative history, fantasy, there's always that lingering doubt that it's not... not quite. 4.5 out of 5 stars.Recommendation: It's not a light read, especially not in the current political climate, but it is an excellent and compelling one. If you don't need your reading to be too escapist, I highly recommend it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Lucy Eversley married David Kahn, not a popular choice for a deb of the Farthing set to do in the aftermath of World War 2. The Farthing set brokered a peace with Hitler, who on the Continent continues waging war with Russia. Even though England is free, Jews are not popular. Then at a house party her mother puts on, one of the guests - the very one who brokered that peace - is killed, and all the evidence points rather sloppily to David. Inspector Carmichael of Scotland Yard is called in, and in alternating chapters he and Lucy try to get to the bottom of who killed James Thirkie and who stands to profit.Welcome to a world that could have been - where governments are corrupt, power is in the hands of the few, and there is one law for the rich and another for the poor. What are you willing to compromise to keep yourself and the people you love free? Who is guilty or innocent, and what are an individual's responsibilities in a society that couldn't care less about certain unpopular groups? I generally prefer books to have characters I can really get to know and get behind, and I spent most of the book wondering what on earth was going on. The ending will not be satisfying for traditional mystery readers, but certainly gives a lot of food for thought. I would be interested in seeing where the trilogy goes from here.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Farthing is an alternative history mystery, which succeeds in both genres. Some books kill a character off apparently only as an excuse to bring the other characters together, and the mystery becomes incidental to the "real" story. Not an issue with Farthing, where the murder stays at the center of the story. It works well with the alternative history: in the real world, there'd be far less reason to frame David Kahn, but in this world, the political motives are clear.And this world is believable: a major change from reality shown to us in small, personal ways. The change—peace with Hitler—was recent enough that it hadn't yet made Farthing's Britain unrecognizable, but long enough ago that it wasn't the only thing the characters could talk about. Walton presents this world in a restrained, natural way. There was the occasional expository mini-lump, but generally, you learn about this world in bits and pieces as you need to. The narration alternates between Lucy Kahn and Inspector Carmichael. Each has their own distinct voice, and not just because Lucy's chapters are in first person and Carmichael's are in third person—yay! I did have a bit of difficulty remembering all the secondary characters, though, simply because there were several of them, but this got easier as the book went on.Farthing is the first book of a trilogy, but it stands well on its own. It was written in 2006 and I've been meaning to read it for years, but kept not getting around to it. It's seemed a bit more relevant lately, though, and I finally pushed myself to tackle it. I'm glad I did, and I already have Ha'penny on reserve at the library.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Starts off well with a murder mystery. Gets a bit bogged down & muddled in the middle as the lead detective and his sergeant toss theories back & forth and the minutiae of life at Farthing House takes center stage. Really picks up in the 2nd half but leaves the reader with a very abrupt and unsatisfying ending that is still rather perfect in a way.I did enjoy the alternating chapters being told via first-person by Lucy Kahn on the one hand and the third-person perspective following Detective Carmichael's investigation on the other.Walton is a gifted writer who has crafted an uncomfortable read, (intentionally so, I'm sure). Some of the socio-political proselytizing is a bit heavy-handed at times but the alternate reality she imagines is very pertinent - almost prescient - to what is happening in western society today. Laced with the, "It can't happen here", mantra, this is a scary and disturbing tale.As soon as I finished this, I picked up the next volume in the series.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I know, it's interesting that I gave this book three stars but didn't finish it myself. Let me explain. The premise, it's after WWII; Hitler and England have brokered peace; a murder occurs on a country estate. From the summary alone this seemed up my alley but I just couldn't get in to the book. I felt the lead protagonist was bit of a drip and the pacing was too slow. I gave it a good go of nearly 100 pages but if you haven't captured the reader's interest this point, why finish?

    All of this and with the resolution given on the last few pages, I concluded this book wasn't worth finishing.

    I can see, however, why people would like this book. The premise is interesting and the writing was technically good, Sadly, it's just for me.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This reads an awful lot like a classic British House Mystery except for the whole alternate history and political intrigue part of the story, which takes it from good mystery to great commentary on the state of affairs. Setting it in a past that never existed serves to me, anyway, to only heighten the feeling that while partially absurd, these things could happen, that events can be manipulated and what seems to be one way turns out to be another and you never know who is on your side. I will probably read the sequel...
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Deftly blended, this combination of an alternate world history with an English country house mystery opens in 1949, but it’s not exactly the 1949 or England we know. Eight years earlier a group of conservative, anti-semitic politicians known as the “Farthing set” made peace with Nazi Germany, securing Britain’s borders after most of continental Europe had fallen to Hitler. The Germans continue to fight the Soviets, the American president is isolationist Charles Lindbergh, and the Jews left in Europe are living a nightmare. Against this background, the aristocratic, politically powerful Farthing set comes together for a country weekend. The daughter of one of the couples, Lucy Kahn, is deeply in love and happily married to David, a Jewish man, so she’s surprised that her parents have invited them to join this gathering at her old family home. If it was up to her they’d skip it, she doesn’t like this group and they see her as a race traitor, but David thinks the invitation is a gesture of reconciliation so they go. But when they wake up the first morning they discover that a powerful politician has been murdered in his bed, and it quickly becomes clear that whoever did this is trying to frame David.The story alternates between two very different voices. Lucy’s chapters chat to readers in the first person, while the point of view of Inspector Carmichael, sent by Scotland Yard to investigate the crime, is told through the third person. Carmichael is a principled, thoughtful man who has secrets of his own--he’s a homosexual. Though he’s working diligently to uncover the truth, he’s being pressured by his superiors to just arrest David and close the case. Jo Walton’s versatility amazes me. The first books I read by her involved a simulation of Plato’s Republic, set up by the goddess Athena on the ancient island of Atlantis, but this is obviously a very different book, and she’s written it from two highly contrasting points of view. Tightly plotted, the tension builds quickly and continuously in Farthing, so by the time I was 80% in my heart was pounding and the book was impossible for me to put down. It’s the first book in a trilogy that I look forward to continuing once my adrenaline comes back down to normal levels.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This was a very odd book. I enjoyed most of it, but it was very odd. It took a bit of mental calisthenics to adapt to a 1949 London in which "Old Adolph admired England and had no territorial ambitions across the channel". Because this world's Old Adolph most certainly had all sorts of ambitions across the channel; he was drooling to get into London and execute the entire royal family.

    Rather than that straight-forward and outright horror, the horror in this book is … sneakier.

    "In May of 1941, the war looked dark for Britain. We and our Empire stood alone, entirely without allies. The Luftwaffe and the RAF were fighting their deadly duel above our heads. Our allies France, Belgium, Holland, Poland, and Denmark had been utterly conquered. Our ventures to defy the Reich in Norway and Greece had come to nothing, The USSR was allied to the Reich, and the increasingly isolationist USA was sending us only grudging aid. We feared and prepared for invasion. In this dark time, the Fuhrer extended a tentative offer to us. Hess flew to Britain with a tentative offer of peace, each side to keep what they had. Churchill refused to consider it, but wiser heads prevailed…"

    Wiser heads prevailed, and those damned isolationists in the US held sway, and Britain made a peace with Hitler, and now most if not all of Europe is under a blanket of fascism. Being Jewish is a very, very difficult thing, when it isn't outright life-threatening, wherever you are. And Orwell imagines his dystopia happening ten years earlier than in this world. (That is a lovely subtle touch.) And the United States is led by President Lindbergh – which … Heaven forbid.

    And it is in this universe that Lucy and her Jewish husband David return to her family's estate for a house party, during which there is a good old-fashioned country house murder.

    There were things I did not like; Lucy uses a verbal shorthand she had developed, but the reader is not clued into exactly what she's talking about until what seemed like a ridiculous ways in. (Page 96 – looked it up. So a third of the way through the book.) It's pretty clear through context what she means by "Athenian" and "Macedonian" and so on – but not totally clear, and a little baffling as to WHY she would be saying "Athenian" and "Macedonian" and so on.

    I never warmed up to most of the characters. Heaven knows Lucy's family didn't deserve warming up to…they are snobs of the first water.
    "How many servants do you get by with?"
    "Just three," David said. "A cook, a housemaid, and a kitchen maid. …"
    "You dress yourselves??"
    - Goodness me. And here I thought that was something one was taught to do as a toddler.

    And Lucy – one of the two point of view characters – began to grate on me. She says, often, that she isn't too bright, though the plan she comes up with is not terrible … but her speech and behavior thoroughly agrees with the "not too bright". Is it all a front? Does she really think she's stupid (perhaps because her mother has taught her so) when she's not so dumb after all? Who knows? She is rather flighty, and certainly fanciful: to avoid spoilers, I'll just say that she develops an unshakeable certainty of something about which she couldn't possibly have a clue, and proceeds from that first moment of certainty as if what she believes is rock solid truth. Is it? Who knows?

    Speaking of servants … Things are a bit odd with them in the country house where the good old country house murder takes place. I mean … they're servants, when all's said and done, employees hired and paid to do specific jobs, in a class structure which requires them to show respect to their social "betters". But here the attitudes are extraordinary – and Mrs. Simons, the housekeeper, is outright offensive. Blatantly, intentionally, viciously rude. Lucy: "I didn't like how quickly I'd resorted to threatening to sack her" – WHY? My God, are you mad? Fire that nasty cow and eject her so hard and fast she bounces twice going down the drive.

    The book alternates viewpoints between Lucy, on the scene of the murder, and Inspector Carmichael, in charge of investigating said murder. And it's all rather repetitive – not even just because of dual points of view, which is handled fairly well. "He might have committed suicide." "Why would he kill himself?" then a little while later "He might have killed himself." "Why would he commit suicide?" This happens over and over.

    I gave this four stars to start with, but – after some time has passed, and having listened to the ensuing two books, and just looking at the notes I made while listening to this one – I bumped it down to three. Because on the whole I really, really hated this series – and, honestly, with the level of exasperation in what I wrote at the time I'm a little shocked that I did rate it higher.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    File under the category of good, but I'm not sure that I have a lot more to add to what other people have said. What I can say is that what lifts this ostensible English country-house mystery above the now-hackneyed "if Hitler won" theme is Walton's skill as a writer and how she weaves believable sexual politics into how her plot plays out.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Very good. I particularly liked the ending though throughout it struck as a book with its head screwed on. Heartily recommended I intend to read the entire series.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    At first blush, this story appears like one of those cozy WWII British mysteries. The year is 1949 and a group of wealthy and influential English families are gathered at a country estate for a weekend holiday. And of course, one of the guests is found murdered. But where this story departs from the typical mystery is this is not quite the England we know. What gradually unfolds is to save Britain from a war with Germany, Churchill has signed a treaty with Hitler. Of course the treaty doesn't sanction Fascism or the horrible policies by the Nazi regime, but it allows Britain to coexist with Germany without going to war. But what gradually unfolds in this mystery is that Churchill's compromise has changed British society. Anti-semitism is rampant and people don't even make an effort to hide their disdain for the Jews. I love the way that author Jo Walton reveals this change. At this posh weekend, one of the guests has married a Jew and the interactions between this Jewish man and all the characters shows that all is not right in this world. From upper-crust guests to the servants, it is clear that Jews don't really have a place any longer in society.The mystery aspect of the story was good, but it's the underlying message of how a single action can change a society that was the gem in this story.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Six-word review: Murder and politics in 1949 Britain.Extended review:Well along in this book, I was still wondering why the alternate history, one in which England has made a war-ending peace with Germany and Hitler still rules in much of Europe. I didn't see how it served the story, why it was necessary to invent this highly charged political climate instead of using one that already existed.By the end I knew: this isn't really a murder mystery. It's a cautionary tale disguised as a murder mystery. Here the Ghost of Horrors Yet to Come points a bony finger at the gravestones of freedom, justice, decency, and the rule of law. The author might have dealt with her more serious themes directly instead of couching them in this way, as so many others have done, and yet there is something particularly effective about having them come at us sidelong.And so we're wrong to expect the conventions of a traditional murder mystery to be honored in the end. For that reason, I feel a bit dissatisfied. Things didn't turn out the way I wanted them to. I could argue that I've been misled. At the same time, I see that the author is serving a larger purpose, and she does it well, at least in this first of a series of three. The two principal characters, Lucy Kahn and Inspector Carmichael, are nicely drawn, appealing and very human in their ideals and virtues, their conflicts and contradictions. I'm inclined to follow Walton forward and see where she was going with this trilogy.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Oh wow. This was the kind of book where you want an excuse to have doctor appointments or long care rides, just so you can keep on reading. Foremost, its a mystery novel in the grand tradition of Agatha Christie. However, the alternative history component is not mere window-dressing--it's everything. Britain declared a cease fire with Germany in 1941 and by 1949 has slid into their own sort of fascism. The scope of racism and homophobia in the book is horrifying because it feels so real.Despite my massive to-read piles, I've ordered the next two books in the trilogy. I'll impatiently await their arrival.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I selected this one on the grounds that I'd loved the two previous Jo Walton books that I'd read, Among Others and Tooth and Claw, so when I was looking for a book that would really draw me in Jo Walton seemed an obvious choice. But unfortunately, while this was a good enough read it didn't grab my attention as much as those other books have done. There are a number of reasons for this, and I'm probably going to spend most of this review explaining why I didn't love what is in essence a decent book, which is probably a little unfair...In the 1940's Lucy Kahn is attending a weekend house party at her ancestral home, Farthings Castle, together with her husband David. Lucy had married the son of a Jewish banker, much to the disapproval of her aristocratic family, and her husband is tolerated at best. And when a fellow guest, Sir James Fairlie, is found murdered with indications that the murderer might have been Jewish, suspicion immediately falls on David Kahn. For in this version of the 1940's Britain made peace with Hitler's Germany in 1941, and Sir James Fairlie was the man who made it happen, as well as being part of a government which is making anti-semitism more and more acceptable. But Inspector Carmichael, drafted in from Scotland Yard, starts to think that the obvious solution is just a little too simple ...I have three main problems with this book. The first is that it is a clear reworking of the country house mystery genre, which is one that I have never read or really been attracted to. The second, which I can't really elaborate on without going into spoilers, is that the reason finally identified for the murder seems altogether implausible and (to me at least) a hugely unlikely way for anyone to go about achieving its stated aim. But my third and main problem is that I don't really believe in the alternative world that has been created. It might be the view of Britain that you could believe in from reading nothing but the country house mysteries mentioned above, a world of the aristocracy and the upper middle classes, a place where the poorer classes are represented only as servants and villains, but even before the Second World War this was a society on the way out. And in this novel it is key to the plot that the Farthings Set, an aristocratic political grouping with distinctly fascist leanings, are leading a popular government despite having the sort of policies which seem designed to completely disempower the working classes. And it's here that my major problems start as I just can't imagine any government of the time getting away with the sort of policies that the Farthing set seem to be enacting quite easily, without there being major political and social insurrection (riots, general strikes, marches, you get the idea). While I can imagine certain members of the aristocracy wanting to do it, I just can't imagine them actually being able to do it without meaningful opposition. The government has apparently been voted in in 'gratitude' for the peace that the Farthing Set brokered, but I'm not a great believer in gratitude when it comes to politics. After all Churchill was widely credited by the British people with winning the Second World War but it didn't stop him being thrown out on his ear when it came to the election in 1945! So complaints over, this is still a decent read that's well worth giving a go. And I will certainly be trying the next one in the series. But it certainly doesn't live up to her other work in my opinion.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A modern take on the country-house murder mystery set in an alternative version of history where WWII ended with the Hess Peace in 1941. Inspired by the works of Josephine Tey and Dorothy Sayers this is an enjoyable read but doesn't quite live up to the works that inspired it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I did react, I know I did. It was fury, at Mummy, and at the rest of them, whoever they were, for being so stupid, so prejudiced, so unthinkingly vile as to think that just because David was Jewish he was likely to be a murderer. If I'd never known David I might have carried on thinking all these people were basically good people, with odd little quirks perhaps, but I'd never have understood how foul they were. David took the blinkers off for me, and I've never been sorry, because who would want to go around in a world that's like a very thin strip of pretty flower garden surrounded by fields and fields of stinking manure that stretch out as far as the eye can see? And it's not as if those people are the only people in the world, though they may imagine they are. I was glad that the Kahns escaped to Canada in the end, but it was all a bit easy for them, once they got in contact with Abby.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This work of alternate history was genius in its conception – cozy mystery crossed with fascist England alternate history and political intrigue.The only thing I really would have changed would be the pregnancy scene, because I just hate that mystical "I'm pregnant at the moment we're having sex" schtick. It doesn't actually happen like that! And I wouldn't mind it as much if it were just supposed to be in someone's head, but the timing of the scene led one to believe that for sure it was real. Argh! Okay, it's a minor point, but it sticks in my craw a few years after reading the book. Which you should do, because it's a great book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Farthing posits an alternate history in which Britain negotiates a "Peace with Honour" with Hitler in 1941. By 1949 when the novel takes place, Hitler had overrun Europe, Nazi death camps still operate, the US (where Lindbergh is president) had closed its borders, and antisemitism runs rampant in Britain. The story is told from the point of view of Lucy Kahn, the daughter of a powerful aristocratic family with whom she has fallen out of favor because of her recent marriage to a Jewish banker, and from the point of view of a Scotland Yard detective who is called to Lucy's family's estate to investigate the murder of a political heavy-weight who was staying there for the weekend. The novel works much like a cozy murder mystery, with investigations into the murder forming the backbone of the story. And that format makes this history even more sinister than it already seems at first glance. Because so much of the story reads like a gentle murder story in which nothing too terribly awful will happen, the little details of the way the world works in the alternate history are all the more sharp and shocking and terrifying.While I enjoyed Farthing a lot (it's written just wonderfully, and Walton handles her characters, setting, and plot deftly), the book did feel a bit uneven. It eventually becomes clear that things are even a lot worse than they appear in this version of Britain, and the book goes from interestingly sinister to downright chilling in the last few chapters. That move was appropriate, and, indeed, it felt the like the book was building toward it all along. But the transition still seemed a little rushed, and the novel ultimately felt not wholly in balance because of it. I'm also still puzzling over Walton's choice to make so many of her characters here secretly gay. Of the major players (easily a dozen), at least five turn out to be Also Gay, by which I mean they are introduced as having a certain bearing on the story (such as being a major figure in the politics of Britain) and then a while later we find out that they are also gay (or bi) (with the fact of their sexuality rarely having anything to do with the plot). I am always happy to see people who historically have often been elided from fiction better represented on the page, but the way Walton kept sliding this fact in about many of her characters led me to suspect that the fact of their sexuality was going be become very important either thematically or in the plot. And it never did. Curious. Perhaps it will become clear in the second book in the series, which I am excited to read.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This was a book I didn't expect - I read alternate histories (Scott Westerfeld's excellent Leviathan series comes to mind) but it usually has a fantasy setting, which turns everything into a curiosity and a great part of my enjoyment comes from discovering what's new in the world in terms of objects and setting. Though Jo Walton has written fantasy (Tooth and Claw is the first in a series I have yet to read), Farthing is very much a country house cosy mystery for 90% of the plot and that, to me, is an entirely new approach and an immediate draw. I'm a huge fan of golden age detection fiction (think Dorothy L Sayers, Josephine Tey, Agatha Christie) and that's how the book lured me in. It's an impeccable mystery with engaging characters, solid writing and an excellent sense of the period. However, Farthing is very much a book in its own, regardless of what inspired it, and for me that's due to three things: first, the absolutely gorgeous two main characters - Inspector Carmichael and Lucy Khan, who share the point of view of the book in alternating chapters , then, the incredible scope of the novel and the way we learn about the world it's set in - while we are given enough to work with concerning what a world with Nazi Germany looks like, we are still very much in the dark due to the two main characters not being much interested in politics themselves - and finally, the relationships. Lucy and David's relationship is one of the most beautiful I've ever seen described and it's quite rare to see a marriage depicted with that much intimacy and detail without verging on sentimentality. The novel also includes a lot of realistic family interactions and musings along with a very interesting exploration of what homosexuality means to different characters throughout. I will say though that there is quite a good amount of antisemitism depicted and though it's entirely condemned by the main characters and the authorial voice, it's still something any reader should be warned about beforehand. I'm really eager to see what comes next - the book is very much open-ended and alludes to a completely different sequel and I can't wait to see what will happen and I'm really looking forward to the author slowly revealing more about this alternate world.
    This was a really engrossing read and I couldn't put this book down even to cook. I'm really happy I found this author.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This feels like the kind of book that I'm not really going to know how much I like it until I read the entire series, which is like the sad, sad, story of my life these days. The style is that of a 1950s murder mystery in an English manor house, the twist is that it takes place in an alternate history in which the UK came to a peace agreement with Nazi Germany, so England is doing rather well, the US never entered the war, and Hitler is living large having conquered Europe. It should come as a spoiler to nobody that one of the key goals of this book is to show how wrong a Hitler compromise scenario would have been. It was impressive to me that this is rather obvious from the get-go, but the author still convinces the reader that it is even more insidious when you actually go through the thought exercise of looking at underlying antisemitism and homophobia just creeping along. It was also amusing to me how I have grown so used to this genre of English mystery that when it goes in a different direction, I was offended on some level, like a "hey, this is NOT the way it works" reaction, which I suppose goes hand and hand with Nazis.I had a few points where the book wasn't quite working for me -- the wacky mechanics of the murder were too wacky; the wide-eyed Mitford-esque family slang was a little too forced; I kept waiting for other qualities deemed undesirable by the Nazis to come into the story; there is a running thing about tea that I didn't get at all, and I don't know whether it's because I'm not smart enough, or not English; a mention of a "Guy Philby" threw me, is that a Cambridge Four/Five reference? -- but I'm mostly curious to see if any of those quibbles get taken up in the following books.

Book preview

Farthing - Jo Walton

1

It started when David came in from the lawn absolutely furious. We were down at Farthing for one of Mummy’s ghastly political squeezes. If we could have found any way out of it we would have been somewhere else, but Mummy was inexorable so there we were, in my old girlhood bedroom that I’d left behind so happily when I’d married David, him in a morning suit and me in a little knee-length beige Chanel thing.

He burst in, already drawing breath to speak. Lady Thirkie thinks you should sack me, Lucy!

I didn’t see at first that he was spitting mad, because I was busy trying to get my hair to stay on top of my head without disarranging my pearls. In fact, if my hair had been less recalcitrant about that sort of thing probably it would never have happened, because I’d have been on the lawn with David, and then Angela would never have been so dim. In any case, at first the whole thing struck me as funny, and I absolutely gurgled with laughter. Darling, you can’t sack a husband, can you? It would have to be divorce. Whatever have you been doing that Angela Thirkie thinks is enough for me to divorce you?

Lady Thirkie appears to have mistaken me for the hired help, David said, coming around behind me so I could see him in the mirror, and of course, when I saw him, I realized at once that he wasn’t the slightest bit amused by it, and that I shouldn’t have laughed, and in fact that laughing was probably the worst thing I could have done in the circumstances, at least without bringing David around to seeing the funny side of things first.

Angela Thirkie is a complete nincompoop. We’ve all been laughing at her for years, I said, which was completely true but didn’t help even a shred, because David, of course, hadn’t been laughing at her for years, hadn’t been there for years to laugh at her, so it was another thing pointing up the difference between me and him and just at the time when he’d had the difference rather shoved down his throat in the first place because of Angela’s idiocy.

He looked rather grim in my mirror, so I turned around to see if he looked any better the right way around. I kept my hands up in my hair because I nearly had it right at last. She thought I shouldn’t be helping myself to cocktails and she said she’d tell your mother and recommend she sack me, he said, smiling but in a way that meant he didn’t find it even the least bit funny. I suppose I do look rather like a waiter in this getup.

Oh darling, you don’t; you look delicious, I said, automatically soothing, although it was true. Angela’s a nitwit, truly. Hasn’t she been introduced to you?

Oh yes, at one of the engagement parties, and then again at the wedding, David said, his smile becoming even more brittle. But no doubt we all look the same to her.

Oh darling! I said, and let my hands go out towards him, abandoning my hair for the time being, because there was nothing I could say—he was right and we both knew he was. I’ll come back out with you now and we can give her such a snub.

I shouldn’t mind it, David said, taking my hands and looking down at me. Except that it reflects on you. You’d have been much more comfortable marrying someone of your own kind.

And this was true of course, there is a sort of comfort in being with people who think exactly as you do because they’ve been brought up exactly the same way and share all the same jokes. It’s a feeble kind of comfort and doesn’t last beyond seeing that you’ve nothing truly in common except that kind of upbringing and background. People don’t marry in order to be comfortable, I said. Then, as usual with people I trust, I let my train of thought go haring off out of control. Unless maybe Mummy did. That would explain a lot about her marriage. I put my hand to my mouth to cover a horrified laugh, and also to try to catch back the train of thought that had got away from me. My old governess, Abby, taught me to think of it that way and to do that. It helps for the blunders, at least if I do it in time, but it does mean that Mummy has reproved me on several occasions for keeping my hand up to my mouth more than a lady ought!

Then are you sure you didn’t marry me for the opposite reason? David asked, ignoring the diversion. Especially so you could use me to enjoy snubbing people like Lady Thirkie?

That’s absurd, I said, and turned back to the mirror, and this time I caught up my hair and the pearls all in one swirl and managed to get it just right where all my careful trying before had failed. I smiled at my reflection, and at David where he was standing behind me.

There was a certain grain of truth in what he said, but a very distant grain that wouldn’t be good for either of us or for our marriage if we spent time dwelling on it. Daddy had made me face all that on the night he’d agreed to the marriage going ahead. David had imagined that Daddy would make endless difficulties, but in fact he just gave me that one really hard talk and then buckled down and accepted David as one of the family. It was Mummy who made the difficulties, as I’d known it would be.

Daddy had called me into his office in London and told all the secretaries and everyone not to let anybody in. I’d felt simultaneously rather important, and as if I were ten years old and on the carpet for not doing my homework. I had to keep reminding myself I was the thoroughly grown-up and almost-on-the-shelf young lady I really was. I sat in the leather chair he keeps for visitors, clutching my purse on my knee, and he sat down behind his big eighteenth-century desk and just looked at me for a moment. He didn’t beat about the bush at all, no nonsense with drinks and cigarettes and getting comfortable. I’m sure you know what I want to talk to you about, Luce, he started.

I nodded. David, I said. I love him, Daddy, and I want to marry him.

David Kahn, Daddy had said, as if the words left a bad taste in his mouth.

I started to say something feeble in David’s defense, but Daddy held up a hand. I already know what you’re going to say, so save your breath. He was born in England, he’s a war hero, his family are very wealthy. I could counter with the fact that he was educated on the Continent, he’s a Jew, and not one of us.

I was just going to say we love each other, I said, with as much dignity as I could manage. Unlike Mummy, who could only make a nuisance of herself, Daddy really could have scuppered the whole thing at that point. Although I was twenty-three and, since Hugh died, heir to pretty much everything except Farthing and the title, I didn’t have any money of my own beyond what Daddy let me have, and neither did David. His family were wealthy enough, but he himself hardly had a bean, certainly not enough for the two of us to live on. His family, which surprised me at first though it made sense afterwards, didn’t approve of me one whit more than mine approved of him. So it could have been a real Romeo and Juliet affair if not for Daddy seeing sense and coming over to my side.

Having seen you together and talked to young David, I don’t doubt that, funnily enough, Daddy said. But what I want to know is whether that’s enough. Love’s a wonderful thing, but it can be a fragile flower when the winds blow cold against it, and I can see a lot of cold winds poised to howl down on the pair of you.

Just so long as you’re not one of those winds, Daddy, I said, pressing my knees together and sitting up straight, to look as mature and sensible as I could.

Daddy laughed. I’ve seen you sitting like that when you want to impress me since you were five years old, he said. Then he suddenly leaned forward and turned really serious. Have you thought what it’s going to mean being Mrs. Kahn? We share a name that we didn’t do anything personally to earn but which we inherited from our Eversley ancestors, who did. It is a name that opens doors for us. You’re talking about giving that up to become Mrs. Kahn—

Kahn means that David’s ancestors were priests in Israel when ours were painting themselves blue with woad, I said, quoting—or probably misquoting—Disraeli.

Daddy smiled. All the same, what it means to people now and in England will close a lot of doors in your face.

Not doors I want to go through, I said.

Daddy raised an eyebrow at that.

No, really, I have thought this through, I said, and I had, or thought I had. You remember when Billy Cheriton was taking me about everywhere? Billy had been one of Mummy’s worst ideas, the younger son of the Earl of Hampshire, who’s Mummy’s cousin and who happened to be married to one of her best friends. We’d known each other all our lives, gone to the same nursery parties, and then the same young-people parties, and Mummy’s idea had been what a natural match it would have been.

Daddy nodded. He didn’t think much of Billy.

Once we were down at Cheltenham for the racing because Tibs had a horse running and Billy was showing the family flag. We were in a crowd of nice people just like us, and the horse lost, of course.

Tibs Cheriton has never had an eye for horseflesh, Daddy said. Sorry. Go on.

So we were drowning our sorrows in Pimms, and I was bored, suddenly, bored to screaming point, not just with Cheltenham and that crowd but with the whole thing, the whole ritual. Tibs and one of the other boys were talking about horse breeding, and I thought that it was just the same with us, the fillies and the stallions, the young English gentry, breeding the next generation of English gentry, and I couldn’t think of anything more excruciatingly boring than to be married to Billy, or Tibs, or any of that cackling crowd. Not that I’d have married Tibs if he were the last man in the world, because I was pretty sure he was Athenian, and I think Mummy knew it too, otherwise it would have been Tibs she’d have been pushing me into going around with, not Billy. I don’t want that. I’ve been presented and done all the deb stuff and even before I met David I knew it wasn’t what I wanted.

That was when Daddy said it. Are you sure you’re not marrying David just to escape from that? he asked. To shock Billy and all the Billies by doing something they can’t countenance? Because if you are, it isn’t kind to David, and that’ll stop being fun too, much sooner than you think.

I thought about it, and I could see the smallest grain of that in me, the desire to give it all up and rub their faces in it with someone totally unacceptable by their own ridiculous standards. I’m afraid Mummy had rather done her bit to encourage that part of my feelings, while intending the opposite, of course. I do think there might be the tiniest bit of that, Daddy, I admitted. But really I love David, and he and I have so much in common in ways that aren’t to do with up-bringing and education and that count for a lot more with me.

He assured me he didn’t intend to pressure you to convert, Daddy said.

He’s not very religious himself, I said.

He told me he has no intention of giving up his religion. Daddy frowned.

Why should he? I asked. It’s not just a religion, it’s a culture. He’s not very religious, but he’s not ashamed of his culture, his background, and converting would be like saying he was. It wouldn’t make any difference to anything anyway—people who hate the Jews hate converts just as much. He says Jewish children take the religion of the mother, so that’s all right.

In the same way it would make no difference, people will always talk of you as ‘that Mrs. Kahn, Lucy Eversley that was.’ He made his voice into a cruel imitation of a society woman, of Mummy at her absolute bitchiest really.

I can’t say that didn’t hurt a bit, but even as it hurt, the tiny sting of it made me realize how unimportant it really was, compared to the way I loved David. I shook my head. Better that than not marrying David, I said.

You know, in Germany— Daddy began.

But we’re not in Germany. We fought a war—you and David both fought a war—to ensure that the border of the Third Reich stops at the Channel. It always will. Germany doesn’t have anything to do with anything.

Even in England you’ll come in for a lot of trouble, which your young man is used to but you won’t be, Daddy said. Little things like not being allowed into clubs, big things like not being allowed to buy land. And that will come to your children. When your daughters come out, they might not be allowed to be debs and be presented, with the name Kahn.

So much the better for them, I said, though that did shake me a little.

There might be stings and insults you don’t expect, Daddy added.

But although he was right, I generally found I didn’t mind them, or thought them funny, whereas poor David wasn’t used to them at all, like this thing now with idiotic Angela Thirkie and her stupid assumption that anyone with a face and coloring like David’s had to be a servant. Maybe he was better able to deal with an outright snub than this kind of casual disregard.

I let my hair go, cautiously, and when it stayed up, I turned back to David. I wanted to marry you because of you, and I’ve never given a damn about those people one way or the other and you should know that.

For a moment he kept on looking pained. Then he smiled and hugged me, and for the time being everything was all right again.

He took my hand and we walked out into the garden, where Mummy’s ghastly bash was now in full swing.

What I was thinking as we walked out there was that David and I really did have a tremendous amount in common, books and music and ways of thinking about things. I don’t mean usual ways of thinking, because I’m scatterbrained and not really very bright while David is tremendously clever, of course. But time after time we’ll come to the same conclusions about whether something is sound, starting from different places and using different methods of logic. David never bores me and he never gives me the feeling that other tremendously brainy people I’ve known have given me of leaving me streets behind. We can talk about anything, except perhaps some of the trickier bits of our own relationship. There are some things best left to the subconscious, after all, as David himself says.

I gave his hand an extra squeeze just because I loved him, and he looked down at me, for once not picking up what I meant but thinking I wanted something. So I put my face up to be kissed, and that was how we snubbed stupid insensitive Angela Thirkie, who was married to the most boring man in England, who everyone knows didn’t even want her, he wanted her sister, by kissing like newlyweds on the lawn when in fact we’d been married eight whole months and really ought to be settling down to life as old respectable married people.

But anyway, when I heard that Sir James Thirkie had been murdered, that’s the first thing I thought of, Angela Thirkie being mean to David the afternoon before, and I’m afraid the first thing to go through my mind, although fortunately I managed to catch the train before it got out of the tunnel that time so I didn’t say so, was that it well and truly served her right.

2

Inspector Peter Anthony Carmichael had been vaguely aware that Farthing was a country house in Hampshire; but before the murder he had only really heard of it in a political context. The Farthing Set, the newspapers would say, meaning a group of loosely connected movers and shakers, politicians, soldiers, socialites, financiers: the people who had brought peace to England. By peace was meant not Chamberlain’s precarious peace in our time but the lasting Peace with Honour after we’d fought Hitler to a standstill. The Inspector included himself in that we—as a young lieutenant he’d been one of the last to get away from Dunkirk. He’d cautiously welcomed the peace when it came, although at that point he’d had a sneaking fondness for crazy old Churchill’s fighting rhetoric and been afraid Hitler couldn’t be trusted. This Farthing Peace isn’t worth a farthing, Churchill had wheezed, and the newspapers had shown him holding up a farthing mockingly.

But time had showed that the Farthing Set were right. The Continent was the Continent and England was England, and old Adolf admired England and had no territorial ambitions across the Channel. Nine years had been enough to test the terms of the Farthing Peace and show that England and the Reich could be good friends. The Farthing Set had been vindicated and stayed at the centers of power. And now there had been a murder in Farthing House, so Farthing changed its meaning for him again and Inspector Carmichael found himself being driven through a green, peaceful, and very beautiful England on a Sunday morning early in May.

Carmichael came from Lancashire, not the industrial southern Lancashire of cotton mills and unemployment, but the bleak northern uplands of moorland and fell. His father lived in a crumbling house not much better than the farmhouses of his tenants and struggled to send his sons to minor public schools. Carmichael’s had been so minor it had since perished, with no loss to anyone, especially Carmichael. If he ever had sons, which he increasingly doubted, he’d certainly not have chosen to send them to that hell-hole to be starved and beaten. Still, that, with the Dunkirk experience, had been good enough for Scotland Yard, and he was a full inspector now at twenty-nine, with good pay and excellent prospects for advancement. Many hadn’t done as well in the lean post-war years. His older brother, Matthew, whose public school had been better, if still minor, was living in the North helping his father with the sheep. He didn’t see civilization more than once a month when he went into Lancaster to the bank and the solicitor and maybe a stop for lunch at the King’s Head and a quick hour at the pictures in the afternoon. It wasn’t much, and Carmichael sometimes paused in his enjoyment of the good things in life to consider the pitiful lot of his distant brother.

All the same, there was enough of the Northerner left in him to distrust the Hampshire countryside that was doing its best to beguile him. The trees, so much more frequent and so much broader here than on his native moor, were in fullest leaf and cast a delightful shade. Beneath them spread as solid a carpet of bluebells as he had ever seen, sending their scent drifting into the car as he was driven on past them. The sun was shining from a deep blue sky, as it rarely shone on Lancashire, the fields were ploughed and planted, the hay was already high, the grass was a verdant green, and the birds were singing. As if this wasn’t enough, every few miles the road wound its way through a little village with a church, a pub, a post office, thatched cottages, and just sufficient individuality to tell it from the last one. One might boast a manor house, a second a duck pond, a third a village green, or a mighty oak with two old men sitting beneath it as if they were about to hand down the wisdom of the elders. Carmichael sighed.

What’s wrong, sir? Sergeant Royston, at the wheel of the police Bentley, spared a quick glance for his superior. Didn’t fancy Sunday duty?

Not especially, Carmichael said. Though I hadn’t anything special to do today, and I might as well work now if the Yard needs me and have a free day in the week when the shops are open. It’s just this countryside depresses me somehow.

They swept into another little village. This one had a pretty girl feeding white Aylesbury ducks outside one of the cottages. It is lacking a bit of life compared to town, Royston said as he rounded the curve back into the endless fields and spinneys.

It’s not that, Carmichael said, as it suddenly came to him what it was. It’s all so fat and complacent somehow, as if it’s had too long living on its rich soils and warm summers. It’s fallen asleep in the sunshine. It could do with something to give it a shake and wake it up, like a famine, or a plague, or an invasion or something.

Royston slowed as they came into yet another village. Just past the church was an unpleasant reminder of the invasion that had nearly happened, an Anderson shelter, with children playing, running in and out of it. Royston said nothing, but Carmichael felt the red tide of embarrassment burning on his cheeks. He hadn’t meant the Germans, nothing had been farther from his mind, he’d been centuries away imagining Vikings or pirates descending on these smug sleepy peasants.

I don’t much care for bluebells myself, Royston said. If we had to drive down this way, I’d have preferred to do it a few weeks ago in primrose season. Primroses are a beautiful color, very cheering.

I find them a bit on the soft side myself, Carmichael said. Bluebells, now, we do have them in the North. I wouldn’t have thought you cared for flowers at all, sergeant. I thought you were a strictly town man.

Well, I was born and bred in London myself, but my mother’s family lived in the countryside.

Round here? Carmichael asked.

Kent. I have an aunt who still lives there; some of the family go down to see her at Easter and for the hop picking. Easter’s when we used to see the primroses, when I was a boy. It’s a good way east of here, but I suppose from the perspective of Lancashire it would count as these parts.

Carmichael laughed. All these years, and I’d never have suspected you of having a Kentish aunt, Royston. You hide it very well.

There was a fork in the road ahead. Royston slowed to a halt to check the arms of the little signpost. Would we want Farthing Green, Upper Farthing, or Farthing St. Mary? he asked.

Castle Farthing. Carmichael checked his notes and his map without effect. There was an area on the map labeled unhelpfully THE FARTHINGS. Head for Farthing St. Mary, he said, decisively.

Yes, sir, Royston said.

Carmichael knew the first secret of command, which was making a decision, right or wrong, but going ahead without hesitating. He might have sent them off the wrong way and condemned them to an endless trek through the barely charted Hampshire countryside, but at least he had made a decision.

By pure luck he was right. The next sign offered CASTLE FARTHING on one of its branches, and the lane it led down, with its heavy hedgerows, came at last to an end with a loop around a village green. There was a church, larger than most, a pub, the Eversley Arms, a row of cottages, and a high wall containing a pair of wrought-iron gates with the word FARTHING scrolling indolently across them as if there were no other possible Farthing, as indeed, for anyone beyond this little corner of Hampshire where people no doubt knew one Farthing from the next, there was not. Beneath the name was the ubiquitous robin, the obverse of the farthing coin, the political symbol of the Farthing Set. With a start, Carmichael realized that considering the antiquity of the gates, a century if it was a day and probably more, this particular robin must pre-date the Set and was doubtless the prototype for the whole thing.

Meanwhile, the gates were closed. Judging from the ruts in the gravel, this was an unusual state of affairs. Probably the local police shut them to close off the house from press and sightseers, Carmichael said, indicating the ruts.

Sightseers? Here? Royston’s London face dismissed the possibility. All the same, they should have left a bobby on the gates, he said, his tone reproving the absent local constabulary. Shall I try if they’re open, sir?

You do that, sergeant, Carmichael said. As a young officer he’d have got out to try them himself, and lost all his subordinate’s respect in the process. Now he sat back and watched Royston crunch across the gravel.

With the engine off, the bird-song seemed very loud. A nearby but invisible blackbird chirruped, Look at me. Look at me. This is my territ’ry. He was answered by other birds seeking mates, building nests, or defending their boundaries. They stilled to silence when they heard the clang of Royston shaking the gate, then started up again, for all the world as if they were gossiping about it. Royston started back towards the car, shaking his head.

Carmichael stuck his head out of the open window. Let’s give them a quick blast and see what that roots out, he said. Royston grinned. Carmichael leaned across the driver’s seat and tapped out a quick salute on the horn: Pa pa pa paaaarp!

The only immediate result was another avian hush, and Carmichael was about to try again when a middle-aged woman came hurrying from the nearest cottage, wiping her hands on her apron. You’ll be the police, she said. Excuse me not hearing you, but I was just getting dinner out. As if to authenticate her statement, the church clock suddenly chimed through its sequence and then struck noon. It was so close that none of them could speak over the clamor.

Isn’t that a bit loud? Royston asked, taking his hands down from his ears.

Oh, we’re used to it, the woman said. It has to be that loud so they can hear it up at the house. She nodded towards the gates.

Are you the gatekeeper? Carmichael asked.

She blinked. No . . . and I’m not rightly the gatekeeper’s wife neither, because there hasn’t been a gatekeeper since my father died. The gates stand open, mostly. I was saying to Jem this morning that I don’t know when we shut them last.

This confirmed Carmichael’s observation. He nodded. They’re not closed even at night? he asked.

No, not for ever so long now, she said. Not since my father died probably, the same year the old king died.

It was as Carmichael had thought. Anyone could have driven up to the house. The gravel held tracks. The local police would have driven up it this morning, but it might be possible to find some evidence even so. He got out of the car and stood beside Royston. So, if you’re not the gatekeeper, who are you? he asked the woman.

I’m Betty, she said, Betty Jordan. My husband Jem is the mechanic up at the big house.

Mechanic? Royston asked, surprised.

He keeps their cars and that going, she said.

But you have a key to the gate? Carmichael asked.

Yes, and the policeman from Winchester said you’d be arriving and to let you in when you did, she said, brandishing a large iron key inset with a robin to match the robin on the gates. You are the London police, aren’t you? She took their silence for assent and went on immediately. Isn’t it terrible, anarchists murdering Sir James in his bed like that?

And to think it might have been prevented if they’d only locked the gates, Carmichael said, taking the key from her unresisting hand. I’ll be sure to lock them behind me now, and to see that this key is returned to you later. We’ll also need to interview you and your family—does your husband sleep at home?

Jem? she asked, as if he might mean some

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1