|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
006325090X
| 9780063250901
| B0BNJ4SDZT
| 3.51
| 413
| Aug 29, 2023
| Aug 29, 2023
|
liked it
|
"Over just the past decade the evidence of extraterrestrial life, extraterrestrial civilizations, and extraterrestrial interest in us has mounted rapi
"Over just the past decade the evidence of extraterrestrial life, extraterrestrial civilizations, and extraterrestrial interest in us has mounted rapidly..." Interstellar was an interesting book, but I found the writing a bit slow at times. It is my second from the author, after his 2021 book Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth, which I enjoyed. Unfortunately, I did not enjoy this one quite as much as his first book. The author drops the quote above in the book's intro. Author Abraham "Avi" Loeb (Hebrew: אברהם (אבי) לייב) is an Israeli-American theoretical physicist who works on astrophysics and cosmology. Loeb is the Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science at Harvard University. He had been the longest serving chair of Harvard's Department of Astronomy (2011–2020), founding director of Harvard's Black Hole Initiative (since 2016) and director of the Institute for Theory and Computation (since 2007) within the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Avi Loeb: [image] I have been interested in the topic of possible alien life since I was just a little kid. Who doesn't find the idea that we are not alone incredibly exciting? What would alien life look like? How advanced could their civilizations be? Are the reports of visits to Earth actually true?? These are a few of the questions that captured my imagination then - and now. Loeb gets the writing here off on a good foot, with a well-written intro. Once relegated to the realm of tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy; the topic of extraterrestrials is slowly making its way into the mainstream, with science being dragged kicking and screaming into the discussion. He mentions the growing body of evidence for the existence of these phenomena, once called "UFOs," and now colloquially known as "Unidentified Aeriel Phenomenon" or "UAPs." Particularly notable are the reports of these coming from American military installations, and an admission by the US Government that they actually don't know what these objects are. The quote from the start of this review continues: "...The possibility of life on Mars and Venus is being explored. The statistical likelihood of life existing on one of the innumerable exoplanets in a star’s habitable zone is high, and soon to be explored by spacecraft capable of sending data back within a human lifetime. Most importantly, for the first time, the search for near-Earth extraterrestrial artifacts is the work of science, privately and publicly funded. Whether or not humanity persists long enough to get off its home planet and to exist independent of its home star is on us. And, if we are diligent, smart, and intrepid, just maybe we manage this with an extraterrestrial assist." Central to the book's case is the documentation of an unexplained interstellar object that entered our solar system in 2017. Called "Oumuamua," it is compelling, says Loeb, because it exhibited non-gravitational acceleration. He writes this: "Data support the possibility that in 2017 an extraterrestrial-manufactured artifact passed through the Solar system. That year, astronomers, using data collected by the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) located at Haleakala Observatory, Hawaii, identified an interstellar object1 that they called ‘Oumuamua, which translates to “scout” in Hawaiian. Based on the wealth of empirical data collected about the object, I argued that it was most plausibly of extraterrestrial manufacture, rather than a naturally occurring interstellar rock. Loeb is somewhat of an outlier among his peers, as many of them remain skeptical, despite this compelling evidence. The cultural zeitgeist around the topic of UFOs, or UAPs still remains somewhat taboo and fringe. Most of the mainstream scientific community does not seem open to exploring the idea that we are not alone, and are reluctant to give this evidence too much credulity. Loeb writes: "What was a little more surprising—and disappointing—was the fact that on Day Two, and continuing over Years One through Five, a majority of the scientific community expressed a skepticism about this evidence that was greater than anything directed at scientific speculations such as string theory, types of dark matter, and multiverses. This is despite the fact that to date we have no empirical data demonstrating a theorized string, a dark matter particle, or a single universe other than our own. Scientists, in other words, are more comfortable asserting the existence of phenomena they have no empirical evidence for than accepting the possible existence of a phenomenon—Extraterrestrial Civilization (ETC)—for which we do." Some more of what is covered here by Loeb includes: • Recent UAP reports by the US military • Speace telescopes • Space exploration • The Drake Equation • The Fermi Paradox • The Kardashev scale of civilizations • The IM1 meteor • Our technological future • Noah’s Spacecraft ******************** Interstellar was a decent read, but ultimately, it did not live up to my expectations. I am admittedly fairly picky about how lively the books I read are, and this one left a bit to be desired for me here... There was still some interesting information presented here, though. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 31, 2023
|
Sep 2023
|
Sep 13, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
B0041OT9JE
| 3.87
| 874
| Sep 01, 2008
| Apr 19, 2010
|
it was ok
|
"What if there were zombies? Could the routine and infrastructure of law enforcement and the combined strength of modern science be able to recognize
"What if there were zombies? Could the routine and infrastructure of law enforcement and the combined strength of modern science be able to recognize and adequately respond to the threat? You know…it just might. Let’s go find out..." Zombie CSU was a mixed bag for me. It is an extremely comprehensive examination of all things zombie. While I was looking for something a bit lighter than some of the books I typically read, the hefty size of this presentation was a bit much... Author Jonathan Maberry is an American suspense writer, anthology editor, comic book writer, magazine feature writer, playwright, content creator and writing teacher/lecturer. Jonathan Maberry : [image] As its title indicates, the book is a deep dive into the workings of fictional zombies. If it is zombie-related, it's covered here. And not just covered, but discussed in a very in-depth fashion. He's got bits of writing about different zombie movie recommendations, the eternal "slow" vs "fast" zombie debate (8 parts on this LMAO), and much more. Fortunately, the book is written with a fairly lively and engaging tone, so it should be accessible to even the finicky reader. Unfortunately, as mentioned above, I found the overall presentation just too long for my tastes. The audio version I have clocked in at ~11.5 hours. While I do somewhat enjoy zombie movies, I think that the target audience for this one are the die-hard fans of the genre. If that's you, then I think that this book will resonate a bit better than it did with me... ****************** While the author did a decent job covering all angles of this story, I found the book just too long and unwieldy. A subjective thing, for sure. If you are a huge fan of the zombie genre, I think you'll probably like this one. My reviews have to reflect my level of enjoyment, however, and that will see it get a 2-star rating. If it were any longer, I would have put it down... ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Sep 05, 2024
|
Sep 09, 2024
|
Sep 04, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
B01BAZXZQY
| 3.86
| 218
| Oct 18, 2016
| Jan 24, 2017
|
liked it
|
"Amazing Stories of the Space Age is about the most mysterious and intriguing episodes of the history of space exploration—its undercover projects, gr
"Amazing Stories of the Space Age is about the most mysterious and intriguing episodes of the history of space exploration—its undercover projects, grandiose dreams, odd spinoffs, and muffled dramas..." I enjoyed Amazing Stories of the Space Age; for the most part. It was a decent look into the topic. Author Rod Pyle is an American writer, journalist, public speaker, and former television producer and educator who concentrates on subjects regarding spaceflight. Rod Pyle : [image] Pyle has a good writing style that I found to be fairly engaging. He covers the material here in a straightforward, no-frills manner that I felt worked. As the book's title hints at, the writing here examines many different episodes - some classified, others not - from the space race. Both Russian and American technologies are discussed. The contents of the book proper covers: • Nazis in Space: Project Silverbird • Red Moon: Countering the Communist Threat on Earth and in Space • Das Marsprojekt: Red Planet Armada • Project Orion: We Come in Peace (With Nuclear Bombs!) • LUNEX: Earth in the Crosshairs • The Wheel: An Inflatable Space Station • Venusian Empire: NASA's Mars/Venus Flyby Adventure • Blue Gemini: Weaponizing Orbit • Flirting with Death: The Terrifying Flight of Gemini 8 • Manned Orbiting Laboratory: How to Design, Test, and Never Fly a Space Program • Apollo 11: Danger on the Moon • The First Space Shuttle: Project Dyna-Soar • Beyond the Edge of Space: The X-15B • The Sad, Strange Tale of Soyuz 1 • The Turtlenauts • Falling to Earth: The Dangerous Science of Reentry • Funeral for a Viking: The End of Viking 1 • Saving Skylab: Cowboys in Space • Near Misses: Danger Stalks the Space Shuttle • Showdown in Space: Firearms on the Moon • Buran: The Soviet Union's One-Flight Wonder • Major Matt Mason: A Man for the New Space Age ****************** While this was a very well-researched book, it was not really the gripping page-turner I hoped for... I am very picky about how readable my books are, so I have to take a few stars off. Your mileage may vary, however, so don't let my review dissuade you from reading this one. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 23, 2024
|
Aug 27, 2024
|
Aug 22, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
0691189641
| 9780691189642
| B07YYR6F4V
| 4.14
| 822
| Apr 07, 2020
| Apr 07, 2020
|
it was ok
|
"We were stuck on the bottom. Batteries were running low. Our air was running out. We had no way to communicate to the other submersible or to the tea
"We were stuck on the bottom. Batteries were running low. Our air was running out. We had no way to communicate to the other submersible or to the team on the boat some 10,000 feet above us. We were nestled in the metal sphere of our tiny submersible, perched on some rocks at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean..." Despite its catchy title and being excited to see where the author would take the book, I ultimately put it down ~midway through, which is something I rarely do... Author Kevin Peter Hand is an astrobiologist and planetary scientist at JPL. He is also the founder of Cosmos Education and was its president until 2007. Kevin Peter Hand : [image] I recently decided to pull the plug on books that I am not enjoying instead of just trudging through. I was not prepared to spend any more time on this one. While the book contains a ton of interesting data and other factual info, the writing here bored me to tears. Now, fault me all you will for being a finicky reader, but I need my books to be decently engaging and readable. Say whatever you want, but just don't bore me... Science books - broadly speaking - can be delineated into two broad-based categories. The first sees the author rattle off factoid after factoid in a never-ending torrent of obscure minutia, often losing the reader completely. The second makes the science accessible to even the layperson, and keeps the book interesting enough that the reader will likely retain much of its information long after they put it down. Sadly, this book was an example of the former and not the latter... ****************** I'm sorry to say that this one just did not resonate with me. The author has no doubt done some great work in this field, and I'm sure many people will get great value from the book. Sadly, I was not among them, and my ratings need to reflect my level of enjoyment. 1.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 21, 2024
|
Aug 22, 2024
|
Aug 21, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0593192036
| 9780593192030
| B097XS5D6X
| 4.01
| 1,383
| Mar 15, 2022
| Mar 15, 2022
|
it was ok
|
"A supervillain is normally considered the bad guy. I should know, I’ve written enough of them..." How to Take Over the World sounded like a fun change "A supervillain is normally considered the bad guy. I should know, I’ve written enough of them..." How to Take Over the World sounded like a fun change from some of the books I typically read, so I thought I'd give it a shot. Unfortunately, instead of enjoying a light-hearted book, much of the writing managed to thoroughly irritate the shit out of me. More below. Author Ryan North is a Canadian writer and computer programmer. He is the creator and author of Dinosaur Comics, and has written for the comic series of Adventure Time and Marvel Comics' The Unbeatable Squirrel Girl. Ryan North : [image] The audio version I have was read by the author. I normally appreciate it when authors read their own books, but I found this author's voice to be particularly grating and annoying. He also tried to make his presentation funny and whimsical by employing a light-hearted flippant style. This can be very difficult to pull off effectively, and unfortunately (again), I felt the overall style just didn't work here... The quote from the start of this review continues: "But what’s uncommon knowledge is that if you take that universal law of storytelling and combine it with the fact that Marvel and DC are owned by the Walt Disney Company and AT&T’s Warner Media LLC, respectively, then you uncover a terrifying truth. Two of the most powerful multinational corporations on the planet have spent decades, in plain sight, paying some of the most creative people alive today to design increasingly credible world-domination schemes—and these schemes have been thwarted only by chance, by circumstance, by the pins we writers have carefully inserted into our own grenades. Once you understand that, it doesn’t take much to wonder: What if the supervillain didn’t have to lose? What if the heroes faced a scheme so clever and bold and audacious and unprecedented that it could never be predicted, much less foiled? And if a supervillain could do that in fiction, what’s to stop someone else from doing it in real life? That was the origin of this book: that moment when I realized that not only have I spent years working on ways to take over the world, but thanks to my background in science[*] . . . As touched on briefly above, the author tries to make the book funny and engaging. He narrates the audio in a very exaggerated style for added emphasis. He also uses many different voice affectations and other unnecessary and annoying literary accouterments. While being mildly amusing for the first ~10 mins, it gradually became incredibly grating and obnoxious as the book went on. There were also a bunch of back-and-forth exchanges and other hypertexts interspliced into the writing here, with similarly frustrating results. Further, there was a huge chunk of writing about climate change that managed to be both poorly done, as well as mindless fear-mongering nonsense. When breaching the topic, he formats the writing into the above-mentioned hypothetical back-and-forth social media exchange between humanity, plants, and other participants. This was passed the point of obnoxious and almost made me put the book down. Did his editors not tell him how annoying this is?? They should have. He also says this, during the hypothetical back-and forth between humanity and plants, when the "plants" are complaining about rising CO2 levels: "...if u don’t do anything a significant portion of them (people) are going to die as the areas they live in become inhospitable to human life." LOL. Imagine actually believing this... People are problem-solving, adaptable creatures. Problems arise, and then solutions are found. If some areas become inhospitable, people don't just sit there and die. They move. The history of humanity on Earth is in fact the global movement of people, to gradually encompass the entire Earth. Also, in case no one pointed this out to him, plants actually thrive on CO2. CO2 is literal plant fertilizer. More CO2 = more plants. The increase of CO2 in the last few hundred years has resulted in a dramatic greening of the Earth. Why would his hypothetical "plants" not like increased CO2 levels? What a moron... He goes on to say that to fix this problem, all we need to do, is stop burning fossil fuels: "We’re addicted to the cheapness and convenience of fossil fuels, and even after we’ve invented and invested in renewable fuel sources like solar, hydroelectric, and wind power, those are often used to supplement our ever increasing desire for power, rather than to fully replace fossil-fuel generation." ~ Civilizations need energy. Developing economies and countries need to use more, not less energy if they are to escape the entropy that conspires to drag them backward into antiquity, and away from modernity. This energy needs to be: 1) cheap, 2) reliable, and 3) scalable. Like it or not, fossil fuels are the only energy source that currently fits that bill. In the future, as fossil fuel stores become lower and their prices gradually become higher due to scarcity, the market will gradually transition away from them; making other sources tenable. Raging at the burning of fossil fuels is a low-IQ take that fails to see all the benefits and prosperity that they bring to humanity on the whole. Virtually everything you touch, look at, or interact with in your modern day-to-day life would not be possible without the usage of fossil fuels. See Alex Epstein's 2014 book The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels for a more deep dive. ****************** I was excited to start How to Take Over the World. Unfortunately, the finished product was a frustrating mess. Ironically enough, it sounds like the author has no clue about actual power, realpolitik, or the application of force... I would not recommend it. I'm not sure how it managed to have such a high aggregate score here. 1.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 19, 2024
|
Aug 21, 2024
|
Aug 19, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0393355578
| 9780393355574
| 0393355578
| 3.97
| 12,894
| Feb 07, 2017
| Feb 20, 2018
|
it was amazing
|
"We don’t experience natural environments enough to realize how restored they can make us feel, nor are we aware that studies also show they make us h
"We don’t experience natural environments enough to realize how restored they can make us feel, nor are we aware that studies also show they make us healthier, more creative, more empathetic and more apt to engage with the world and with each other. Nature, it turns out, is good for civilization." I really enjoyed The Nature Fix. It was a very well-done book; all around. The author did a great job in the research, writing, editing and final presentation of the material. As society becomes more prosperous, larger numbers of people leave the countryside and head for the economic opportunities offered in metropolitan areas. Also, in a broad-based trend across all Western and non-Western advanced countries, people are been spending less time outdoors and immersing themselves in nature. In what is likely an evolutionary mismatch, this broad change will have wide-ranging effects on the population at large. Author Florence Williams is an American journalist and nonfiction writer whose work focuses on the environment, health and science. Florence Williams: [image] Williams opens the book with a good intro, where she talks about biologist E.O. Wilson's concept of "biophilia." She writes with a decent style, and this one should have no trouble keeping the finicky reader engaged. "Biophilia explains why even today we build houses on the lake, why every child wants a teddy bear, and why Apple names itself after a fruit and its software after noble predators, surfing spots and national parks. The company is brilliant at instilling biophilic longing and affiliation at the very same time it lures us inside." She continues: "This book explores the science behind what poets and philosophers have known for eons: place matters. Aristotle believed walks in the open air clarified the mind. Darwin, Tesla and Einstein walked in gardens and groves to help them think. Teddy Roosevelt, one of the most hyperproductive presidents of all time, would escape for months to the open country. On some level they all fought a tendency to be “tired, nerve-shaken, over-civilized people” as hikerphilosopher John Muir put it in 1901." And outlines the structure of the book's contents in this quote: "I’ve divided the book into five parts to help make sense of the material, and to make it useful. The first part sets up the two dominant theories that attempt to explain why our brains need nature and that drive much of the research: the first chapter takes us to Japan, where researchers are quantifying nature’s role in lowering stress and boosting mental health using a framework based on the biophilia hypothesis, the idea that we feel most “at home” in nature because we evolved there. The second chapter swerves over to Utah, where American neuroscientists are more interested in how nature helps restore our attention-addled brains to a state of sharper cognition. I’ve organized the rest of the book by nature dose. I explore the immediate effects of quick bursts, or “nearby nature” on our three main senses—smell, sound, sight. Then I look at what happens to our brains and bodies when we hang outside a bit longer to approximate the Finnish recommended nature dose: five hours a month. In Part Four, I take a deeper, longer dive into the wilderness, where really interesting things happen to our brains. This is where, in the words of neuroscientist David Strayer at the University of Utah, “something profound is going on.” Finally, we’ll look at what it all means to the way most of us live, in cities." Some more of what the author covers here includes: • The Japanese practice of "shinrin yoku," or “forest bathing” • The three different brain networks: the executive network, the spatial network, and the default network • Official healing forests in South Korea • Aromatherapy • The effects of persistent noise pollution • The positive effects of listening to nature sounds: wind, water and birds • Fractals • The Finnish; their connection to nature • Scotland • The positive effects of exercise • Wilderness, Creativity and the Power of Awe • Water on the Brain • The effects of time in nature on young brains • The importance of trees ****************** The Nature Fix. was a well-done book . I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested. 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 31, 2024
|
Aug 06, 2024
|
Jul 24, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1642504157
| 9781642504156
| 1642504157
| 3.85
| 194
| Mar 2021
| Mar 30, 2021
|
liked it
|
"Science Let this word simmer in your mind for a moment. Examine every texture. Taste the nuance. What does this word make you think of? How does it m
"Science Let this word simmer in your mind for a moment. Examine every texture. Taste the nuance. What does this word make you think of? How does it make you feel?" Is This Wi-Fi Organic? was a decent book on science communication. I have watched a few videos by the author on his YouTube channel, and thought I'd check out his book. While most of the content was well done, I had a few small points of contention. More below. Author Dave Farina received a BA in chemistry from Carleton College, and performed graduate studies in both synthetic organic chemistry and science education at Cal State Northridge, receiving an MA in the latter. He is best known for his above-mentioned YouTube channel: "Professor Dave Explains," where he has over 3 million subscribers. Dave Farina: [image] As the book's title cheekily hints at; the writing in the book proper attempts to dispel common misconceptions about science. The average layperson has roughly zero knowledge of many basic scientific principles and are functionally scientifically illiterate. Books like this are important, to help these people familiarize themselves with some of the basics. There is a large-scale distrust and misunderstanding of science, and what it is, especially since the recent debacle of how COVID was handled. Many people have lost trust in science. Science communicators like the author are important to help push back against much of the irrationality that has bubbled up into the public arena in the age of a democratized internet. The author opens the book with the quote above, and it continues below: "Do you imagine futuristic cityscapes? Do you feel hopeful? Do you picture billowing smokestacks? Do you feel terrified? Does it remind you of school? Does that hold a positive or negative connotation for you? Farina writes with an effective style here, and I found the book to be very readable. I am admittedly very picky about how engaging my books are, and thankfully this one passed muster. The audio book version I have was also read by author, and I felt he did a great job of this, too. Farina speaks to the nature of the problem in this quote: "Prior to the internet, there were sources of information that were unanimously agreed upon to be trustworthy and reliable. Stories published by newspapers had to be heavily researched by professional journalists. Knowledge from an encyclopedia was not questioned by those who needed to reference a fact, because they were written by top specialists in every discipline, which contributed to their considerable cost. Whether we regard them as good or bad, those times are gone, and they are never coming back. Unlike the encyclopedias of old, the quality of information on the internet is not reliable. It ranges from outstanding to abysmal. For this reason, the internet can serve as a magic mirror, a place where people go to confirm pre-existing bias. Outlets that reflect what we already “know” are correct and trustworthy. Those that do not are ignored, deemed fraudulent, deceitful, paid for by malevolent institutions, or worse. This method of assessment rarely has any respect for the qualifications of those who produce the content we encounter, which has led to what is popularly referred to as the “post-truth era.” The writing in the book proper starts with Farina giving the reader a lesson in some basic chemistry. He continues on into organic chemistry, before talking about health and wellness. The rest of the contents of the book include: • What Are All These Lines and Hexagons? • The Death of Vitalism • Natural vs. Synthetic (Tackling Chemophobia) • The Molecules of Life • The Molecular Basis of Wellness • The Rise of the Alt-Health Industry • The Body as Machine • Recognizing Science-Based Medicine • Biotechnology and the Future of the Species • Energy Defined • An Equation for This and an Equation for That • To Debunk Is Divine • Science and Industry in an Educated World Ok, on to my gripes. Early on, he says that Schedule 1 drugs are "... a classification reserved for the most addictive drugs we are aware of." That's not what Schedule 1 means. According to The DEA, which designates drugs, Schedule 1 drugs are drugs "with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse." Also, he goes on to say right after that: "There is no evidence to support the notion that marijuana is addictive at all." This is not true. Any behaviour or substance which taps into the reward system has the potential for addiction. Anything that lights up the dopamine circuitry in the brain can become addictive. See Anna Lembke's book Dopamine Nation: Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence for more. He also says that diet can't help treat cancer. Cancer is heavily correlated with inflammation. Someone's diet can be pro or anti-inflammatory. Certain compounds like turmeric can possibly up or down-regulate oncogenes and tumour-suppressing genes. Additionally, Paul Stamets has done some work on the polysaccharide compounds found in turkey Tail mushrooms; showing 7 different possible mechanisms of anti-cancer action. Japan also has used Turkey Tail derived PSK compounds in their mainstream oncology treatments for a few decades now. Farina is just not qualified to make blanket statements like this. No one is, really. Biochemistry is incredibly complex... Finally, in a case of hilariously tragic irony in a book about magical thinking, he closes the writing here with some magical thinking of his own. He has an airy-fairy epilogue where he chastises celebrity worship, consumerism, and other aspects of human nature. Unfortunately, celebrity worship is an evolutionary mismatch that has been baked into human psychology since time immemorial. To evolve and thrive in a cohesive tribe, people have always looked up to those they perceive as having higher social status than they do. Mindless consumerism just hijacks the basic biological desire for greed, and its related dopaminergic circuitry to accumulate as many possessions as possible in a world of scarcity. Additionally, consumerism has been a chief driver of innovation and invention. If there were no organic demand for new products and technologies, then there would be no incentive to produce them in the first place. So, much, or even most of our new technology can largely be attributed to the human desire for novelty and innovation expressed through consumerism. ****************** Is This Wi-Fi Organic? was a good short read, despite the minor criticisms above. Farina did a great job conveying complicated technical information in a manner that should be accessible to even the scientifically illiterate layperson. I would recommend it to anyone interested. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 23, 2024
|
Jul 27, 2024
|
Jul 23, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0520390970
| 9780520390973
| B0CVND5N23
| 3.76
| 29
| unknown
| Apr 23, 2024
|
liked it
|
"Sometimes the slightest things change the directions of our lives, the merest breath of a circumstance, a random moment that connects like a meteorit
"Sometimes the slightest things change the directions of our lives, the merest breath of a circumstance, a random moment that connects like a meteorite striking the earth. Lives have swiveled and changed direction on the strength of a chance remark." —Bryce Courtenay, 1996 The Random Factor was an interesting look into the topic, but I had a few small gripes with the finished product. More below. Author Mark Robert Rank is a social scientist and Herbert S. Hadley Professor of Social Welfare at George Warren Brown School of Social Work at Washington University in St. Louis, known for his work on "poverty, social welfare, economic inequality and social policy." Rank is considered to be an expert in poverty studies. Mark Robert Rank: [image] Rank opens the book with a decent intro, but it was very long. Clocking in at just shy of 45 mins, this was just too long for an intro, IMHO. Fortunately, the author writes with a decent style here that shouldn't struggle to hold the reader's attention. Accordingly, I found the book to be readable and engaging. The author drops the quote above near the start of the book, and continues on below: "Have you ever stopped to wonder how you arrived at where you are? Sit back for a moment and think about it. Ask yourself, “How did I end up at my current job, in this city or state or country, with these particular friends and family?” If you are like most people, you will probably think back to some of the major decisions you made throughout your life. You might consider the skills, interests, and talents you have acquired across the years. Perhaps you will recall the hard work and effort you have exerted in order to get to where you are. Undoubtedly, these are all important factors in helping to explain the specific twists and turns that have occurred in our lives. Rank also drops this quote, speaking to the nature of "luck" and the aim of the book: "Randomness is thus a constant companion as we live out our lives. It exerts its influence in ways that are obvious and not so obvious. In this book we explore the manner in which this companion walks beside us. This book is the 2nd one I've read on this exact topic, after Brian Klaas's book: Fluke: Chance, Chaos, and Why Everything We Do Matters, which I really enjoyed, and would highly recommend. The subject matter fielded here is fascinating. As Rank writes in the quote above; If you examine your own life, you will undoubtedly find that many of the larger events, people and circumstances you have experienced have been at least somewhat (and perhaps entirely) influenced by sheer luck. Zoom out, and you will also see that much of the Big History of the world has also turned on random happenstance. Additionally, as Rank writes here; a relatively small change - positive or negative - can have a downstream cascade effect that can endure for the remainder of someone's life. A small fortunate incident can lead to bigger opportunities, which then snowball. Conversely, a small obstacle in the way of someone who is ill-equipped to deal with it can lead to a downward spiral. He's got some very insightful writing here about this that I found simultaneously very interesting and terrifying. We're all (to one degree or another) susceptible to experiencing some bad luck that changes the trajectory of our lives. Towards the end of the book, he reiterates this point, and talks about the importance of gratitude. This writing really resonated with me, as I make gratitude a daily habit. It's too easy to take your blessings for granted. And you can always have it worse. Some of the topics covered here include: • Hitler denied acceptance to art school. Lived through 2 failed bomb assassination attempts • Cuban Missile Crisis • Bad weather spares the Japanese city of Kookaburra from a nuclear bomb; dooms Nagasaki • Nature, Nurture, or Chance? • What’s in a Name? • The Randomness of Birth Cohorts • Who We Form Relationships With • What We Do and What We Earn • Where We Live • Timing Is Everything • Ripples and Currents • Does Luck Even Out and Can It Be Influenced? • A Robust Universal Safety Net • Equality of Opportunity • Humility and Empathy • Gratitude Unfortunately, there was a fair bit of leftist nonsense peppered throughout the writing here. This kind of shit is getting harder and harder to get away from. Which is unfortunate, especially for a book like this, because the insertion of too much of an author's shit political takes can really ruin the overall experience of the book. The author has a slippery bit of writing about the 2014 death of Michael Brown. He insinuates that Brown was killed by the police for no reason, other than he was black. His death spawned the entire "Hands up! Don't shoot!" protests later that year. What was not as widely reported is that the actual story was twisted to the point of complete fiction. The incident was billed as showing a grade school-aged Brown's picture and headlines saying "Unarmed black teen shot by police." Michael Brown (who was 6'4" and 292lb) was shot as he charged at a police officer, after a struggle over the officer's gun that saw 2 shots fired in his squad car. And contrary to the media narrative, he was not shot while his hands were in the air. The shot that killed him went through the top of his head, indicating that he was charging with his head down at the officer when he was shot. Among the talk in the last part of the book, Rank also slyly slips in a few patent falsehoods. When talking about fairness and equality, he says: "For example, rather than making it harder to vote, particularly for persons of color and / or lower-income individuals (which has been the case in recent years), policy should be focused on creating greater access to voting." And: "...the right to live and reside in any residential community regardless of race..." ~ It is not harder for "persons of color" to vote. The same voter requirements exist for any citizen; regardless of their race. Further, in what may be an unpopular opinion - if you don't have your life together to the point where you at least possess a photo ID, then maybe you shouldn't have an equal say in how to run something as complex as a society. The ancient Greeks disliked the concept of Democracy for this very reason... Also, people of any race already do have "the right" to live in any residential community they want. Whether they can afford to do so or not is another question. I'm pretty sure that preventing someone from living somewhere based solely on their race is illegal. The bigger issue I have with all this virtue-signaling politicking is WTF it's doing in the book in the first place?? Authors should have the good sense to avoid inserting their personal political commentary and narrative into books, especially considering how polarizing the landscape has become recently. Unfortunately, many of these academics reside in leftist echo chambers, and they have become ideologically captured. Just like an Evangelical Christian who never shuts up about Jesus, they just can't help themselves... ****************** The Random Factor was an interesting look into the topic; minus the little bits of political opining here and there. I still would recommend it to anyone interested. 3.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 10, 2024
|
Jul 12, 2024
|
Jul 10, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
9798786512886
| B09NR9NTMJ
| 4.38
| 8
| unknown
| Dec 17, 2021
|
it was amazing
|
“What if the enemy should get the atomic bomb before we did! We could not run the mortal risk of being outstripped in this awful sphere.” – Winston Ch
“What if the enemy should get the atomic bomb before we did! We could not run the mortal risk of being outstripped in this awful sphere.” – Winston Churchill The Race for Nuclear Weapons during World War II was a decent look into the topic. I have read a few books from Charles River Editors, and have generally enjoyed the content they produce. The quote from the start of this review continues: "Before the Second World War, military conflicts were fought under orthodox conditions, usually termed “conventional warfare,” but several innovations had significantly changed combat, leading inextricably to the race for a nuclear weapon in the 1930s and 1940s. Conflicts had been fought by armies on horseback with guns of varying sophistication since the 16th century, but mechanized warfare and machine guns changed this calculus and set the stage for future combat by the end of World War I. Other sinister changes entered the fray during this conflict, such as chemical weapons like chlorine and mustard gas. The total warfare brought about by World War I and ensuing wars like the Spanish Civil War made the quest for the most powerful weapons somewhat necessary." The overall presentation of this one was well done. As the title implies, the authors cover the global efforts toward achieving a nuclear bomb. The successful American efforts, as well as the unsuccessful efforts of both Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany. Although the writing here was well done, the narrator of the audiobook that I have mispronounced many commonplace words. Off the top of my head, he says: "W, W 2" instead of "World War 2," and unbelievably says "rap-ing," instead of "rape-ing," Has the narrator never heard of rape?? (Minor gripes, for sure, but a bit odd.) ****************** The Race for Nuclear Weapons during World War II was still a very decent short read. I would recommend it to anyone interested. 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 09, 2024
|
Jul 10, 2024
|
Jul 05, 2024
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||
1760987530
| 9781760987534
| B094HRG53V
| 4.20
| 1,105
| Jun 24, 2021
| Aug 10, 2021
|
it was ok
|
"WE HUMANS ARE OFTEN DESCRIBED as sentient beings, but what does this mean?" Although I was excited to start Sentient, the writing here really fell fla "WE HUMANS ARE OFTEN DESCRIBED as sentient beings, but what does this mean?" Although I was excited to start Sentient, the writing here really fell flat for me. More below. Author Jackie Higgins is a graduate of Oxford University with an MA in zoology and has worked for Oxford Scientific Films for over a decade, along with National Geographic, PBS Nova, and the Discovery Channel. She has also written, directed, and produced films at the BBC Science Department. She lives in London. Jackie Higgins: [image] Unfortunately, Higgins writes in a style that is somewhat stereotypical of British prose. I found much of this book's writing to be extremely dry and long-winded. I found my finicky attention wandering numerous times here. I was close to putting the book down more than a few times. I am admittedly very particular about how readable my books are, and this one really missed the mark for me... She drops this quote early on, about the concept of sentience: "The word, from the Latin sentire, to feel, is so mercurial that the philosopher Daniel Dennett has, perhaps playfully, suggested, “Since there is no established meaning… we are free to adopt one of our own choosing.” Some use sentience interchangeably with the word consciousness, a phenomenon that in itself is so elusive as to reduce the most stalwart scientific mind to incantations of magic. ****************** While the book covers some super-interesting subject matter, the telling of it fell way short for my tastes. I did not enjoy the overall presentation of this one. 2 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
Jul 02, 2024
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
B0CVBJV3ZF
| 3.76
| 438
| unknown
| Mar 14, 2024
|
did not like it
|
Despite its short length, Neurodiversity and the Myth of Normal was a really shoddy presentation. While there was some interesting content presented h
Despite its short length, Neurodiversity and the Myth of Normal was a really shoddy presentation. While there was some interesting content presented here; mainly early on, there were some fairly sizeable structural problems with the overall presentation. More below. Co-author Kyler Shumway a professional writer, and psychotherapy practice developer. Co-author Daniel Wendler, MA is a doctoral student in Clinical Psychology and the founder of MarketingforTherapists.org. Kyler Shumway & Daniel Wendler: [image] The book is an audio presentation, so I won't be including the quotes I typically add to my reviews. It is also a shorter presentation; clocking in at a little less than 3 hours. As the books title implies, the authors unfold a theory of neurodiversity. Although not summarized exactly this way here (and it should have been); the theory is that modern science does not know enough about the workings of the human brain to be able to tell what "normal" neural functioning looks like, compared with pathological functioning. The authors talk about ADHD and autism a lot in the first part of the book, using these case studies to explain how people are differently wired. Ok, so all good so far. Right up until they started editorializing... The authors are self-loathing leftist "progressives" who subscribe to Neo-Marxist "intersectionality." They have been thoroughly parasitized by the Woke Mind Virus. And, as is oh-so fashionable in 2024, they spare no opportunity to push their political narrative here; with frustrating results. Many people on the autistic spectrum don't behave according to social norms. Autism is primarily a disorder associated with reduced empathy, so autistic people often miss the social cues that non-autistic people take for granted in their interactions with others. The authors talk about the "harm" caused by people trying to "mask" these abnormal behaviours; making a victimology claim. This may be true, but people are social animals. Every aspect of human behavior is strongly influenced by culture. All of our expectations, behaviours, decisions, and habits are strongly influenced by the group. Every society has norms and taboos. They are a foundational part of any social group. The authors don't seem to like this, and use magical thinking to wish that this wasn't so. Encouraging autistic people to behave normally may cause them some distress, but encouraging them to not conform also has downsides. Namely; rejection and ostracism from the group; which is arguably more damaging than having to internalize your abnormal behaviour. It's not a black and white issue... Ridiculously enough, these authors think that it is the entire world and the majority of people that need to change to accommodate everyone's specific preferences, and not the other way around. How would this even work in practice?? By definition, you can't please every minority group there is, because for every special need or preference that you accommodate, you'll end up displeasing someone else's needs or accommodations. This is not a feasible strategy. These two accredited academics don't seem to realize this obvious reality. Also, unfortunately, there was a plethora of leftist newspeak in here. Terms like "starting a conversation" "creating space," "marginalized," and other assorted ideological language was liberally peppered in the writing. I really don't like political language in a book, as it typically indicates that the author has been ideologically captured. And these guys clearly have been. They've got a ridiculous bit of writing saying "when we give someone the "psychosis" label, it makes it ok for the police to haul them off to jail." Umm, no. People are not just carted off to jail for no reason. They are taken to jail for criminal behaviour. If a psychotic person is arrested, it is because they are a threat to themselves or others. What should we do when someone who is detached from reality (the definition of a psychotic episode) is posing a danger to society? Just leave them alone and hope for the best?? This is airy-fairy utopian nonsense. Interestingly, most normal people wouldn't advocate for such nonsense. It takes a certain amount of education to become so stupid. “Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them...” The authors also have some garbage in here about gender ideology. They trot out the fact that there are intersex people as "evidence" for the fact that sex and gender are completely uncorrelated. Human beings are sexually dimorphic, sexually reproducing creatures, with 2 default phenotypes. The binary idea of sex is not flawed. The overwhelming majority of people are either XX or XY. Even when intersex and sex chromosome aneuploidies are taken into account, M-F still applies to ~99.9% of the population. They also mention that brain scans show that the brains of trans people more closely resemble the brains of the sex they identify as, and cis people's brains more typically resemble the brains of their biological sex. The first problem with the entire "brain scan" line is thinking that there is a "male brain" and a "female brain." There are effeminate men, and there are masculine women. The amount of overlap between the brains of the sexes is so vast that trying to dichotomize the two is not workable. Disposition is not "gender." Dr. Kenneth Zucker, one of the world's leading gender researchers has a great bit of writing about this in Abigail Shrier's book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters. They trot out some stats that say that >20% of Gen Z, >10% of millennials, 4.2% of Gen X and only 2.6% of Baby Boomers identify as LGBT+. The authors say that this discrepancy is reflective of stigma. It doesn't seem to occur to them that this parabolic rise in these numbers over the last few decades may also have social influence as a causal factor. We get the result we want first, and then go backwards to establish causation. Great "science," guys. They've also got a bit of writing in here about obtaining "enthusiastic consent" for sex. What the fuck does this have to do with neurodiversity?? Answer: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. But, much like an evangelical Christian who never shuts up about Jesus, these people just can't help themselves. Ideology is a hell of a drug, kids... Sadly, ideologues ramming their shit political takes down your throat has spilled out of academia and Hollywood, and is becoming more and more commonplace in books... ****************** I had high hopes for Neurodiversity and the Myth of Normal, but it ultimately fell way short. I would not recommend it. There's not much real value here. Instead of using the <3 hours of this book's runtime to talk about the science of neurodiversity, the authors spend most of this short time evangelizing for a worldview. How tiresome... 1 star, and off to the return bin. Remind me to give a hard pass on anything else these guys produce. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 21, 2024
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
Jun 21, 2024
|
Audible Audio
| |||||||||||||||||
B07T3HC7BC
| 3.93
| 6,954
| Jul 04, 2019
| Jul 04, 2019
|
really liked it
|
This was a fairly interesting short presentation. Author and presenter Ben Garrod is an English evolutionary biologist, primatologist and broadcaster.
This was a fairly interesting short presentation. Author and presenter Ben Garrod is an English evolutionary biologist, primatologist and broadcaster. He is Professor of Evolutionary Biology and Science Engagement at the University of East Anglia, Norwich, since 2019, according to his Wikipedia page. Ben Garrod : [image] A Grown-Up Guide to Dinosaurs is presented in an audio format. It is 6 episodes; each ~30mins long. The episodes are: Ep.1 - What Is a Dinosaur Ep.2 - Size Matters Ep.3 - Feathered Freaks Ep.4 - Who Needs Bones Ep.5 - What Is Not a Dinosaur Ep.6 - The Fall of the Dinosaurs Although I found this series interesting, the audio format is probably not the ideal presentation. There is much talk here of dinosaur morphology that could have used illustrations to help give the reader a better picture. 3.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 23, 2020
|
Nov 30, 2020
|
Jun 11, 2024
|
Audible Audio
| |||||||||||||||||
1722523840
| 9781722523848
| B07XYGNQP8
| 3.79
| 824
| 1923
| Oct 14, 2019
|
liked it
|
"A new phrase has come into the language—counsel on public relations. What does it mean?" Crystallizing Public Opinion contained some interesting info, "A new phrase has come into the language—counsel on public relations. What does it mean?" Crystallizing Public Opinion contained some interesting info, but I didn't enjoy the book as much as his more notable book: Propaganda Author Edward Louis Bernays was an American pioneer in the field of public relations and propaganda, and referred to in his obituary as "the father of public relations". His best-known campaigns include a 1929 effort to promote female smoking by branding cigarettes as feminist "Torches of Freedom", and his work for the United Fruit Company in the 1950s, connected with the CIA-orchestrated overthrow of the democratically elected Guatemalan government in 1954. Edward L. Bernays: [image] Unfortunately, I did not find the writing here as engaging and lively as it was in Propaganda. The tone of this book is more like an academic paper, or other factual diatribe. This one is missing all the flow and panache of Propaganda. Although it is a shorter book, the audio version I have had a boggling 52-minute introduction. Way too long... The average member of organized society thinks that they are the authors of their own opinions and beliefs. Unfortunately, this is (mostly) not the case. People are a deeply tribal animal, with an inborn tendency to follow the herd. Early influencers realized this, and the field of "public relations" was born. With a successful public relations campaign, societal norms and taboos can be shaped, created, or destroyed. Mankind's inborn pro-social wiring is both his greatest trait, as well as his Achilles heel. If society is aimed towards noble goals and endeavours, then it can accomplish incredible feats. However, if the established groupthink of the crowd becomes disordered, the herd can go off in a bad direction, often right off the cliff. History is replete with many examples of this maladaptive behaviour. So, influencing the direction of the herd has become a top priority for those in positions of power; the upper echelons of the economic, political, and academic classes - to name but a few. This is how propaganda spreads. For it to be effective, it is disseminated in a top-down fashion. In a clever "hack" of our evolutionary biology, people look up to those seen to have high social status. People in this position are able to shape the thoughts and behaviours of their followers. Add to this the fact that people typically do not examine an issue objectively and look at its pluses and minuses to determine what is "true." People are cognitive misers, and reluctant to expend any more mental energy on thinking than is absolutely necessary. To navigate the complex world, evolution has created a "shortcut" of sorts to help people assess complicated issues. Typically, they look to the group they most identify with, and adopt the same beliefs and opinions as that group. In evolutionary psychology, this is called "social proof." Personally speaking, I've always found it fascinating (from a scientific standpoint), and terrifying (from a realistic standpoint) - that most people get their entire worldview via osmosis from the crowd. People are the strangest creature, which is why I enjoy reading about social psychology so much. ****************** Crystallizing Public Opinion fields some incredibly interesting and rich subject matter. Sadly, something here about the writing style just did not land with me. 2.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 07, 2024
|
Jun 08, 2024
|
Jun 05, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1250288355
| 9781250288356
| 3.64
| 510
| Feb 2024
| Feb 20, 2024
|
it was ok
|
"Though it may be easy to find information about animal sex in one place, birdsong in another, the first vaccine in yet another, and the science of th
"Though it may be easy to find information about animal sex in one place, birdsong in another, the first vaccine in yet another, and the science of the hangover in a fourth, it’s much more difficult to find in-depth, quirky content about multiple scientific subjects in one spot. Therefore, we think this book will fill that void of underservedness. With plenty of quirkiness and silliness along the way..." I was in the mood for something a little lighter than the books I typically read, so I thought I'd give How to Win Friends and Influence Fungi a go. While there was some interesting info here, I didn't really enjoy the overall presentation very much. More below. Author Chris Balakrishnan founded Nerd Nite when he was a graduate student in evolutionary biology at Boston University. Nerd Nite was born of a Boston bar owner’s curiosity about Chris’ ornithological adventures and Chris’ goal of making science more accessible. Chris Balakrishnan: [image] The book is presented as a collection of numerous short essays; across a wide swathe of territory. The presentation was supposed to be funny. Unfortunately, I didn't laugh once. Usually, I appreciate the narration of audiobooks. Unfortunately (again), some of these narrators began to grate on me as the book went on. The presenters have a habit of speaking in an overly exaggerated tone, and frequently uptalk - sort of how you might speak to a 2-year-old. The writing here is also full of talk about sex, which is not really my cup of tea. Also, for a fun science book, there was a baffling amount of pro-LGBT propaganda crammed in here. Nowadays, you can't even pick up a science book without being force-fed THE MESSAGE. It seems you can't escape this crap no matter where you go... SIGH Instead of just sticking to telling amusing scientific stories and anecdotes, many of these presenters take the opportunity to evangelize for their leftist "progressive" worldview here, instead. I really, really dislike when authors cram their shit-tier political opinions into books where they have no business being, and my ratings always reflect this. In a super-cringey attempt to make a funny, one of these lobotomized authors proclaims: "...if you care about teens, don't ever vote for a Republican." Oh, wow. Cool opinion. Thanks for sharing. Maybe just stick to talking about science next time? There was also more nonsense in here about how biological sex is on a spectrum. That some animals have different chromosomal characteristics than people do is trotted out as "evidence." Human beings are sexually dimorphic, sexually reproducing creatures, with 2 default phenotypes. The binary idea of sex is not flawed. The overwhelming majority of people are either XX or XY. Even when intersex and sex chromosome aneuploidies are taken into account, M-F still applies to ~99.9% of the population. Later in the book, another lobotomized scientist talks about the dangers of tribalism, noting that there has been a rise in (gasp) nationalism, and pearl clutches over the election of Jair Bolsonaro. Strangely enough, no mention was made of the danger of wide-sweeping far-leftist sentiment: the literal Neo-Marxist movements sweeping across college campuses, and the violent riots of summer 2020, to name but a few. On a positive note, there was a good bit of writing here about GMO foods. ****************** Despite being excited to start this one, How to Win Friends and Influence Fungi ultimately was a disappointment. 2 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 16, 2024
|
May 21, 2024
|
May 16, 2024
|
ebook
| ||||||||||||||||
0358646502
| 9780358646501
| 0358646502
| 3.88
| 476
| unknown
| Apr 09, 2024
|
liked it
|
"IN THE LATE 1990S, INSIDE A FORMER NUCLEAR MISSILE silo in Kansas, Leonard Pickard set up what was probably the biggest LSD lab of all time. The choi
"IN THE LATE 1990S, INSIDE A FORMER NUCLEAR MISSILE silo in Kansas, Leonard Pickard set up what was probably the biggest LSD lab of all time. The choice of this site for such a large-scale operation seems symbolic, given that the history of the powerful substance is tightly interwoven with that of the Cold War and its arms race. On twenty-eight acres of land, behind electronically controlled gates and a hundred-ton steel door that could withstand even a nuclear attack, Pickard was alleged to have produced a kilogram of the drug per month—due to its potency, an unimaginably large amount. With it, the graduate of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government was said to have provided 95 percent of the world’s supply of LSD..." Tripped is my second from the author, after his 2015 book: Blitzed: Drugs in Nazi Germany, which I really enjoyed. So, I admittedly went into this one with high expectations. Unfortunately, I did not find the writing here to be quite on par with the writing in Blitzed. Author Norman Ohler is a German New York Times bestselling author, novelist and screenwriter, best known for this book, which has been published in over 30 languages. Norman Ohler: [image] The writing here opens with a bang, as Ohler delivers a high-energy intro where he drops the quote above. He writes in a matter-of-fact, straight-forward manner here that shouldn't struggle to hold the finicky reader's attention. Ohler describes the aim of the book in this short quote: "...I myself became curious about the drug when my father, a retired judge, started to consider giving microdoses of LSD to my mother to treat her Alzheimer’s disease. He had asked me why, if the drug was actually supposed to help, he couldn’t just get it at the pharmacy. This launched me on my research. As the book's subtitle implies, the author takes the reader through the history of psychedelic drug use in the West, and America; more specifically. The book also covers the roots of the modern Western drug prohibition movement, and the history of the "War on Drugs." The West adopted the Nazi's temperance movement, which was ultimately blowback from the decadent and degenerate culture that emerged in Weimar Germany post WW1. The author continues, telling the reader about the discovery of early psychedelics and the synthesis of LSD. Although not mentioned here, the Americans became paranoid that the Russians had developed a mind control agent, after freed POWs from the Korean War were returning to America seemingly brainwashed. This had the Americans up in arms, and drove later efforts by CIA scientists to produce a mind-control agent of their own. This project became known as Project MKUltra. MKUltra was preceded by two drug-related experiments, Project Bluebird and Project Artichoke. It began in 1953, was reduced in scope in 1964 and 1967, and was halted in 1973. It was organized through the CIA's Office of Scientific Intelligence and coordinated with the United States Army Biological Warfare Laboratories. The program engaged in illegal activities, including the use of U.S. and Canadian citizens as unwitting test subjects. MKUltra's scope was broad, with activities carried out under the guise of research at more than 80 institutions, including colleges and universities, hospitals, prisons, and pharmaceutical companies. The CIA operated using front organizations, although some top officials at these institutions were aware of the CIA's involvement. Some more of what is covered in here includes: • LSD in America • The Case of Frank Olson • Mösch-Rümms • LSD JFK • "The Revolt of the Guinea Pigs" • "The Bear" • Elvis Meets Nixon • The author microdosing his mother to treat her Alzheimer's. (Some great info here) ****************** Tripped was a decent read, but I didn't enjoy it as much as the author's first book in the series. I also felt that John D. Marks book: The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA & Mind Control already covered this topic in a more effective and engaging manner. The book was still a decent read if you don't know this history. 3.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 09, 2024
|
May 10, 2024
|
May 08, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1089449186
| 9781089449188
| 1089449186
| 4.16
| 45
| unknown
| Aug 10, 2019
|
liked it
|
"...Also called biostimulation, light box therapy, low-level light therapy (LLLT), or Photobiomodulation, Red Light Therapy or treatment has gained po
"...Also called biostimulation, light box therapy, low-level light therapy (LLLT), or Photobiomodulation, Red Light Therapy or treatment has gained popularity. Although the therapy is what we would consider “alternative,” many are swearing by it and using it to enhance wellbeing, promote recovery after surgery, minimize the effects of aging (to reduce wrinkles), and for various other personal wellbeing ends including but not limited to improved hair growth, easing sore muscles, dry skin, winter depression, and even weight loss." Red Light Therapy was a somewhat decent introductory look into the topic, but I had some gripes. More below. The book is my fourth on the subject of red light therapy, properly known as "photobiomodulation," or "PBM." Although the topic of red light therapy first struck me as woo-woo, new-age mumbo-jumbo, there have been thousands of scientific studies done on it, and the FDA currently approves its usage to treat myriad conditions. Anecdotally speaking; I recently purchased my own LED device. I was extremely skeptical that I would ever see any positive results from this therapy. However, immediately after my first 20 minute session, I felt an incredible surge of energy. I have seen some incredible results so far, despite having used PBM for less than 2 weeks now. The book is a very short presentation. The version I have clocked in at only 52 pages. Although the author breezes through most of the relevant material, a deeper look was warranted. The topics covered in the book are: • PBM Benefits for the Skin • PBM Enhances Sleep • PBM Has Weight Loss Benefits • PBM Enhances Muscle Recovery and Performance • PBM Improves Inflammation and Joint Pain • Red Light Therapy at Home • Choosing an RLT Device • PBM dose guidelines Although the author references many scientific studies here, she uses unscientific and incorrect language quite often. She has a rather awkward writing style that could use some refinement. For example, she drops this borderline word salad: "...Red light and near-infrared wavelengths is not harmful because treatments occur in a controlled environment such as a licensed spa or medical center, or even using a high-grade red light device at home. This means the chances of the light wavelengths generated by pure red light burning the skin are very dismal."~Whether something is harmful to you has nothing to do with where it has been administered. Also, "dismal" is not a scientifically quantitative term. She also mentions "detoxing" in the book. Aside from discontinuing usage of addictive substances, "detoxing" is a nonsensical pseudoscientific term. There is no such thing as doing a "detox." Your body "detoxifies" itself constantly. This is what your liver and kidneys are for... ******************** Red Light Therapy was an OK primer to the topic. However, I would recommend a better-written and researched book to anyone wanting to familiarize themselves with PBM. Check out Ari Whitten's book: The Ultimate Guide to Red Light Therapy: How to Use Red and Near-Infrared Light Therapy for Anti-Aging, Fat Loss, Muscle Gain, Performance Enhancement, and Brain Optimization. It was a far more comprehensive and coherent look into the topic. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 08, 2024
|
May 09, 2024
|
May 07, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
B084MNJ4HR
| 3.64
| 14
| unknown
| Apr 28, 2020
|
really liked it
|
"In the past few years, red and near-infrared light therapy has exploded in popularity—the treatment seems to be everywhere, from the doctor’s office
"In the past few years, red and near-infrared light therapy has exploded in popularity—the treatment seems to be everywhere, from the doctor’s office to the salon. It’s received high praise from the press, too: Glamour calls it a “fountain of youth”; Shape insists you make it a part of your skin-care routine; and Men’s Journal praises its sleep, strength and endurance training, and post-workout recovery benefits. It certainly seems like this painless, side effect– free treatment could be the medical breakthrough we’ve been waiting for..." Healing with Red Light Therapy was a great introduction to the topic of red light therapy; properly known as "photobiomodulation," or "PBM" from here on. The book is my third on the topic, and I'll read just about everything I can get my hands on about PBM. The author did a decent job putting this one together. Author Stephanie Hallett is a Toronto-born journalist. A graduate of the University of British Columbia’s Master of Journalism program, she has worked as a reporter and editor at Ms. magazine, HuffPost, and HelloGiggles, and has had her work published by Pacific Standard, BuzzFeed, Modern Luxury Brides California, DAME magazine, and more. Stephanie Hallett: [image] Although the topic of red light therapy first struck me as woo-woo, new-age mumbo-jumbo, there have been thousands of scientific studies done on it, and the FDA currently approves its usage to treat myriad conditions. Anecdotally speaking; I recently purchased my own LED device. I was extremely skeptical that I would ever see any positive results from this therapy. However, immediately after my first 20 minute session, I felt an incredible surge of energy. I have seen some incredible results so far, despite having used PBM for less than 2 weeks now The quote from the start of this review continues: "...Red light therapy has been around for decades, since the advent of lasers in the 1960s. Currently, there are dozens of FDA-cleared red and near-infrared light therapy devices on the market, mainly for skin care and aches and pains. Some estimates suggest that the light therapy market, including white light devices for seasonal affective disorder and devices of other colors, will reach $1 billion worldwide by 2025." She lays out the aim of the book in this short blurb: "The goal of this book is twofold: to inform and inspire curiosity and action. Because light therapy can seem like magic—how, after all, can a form of energy have healing effects on the human body?—this book lays out in plain language the science of this treatment and its possible results. It does not diagnose or treat, but it does explain which conditions respond best to light therapy and how to seek it out." And talks about the empirical validation of PBM as an effective therapeutic, as well as one of it's mechanisms of actions in this short quote: "More than 4,000 PBM lab studies have been conducted, as well as about 700 clinical trials. In total, more than 6,000 papers have been published on the subject—nearly 500 in 2018 alone, signaling a rising interest in the treatment. For all the skeptics out there, she drops this quote, which I found pretty witty: "PBM is also effective at treating wounds and illnesses in animals, which seems relevant to the conversation since there’s no such thing as a placebo effect in animals. As Dr. Praveen Arany, a PBM researcher at the University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, explained to me, “Animals do not have placebo. They do not pretend to get better because you’re shining light on them.” Take that, PBM skeptics." Unfortunately, despite covering many of the benefits of PBM, the author doesn't spend any time talking about the different wavelengths of light that are used. She just advises the reader to look into it for themselves. Well, isn't that why people bought this book? FWIW, I have read in other books on PBM that the two most therapeutic wavelengths are ~660nm red and ~850nm near infrared. ******************** Healing with Red Light Therapy was an interesting look into the topic. I would recommend it to anyone interested. 4 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 07, 2024
|
May 08, 2024
|
May 03, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
0994741863
| 9780994741868
| 0994741863
| 4.26
| 611
| unknown
| May 08, 2018
|
liked it
|
"Red light therapy is an FDA approved treatment for acne, muscle and joint pain, arthritis, compromised blood circulation,1 and for reversing hair los
"Red light therapy is an FDA approved treatment for acne, muscle and joint pain, arthritis, compromised blood circulation,1 and for reversing hair loss.2 When you explore the 50,000+ scientific and clinical studies conducted on red light therapy to date, you’ll find that no matter which disease a person has, they can probably benefit significantly from red and near-infrared light..." Red Light Therapy was an interesting short read, but I had some gripes. More below... Although I read quite a lot of books and watch many of the podcasts from the world's leading practitioners in the health and wellness sphere, I had not come across the topic of red light therapy (properly known as photbiomodulation or from here on PBM) until recently - when I happened to be listening to the "Quirks and Quarks" science podcast on my way to the store a few weeks ago. What I heard there really had me thinking afterward. Basically, the professor said that modern humans aren't exposed to as much red and infrared light as when life was spent mainly outdoors, resulting in somewhat of an evolutionary mismatch. (from the Quirks and Quarks website): "The global transition to LED lighting seems to be having some concerning impacts on the natural world and human health. These energy efficient artificial lights produce different spectra than older incandescent technology, or the natural light of the Sun that life on Earth evolved with over billions of years. LED lighting is brighter, bluer, and more widely used than incandescent lighting. Author Mark Sloan has been researching and writing about many subjects, with specific emphasis on health, for over 15 years. He has written over 300 articles, and is the author of a number of books including The Cancer Industry: Crimes, Conspiracy and The Death of My Mother. Mark Sloan: [image] As briefly touched on above; the book is a very short presentation. I felt that this was a bit unfortunate, as I was eager for the author to expand on the writing here. Sloan writes with an easy, matter-of-fact style that won't have any trouble holding the finicky reader's attention. The book is also formatted very well, and is broken into well-delinaited coherent chapters. The quote from the start of this review continues: "...While it was once believed that the healing effects of red and near-infrared light could only be obtained using expensive laser devices, science has since established that inexpensive LEDs (light emitting diodes) of the same wavelengths can provide the same remarkable healing benefits at a fraction of the cost." In this quote, he talks about the aim of the book: "I wrote this book because I’ve experienced the benefits of red light therapy firsthand, and I now feel compelled to tell the world and help others find the same healing. The repair and enhancement of my brain function, sexual function, thyroid and overall health due to light therapy have been nothing short of miraculous. Perhaps somewhat controversially, the author unfolds a theory here of cancer being a metabolic disease, not a genetic one, citing the work of Noble Prize winning scientist Otto Warburg. As I did some more reading on the topic, I found that there may be some merit to this line of thinking. See here for more. Further to the above, I have been reading and hearing more evidence for many diseases and disorders being driven by dysfunctional metabolism. Specifically: mitochondrial dysfunction. As everyone who's taken grade 11 biology can tell you: "the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell." The "power" is Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is the source of energy for use and storage at the cellular level. The body produces about its own weight in ATP every day. Given that your body is made of trillions of cells, each with their own mitochondria - any functional disorder with this process scales up and ends up having outsized effects on the rest of the body. The mechanism of action that photobiomodulation is said to have on cells is by unbinding (aka photodissociate) nitric oxide from the cytochrome c oxidase enzyme, expelling the NO, and using oxygen in the Kreb cycle to produce 32x ATP, instead of just 2x. So, basically, it can "charge" your cellular "batteries." ATP is the currency of energy in the body, and to have your cells metabolically functioning well and producing more ATP should see broad-based positive synergetic benefits. Although the topic of red light therapy first struck me as woo-woo, new-age mumbo-jumbo, there have been thousands of scientific studies done on it, and the FDA currently approves its usage to treat myriad conditions. Anecdotally speaking; I recently purchased my own LED device. I was extremely skeptical that I would ever see any positive results from this therapy. However, immediately after my first 20 minute session, I felt an incredible surge of energy. I have seen some incredible results so far, despite having used PBM for less than 2 weeks now. OK, now on to my criticisms. I would say that the author speaks in black-and-white terms quite often here, and biochemistry is not black-and-white. He also has no academic or professional qualifications to speak with authority on complicated matters like cancer and its related biochemistry. To the best of my knowledge, he does not have a doctoral degree in the sciences, he is not a licensed practitioner of medicine, and he has not published any peer-reviewed papers. So, he is (by definition) unqualified to be giving black-and-white advice about serious diseases like cancer. Although he has obviously done extensive research for the writing in this book, and undoubtedly has noble intentions, his opinion is just not on an equal footing with an academically-educated professional, who has themselves worked in the field, and has amassed decades of real-world experience. I've read quite a lot of books about biology, from the world's leading researchers and scientists in their respective fields. People who have spent literally decades doing lab research firsthand. These people rarely (if ever) use definitive language, like the author does here. In fact, it can be rather frustrating trying to parse an overall message from their writing, because almost everything they talk about is prefaced with "ifs," "buts," and other assorted non-commital caveats, stipulations, exemptions, and cautions. They'll say: "the risk profile of __ has been shown to be correlated with ___." And "...under certain circumstances, there is an association with ___." Empirically teasing out causality is one of the harder things to do when looking at pathological biology, because there are just so many variables. And as everyone knows: "correlation does not equal causation." Further to the above, the author seems to disparage most modern forms of medicine, including oncology. He seems to think that there is a cancer "industry" full of scientists, oncologists, and other assorted medical researchers and practitioners making up a shady, nefarious cabal, eagerly counting their gold coins like some demented Scrooge McDuck. I'm not sure if the author has ever known a real-life research scientist. Because, if he had, then he would know that these people are not high-rolling ballers motivated by a lust for money. In fact, quite the opposite. Mostly, they are people motivated by helping others, and trying to cure humanity of a disease as old as time... I know this because my own mother was a career cancer research scientist for her entire professional career. She never made a lot of money from her research - ever. In fact, for almost all of her professional career, we made ends meet by the skins of our teeth. She would go from one sparse grant to another, and her lab was never funded to the level they wanted. So, it's a bit naive of the author to paint people trying to cure cancer as some type of Machiavellian crooks. I knew many of them firsthand, and to insulate as much is a bit offensive, not to mention completely false. ******************** Red Light Therapy was still an interesting short read, despite the above criticism. I would recommend it to anyone interested, but with my own caveat to take what the author says with a grain of salt. For anyone looking at more empirically-grounded scientific look into the topic, I can recommend The Ultimate Guide to Red Light Therapy: How to Use Red and Near-Infrared Light Therapy for Anti-Aging, Fat Loss, Muscle Gain, Performance Enhancement, and Brain Optimization by Ari Whitten. 3 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 02, 2024
|
May 03, 2024
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
B07FJNZ821
| 4.15
| 827
| Jul 09, 2018
| Jul 09, 2018
|
it was amazing
|
"If there were a pill that was proven to have powerful anti-aging effects on our skin, combat neurological disease, fight depression and anxiety, incr
"If there were a pill that was proven to have powerful anti-aging effects on our skin, combat neurological disease, fight depression and anxiety, increase fat loss, speed recovery from exercise, increase strength and endurance, combat certain autoimmune conditions, fight hair loss, and speed healing from injury—all with little to no side effects—it would be a billion-dollar blockbuster drug..." The Ultimate Guide to Red Light Therapy was an excellent look into the topic. Although I read quite a lot of books and watch many of the podcasts from the world's leading practitioners in the health and wellness sphere, I had not come across the topic of red light therapy (properly known as photbiomodulation or from here on PBM) until recently - when I happened to be listening to the "Quirks and Quarks" science podcast on my way to the store a few weeks ago. What I heard there really had me thinking afterward. Basically, the professor said that modern humans aren't exposed to as much red and infrared light as when life was spent mainly outdoors, resulting in somewhat of an evolutionary mismatch. (from the Quirks and Quarks website): "The global transition to LED lighting seems to be having some concerning impacts on the natural world and human health. These energy efficient artificial lights produce different spectra than older incandescent technology, or the natural light of the Sun that life on Earth evolved with over billions of years. LED lighting is brighter, bluer, and more widely used than incandescent lighting. Author Ari Whitten is a natural health expert who takes an evidence-based approach to human energy optimization. He has a Bachelor of Science in Kinesiology, certifications from the National Academy of Sports Medicine as a Corrective Exercise Specialist and Performance Enhancement Specialist, has extensive graduate-level training in Clinical Psychology, and holds a Master of Science degree in Human Nutrition and Functional Medicine. Ari Whitten: [image] The writing here is very heavily annotated, and the author references many different scientific papers. However, even though this book is a science-driven look into the topic, Whitten writes in a very straightforward, down-to-earth manner that manages to convey technical scientific jargon to the reader in an easily digestible manner. Even the scientifically illiterate layperson should have no trouble understanding what is presented here. Points awarded for this effective communication, because all too often, science books fail at just this. They drown the reader in a virtual never-ending torrent of esoteric minutia; effectively losing the forest for the trees... The quote from the start of this review continues below: "...Hundreds of millions of people would be told to start taking it by their doctors every day. And doctors all over the world would call it a “miracle drug.” Whitten lays out the aim of the book in this bit of writing: "In this book, you’ll discover the incredible power of red and near-infrared light therapy and how it can help: Far from being some new age airy-fairy, tree-hugging pseudoscience, the evidence for the efficacy of PBM on the body is well scientifically grounded: "There have now been literally thousands of studies conducted upon both animals and humans. Overall, red light has been repeatedly shown to have positive effects on cell function in animal and human studies and aid in improving a wide range of conditions, improving health in numerous ways. Red and near-infrared (NIR) light therapy devices have been FDA-approved for several purposes so far, including anti-aging, hair-loss reversal, acne treatment, pain relief, slow to heal wounds, fat loss, among other purposes. (This is worth noting as it proves the abundance of research showing benefits—the therapy has to be proven safe and effective in numerous trials to gain FDA approval.)" Whitten references Michael R. Hamblin et al.’s 2018 textbook "Low-Level Light Therapy: Photobiomodulation" many times here, and says that Hamblin is one of the world's leading scientists on the topic of photobiomodulation. Click here to read a decent article from him about PBM and its scientific veracity on PubMed. Having recently purchased a moderately-priced LED red/NIR unit myself, I can (so far) attest to this therapeutic's powerful effects. To be honest, I was extremely skeptical that I would feel any measurable benefit; immediately, or even long-term. However, after my first ~20 minute session, I felt a huge surge of energy, which lasted the rest of the day. At the gym later that afternoon, I had much more energy than I typically do. Anecdotally speaking, and as I write this review, I have only been doing the PBM therapy for about a week now, but in that short time, I have noticed that: 1) I no longer feel lethargic, and/or tired in the early afternoon anymore. Around 1 pm I'm usually ready for a nap, 2) Overall, my mood is much more improved. I am generally in a more positive frame of mind, and have less anxiety and depressive thoughts. I am less inclined towards negative self-talk and recursive thinking. 3) I have an increased level of energy at the gym, as well, which has led to me breaking some long-held personal strength records, as a middle-aged man who is not taking any AAS, 4) I train very hard at the gym; both cardio (to improve Vo2 Max) as well as strength train. I lift very heavy. Typically, this results in some pretty serious soreness/ DOMS in the day or two following my workouts. The PBM has dramatically reduced the amount of soreness I experience afterwards, 5) My skin also appears markedly more radiant and flush. Subjectively speaking, people have told me that my wrinkles appear to have diminished noticeably, 6) As part of the biochemical process that PBM produces in the body, I really feel the pump from the increase in nitric oxide (NO). The author spends quite a bit of time covering many of the proposed benefits of PBM, as well as their potential mechanisms of action. All the writing is heavily annotated. He also talks the reader through calculating the optimal dosage, and notes that (contrary to what you might read elsewhere) PBM is a very potent therapy that's easy to overdo. PBM has a biphasic dose response curve, so more is not necessarily better. In fact, too much can actually be deleterious: [image] Near the end of the book, he covers a few of the more popular home devices for sale, and makes recommendations to the reader. He says that the two most evidentially-supported therapeutic wavelengths are somewhere around 660nm, and 850nm. He advises the reader to select a device that has a power output of between ~25-100 mW/cm2. [image] If I were to fault this book, I would note that the author spends quite a bit of time talking about "EMFs" and "detecting EMFs" coming from PBM devices. The entire topic of "EMF sensitivity" is pseudoscientific nonsense. People aren't "sensitive to EMFs." Their supposed sensitivities never hold up to empirical blind testing. There is no known biological mechanism for non-ionizing EMFs (i.e. power lines, cellphones, and wifi) to cause DNA damage, and thus cancer. EMF "sensitivity" is a psychosomatic disorder. ******************** The Ultimate Guide to Red Light Therapy was an excellent and comprehensive look into the topic. I would definitely recommend it to anyone interested in learning about the potential benefits of photobiomodulation. 5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Apr 30, 2024
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
B0CJMTL7ZQ
| unknown
| 3.53
| 142
| unknown
| Oct 12, 2023
|
it was ok
|
The History of Psychedelics was a middle of the road presentation at best. There was not too much real value here, and the nonstop WHITE MAN BAD rheto
The History of Psychedelics was a middle of the road presentation at best. There was not too much real value here, and the nonstop WHITE MAN BAD rhetoric was irritating as fuck. More below. Author Erika Ellen Dyck is a Canadian historian. She is a professor of history and Canada Research Chair in the History of Medicine at the University of Saskatchewan. Erika Dyck : [image] The presenter speaks in a deadpan fashion, and the lectures are delivered with all the enthusiasm and panache of an Encyclopedia entry. This is an audio presentation; split across 6 lectures. Each ~30mins. This is not enough time to properly talk about psychedelics or their history; let alone both topics together. And with such a short run time, you'd think that the author might want to cram in as much valuable info into this presentation as she could. While there was some interesting info provided, the author chose to look at the topic through a critical theory lens, which is oh so fashionable in 2024... There are little bits of partisan jargon liberally shoehorned in everywhere throughout this very short presentation. She crams in unnecessary little literary accouterments that firmly mark her leftist tribal affiliation, and victimology-based worldview. I lost count of how many times she used politically laden terms like: "power structures," "colonialism," "the legacy of colonialism," "patriarchal," "marginalized," and other such assorted leftist newspeak. [FUN GAME IDEA?: Take a drink every time she drops a leftist buzzword. You won't make it through the first lecture...] She also uses nonsensical terms like "non-Western knowledge systems." There is no such thing as a "Western knowledge system." There is just empirical knowledge, and magical thinking. Much of her talk reads like a post-modernist word salad. The author also drops in a curious little line in lecture 6, when she talks about the future of psychedelics: "...we may see them as a means to encourage people to think outside the box. Maybe even to stimulate new revolutionary ideals..." (~Karl Marx, is that you??) Just what kind of "revolutionary ideals" she is referring to is left up to the listener's imagination, but if the other ideologically-laden language is any clue, then you can probably guess. When Western people are talked about, it is almost always with disdain. She spares no opportunity to push the "white guilt" narrative. However, when indigenous people are talked about, it is with reverence and respect. She clearly drank the "Noble Savage" Kool-Aid. It sounds like she places the blame for all that ails Indigenous communities squarely at the feet of the evil colonialists. It must be comforting to have the black-and-white worldview of a 5-year-old. I always imagine professors like this sitting back, patting themselves on the back for what brave and noble social justice warriors they are. The French have a term for people like this. They call them "bien pensants." Christ, these people are exhausting, and I'm getting sick of being bludgeoned over the head with this shit ad nauseam. ****************** If you're in the mood to hear about how terrible your ancestors were and how noble the wise Indian was, then this one is for you. If you'd like an informative look into the history of psychedelic drugs, there are much better books or lectures than these. That someone so ideologically possessed teaches young, impressionable minds scares the shit out of me, TBH. People like this need to be dragged kicking and screaming as far away from any kind of institutional power as can be. 1.5 stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
May 17, 2024
|
Apr 19, 2024
|
Audiobook
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.51
|
liked it
|
Sep 2023
|
Sep 13, 2024
|
||||||
3.87
|
it was ok
|
Sep 09, 2024
|
Sep 04, 2024
|
||||||
3.86
|
liked it
|
Aug 27, 2024
|
Aug 22, 2024
|
||||||
4.14
|
it was ok
|
Aug 22, 2024
|
Aug 21, 2024
|
||||||
4.01
|
it was ok
|
Aug 21, 2024
|
Aug 19, 2024
|
||||||
3.97
|
it was amazing
|
Aug 06, 2024
|
Jul 24, 2024
|
||||||
3.85
|
liked it
|
Jul 27, 2024
|
Jul 23, 2024
|
||||||
3.76
|
liked it
|
Jul 12, 2024
|
Jul 10, 2024
|
||||||
4.38
|
it was amazing
|
Jul 10, 2024
|
Jul 05, 2024
|
||||||
4.20
|
it was ok
|
Jul 02, 2024
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
||||||
3.76
|
did not like it
|
Jun 25, 2024
|
Jun 21, 2024
|
||||||
3.93
|
really liked it
|
Nov 30, 2020
|
Jun 11, 2024
|
||||||
3.79
|
liked it
|
Jun 08, 2024
|
Jun 05, 2024
|
||||||
3.64
|
it was ok
|
May 21, 2024
|
May 16, 2024
|
||||||
3.88
|
liked it
|
May 10, 2024
|
May 08, 2024
|
||||||
4.16
|
liked it
|
May 09, 2024
|
May 07, 2024
|
||||||
3.64
|
really liked it
|
May 08, 2024
|
May 03, 2024
|
||||||
4.26
|
liked it
|
May 03, 2024
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
||||||
4.15
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 30, 2024
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
||||||
3.53
|
it was ok
|
May 17, 2024
|
Apr 19, 2024
|