What do you think?
Rate this book
The Sacred Book of the Werewolf
A darkly comic work by the author of Buddha's Little Finger finds fifteen-year-old Moscow prostitute A. Huli hiding her identity as a two-thousand-year-old were-fox who seduces men to absorb their life force, a practice that catches the attention of a high-ranking intelligence officer and fellow werewolf. 10,000 first printing.
336 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2004
About the author
Victor Pelevin
187 books1,851 followersVictor Olegovich Pelevin is a Russian fiction writer. His books usually carry the outward conventions of the science fiction genre, but are used to construct involved, multi-layered postmodernist texts, fusing together elements of pop culture and esoteric philosophies. Some critics relate his prose to the New Sincerity and New Realism literary movements.
RU: Виктор Пелевин
RU: Виктор Пелевин
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 418 reviews
December 10, 2018
Even if you don't ordinarily read science-fiction or novels with werewolves, you will still enjoy The Sacred Book of the Werewolf since Victor Pelevin grounds his novel in a fund of everyday reality and tells his tale in easy-to-follow linear narrative. True, the narrator is a two thousand year old female werefox in the body of a sleek, shapely gorgeous sixteen year old girl, but, still, there is enough human-like traits to identify with her desires and aspirations and conflicts.
We follow our sly werefox, A Hu-Li by name, through a number of sexual encounters, frolicking adventures and emotionally charged relationships in Moscow 2005. What really adds a zesty flavor to this tale is the cross-species, supernatural qualities of several characters and how they transform and then interact with mere humans, or, in some cases, with other were-creatures, as per the below examples.
A Hu-Li also has a fox's tail, which she describes as follows : "When a fox's tail increases in length, the ginger hairs on it grow thinker and longer. It's like a fountain when the pressure is increased several times over (I wouldn't draw any parallels with the male erection). The tail plays a special part in our lives, and not only because of its remarkable beauty. I didn't call it an antenna by chance. The tail is the organ that we use to spin our web of illusion." And what a web of illusion! Enough to scramble the minds of any man she meets, any man, that is, who is fully human.
There are other magical, intuitive gifts that come along with being a werefox. A Hu-Li tells us about one such gift: "But thanks to our tail, we foxes find ourselves in a kind of sympathetic resonance with people's consciousness amplified when people take drugs. - his consciousness was hurtling along some kind of orange tunnel filled with spectral forms that he skillfully avoided. The tunnel kept branching sideways and Mikhalich chose which way to turn. It was like a bobsleigh - Mikhalich was controlling his imaginary flight with minute turns of his feet and hands that were invisible to the eye, not even turns really, simply microscopic adjustments of the tension in the corresponding muscles." Such a description is an example of the clear, vivid language we find in Andrew Bromfield's translation.
And here is a snippet from a section where A Hu-Li observes a special someone in her life metamorphosing into a full-fledged werewolf: "And then he sprouted fur all over him. The word `sprouted' isn't entirely appropriate here. It was more as if his tunic and trousers crumbled into fur - as if the shoulder straps and stripes were drawn in watercolour on a solid mass of wet hair that suddenly dried out and layered off into separate hairs." If you enjoy your literary fiction super-charged with such shape-shifting, you will love Victor Pelevin's spins of imagination and will gladly keep turning the novel's pages.
All of this fictional ingenuity and inventiveness combined with social commentary, especially commentary on Russian history and society, along with a healthy amount of metaphysics and Eastern mysticism makes for one first-rate novel. One last note: If you enjoy listening to Audiobooks, Cassandra Campbell's breezy, saucy voice is pitch-perfect as Pelevin's frisky werefox.
May 12, 2016
Think of this a a re-telling of a classic Russian Fairytale : a young redhead girl meets the big bad wolf in the urban jungle of Moscow, in the wildness of the post-perestroika social restructuring. Be prepared for some radical role inversions, some black humour and a lot, I mean A LOT, of metaphysical introspection with an Oriental flavour.
It's also a kind of love story with kinks in it (
The story is told in the form of the private journal of A Hu Li, an imported fairytale creature from the myths of China and Japan. She is a fox woman, a werefox. She can alter her appearance and induce illusions in the minds of men with the help of her prehensile tail. Alexander, her counterpart, is also an import, this time from the frozen lands to the north, a scion of Skandinavian legends about the end of the world (Fenrir). Their tale though is 100% Russian, and firmly anchored in the larger context of the modern world. The journal of A Hu Li is not a simple recap of her meeting with Alexander, but an ambitious study of social collapse, a critical analysis of literature and a metaphysical treatise on the nature of reality and illusion.
Paint me in the guise of a shallow reader, but I like a little more action and a little less philosophy in my werewolf novels. I enjoy Victor Pelevin's highbrow style and his bleak, coal-black style of humour, but I believe he was a tad heavy handed with the Oriental esoterism. Initially I was going to make this a three star review but, as usually happens with me, while reading through my bookmarks I realised there is a lot more depth and subtlety to the writing, enough to subdue my initial misplaced expectations.
I took Lolita's story very personally and very seriously. For me Dolores Haze was a symbol of the soul, eternally young and pure, and Humbert Humbert was the metaphorical chairman of this world's board of directors.
Early references to the oeuvre of Vladimir Nabokov serve as a warning to the casual reader to put his thinking cap on and to search for the universal meaning behind the hotel room assignations between an apparently nubile girl and rich businessmen looking for cheap thrills. If the barbed arrows launched by Pelevin at his readership were not clear enough, the werefox will later chide her boyfriend about his choice of literary fare, with similar Nabokovian disdain for the facile mass entertainment:
Reading is human contact, and the range of our human contacts is what makes us what we are. Just imagine you live the life of a long-distance truck driver. The books that you read are like the travellers you take into your cab. If you give lifts to people who are cultured and profound, you'll learn a lot from them. If you pick up fools, you'll turn into a fool yourself. Wasting time on detective novels is ... it's like giving an illiterate prostitute a ride for the sake of a blowjob.
Ohh ... hmm ... I will have to think a little more on this example / metaphor ... why do I have to defend my continuing interest in detective novels, Mr. Pelevin? Does this mean I am not only shallow, but also a pervert? A Hu Li is firmly in the camp of literature as education and not as escapism. She is a militant who mixes feminism with political rants and with Buddhism. She tends to get carried away by her theories, bragging and name dropping several philosophical schools, literary allusions (Aleister Crowley, Haruki Murakami, Tolstoy, etc.) and the movie Matrix in her efforts to convince the readers that reality is an illusion:
... But in fact everything's like in 'The Matrix', only without the warehouse. There's a dream, but there isn't anybody dreaming it. That is, they're part of the dream too. Some say the dream dreams itself. But strictly speaking there isn't any 'itself'.
Even giving the girl some credit for being more than a millenia old and justified in her research for the soul, I still found her theories condescending and unnecessarily long-winded. A Hu Li may or may not be aware of the irony of the following statement in her diary : ... a brief theoretical digression is required here, or else I'm afraid what I say will be incomprehensible. , but her digressions were anything but brief.
Even so, there are gems to be dug out of the dross for the patient reader, like some letters purported to describe opposing lifestyles in Moscow and London. I let you decide which is which from the following quotes:
You ask me what it is like here. To be brief, even the most hardened of optimists are now finding that any hope that the brown sea advancing on us from all sides consists of chocolate is melting away. And, as the advert puts it so wittily, it is melting not in their hands, but in their mouths.
>><<>><<>><<
The elite here is divided into two branches, which are called 'the oligarchy' (derived from the words 'oil' and 'gargle') and 'the apparat' (from the phrase 'upper rat').
>><<>><<>><<
Understand this - the West is just one big shopping mall. From the outside it looks magical, fantastic. But you had to live in the Eastern Bloc to take its shop windows for the real thing. [...] In actual fact, there are three roles you can play here - the buyer, the seller, or the product on the shelf. To be a seller is vulgar, to be a buyer is boring (and you still have to earn your living as a seller), and to be the product is repulsive. Any attempt to be anything else actually means 'not to be', as the market forces are quick to teach any and every Hamlet. All the rest is simply show.
My favorite parts of the novel are the ones when the esoteric and political conversations stop, and the fox and the wolf do something silly or out of character:
We foxes are keen hunters of English aristocrats and chickens. We hunt English aristocrats because English aristocrats hunt us, and it's a sort of point of honour. But we hunt chickens for our own enjoyment.
Hoping I'm not spoiling anything important to the plot, a point of (vicarious) interest in the relationship between A Hu Li and Alexander is the exploration of love as another form of illusion, the sort we create inside our own imagination and aplly to the object of our attentions, with mood swings from the sublime ( Alas, it is true: beauty is like fire, it burns and consumes, driving you insane with its heat, promising that in the place to which it drives its victim there will be calm, cool shade and new life - but that is deception. ) to the kinky. The last part appeals to the movie afficionado in me, when the bedroom role playing that every couple is dabbling in to a greater or lesser extent moves from Marvel Superheroes to Japanese Anime to arthouse existentalism and finally to some trueblood poetry under the direction of Wong Kar-Wai ("In The Mood For Love"). As in other bedroom sports, it seems that women are more accomplished and more liberated in spirit than us prude and timid males:
For instance, [we] turn ourselves into a pair of cartoon transformers who discover their attraction to each other on the roof of a Tokyo skyscrapper ... How dreadful! But when I wanted to become the German major in 'Casablanca' and take him from behind while he was the black pianist Sam playing it again, he was as horrified as if I'd been urging him to sell the motherland.
>><<>><<>><<
Recommended for readers who are ready to accept that a werewolf novel can be a literary gem that includes more than howling at the moon. Alternative (complementary) suggestions :
Kij Johnson - "The Fox Woman", "Fudoki" - for a lyrical study of oriental werecreatures
Robert McCammon - "The Wolf's Hour" - for the action junkies out there
Guy Endore - "A Werewolf in Paris" - for some of that nineteen century Romantic charm of the horror novel
Jasper Kent - "The Twelve" - for more werewolf goodies in a Russian setting
August 23, 2010
Victor Pelevin has been one of those writers that has been calling out to me for years now. I see his books at work, and some of them I think, "I should buy this someday", and others look like books that would irritate me. And over the years the idea that his books will irritate me had been winning out over getting enjoyment out of his books.
I don't know what I really expected from his books. Maybe a Russian Douglas Coupland mixed with Chuck Palanhuick? Look at this cover:
This looks like it could be annoyingly hip.
I might have read this (the one I'm 'reviewing', not the one in the picture above) book years ago if I had actually read what the book was about (but to be honest the book that always called to me was A Werewolf Problem in Central Russia and Other Stories). If I had read the back cover and known it was about a four thousand year old werefox that looks like a really beautiful fifteen year old virgin prostitute I probably would have read it a lot sooner. Werewolfs are kind of a blah idea to me, but uber-smart ancient fox people, well that is awesome.
The book itself is a bit more than mildly entertaining plot-wise, but bursting with enjoyment with the little details planted throughout the book. Right from the book's opening epigram taken from Lolita Pelevin sets up the book like Nabokov would construct one. With layered references that the reader is sure to only grasp psrts of, but which taunt the reader into paying more attention and play the game the author is constructing (of course I'm not really going to play this game with Pelevin, or with Nabokov, I'm a shitty and greedy reader, but I can appreciate the formal elements of a work even if I don't fully engage in it).
In a geeky way this book is very funny. In a line like this:
"But for specialists in the humanities words mean a lot, Derrida pointed that out."
I ended up laughing softly out loud on the subway. The same happened with this passage I also marked in my copy with the word HA! next to it (but which I'm stealing from Elizabeth's review, since she has already typed out the passage in full).
'Do you favour a review of the results of privatization?' asked Lord Cricket, who was listening carefully.
'And why not?' put in E Hu-Li. 'If you analyse it properly, the whole of human history for the last ten thousand years is nothing but a constant revision of the results of privatization. History is hardly likely to come to and end because a small number of people have stolen a large amount of money. Not even if the small number of people hire themselves three fukuyamas apiece!'
My sister E occasionally liked to express some radical, even seditious views - it suited her predatory beauty and instantly enchanted her future victim. And now I noticed how admiringly Alexander was gaping at her.
'Precisely!' he said. 'I ought to write that down. A pity, I haven't got a pen. But what's a fukuyama? A sort of geisha?'
To me, this is hilarious and like the Derrida related quote above it is taking a pot-shot at the serious vacuity of contemporary (Post-Berlin Wall / Pre 9/11) discourse.
Along with poking fun at contemporary theori(-es)/(-sts) and scientific proclamations that total understanding of everything is just one or two findings away, the book delves into some Buddhist type answers to the destructive silliness that makes up day to day life. This 'answer' I would have found really annoying a few years ago but in my post-defeatist frame of reference I didn't find it annoying at all (unlike how annoying I found the Buddhist nonsense thrown into that Bangkok Haunts book I read about a month ago).
I'd recommend this as a fun smart book. And I might even go as far as call it my 2010 Beach Read for geeks like me.
I don't know what I really expected from his books. Maybe a Russian Douglas Coupland mixed with Chuck Palanhuick? Look at this cover:
This looks like it could be annoyingly hip.
I might have read this (the one I'm 'reviewing', not the one in the picture above) book years ago if I had actually read what the book was about (but to be honest the book that always called to me was A Werewolf Problem in Central Russia and Other Stories). If I had read the back cover and known it was about a four thousand year old werefox that looks like a really beautiful fifteen year old virgin prostitute I probably would have read it a lot sooner. Werewolfs are kind of a blah idea to me, but uber-smart ancient fox people, well that is awesome.
The book itself is a bit more than mildly entertaining plot-wise, but bursting with enjoyment with the little details planted throughout the book. Right from the book's opening epigram taken from Lolita Pelevin sets up the book like Nabokov would construct one. With layered references that the reader is sure to only grasp psrts of, but which taunt the reader into paying more attention and play the game the author is constructing (of course I'm not really going to play this game with Pelevin, or with Nabokov, I'm a shitty and greedy reader, but I can appreciate the formal elements of a work even if I don't fully engage in it).
In a geeky way this book is very funny. In a line like this:
"But for specialists in the humanities words mean a lot, Derrida pointed that out."
I ended up laughing softly out loud on the subway. The same happened with this passage I also marked in my copy with the word HA! next to it (but which I'm stealing from Elizabeth's review, since she has already typed out the passage in full).
'Do you favour a review of the results of privatization?' asked Lord Cricket, who was listening carefully.
'And why not?' put in E Hu-Li. 'If you analyse it properly, the whole of human history for the last ten thousand years is nothing but a constant revision of the results of privatization. History is hardly likely to come to and end because a small number of people have stolen a large amount of money. Not even if the small number of people hire themselves three fukuyamas apiece!'
My sister E occasionally liked to express some radical, even seditious views - it suited her predatory beauty and instantly enchanted her future victim. And now I noticed how admiringly Alexander was gaping at her.
'Precisely!' he said. 'I ought to write that down. A pity, I haven't got a pen. But what's a fukuyama? A sort of geisha?'
To me, this is hilarious and like the Derrida related quote above it is taking a pot-shot at the serious vacuity of contemporary (Post-Berlin Wall / Pre 9/11) discourse.
Along with poking fun at contemporary theori(-es)/(-sts) and scientific proclamations that total understanding of everything is just one or two findings away, the book delves into some Buddhist type answers to the destructive silliness that makes up day to day life. This 'answer' I would have found really annoying a few years ago but in my post-defeatist frame of reference I didn't find it annoying at all (unlike how annoying I found the Buddhist nonsense thrown into that Bangkok Haunts book I read about a month ago).
I'd recommend this as a fun smart book. And I might even go as far as call it my 2010 Beach Read for geeks like me.
February 18, 2015
I don't know.
I wanted to like this book. The cool cover caught my eye and after reading the description - it being a tale about a werefox - I thought I would love it.
I'm afraid not.
It is lame, pretentious, and tries way too hard to be so slick and so post-moderne that it affected me in the same way as when some guy cuts you off while recklessly driving his damn annoyingly expensive car down the road - dressed in an overstuffy suit & tie no doubt - as he gabs away on his ultra-bling-blingy iPhone, completely oblivious to the fact that he all but sideswipes your car, probably killing you and himself in the process!
What could have been cool is just not.
And btw some @$$hole critic compared Victor Pelevin to Vladimir Nabokov. Yeah, right! What a joke! That's like comparing a mud guppy to Moby-Dick!
However, though I pretty much all but hated this book, I feel that someday I'm going to give it another chance. Why? I can't figure it out either. I guess because it has werewolves and a werefox in it and the cover is so striking and attractive.
One of the 3 or 4 most disappointing books I've purchased over the last 30+ years.
Only recommended if you like to brush your teeth with Pine-Sol.
January 27, 2009
Not sure how a book about a werefox prostitute in post-Soviet Russia manages to be boring, but this novel managed to do just that. Color me seriously disappointed.
October 6, 2008
Viktor Pelevin has given us a delightful critique of modern Russia inside a love story, which is inside a fairy tale, which is inside a meditation on the Tao, or perhaps it is the meditation on the Tao that is inside the fairy tale, which is inside the love story contained in a critique of modern Russia. Whichever way the elements of this magical narrative nest, the matruschka-doll nature of the novel is appropriate to the subject. What that subject may be is a bit harder to describe, since what can be spoken has already forfeited any claim to truth. Suffice it to say that the author leads the reader to the Rainbow Stream by such delightful detours through Russian literature, puns, folklore, and philosophy that the reader will forgive the author when the realization comes that the journey was unnecessary after all. Those who enjoy Bulgakov will find this novel pizdets in the appropriate sense of that most ambiguous word.
July 15, 2020
"That's the way language works. It's the root from which infinite human stupidity grows. And we were-creatures suffer from it too, because we're always talking. It's not possible to open your mouth without being wrong."
I know it might sound like I'm reaching, drowned as I am in hyperbole after finishing this fantastic novel, but I think I have good grounds to say that Pelevin might be the living, rightful heir to Dostoevsky as far as Russian fiction goes.
My reason for that is difficult to put into words, and also makes this book very difficult to review. It has to do with literature being restored to its place as a kind of playground of different ideas, the way a psychologist might collate his patients' disturbances to pore through his own neuroses. This book is very much a book of ideas, often conflicting, but always beautiful, like Dostoevsky's work: the polemics become part of the art.
This novel is about a Chinese were-fox who is centuries old and living in Moscow working as a teenage prostitute (because she looks young). Thing is, because of the power her tail has to create illusions, she actually never has to do the unsavory, perverted things her clients want her to do. Instead, she is free to give them whatever illusion they want without them knowing it while she gets to feed, again through her tail, on their life-force.
Fox girl's life suddenly changes dramatically when she meets an FSB werewolf and encounters a bizarre prophecy involving a super were-creature that will clarify reality (or destroy it).
Much of the novel involves the fox-wolf love affair and hilarious philosophical debates on a variety of issues. No topic is really spared, whether as a scathing critique of postmodernism, philosophy in general, and modern Russia.
Probably one of the best books I've read this year so far. For the reader who likes some depth to their weirdness and absurdity.
I know it might sound like I'm reaching, drowned as I am in hyperbole after finishing this fantastic novel, but I think I have good grounds to say that Pelevin might be the living, rightful heir to Dostoevsky as far as Russian fiction goes.
My reason for that is difficult to put into words, and also makes this book very difficult to review. It has to do with literature being restored to its place as a kind of playground of different ideas, the way a psychologist might collate his patients' disturbances to pore through his own neuroses. This book is very much a book of ideas, often conflicting, but always beautiful, like Dostoevsky's work: the polemics become part of the art.
This novel is about a Chinese were-fox who is centuries old and living in Moscow working as a teenage prostitute (because she looks young). Thing is, because of the power her tail has to create illusions, she actually never has to do the unsavory, perverted things her clients want her to do. Instead, she is free to give them whatever illusion they want without them knowing it while she gets to feed, again through her tail, on their life-force.
Fox girl's life suddenly changes dramatically when she meets an FSB werewolf and encounters a bizarre prophecy involving a super were-creature that will clarify reality (or destroy it).
Much of the novel involves the fox-wolf love affair and hilarious philosophical debates on a variety of issues. No topic is really spared, whether as a scathing critique of postmodernism, philosophy in general, and modern Russia.
Probably one of the best books I've read this year so far. For the reader who likes some depth to their weirdness and absurdity.
January 15, 2024
Two cautions. Waterstones put this on their horror shelf - it isn't a horror novel and it adds nothing consequential to the werewolf genre. It might just slip into the dark fantasy category but only at a stretch. It should sit nowhere else but under general fiction.
The second is the claim on the dust jacket that it is 'very funny' or 'outrageously funny'. It is not - in English. It can be mildly amusing at times but I think you have to be a post-Soviet Russian to get this book.
I would bet that it is 'funny' in Russian to Russians, though perhaps not 'very' or 'outrageously'. It is like that type of joke where the teller looks at you as you respond stony-faced and says, "ah, but you had to be there".
The big picture is that this is a book by a certain type of European intellectual for other European intellectuals - sardonic, a bit sly, too clever for its own boots or, rather, filled with cultural references that are really not quite as clever or as well thought out as either a naive reader or the author might think.
I am not sure that I want to say more out of courtesy. I finished it, though the vaguely occultist ending (no spoiler in that), did not convince and was certainly long-winded rather than 'funny' but, truth to tell, I was a bit bored from beginning to end.
Shame. The heroine - a several thousand year sexy little werefox - and the hero - a werewolf in the Russian security services - are interesting and well-drawn. So much more could have been done with them than have them act as half-baked agents for a bit of half-hearted sex, cod occultism and dull satire leading up to a somewhat conventional moral end. I suggest foxy gets another agent ...
January 16, 2023
When I first began reading, I was captured. I fell in love with the main character, a fox named A. Hu-Li. In every sense, a beautiful creature: a fox by birth but a girl in appearance. She's a philosopher, a warrior, an intellectual, a little but of a pervert, sharp on the tongue, and infinitely kind. But once her love interest FSB colonel-werewolf Alexander appeared... the book began to push me away. I did enjoy Pelevin's abrupt transitions from modern day life in Russia, to Eastern practices and philosophy, then suddenly to Scandinavian myths, werewolf sex scenes, politics, and love.
I would recommend this work to those who enjoyed Shantaram's philosophical statements, and, perhaps, to fans of Carlos Castaneda's works.
P.S. I am giving three stars not to the book, but to myself and my erudition. For not being able to transform perception, but only perceiving transformation.
I would recommend this work to those who enjoyed Shantaram's philosophical statements, and, perhaps, to fans of Carlos Castaneda's works.
P.S. I am giving three stars not to the book, but to myself and my erudition. For not being able to transform perception, but only perceiving transformation.
September 25, 2020
"Aslan bakışı öğretisi bu," dedim aceleyle; gereksiz konuştuğumu hissetmiştim. “Dediklerine göre bir köpeğe sopa fırlattığında dönüp bu sopaya bakarmış. Ama bir aslana sopa fırlattığında gözlerini ayırmadan sopayı atana bakarmış. Eski Çin’de tartışmalar sırasında eğer konuştuğun kişi kelimelere takılır ve esas meseleyi görmeyi bırakırsa öyle derlerdi.”
December 24, 2016
Wertiere gibt es unterschiedlichste, nicht nur Werwölfe. Das habe ich in diesem Buch gelernt, in dessen Mittelpunkt eine Werfüchsin steht, die in Moskau als Prostituierte arbeitet (oder so ähnlich, denn Sex hat sie nicht, zumindest nicht so, wie wir es uns für gewöhnlich vorstellen). Sie verliebt sich in einen Werwolf, der für den Geheimdienst arbeitet (man darf nicht vergessen: diese Wertiere sind normalerweise von Menschen nicht zu unterscheiden).
Das klingt völlig verrückt und solch phantasisch angehauchte Geschichten sind eigentlich nicht mein Fall. Doch über Pelewin habe ich einmal eine interessante Rezension gelesen und dieses seiner Buch fiel mir kürzlich in die Finger. Bereut habe ich es nicht, denn im Gegensatz zu manch anderer Werwolf-Geschichte (ich gebe zu, ich beziehe mich hier eher auf Filmerfahrungen) ist das sehr gut erzählt, voller Witz und Anspielungen. Insbesondere über Literatur wird gerne mal räsoniert, zum Beispiel hält die Werfüchsin einem Freier einen Vortrag darüber, wie Nabokovs Lolita wirklich zu verstehen ist. Auch dass die Werfüchse uralt sind und ihr Gedächtnis ca. 2000 Jahre umfasst, führt dazu, dass sie sich an Begegnungen mit historischen Figuren und in jüngerer Zeit zum Beispiel an Auden oder Sartre erinnern. Nebenbei wird dann die Gesellschaft Moskaus oder auch des Westens (zum Beispiel die Füchse jagenden Engländer, die bei Werfüchsen natürlich nicht beliebt sind) aufs Korn genommen. Und dann spielt Sex eine wichtige Rolle – eben wegen der Profession der Erzählerin und den Informationen über das Liebesleben der Wertiere. Alles in allem also eine vergnügliche, gescheite Lektüre.
Leider nerven die Diskurse dann auch irgendwann, weil sie sehr zahlreich und raumgreifend sind und die Kriminalhandlung (wenn man sie denn als solche bezeichnen will. Die Frage: Was hat es mit dem Überwertier auf sich?) dabei ins Stocken gerät. So kommt es, dass ich, obwohl ich mich gut unterhalten fühlte, zum Ende hin die ein oder andere Seite nur noch überflogen habe. 100 Seiten weniger hätten dem Buch sicher gut getan. Ich h��tte gerne wegen Originalität 4 Sterne vergeben, aber wegen Kürzungsbedarf gibt es nur 3. Dennoch würde ich nicht ausschließen, wieder ein Buch von Pelewin zu lesen.
Das klingt völlig verrückt und solch phantasisch angehauchte Geschichten sind eigentlich nicht mein Fall. Doch über Pelewin habe ich einmal eine interessante Rezension gelesen und dieses seiner Buch fiel mir kürzlich in die Finger. Bereut habe ich es nicht, denn im Gegensatz zu manch anderer Werwolf-Geschichte (ich gebe zu, ich beziehe mich hier eher auf Filmerfahrungen) ist das sehr gut erzählt, voller Witz und Anspielungen. Insbesondere über Literatur wird gerne mal räsoniert, zum Beispiel hält die Werfüchsin einem Freier einen Vortrag darüber, wie Nabokovs Lolita wirklich zu verstehen ist. Auch dass die Werfüchse uralt sind und ihr Gedächtnis ca. 2000 Jahre umfasst, führt dazu, dass sie sich an Begegnungen mit historischen Figuren und in jüngerer Zeit zum Beispiel an Auden oder Sartre erinnern. Nebenbei wird dann die Gesellschaft Moskaus oder auch des Westens (zum Beispiel die Füchse jagenden Engländer, die bei Werfüchsen natürlich nicht beliebt sind) aufs Korn genommen. Und dann spielt Sex eine wichtige Rolle – eben wegen der Profession der Erzählerin und den Informationen über das Liebesleben der Wertiere. Alles in allem also eine vergnügliche, gescheite Lektüre.
Leider nerven die Diskurse dann auch irgendwann, weil sie sehr zahlreich und raumgreifend sind und die Kriminalhandlung (wenn man sie denn als solche bezeichnen will. Die Frage: Was hat es mit dem Überwertier auf sich?) dabei ins Stocken gerät. So kommt es, dass ich, obwohl ich mich gut unterhalten fühlte, zum Ende hin die ein oder andere Seite nur noch überflogen habe. 100 Seiten weniger hätten dem Buch sicher gut getan. Ich h��tte gerne wegen Originalität 4 Sterne vergeben, aber wegen Kürzungsbedarf gibt es nur 3. Dennoch würde ich nicht ausschließen, wieder ein Buch von Pelewin zu lesen.
Want to read
March 26, 2020Well, how could I not want to read it after no less a literary luminary than Ursula K. Le Guin liked it? She offered this tit-bit in her review for the 16 Feb 2008 edition of The Guardian:
I ask you.
There are interesting discussions of the nature of reality. A Hu-Li's list of definitions of the word "real" ends with: "(4) a widely used adjective with the meaning 'having a dollar equivalent'. The latter meaning makes the term 'real' a synonym for the word 'metaphysical', since nowadays the dollar is an occult, mystical unit based entirely on the belief that tomorrow will be like today. And mysticism is something that should be practised not by were-creatures, but by those who are professionally obliged to do it - the PR consultants, political technologists, and economists."
I ask you.
March 22, 2016
This occupies that zone of the post-modern era where the stupid and the intelligent can coexist easily without contradiction. Thus it's an adventure story and supernatural romance (about Were-creatures?! Albeit written before all that rose to new prominence via the YA market) as conduit for post-Soviet satire, interspersed with philosophical discussion that I'm actually not really ready to discard out of hand. It says something that the latter were some of the most gripping parts (one of the things it says is that I have a weird sense of ideal pacing). This has a fantastic narrator, the kind who sometimes seems almost to get free of the limitations of the author creating her (he has some problematic bits here nonetheless). On the whole though, a singular and impressive concoction. At the very least, it has a much less irritating dalliance with Buddhism than Kerouac's.
January 21, 2010
I hated this book. truly. There may have been great metaphors that I missed, but mostly it felt like a pretentious effort to link al ot of erudite stuff in what was really just a Beauty and the Beast- meets - Nabakovian pedophile effort of prurient crap.
August 26, 2009
In modern Moscow, a werefox prostitute falls in love with a werewolf FSB (formerly KGB) agent, and seeks enlightenment through philosophy and Buddhism. Sexy and smart, and full of Nabokovian turns of phrase. Just as the fox's tail spins a glamour on her clients, Pelevin's wordplay ensorcells the reader, and a satire of contemporary Russia transmutes into a profound exploration of the very notion of existence itself.
The only quibble I had at all was a minor one, that of the werefox nomenclature; A Hu-Li is our first-person protagonist, and her name is set up as a linguistic joke in that, in Russian, it's a vulgar obscenity. In its original Chinese, it simply means "the fox named A," with "Hu-Li" as her surname. However, this is counter to Chinese naming, where the surname actually comes first, and the correct form should have been "Hu-Li A," although "A" would not be used as a Chinese given name (mostly because the letter by itself gives no clue as to its pronunciation); again, with the protagonist and her sisters ("A," "E," "U," and supposedly the other vowels as well), the linguistic conventions are expressed in a Russian mindset that just would not make sense for creatures who originated from China.
But as I say, this is a very minor beef for such an incredible novel. Absolutely brilliant, and easily the best book I've read this year. Highly recommended.
The only quibble I had at all was a minor one, that of the werefox nomenclature; A Hu-Li is our first-person protagonist, and her name is set up as a linguistic joke in that, in Russian, it's a vulgar obscenity. In its original Chinese, it simply means "the fox named A," with "Hu-Li" as her surname. However, this is counter to Chinese naming, where the surname actually comes first, and the correct form should have been "Hu-Li A," although "A" would not be used as a Chinese given name (mostly because the letter by itself gives no clue as to its pronunciation); again, with the protagonist and her sisters ("A," "E," "U," and supposedly the other vowels as well), the linguistic conventions are expressed in a Russian mindset that just would not make sense for creatures who originated from China.
But as I say, this is a very minor beef for such an incredible novel. Absolutely brilliant, and easily the best book I've read this year. Highly recommended.
January 6, 2009
Every so often while reading the burgeoning urban fantasy genre, I long for a more literary text. Though I thoroughly enjoy my escapist and predictable werewolf yarns, the yearning for something with more weight often assails me at the novel's completion. Attesting to Pelevin's reputation as one of Russia's leading contemporary novelists, The Sacred Book of the Werewolf provides that density of subject and verbage. Knowing this is a translation, I am amazed at the translator's adept handling of Pelevin's wry humor and complex ideas voiced through his characters. This novel claims less kinship with urban fantasy than with some personal philosophical engagements.
The voice putting pen to story is A Hu-Li, a multi-milennia-old werefox and pursuant of the mysteries of life. She relates her current time in Russia, oftentimes commenting directly on the state of the country, but Pelevin often slips in a more subtle commentary through her interactions. As we are being told her story directly as she writes a memoir-like document, A Hu-Li is prone to comedic engagement with her intended audience, revealing the inner workings of her multi-layered and antediluvian mind. Rather than being burdened with the centuries she has witnessed, her perception is an engaging and almost innocent one. She reveals that werefoxes mostly forget what they know so as to avoid this very detrimental lassitude of long spans of time, remembering past events only with sincere effort.
This innocence translates into a comical love affair with a werewolf, the initial subject and eventual object of A Hu-Li's philosophical explanations. For someone who has seen several milennial turns and who makes a living as a sex worker, A Hu-Li's dearth of sexual knowledge and wide-eyed and tail-puffed, yet remarkably logical love are all the funnier, especially their sex scenes which seem to be a snarky commentary on genre urban fantasy and its proliferation of sex and the more outre expressions thereof.
If A Hu-Li tends to come off as sounding a bit superior, she at least tries to be humble about her superiority amidst an explanation of Taoist philosophies of nothing and merging with the infinite, wrapped of course in paradox and ouroboric logic. Pelevin manages to capably interweave these moments of philosophical musing without derailing the story, humorously pairing them with A Hu-Li then mundanely checking her email.
If the story ends on what should be a predictable resolution, it is more impressive that I did not anticipate it. And it speaks more to the depth of A Hu-Li as a character that she is even more surprised than I was, and she has had several thousand years to reach that understanding. Sometimes the most cunning fox fools the most gullible target: herself.
The voice putting pen to story is A Hu-Li, a multi-milennia-old werefox and pursuant of the mysteries of life. She relates her current time in Russia, oftentimes commenting directly on the state of the country, but Pelevin often slips in a more subtle commentary through her interactions. As we are being told her story directly as she writes a memoir-like document, A Hu-Li is prone to comedic engagement with her intended audience, revealing the inner workings of her multi-layered and antediluvian mind. Rather than being burdened with the centuries she has witnessed, her perception is an engaging and almost innocent one. She reveals that werefoxes mostly forget what they know so as to avoid this very detrimental lassitude of long spans of time, remembering past events only with sincere effort.
This innocence translates into a comical love affair with a werewolf, the initial subject and eventual object of A Hu-Li's philosophical explanations. For someone who has seen several milennial turns and who makes a living as a sex worker, A Hu-Li's dearth of sexual knowledge and wide-eyed and tail-puffed, yet remarkably logical love are all the funnier, especially their sex scenes which seem to be a snarky commentary on genre urban fantasy and its proliferation of sex and the more outre expressions thereof.
If A Hu-Li tends to come off as sounding a bit superior, she at least tries to be humble about her superiority amidst an explanation of Taoist philosophies of nothing and merging with the infinite, wrapped of course in paradox and ouroboric logic. Pelevin manages to capably interweave these moments of philosophical musing without derailing the story, humorously pairing them with A Hu-Li then mundanely checking her email.
If the story ends on what should be a predictable resolution, it is more impressive that I did not anticipate it. And it speaks more to the depth of A Hu-Li as a character that she is even more surprised than I was, and she has had several thousand years to reach that understanding. Sometimes the most cunning fox fools the most gullible target: herself.
November 24, 2023
Мусила ознайомитись, оскільки мене запросили дискусантом на захід, де поряд з речами, на яких я більше розуміюся, будуть говорити про цю книжку. (Зазначаю це, оскільки на оцінку читацького досвіду дуже сильно впливає, чи це книжка, яку береш до рук за власним вибором, чи щось, що мусиш для навчання\роботи - а ця книжка досить далека від того, що я читаю за своїм вибором).
У жанрі вестернів в якийсь момент (десь у 1880-х) автори потрапили в таке замкнене коло: читачі були вже призвичаєні до такої кількості крові й жорстокості у текстах жанру, що щоб далі читача вражати, авторам треба було додавати дедалі більше крові й жорстокості: дедалі кровожерливіші "дикуни", яких дедалі більшу кількість зарубав прекрасний герой.
До чого це я? Мені іноді здається, що в якесь подібне замкнене коло стосунків з читачами потрапили автори-постмодерністи: що далі, то більше треба стверджувати, що цінностей немає, усе дискурс, усе тільки інтелектуальний пінг-понг, усе це вже хтось до нас казав. Що далі, то більше, бо до якогось попереднього рівня відсутності сенсу і цінностей уявний читач уже призвичаївся, а треба ж казати щось наступного рівня, щоб ще більше вразити? Ме... У раннього Пєлєвіна було пару текстів, де був подібний гностичний мотив виходу з безсенсовного світу, але там був натяк на те, що на зовнішнього рівні сенси все-таки є, просто треба туди пробитися. В цій книжці на зовнішньому рівні є тільки велике "ніщо" - ну то і що; всі, хто не безсмертні лиси-перевертні, і так у це "ніщо" скоро зійдуть - що нам тут такого особливого розказали?
Іще, звісно, сатира на р-ке суспільство раннього п-зму: але не така сатира, яка виопуклює якісь суспільне явища, інакше не всім помітні, і заохочує про них замислитися і якось виправити, а просто абсурдизує очевидні речі, і так наявні в дискурсі, стверджуючи, що все одно альтернатива ("західне споживацьке суспільство") ще гірше. (Можливо, зараз, за 20 років, "очевидні", але я ж не можу вирвати свій читацький досвід з часу і контексту, в якому він відбувається.)
Не буду тут розказувати, що література кому повинна - література нічого нікому не повинна, але і читачі нічого нікому не повинні, зокрема вважати, що прочитали тут щось цінне.
У жанрі вестернів в якийсь момент (десь у 1880-х) автори потрапили в таке замкнене коло: читачі були вже призвичаєні до такої кількості крові й жорстокості у текстах жанру, що щоб далі читача вражати, авторам треба було додавати дедалі більше крові й жорстокості: дедалі кровожерливіші "дикуни", яких дедалі більшу кількість зарубав прекрасний герой.
До чого це я? Мені іноді здається, що в якесь подібне замкнене коло стосунків з читачами потрапили автори-постмодерністи: що далі, то більше треба стверджувати, що цінностей немає, усе дискурс, усе тільки інтелектуальний пінг-понг, усе це вже хтось до нас казав. Що далі, то більше, бо до якогось попереднього рівня відсутності сенсу і цінностей уявний читач уже призвичаївся, а треба ж казати щось наступного рівня, щоб ще більше вразити? Ме... У раннього Пєлєвіна було пару текстів, де був подібний гностичний мотив виходу з безсенсовного світу, але там був натяк на те, що на зовнішнього рівні сенси все-таки є, просто треба туди пробитися. В цій книжці на зовнішньому рівні є тільки велике "ніщо" - ну то і що; всі, хто не безсмертні лиси-перевертні, і так у це "ніщо" скоро зійдуть - що нам тут такого особливого розказали?
Іще, звісно, сатира на р-ке суспільство раннього п-зму: але не така сатира, яка виопуклює якісь суспільне явища, інакше не всім помітні, і заохочує про них замислитися і якось виправити, а просто абсурдизує очевидні речі, і так наявні в дискурсі, стверджуючи, що все одно альтернатива ("західне споживацьке суспільство") ще гірше. (Можливо, зараз, за 20 років, "очевидні", але я ж не можу вирвати свій читацький досвід з часу і контексту, в якому він відбувається.)
Не буду тут розказувати, що література кому повинна - література нічого нікому не повинна, але і читачі нічого нікому не повинні, зокрема вважати, що прочитали тут щось цінне.
October 17, 2017
This is a weird book that was recommended to me by a friend. It certainly was strange enough to keep me entertained. Sometimes it makes you laugh, sometimes uncomfortable, sometimes enlightened but always I wanted to know what would happen next. Though I had to put the book down a few times and return to it later when my brain felt it had had enough. Its has elements of dark fairy-tales and a kind of magical mysticism but set in a realistically abrasive reality. There are many wordplays and puns which appear to have translated well from the original Russian. Original and complex ideas are littered through the pages but the novel just felt a bit pretentious and tedious. Overall it didn’t quite gel for me.
Full review is on the blog: https://clairsbookshelfblog.wordpress...
June 21, 2018
Perfectly blended intertwining themes mark this, the first novel I've read by the much touted Victor Pelevin. Firstly and primarily--although it sneaks up on you as it goes along--the text is the fictional holy scripture of the pseudo-Buddhist concept of the super-werewolf. This is the part of the novel I liked least because, alas, I'm just not a spiritual or superstitious guy, despite my love of horror and ghost stories. (It irks me--a writer who wants to live the dark tragic romanticism of Byron and write with the precise passion of Shelley--but on aptitude tests I always score off the charts on logic and the linguistic double-talk of religious writing makes me laugh louder than satire. Plus you have to question a novel, written with words, that keeps telling you that words are totally insufficient for communication--why, then, did you bother?) Putting my own predilections aside for a moment, though, the Buddhist stuff is grounded in more familiar Western concepts and I enjoyed the philosophical ramblings of our werefox narrator A Hu-Li. So the Buddhism gets a pass although I must add that all of the sacred paradoxes of all of the great religions of the world are silly, juvenile, and life-denying for the most part to my way of thinking.
Beyond this one theme, however, we also get the themes of Russian history, society, politics, and the Russian character, if you will--patriotism, fatalism, and spiritualism. This fascinated me as I'm not Russian and am therefore very curious about a nation whose national character, I've heard frequently, is quite a bit like my own but with whom my nation spent the second half of the last century competing with and now seems to be surrendering to/allying with/joining in the new Mafia-style modern pseudo-fascist form that the nation states of the world seem to be adopting. Great stuff--the writing, not the decay of democracy. Took me back to High School when I fell in love with Russian literature and poured through Dostoevsky primarily but also Chekhov, Gogol, Tolstoy, and Turgenev--I didn't get around to Bulgakov until recently, and his "A Dog's Life" is a huge subtext in The Sacred Book of the Werewolf.
Also literature in the form of commentaries on Bulgakov and Nabokov for the most part, but other authors as well--Tolstoy next.
The other most pervasive theme besides spiritualism/philosophy, and the most interesting for me, was the exploration of gender roles, cleverly accentuated here via the romance between a werefox and a werewolf. Both being canines, the metaphor was a lot better than the usual dogs and cats or Mars and Venus dichotomies. This theme was perhaps less directly explored so it drew me in more as a reader and let me do the thinking and draw my own conclusions rather than the author (through his outspoken and foxsplaining narrator) just tell me things all the time.
It's also a very funny novel that trots jauntily along, like a fox itself, smirking at all of these themes as it explores them. The narrator is a great character and Pelevin, I thought, wrote convincingly in a woman/werefox's voice. In the end, though, there's not much to unpack critically as the novel pretty much tells you directly exactly what it wants to say--which is fine, just a thing.
Beyond this one theme, however, we also get the themes of Russian history, society, politics, and the Russian character, if you will--patriotism, fatalism, and spiritualism. This fascinated me as I'm not Russian and am therefore very curious about a nation whose national character, I've heard frequently, is quite a bit like my own but with whom my nation spent the second half of the last century competing with and now seems to be surrendering to/allying with/joining in the new Mafia-style modern pseudo-fascist form that the nation states of the world seem to be adopting. Great stuff--the writing, not the decay of democracy. Took me back to High School when I fell in love with Russian literature and poured through Dostoevsky primarily but also Chekhov, Gogol, Tolstoy, and Turgenev--I didn't get around to Bulgakov until recently, and his "A Dog's Life" is a huge subtext in The Sacred Book of the Werewolf.
Also literature in the form of commentaries on Bulgakov and Nabokov for the most part, but other authors as well--Tolstoy next.
The other most pervasive theme besides spiritualism/philosophy, and the most interesting for me, was the exploration of gender roles, cleverly accentuated here via the romance between a werefox and a werewolf. Both being canines, the metaphor was a lot better than the usual dogs and cats or Mars and Venus dichotomies. This theme was perhaps less directly explored so it drew me in more as a reader and let me do the thinking and draw my own conclusions rather than the author (through his outspoken and foxsplaining narrator) just tell me things all the time.
It's also a very funny novel that trots jauntily along, like a fox itself, smirking at all of these themes as it explores them. The narrator is a great character and Pelevin, I thought, wrote convincingly in a woman/werefox's voice. In the end, though, there's not much to unpack critically as the novel pretty much tells you directly exactly what it wants to say--which is fine, just a thing.
July 31, 2016
Uf,namuči me Viktor,za njega zaista morate biti u pravom raspoloženju....Gomila referenci,oslanjanja i citata što klasika književnosti što filozofije upakovano u naizgled fiction priču.Kad ogolite sve maske,repove krzna i mitologije ostaje samospoznaja i odnos muškog i ženskog ,psihologija odnosa i ljubavi.
January 11, 2009
tedious and pretentious -- what a waste of a good silly premise.
May 4, 2024
The Sacred Book of the Werewolf by Viktor Pelevin
10 out of 10
If the name of this magnum opus does not encourage the ‘serious’ reader, who might think this is a children’s book, it would be a mistake to miss this amusing, informative, erudite, even inspirational novel, listed with the 1,000 Novels Everyone Must Read, which is very critical of Russia – even my interpretation is not wrong – in fact the oligarchs and corrupt officials that work in tandem to steal the riches of the country, but also very sardonic in what concerns the West – there are quite a few passages that ridicule some western clichés, shortcomings, and in one, the FSB general – there is also a criticism of the name change…why would anyone replace a worldwide famous brand, such as the KGB, with something associated by a character with a female illness – is furious with the privatization made after the fall of the Soviet Union, by people who had barbecues with inebriated Yeltsin’s daughter, then thought they own the game.
The general might also become the super-werewolf if he does the right things – as observed by one critic, the Sacred Boom offers some very interesting explanations and insight into Eastern religions, mentioning and analyzing The Way, Sikh religion and the concept of Nirvana, meditation – such as look into himself and enter the Rainbow River, understand the emptiness, the fact that nothing is everything, though these are just the pitiful words that are left with this reader – indeed, in the brilliant, sometimes too clever to really comprehend dialogue, at least to the evidently deep extent suggested by the mesmerizing author, there is also the statement that we need fewer words for the really superior theories, the less important things are told with too many words, which are also so badly understood and for most of the time, misplaced and misused…
Alexander is a FSB general and he has a Maybach, which though it is perhaps more than half a million dollars, it should not surprise us that it is used by a man who works for the tax payers in theory, but in practice, as the book makes clear, the oligarchs pay the officials to be allowed to operate and this vicious circle seems to lead to the rise of palaces such as the one that we can see on the internet, posted by Navalny and his team recently, belonging to Putin – if it is not in his name and in theory it is the property of the friend who claims it, in practice this dictator can and has anything he wants in a country that more or less belongs to him, where he can use military grade nerve gas to kill opponents, or at least try, and if that does not work, throw the man in jail for some time and then execute him again -
I just thought that to some extent, we could consider Alexey Navalny the super werewolf – to use the technique of the narrator that likes to use points, from one to four, not more in general…1. Alexey shares the name with the general in the book, 2. He survived an assassination attempt that would have killed most others and furthermore, they have attacked him in the past, the psychological pressure on him is enormous and he has to have clear super qualities to manage not just to stay together and have a sane mind, but lead the opposition against a predator that has an immense apparatus at his disposal.
We learn from this amusing novel that Russia has apparatus aka upper rat, national style in the country is eclectic, the difference between intelligentsia and intellectuals, but also we have an extremely refined look into so many aspects of life, from the Sikh religion – they worship the holy book as if it were a living mentor and nowhere else is the idea that God didn’t create the world for some exalted purpose, but for his own amusement is expressed before…god is the executioner, the victim, the book, grass, everything – there are comical definitions – ‘a prostitute wants to get one hundred bucks for giving a man a blowjob, while a respectable woman wants all his dough for sucking all his blood out’
There are other assessments that make one wonder if they ignored this book and how would they view it within the circles of power – if they took the trouble to read, busy as they are syphoning money away – seeing as exalting Viktor Pelevin says that ‘everything that was rotten at the time of Ivan the Terrible is still alive today…money is pouring from all over Russia into Moscow and then from there is it is sent into the hyperspace of the offshore territories…Russia is the archipelago about which everything has been said by Solzhenitsyn…’ and there are references to almost all the major writers, from Tolstoy to Nabokov – we are told about the fact that the youth of Dolores Haze is not the expression of a perversity, but it is ‘the symbol of the soul, always young and pure’ and movies are also included De Niro shooting the woman who talks too much in Jackie Brown, the Mel Gibson lashes in his Christ film…
The West is not the ideal, paradisiacal land, on the contrary, one of the ‘foxes’ writes about it and says ‘it is all a giant shopping mall….there are three options, you are seller, buyer or the product and I think the suggestion was that for most of time we are the product’ then there is talk of the ‘hippopocracy’ as in probably a giant hyppopocracy, with adverting and pervasive, intoxicating consumerism and hippopocracy so conspicuous and omnipresent in fact, that if a ‘friend whispers confidentially, you think or maybe you are sure that he is advising you to buy shampoo…’
Then there is the discussion over Russia and its greatness, as clearly demonstrated by the map, which is a huge argument…”Russia has been doing very well for one thousand years…just look at the map’ and he has such a massive point there, given that this is the country with the largest territory in the world – is it not – and this accumulation of territory demonstrates power, they had success in grabbing land from others, the Crimea as the most recent example – granted, they have lost so much over the past three decades and there tyrant laments the end of the soviet empire, well he calls it Soviet union, not empire, as the biggest calamity of the last century…what the hell does he want, a palace as big as a city, is not the huge monstrosity we can see online enough for such a short man, trying hard to compensate the Napoleon effect
Revelations might turn out to be red herrings, as in the statement that Freud was a cocaine freak – cocaine being a powerful sexual stimulant, if we are to believe the general – and all that ‘stuff that he invented, Oedipuses, sphincters, sphinxes exist in a cocaine infested brain…in that state, a man has only one problem, what to do first, to screw his mummy or waste his daddy…’
10 out of 10
If the name of this magnum opus does not encourage the ‘serious’ reader, who might think this is a children’s book, it would be a mistake to miss this amusing, informative, erudite, even inspirational novel, listed with the 1,000 Novels Everyone Must Read, which is very critical of Russia – even my interpretation is not wrong – in fact the oligarchs and corrupt officials that work in tandem to steal the riches of the country, but also very sardonic in what concerns the West – there are quite a few passages that ridicule some western clichés, shortcomings, and in one, the FSB general – there is also a criticism of the name change…why would anyone replace a worldwide famous brand, such as the KGB, with something associated by a character with a female illness – is furious with the privatization made after the fall of the Soviet Union, by people who had barbecues with inebriated Yeltsin’s daughter, then thought they own the game.
The general might also become the super-werewolf if he does the right things – as observed by one critic, the Sacred Boom offers some very interesting explanations and insight into Eastern religions, mentioning and analyzing The Way, Sikh religion and the concept of Nirvana, meditation – such as look into himself and enter the Rainbow River, understand the emptiness, the fact that nothing is everything, though these are just the pitiful words that are left with this reader – indeed, in the brilliant, sometimes too clever to really comprehend dialogue, at least to the evidently deep extent suggested by the mesmerizing author, there is also the statement that we need fewer words for the really superior theories, the less important things are told with too many words, which are also so badly understood and for most of the time, misplaced and misused…
Alexander is a FSB general and he has a Maybach, which though it is perhaps more than half a million dollars, it should not surprise us that it is used by a man who works for the tax payers in theory, but in practice, as the book makes clear, the oligarchs pay the officials to be allowed to operate and this vicious circle seems to lead to the rise of palaces such as the one that we can see on the internet, posted by Navalny and his team recently, belonging to Putin – if it is not in his name and in theory it is the property of the friend who claims it, in practice this dictator can and has anything he wants in a country that more or less belongs to him, where he can use military grade nerve gas to kill opponents, or at least try, and if that does not work, throw the man in jail for some time and then execute him again -
I just thought that to some extent, we could consider Alexey Navalny the super werewolf – to use the technique of the narrator that likes to use points, from one to four, not more in general…1. Alexey shares the name with the general in the book, 2. He survived an assassination attempt that would have killed most others and furthermore, they have attacked him in the past, the psychological pressure on him is enormous and he has to have clear super qualities to manage not just to stay together and have a sane mind, but lead the opposition against a predator that has an immense apparatus at his disposal.
We learn from this amusing novel that Russia has apparatus aka upper rat, national style in the country is eclectic, the difference between intelligentsia and intellectuals, but also we have an extremely refined look into so many aspects of life, from the Sikh religion – they worship the holy book as if it were a living mentor and nowhere else is the idea that God didn’t create the world for some exalted purpose, but for his own amusement is expressed before…god is the executioner, the victim, the book, grass, everything – there are comical definitions – ‘a prostitute wants to get one hundred bucks for giving a man a blowjob, while a respectable woman wants all his dough for sucking all his blood out’
There are other assessments that make one wonder if they ignored this book and how would they view it within the circles of power – if they took the trouble to read, busy as they are syphoning money away – seeing as exalting Viktor Pelevin says that ‘everything that was rotten at the time of Ivan the Terrible is still alive today…money is pouring from all over Russia into Moscow and then from there is it is sent into the hyperspace of the offshore territories…Russia is the archipelago about which everything has been said by Solzhenitsyn…’ and there are references to almost all the major writers, from Tolstoy to Nabokov – we are told about the fact that the youth of Dolores Haze is not the expression of a perversity, but it is ‘the symbol of the soul, always young and pure’ and movies are also included De Niro shooting the woman who talks too much in Jackie Brown, the Mel Gibson lashes in his Christ film…
The West is not the ideal, paradisiacal land, on the contrary, one of the ‘foxes’ writes about it and says ‘it is all a giant shopping mall….there are three options, you are seller, buyer or the product and I think the suggestion was that for most of time we are the product’ then there is talk of the ‘hippopocracy’ as in probably a giant hyppopocracy, with adverting and pervasive, intoxicating consumerism and hippopocracy so conspicuous and omnipresent in fact, that if a ‘friend whispers confidentially, you think or maybe you are sure that he is advising you to buy shampoo…’
Then there is the discussion over Russia and its greatness, as clearly demonstrated by the map, which is a huge argument…”Russia has been doing very well for one thousand years…just look at the map’ and he has such a massive point there, given that this is the country with the largest territory in the world – is it not – and this accumulation of territory demonstrates power, they had success in grabbing land from others, the Crimea as the most recent example – granted, they have lost so much over the past three decades and there tyrant laments the end of the soviet empire, well he calls it Soviet union, not empire, as the biggest calamity of the last century…what the hell does he want, a palace as big as a city, is not the huge monstrosity we can see online enough for such a short man, trying hard to compensate the Napoleon effect
Revelations might turn out to be red herrings, as in the statement that Freud was a cocaine freak – cocaine being a powerful sexual stimulant, if we are to believe the general – and all that ‘stuff that he invented, Oedipuses, sphincters, sphinxes exist in a cocaine infested brain…in that state, a man has only one problem, what to do first, to screw his mummy or waste his daddy…’
August 21, 2018
Naprawdę czuję się jak zwykła, bezogonista małpa po lekturze.
February 24, 2020
Die beste Beschreibung für diesen Abgrund, an die ich mich erinnern kann, lieferte ein roter Kommandeur im Herbst 1919; ich hatte ihn mit Lachpilzen bewirtet, buchstäblich neben den Rädern seines Panzerzuges aus dem Sand geklaubt. Er drückte sich so aus: »Irgendwie leuchtet mir nicht mehr ein, wieso ich, nur weil ich das Gesicht eines Mädchens edel und schön finde, unbedingt ihre feuchte, wollige Möse ficken muss!« Das ist auf die grobe, männliche Art gesagt, aber das Wesen ist trefflich erfasst.
Read
January 31, 2022a foreigner, an oriental messiah, stranded in a country with Western ambitions and Eastern ways, in a new, changed world, an attempt for salvation through love and spiritual ascension, humorous wordplays (starting with main character's name), lengthy philosophical reasoning, sensual peculiarities
March 16, 2016
A Russian-speaking friend expressed some doubt, when I said I was reading this, about whether it would work well in translation. Having finished, I share her feelings. Pelevin fills his pages with wordplay and puns, and while the translator makes a noble effort to translate them, too many fall flat--partly because, I suspect, English-speakers are less inclined to pun to begin with, which makes the constant barrage feel out of place.
Even so, I enjoyed a lot of the prose on a page-by-page basis. If I had to pick one word for this book it would be "clever"; the dialogue snaps and zings. But cleverness grows old after a while, and I was never quite sure there was enough of it to sustain this many pages. I liked the unexpected twist of the end, but I can't help but feel that we could have gotten there a great deal sooner.
Even so, I enjoyed a lot of the prose on a page-by-page basis. If I had to pick one word for this book it would be "clever"; the dialogue snaps and zings. But cleverness grows old after a while, and I was never quite sure there was enough of it to sustain this many pages. I liked the unexpected twist of the end, but I can't help but feel that we could have gotten there a great deal sooner.
May 19, 2022
Beni 20 günlük bir reading slumpa soktu bu kitap. Sıkıldım okurken. İthaki bilimkurgu klasiklerinin içinde bu tarz kitaplar var. Bazı dinsel öğretileri fantastik ya da bilimkurgu tarzına yedirerek bir olay örgüsü ve mesaj oluşturuyorlar yazarlar. Işık Tanrısı buna bir örnek olabilir. Bu kitap da öyle.
Budizm temelli bir düşün şekli, hiççilik sosuna bandırılmış bir fantastik tilki-kurtadam hikayesi. Bunun yanında bolca seks. Her şeyi anlatmak için seks.
Ben aslında yokum, nesneler vardır yoktur felsefi tartışmalarını seviyorsanız bunu da seversiniz. Ben sevmiyorum maalesef.
Budizm temelli bir düşün şekli, hiççilik sosuna bandırılmış bir fantastik tilki-kurtadam hikayesi. Bunun yanında bolca seks. Her şeyi anlatmak için seks.
Ben aslında yokum, nesneler vardır yoktur felsefi tartışmalarını seviyorsanız bunu da seversiniz. Ben sevmiyorum maalesef.
May 6, 2009
Not at all to my liking. The author apparently turns himself on with constant name-dropping of authors. His self-proclaimed hipster status (as exhibited through the writing itself) is laughable. Also, here's a word (or two) of advice: if you're going to write an urban fantasy novel, it NEEDS a plot, fast moving action (chicken hunting in the woods does NOT count), and some sort of spine-tingling je ne sais quoi.
This novel is crap.
This novel is crap.
April 23, 2020
Впевнена, що я зрозуміла з книги десь 50% в кращому варіанті, але вона всеодно зайшла.. і її потрібно перечитати пізніше, можливо навіть підготувались, "Лоліту" прочитати, як мінімум..
В певні моменти - аж занадто, в певні сидиш і думаєш, що ти тільки що прочитав (в хорошому сенсі швидше), а в певні справді відчуваєш, що ця книга надто розумна (також в хорошому сенсі швидше)
All in all - я не знаю 🤷 Спробуйте її, а там далі як піде)
В певні моменти - аж занадто, в певні сидиш і думаєш, що ти тільки що прочитав (в хорошому сенсі швидше), а в певні справді відчуваєш, що ця книга надто розумна (також в хорошому сенсі швидше)
All in all - я не знаю 🤷 Спробуйте її, а там далі як піде)
May 24, 2011
I'm enjoying this so far. It seems to be a perfect follow-up to Lolita, which I just finished, and which it is constantly referencing.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 418 reviews