Stephen's Reviews > The Day of the Jackal

The Day of the Jackal by Frederick Forsyth
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1413439
's review

liked it
bookshelves: audiobook, historical-thriller, spy-stuff, 1970-1979, assassins

To those that gave this 4 or 5 stars…I completely get it…I really do.

I found much impressiveness in this classic spy story, despite the 3 star ceiling I ended up placing on it. Technically proficient and drenched in details, this is as authentic an anatomy of an assassination attempt I have ever seen. Forsyth’s “Jackal-like” control over the narrative was singular and I can certainly understand this being considered a classic among the spy-thriller genre.

Despite the significant amount of superior that Forsyth brought to this story, my 3 star rating reflects my lack of engagement in the story resulting largely from what I found to be a lack of well-drawn characters and a dearth of emotion in the narrative. These two missing components prevented me from getting warm and toasty with the story even with the undeniable quality of the plot.

PLOT SUMMARY

A novel in 4 parts.

First, the reader is introduced to the OAS (“Organisation de l'armée secrète”…or “Organization of the Secret Army”), a rabies-loaded, right-wing French nationalist group formed during the Algerian War and dedicated to keeping Algeria part of France…[if I can pause for a brief side note, the OAS completely reminded me of the scene in Monty Python’s, The Meaning of Life when John Cleese said:
I would remind you that [the cormorant] was presented to us by the Corporation of the town of Sudbury to commemorate Empire Day, when we try to remember the names of all those from the Sudbury area who so gallantly gave their lives to keep China British.
...Sorry, couldn’t resist sprinkling a little MP into the mix.]

Anyway, feeling spiteful, betrayed and more than a little miffed by de Charlie‘s “gall” and his support for Algerian independence, the OAS unsuccessfully tries to pop caps in de Gaulle’s derriere several times, most notably in a French suburb in 1962.

The above is all historical fact and provides a terrific lead in for Forsyth to seamlessly transition into the fictional story.

Part 2 of the story is easily my favorite part of the book. The OAS is in shambles after being infiltrated and decimated by the French “Action” service (the counter-terrorist portion of the French intelligence apparatus). As a result, the head of the OAS decides that the only way to turn things around is to succeed in assassinating de Gaulle and the only way to do that is to bring in a ninja professional assassin. Enter…Bruce Willis the Englishman …a nameless, mysterious, high-priced assassin considered the best in the world.

Engaged by the OAS and given complete operational control over the assignment, the rest of this section of the book details….and I mean D.E.T.A.I.L.S.…the Englishbloke’s preparation for the assassination. I was fascinated by this section and thought it felt incredibly authentic. Step by step the reader follows the Englishgent as he arranges the creation of false identities, the design and production of the perfect weapon, extensively studies de Gaulle, selects the appropriate time and place for the kill, and identifies his escape route.

I’ve never seen this kind of detail presented better without intrusion by the “pace-assassins” known of PLOD and BOG. Forsyth eludes both of these story killers and maintains excellent narrative flow. I LOVED IT.

Part 3 focuses on the French government’s counter-terrorist group as they learn of the potential plot and investigate various leads looking for a break. As with the rest of the book, the intricacy of the details is very impressive. However, this is where I started to disengage a bit from the plot due to a lack of emotional investment in the story. Part of this stems from the “intentional coldness” of the Englishman. His whole persona is one of ice which would have been great if contrasted by more emotionally colorful characters in the novel. Unfortunately, I didn’t find that and so it made immersing myself into the story impossible. Lack of immersion led to lack of connection led to lack of interest as the narrative began to seem far too dry.

The fourth part of the book is the climax where we have the Jackal closing in on his target and the Frenchies closing in on the Jackal. Again, technically this was done to perfection and I have no truck with anyone who slapped 5 stars on this story. However, for me, my lack of investment in the narrative continued to plague me and so the amount of tension (of which there should have been plenty) was running on empty. I still enjoyed it, but I kept telling myself that I SHOULD be enjoying it more.

Overall, Forsyth wrote a very impressive book and I would not quibble with it being listed among the classics of the genre. I just found the story a bit dry and the characters a bit too wooden to engage enough to say I really liked it. Thus a solid 3 stars and my respect for Forsyth’s accomplishment.
107 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Day of the Jackal.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

August 15, 2010 – Shelved
August 15, 2011 – Started Reading
August 17, 2011 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-17 of 17 (17 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Duffy Pratt I'm not sure I disagree with you, even though I think I liked the book better than you did. (Four stars for me is really good, and I don't even consider the possibility of 6 stars.) There have been two move versions of this book. The first is older and is very faithful to the book. As a result, it also comes off as a bit cold. The second tries to add the sort of emotional interest that you seem to want. For me, there is no question which of the two is the better movie -- the first by miles.


Stephen I think my having seen the two movie versions may have affected my enjoyment a little as well. I knew exactly what was coming and that certainly didn't help the tension. Still, I did really enjoy that amount of detail Forsyth brought to the story.


Maciek This is a very good review, Stephen. I share your sentiments, although I gave the book a full 5 stars. The intricacy of the detail and the character of the Jackal made up for the lack of tension in some parts. And that ending!


message 4: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus I hated it as much as I hated "Bored of the Wrings" and I agree completely with what you said.


message 5: by Mohammed (new)

Mohammed  Abdikhader  Firdhiye This is shocking Stephen, i expected better from you ;)


Stephen Maciek wrote: "This is a very good review, Stephen. I share your sentiments, although I gave the book a full 5 stars. The intricacy of the detail and the character of the Jackal made up for the lack of tension in..."

Maciek, I think you hit it right on the head as far as the difference in ratings. I completely agree with the level of detail and I think the Jackal is a great creation. For some reason, the clinical nature of the narrative just didn't suck me in as much as I would have hoped. Still, I did like it and certainly give it major kudos for its technical skills.


Stephen Oldfan wrote: "I hated it as much as I hated "Bored of the Wrings."

Careful...there may be some Tolkienites lurking around ready to pounce.


Stephen Mohammed wrote: "This is shocking Stephen, i expected better from you ;)"

I know, I was a bit shocked myself, but I really did like it. I just couldn't quite bring myself to give it the 4th star. It had 5 star components and in areas was brilliant. It just didn't pull me in as much as I would have liked. Plus, I think the movie versions (mostly the original) may have taken a bit of the suspense out of it for me.


message 9: by Mohammed (last edited Aug 21, 2011 07:27AM) (new)

Mohammed  Abdikhader  Firdhiye Stephen wrote: "Mohammed wrote: "This is shocking Stephen, i expected better from you ;)"

I know, I was a bit shocked myself, but I really did like it. I just couldn't quite bring myself to give it the 4th star..."


Thats why i didnt go near the films before i read this book. I have heard they were similar,good adapatation and might take away some of the supsense.

For me it was like brand new story, the stark, machine like writing was great read to me. It was like lean, noir type story but in spy,political thriller format.

I understand what you feel. I saw Captain America last night and was great fun but it was boring to me in a sense. It was too loyal ro recent years comic books of Captain America that i have read. The latest version of his origin. I knew every scene from the film from page by page in the comic verison i have read in the last 6 years.


Stephen Mohammed wrote: "I understand what you feel. I saw Captain America last night and was great fun but it was boring to me in a sense. It was too loyal ro recent years comic books of Captain America that i have read. The latest version of his origin. I knew every scene from the film from page by page in the comic verison i have read in the last 6 years."

That is a good analogy, Mohammed. Knowing the "scenes" beforehand, whether from reading or seeing a film adaptation can really water down the enjoyment when you see it translated in another medium. I am sure that affected my impression of the book.


message 11: by Mohammed (new)

Mohammed  Abdikhader  Firdhiye Yeah i didnt understand that before. Most of films i have seen first and read books after has been adapatations that didnt follow the books well. Like Godfather film who is based like only 60% of the book. Like Conan that is terrible 80s clichè that has nothing to do with Howard.

Cap America i saw what you meant, it excited me only as seeing as judge saying this is good or worse than the other version.


message 12: by Barbara (new)

Barbara Skuplik Great review! Thanks!


Bettye McKee No, no, no, Stephen. You reviewed the wrong movie. "The Jackal" with Bruce Willis was pure garbage. "The Day of the Jackal" was perfection.

You mentioned a lack of emotion. A story like this would be ruined by emotion. No one wants to read about an emotional, out- of-control professional assassin.

This book will remain on my list of all-time favorites.


Saksham Gakhar Good review but I must say -- this is one of the best books I have read in the thriller category. I found myself reading it very carefully (having had interest in the French politics) and found that I could not put down the book at all which speaks volumes about my personal engagement with the book. I did find the first part a bit laborious but realized it was a great builder for the rest of the 3quarts of the novel. I gave a 5/5!


Raghava Completely disagree. This is the greatest thriller ever. 3 stars? What? Curious what you think are 4 and 5 * or is your review click bait?


message 16: by Leo (new) - rated it 5 stars

Leo Quinn It's not a spy story.


message 17: by Davy (new)

Davy Bennett I saw this movie at the Kokomo Mall when it was new, maybe 1971-ish? I thought it was real good, I was about 16 though and didn't grasp much of it.
Kokomo is where the Blues Brothers were when they had to rely on the theme to Rawhide in order to survive.


back to top