E.B.'s Reviews > Neuromancer

Neuromancer by William Gibson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
958634
's review

did not like it

Wow. What a terrible book.

First, let me just say that I read for entertainment value. Anything else that happens is gravy. That being said- the biggest reason this book is so awful is that Gibson's characters are completely hollow. Gibson makes it up as he goes along. He'll introduce a character, barely describe him and then 10 chapters later toss in another description. As if to say "Oh, yeah did I mention his hands were chainsaws? Yeah, they were totally chainsaws. Cool right?"
The reason this is such a headache is that once your mind's eye has cast the characters, as shallow as they are, all of a sudden there's a new dimension tossed in. He doesn't just do this with characters, he does it with locations as well. Never giving you a chance to really place the characters in a setting. Other than "a dark city street." I mean, Try a little harder Gibson. I'm not a writer, but isn't that a sign of BAD WRITING?

The second reason this book is so bad, is Gibson's writing "style". I hate writing "styles". Stop trying to show off and just tell me a story. The "style" makes Neuromancer a very difficult book to read. I'd read 2 or 3 chapters and literally have no idea what was going on. Gibson will write a whole page with four lines of dialog and the rest of the page will describe absolutely nothing. Reminds me of the Mark Twain quote: "Don't say the old lady screamed. Bring her on and let her scream."

Now- for the positives. Gibson clearly just wanted to write a string of action sequences and techno-babel. Being a computer nerd myself, I found all of that interesting. Towards the end the characters actually have dialog with each other and as things come to a head it actually get's entertaining here and there. Another huge plus is that this book is considered the first true Cyberpunk work and has been heavily mined by Hollywood, Anime and pop-culture in general. Coining phrases like Matrix, Cyberspace, etc. For me, this was probably the first book I ever read just to say I read it. I don't regret it, but believe me, I'm glad it's over because I literally forced myself through it. Just wait for the movie. It'll probably make more sense.
268 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Neuromancer.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

March 1, 2008 – Shelved
Started Reading
April 1, 2008 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-23 of 23 (23 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Maureen lol, loved the book, but totally agree with the chainsaws comment.


message 2: by [deleted user] (new)

I like this one, Gibson gets better at writing in his latter works. Although I do disagree with you about "writing styles": if everything was in the same style, we wouldn't have many stories of interest.

Alas it isn't forever one i guess.


Dimitris Hall Well said.


Fintan I agree about his writing style. I found myself lost a few times, backtracking to see if I missed something that would help me understand what was going on.


Nicholas Wait! There are chainsaw hands? Now I'm interested!


Kizzy Dixon Couldn't agree more with your review. I couldn't even finish the book because his writing style was all over the place.


Jonathan If this helps, Gibson is more enjoyable heard rather than read, so I suggest audiobook format. His prose if read skillfully can be very enjoyable. I agree otherwise with all of your points.


John Your review is spot-on. Gibson uses multiple paragraphs to describe things, but his terrible writing is too large a barrier to look over and see his vision. The moron telling you to read Dan Brown completely missed the point of what you said.


message 9: by dp (new) - rated it 2 stars

dp 100% agree. I stopped fairly early on for similarly reasons


Ivana ugh, thank you, these were my thoughts exactly!


message 11: by Diane (new)

Diane Wallace Bluntly stated n honest review, E.B.!


message 12: by Cavuln1ble (new)

Cavuln1ble Oh wow. The bots in the comments don't even understand how stupid they sound.
Hey, you're not spot-on. You may be right about a few things, but not others.


message 13: by Cavuln1ble (new)

Cavuln1ble btw it's artistic value, since literature is an art, not just mere entertainment, which is why your way of reading is technically wrong, because you don't read for all values


message 14: by Paul (new) - rated it 1 star

Paul Mc Thanks for summing up how I feel. I have just given up on this in chapter 4 because I cannot see how it is worth me investing my time.


Khaled This review reflects exactly how I felt about the book. I couldn't have said it better.


Julius Wow, I completely disagree with you. This book was not hard to understand. Yeah, a lot of "dark city streets", such as Chiba, the Sprawl, Zion, Freeside, Villa Straylight, Turkey...


Pdendrijver Funny, I felt the exact same way!


Thoth Harris Count Zero is his best work, I think.


Maayan B Feeling the same way - super confused


Brenton Walters techno-babble


message 21: by Cal (new) - rated it 2 stars

Cal Dude this review hit well with me. I felt the same way, sadly..


message 22: by Ryan (new)

Ryan Second worst review on this site.


message 23: by Ted (new) - rated it 2 stars

Ted Williams Agree. I loved Snow Crash and this book is under recommendations for it so I gave it a try. I tried hard to get into it but it was awful word-salad.


back to top