Chris's Reviews > The Diamond Age: Or, a Young Lady's Illustrated Primer

The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
858949
's review

liked it
bookshelves: fantasy

I get the feeling that Stephenson's writing process goes something like this:

Hey, I found a really cool idea here. I wonder what I can do about it....

He then writes about 200 pages of really awesome, meticulous world-building, with innovative ideas about, in the case of this book, the possibly uses of nanotechnology and its eventual social ramifications, and then goes, Oh, damn, I'm writing a story, and high-tails it to the end of the book, leaving the reader a little wind-blown and confused. It happened in Snow Crash, where he was playing with the origins of language and the fundamental functioning of the human mind. It happened in Cryptonomicon, where he dove into the murky waters of cryptography and brought up brilliant gems, and it happened here, too.

The Diamond Age is, fundamentally, about what would happen, or what might happen, if we really got nanotechnology working properly. How would society adapt if, suddenly, government became obsolete? With the Feed and the Matter Compilers able to create anything out of nothing, the entire economic and political underpinnings of the planet came undone, and people banded together into phyles. Like-minded individuals bonded with each other through shared values and morality, united only by a commonly upheld treaty which, in turn, rested on the new economy that nanotechnology allowed.

Within one of the phyles, the Neo-Victorians, one of the more highly-placed Lords realized what was wrong with the world. The problem wasn't the corruption of values of which the old always accuse the young - indeed it was that those values were passed on too well. Children did not elect to join their phyles, they were indoctrinated into them from birth, which made them, well, boring.

And so Lord Finkle-McGraw commissioned a great work - The Young Lady's Illustrated Primer to guide his granddaughter to a more interesting life. And had that been all that happened, the story would have been short. But two other copes of the Primer were made - one for the daughter of the book's designer, and another that fell into the hands of Nell, a young girl born into poverty and otherwise destined to lead a life of misery and sorrow.

The Primer is a smart book, fully interactive, able to teach reading, science, history and martial arts, among other things. And what it teaches little Nell is how to be great.

All of this is quite awesome - there's a great hunt for the Primer, plans within plans and all that. And then, suddenly, a new plot about a technology to supplant the Feed and some kind of Chinese revolution and the whole book runs off the rails.

I know a lot of people love Neal Stephenson, and I can understand why. He's an incomparably imaginative man, who is able to find ways to express ideas that some of us couldn't even imagine. He's an heir to the world of that William Gibson and his contemporaries pioneered. He creates captivating worlds and characters and problems without simple solutions.

He just keeps bollixing up the endings. Seriously, it's like a whole different story kicks in around page 250. I'm willing to read more of his works, though, in the hope that he's getting his act together....
450 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Diamond Age.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
September 17, 2006 – Finished Reading
February 6, 2008 – Shelved
February 6, 2008 – Shelved as: fantasy

Comments Showing 1-37 of 37 (37 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Dani I just read this book, but I understood it better after reading your summary. I also agree with you that the plot seemed to change around page 250. The bit about the revolution and the Seed totally turned me off. I was more interested in what Nell was going to do with her life.


Ryan Ratings are always strange. I finished the first half of Diamond Age thinking five stars and lowered to four after the ending. I think you must have read the first half thinking four and ending up three.


Chris Ryan wrote: "Ratings are always strange. I finished the first half of Diamond Age thinking five stars and lowered to four after the ending. I think you must have read the first half thinking four and ending up ..."

That sound about right. The unfortunate thing is that I started off at four, hoping for five.


Smbgr I couldn't agree with you more about the endings of his books. I've read only 2 so far - the Diamond Age and Cryptonomicon. The ending of the former is a total mystery to me. I have really no idea what was happening all the time and I didn't really have the patience or motivation to figure it out. I felt like Stephenson was running up against a publishing deadline and was throwing out some half baked ideas that he hadn't thought out or taken the care to introduce properly. A real shame because the rest of the book was so interesting and coherent.
As I mentioned, I had the same problem with Cryptonomicon although on a smaller scale.

In truth this has deterred me from reading more of his books. They are quite an investment of time. I hate to read 800 pages just to have the ending of the book make no sense and seem rushed.


Richard I have to say that this book has a more satisfying ending than Snow Crash, but still seemed somewhat dependent upon a deus ex machina. Basically everything related to the Drummers in this novel I was annoyed by.


Donna Hi Richard. I'm a big Stephenson fan, and I too wished the whole Drummers episode had not been included. It felt gratuitous, as did the made-up island scene in Cryptonomicon. And I agree, the endings are not quite as well integrated into the whole as I might wish. Even so, no one stimulates my imagination and gets me thinking philosophically about it all in such an entertaining way as Stephenson. So I completely forgive him his faults.


Tinotino This is my favorite Sci-fi novel. I love the world building so much. I recently listen to the audiobook again. I actually found the point the book lost the plot when when Nell found a new home. After that, there is almost no point to the story. The whole drummer/seed thing can be airdropped from any other random novel and it could have made equal amount of sense. And I fell the "action sequences" are there in the end because Stephenson felt there need to be some explosions to make the last chapter feel more like an ending, which is not. It just ends.


message 8: by Ben (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ben I couldn't agree more. You've really hit the nail on the head!


Peter Your review perfectly captured my sense of disappointment as well. This was my first read of Stephenson - and I intend to come back for Anathem - but I was really surprised by the second half of the book. It felt like a shift to bare plot without the insights of earlier chapters. My biggest problem was, as some others seem to feel, that the Seed and the Fists weren't developed enough to justify so much focus at the end. An interesting novel, but one that feels very much like a rushed work and missed opportunity.


Kitap Agreed with your review 100%. I really wanted to give this book four stars (and five at times), but the last third really blew it for me. Everything after the Drummers made little sense. I remember feeling similarly about Snow Crash. Stephenson is an over-rated writer, evidently.


message 11: by Ola (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ola i thought exactly the same. i was amazed with the ideas of the first half of the book (i would give even 5 stars). but the ending was just, i don't know, boring (maybe) for me. it was boring to read about this whole revolution and such (only 2 stars for it).


Ahmed I also agree 100%. Rushed ending.


Chris I read a review somewhere that said Stephenson writes great stories and then runs them headlong in to a brick wall. Maybe someone should steal his manuscripts and finish the third act for him.


message 14: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Agree with a lot of these comments. First 2/3, fantastic! Last 1/3, pretty much awful.


Eatwith Thedead I agree with your review. It seemed like he started writing one story in Part One then came back later and wrote a completely different one in Part Two.


Brian Could not agree more. Every time I start one of these books, it's either "Oooh, this is good" (Snow Crash) or "Whoa, this is terrific" (Anathem and The Diamond Age). I have yet to find one that had me saying anything other that "Meh" at the end of the book (or when I abandoned it. Anathem managed to be the most consistently good for me, Diamond Age struggled tremendously, but I did finish it, and Snow Crash... let's not talk about Snow Crash.


message 17: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will I also agree with your review: Neil, if you're reading this, please note the overwhelming sincere positivity that's being hoisted up about your books. We just want better endings for such epic tales. Thanks!


message 18: by Jerry (new)

Jerry Cufr I agree totally about Diamond Age. I put it down about three fourths through and proceeded to read the whole Sherlock Holmes series and then came back to the story and it wasn't like the first part.It was hard to finish which got me to thinking that this whole story is an allegory for some things I can't figure out.Not face value stuff. Still thinking and wondering. I have read most of his other books. Snow Crash I still think is one of the best books on the planet.It enthralled me from start to finish. If it had a double meaning I haven't looked for it. It is probably there. I've heard how great The Diamond Age is. I missed it. Haven't read Anathem or Read Me yet but I can't wait.


Jeffrey Schmieder Unlike nearly everyone here I liked the ending. It was just like the primer designer planned (spoilers ahead) Nell learned how to not only survive her horrible background but lead her army to safety. And help those around her. Would eagerly read a sequel with these characters especially the Judge.


message 20: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Jeffrey wrote: "Unlike nearly everyone here I liked the ending. It was just like the primer designer planned (spoilers ahead) Nell learned how to not only survive her horrible background but lead her army to safet..."

I think we all would agree that the story is enthralling. We just wish the conclusion had as much oomph as the rest of the story. Ending with the drummers and their leader essentially spontaneously combusting confused me.


message 21: by Rich (new)

Rich I agree that Stephensen's strength is his world-building ideas rather than ability to write strong stories like, for example, a Leo Tolstoy. He gets the story to a point that is good enough to be considered a novel and its published. Turning a single story that's as long as the stories he writes into a complete novel is extremely difficult and there are very few authors that can do this. It's something to consider that maybe Stephensen is not attempting to write the world's best novels, but rather to make books with the strengths you've identified in your review.


message 22: by Theo (new) - added it

Theo Gangi You can safely add 'Reamde' to that list of books with brilliant ideas and world-building that falls off the rails midway. If he could reign it in, he'd be a major crossover writer. Even genius needs an editor!


Doctor Doom great review!


message 24: by Alice (new) - added it

Alice I agree! Snow Crash and this book start off very slowly, developing backstories and characters for a long time. By the time the book is halfway done, Stephenson is still setting the stage, and by the time the book is finished, he rushes to tie everything together. Still fun to read, though!


message 25: by Liz (new) - rated it 3 stars

Liz Same!


Jeffrey Schmieder Agree, his books come to a crashing and confusing end, like the man runs out of gas, but what a crazy and rewarding ride you have got to experience. Almost like a modern, meth fueled On The Road.


message 27: by Robert II (new)

Robert II You hit the Nail! I only read Snow Crash, and liked but hated it for that reason. Someone should run with these concepts, but more coherently... mm


message 28: by Felicity (new)

Felicity I'm so glad I'm not the only one who feels this way about Neal Stephenson's work! The first book of his I read was Seveneves, and the start was so engrossing that I spent several days going through the motions of Real Life feeling like I was under the weight of humanity's impending doom. But then 2/3 of the way through the book, the main storyline ended, and it became something totally different, and after trying to slog my way through it for a while I gave up. The first 2/3 made a great story on its own; I don't know exactly what went down at the end but I imagine it could have fit into an epilogue, with the more interesting ideas saved for a separate novel of their own.

On the plus side, The Rise and Fall of DODO doesn't do this. I assume that's Nicole Galland's influence.


Jeffrey Schmieder Maybe he does need a co-author or he could walk away and get back when he is refueled. Just finished Confusion and loved about 85%.


message 30: by Kgosi (new)

Kgosi This is SOOO true. Seveneves has the exact same problem.


message 31: by Ryan (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ryan Spot on. The last half of the book just seemed completely off therails, messy and rushed, I struggled to get through it. I'm glad it wasn't just me who thought that. I still love the character and world building, these stories could be amazing if they headed in a different direction!


Robert Bush I thought it was consistent, the overall theme being equality in education without dumbing it down for the lower classes can bring down an apathetic oppressive system focused on keeping the haves and have nots separated and static. I don't know if this book may have spawned the rush to online learning as a way to profit, but it has the possibility, along with tech access, to change the world. That's what I got from the entire book cover to cover anyway. It could have had a longer ending about the revolution, but I got that it came from under the radar of the elites, so was the same story from multiple angles. Just my take.


Tyler Aaron Agree on the ending. Head-scratching.


message 34: by Daz (new) - rated it 3 stars

Daz I think you are pretty much spot on!


Taseen Muhtadi This review sums up my feelings about the book perfectly.


Jeffrey Schmieder Anyone else think the author peaked about halfway through his career? But it is hard to top works like the Baroque Cycle.


message 37: by jane (new)

jane Qatar
😂


back to top