HBalikov's Reviews > The Consuming Fire

The Consuming Fire by John Scalzi
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
929238
's review


For most of you this isn’t your first Scalzi read. For the rest of you, it better not be because this is book #2 in the series.

Those of us who know Scalzi appreciate his sense of humor, his imaginative plotting and his adept dialogue. What I hadn’t appreciated until this book was how nuanced his sense of evil was. So, this is a dark comedy about the veniality of those in power.

For most of this book we are on the home world of the Holy Empire of Interdependent States and Mercantile Guilds ruled by the Wu family through Emperox Grayland II who is also head of the Church of the Interdependency. Those familiar with book #1, The Collapsing Empire, know that physical change has come unbidden to the Empire with the predicted (but not believed) collapse of the “Flow,” which is the equivalent of a wormhole conduit between stars. Scalzi keeps this very much in the “now” while stirring into his pot measures of politics, religion, history and science.

Some of the things that I enjoyed: the whole government and guilds structure; the idea of the collapse of the Flow and its consequences; the ability to consult with past leaders*; and the idea that humans have had to expand but have not been able to find many suitable planets so they have had to construct giant orbiting dwellings.

There is nothing that you are called upon to figure out. It’s more of a: "Fasten your seatbelts; it's going to be a bumpy (ride)." And, if you can ride it out you are in for some excellent amusement even if you conclude that it is: “…full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” In that case, the only thing you may have lost is a little time. For me, it was a good trade that had me chuckling at: “What fools these mortals be.”

*I think that I want to say more about this but I am going to save it for a “comment.”

Postscript: On further consideration, I feel that readers need to determine how sensitive they are to certain words. This comes from reading "No Time to Spare: Thinking About What Matters" by Ursula K. Le Guin. In her collection of blogs, I came across this:
"I keep reading books and seeing movies where nobody can fucking say anything except fuck, unless they say shit. I mean they don’t seem to have any adjective to describe fucking except fucking even when they’re fucking fucking. And shit is what they say when they’re fucked. When shit happens, they say shit, or oh shit, or oh shit we’re fucked. The imagination involved is staggering. I mean, literally. There was one novel I read where the novelist didn’t only make all the fucking characters say fuck and shit all the time but she got into the fucking act herself, for shit sake. So it was full of deeply moving shit like “The sunset was just too fucking beautiful to fucking believe.”

Though I believe there is a definite shared value between Le Guin and Scalzi, The Consuming Fire is notable for its repeated (and to my sensibility) humorous use of the word. It appears within the first thirty words of the prologue and certain paragraphs can be almost cacophonous, if it were not for the humor that underlies it. Alright, here’s an example for those willing to read further:

“…but the problem with that was, for a rich person, Kiva was spectacularly unmotivated by money. She liked money and she liked that she had money, and she was aware that a life lived without money would well and truly suck…she never thought about money….Instead, Kiva had two primary pursuits: Fucking, which she was enthusiastic about nearly (but not entirely) to the point of indiscrimination; and running things, which she enjoyed and which as it was turning out she wasn’t all that bad at….For now, anyway. Until either the Nohamapetans grabbed it back from her, or all the Flow streams collapsed and they were all fucked anyway. Exciting fucking times, Kiva thought to herself.”

and....
"So why do you work for evil fucks?" Kiva asked Fundapellonan later, as they were lying in Kiva's bed after some better-than-average sex.
Fundapellonan looked over at Kiva, annoyed. "The House of Nohamapetan is not evil."
"Sounds like someone needs a refresher course on certain recent events."
"Fine," Fundapellonan said. "Some members of the House...may be evil."
"Fratricide. Murder. Attempted assassination. Embezzlement. Questionable taste in men. That's just one of those motherfuckers.
"Are evil. Well, were, evil."
"Still evil, just dead."
"But I didn't even work for her."
"You worked for her mom. Where do you think she got it?"
"But I don't even technically work for her. I work for the house."
"Which is run by the countess, your boss, and her family. You're splitting hairs here pretty fucking fine."
"I'm a lawyer; that's my actual job...."
23 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Consuming Fire.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 20, 2019 – Started Reading
February 20, 2019 – Shelved
February 23, 2019 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jane (new) - added it

Jane Sounds like you fucking enjoyed this one, H! ;)

I got started on it but then realized I couldn't remember a thing from the first book (except the feeling of annoyance I had when I realized it was fucking over and I'd need to wait a year for the next instalment). I'm planning to re-listen to the first, then try the second again, but I'm wondering if maybe I shouldn't wait until later this year so that I'm reasonably close to book #3 coming out in 2020.


message 2: by HBalikov (new) - added it

HBalikov Jane wrote: "Sounds like you fucking enjoyed this one, H! ;)

I got started on it but then realized I couldn't remember a thing from the first book (except the feeling of annoyance I had when I realized it was..."


Your logic is irrefutable and you know how to make me laugh, Jane. Thanks!


message 3: by Sean (new)

Sean Bai Man! I was going to write about "the Stream" in my first novel. I had thought it to be original but oh well ...

I can't write such detailed reviews like yours, by the way. I've only recently started writing book reviews (by purchasing one book at a time on my low budget) and I don't want to spoil too much for readers. At the same time, when I read book reviews I will buy a book if A) the story involves aliens, and B) the story evokes great emotion in the reader.

I haven't read Scalzi's books yet but the price tag is why I'm not buying them yet.

I don't even know what reviews to believe or not because everybody hates or likes different types of books.


message 4: by HBalikov (last edited Feb 23, 2019 04:53PM) (new) - added it

HBalikov Reply: "Man! I was going to write about "the Stream" in my first novel. I had thought it to be original but oh well ..."

Very few ideas are really original. Some of the best recently have been Leckie's Ancillary Justice and Tchaikovsky's Children of Time


message 5: by Sean (new)

Sean Bai Do you think it's possible to write a book with zero exposition? I don't know if describing the weather counts but I would rather readers discover the world through dialogue and questions, as they learn new things, like any normal human would.


message 6: by HBalikov (new) - added it

HBalikov Sean wrote: "Do you think it's possible to write a book with zero exposition? I don't know if describing the weather counts but I would rather readers discover the world through dialogue and questions, as they ..."

You're asking a lot from the typical reader but I'm sure that there are some who would go for it. One of the people who could give you better insight into this is GR reviewer, Glenn Russell.


message 7: by Sean (new)

Sean Bai If it's not too much trouble, may I ask what your methodology is for writing detailed book reviews that capture the emotions and awe, or lack thereof, of what you are reading, as well as convey that to possible readers so they are more willing to buy said books and support the said work of art?

I can't stand reviews that go "it was good/bad" without knowing why the reviewer thinks it so.


message 8: by HBalikov (new) - added it

HBalikov I am not sure that I have a "methodology."
I try to draw a bright line between fact and opinion.
I find that often there is no substitute for the author's own words.
I know that I like to read reviews where my GR friends meld some of their own life experience with how they related to the book.


Fiona Cook (back and catching up!) Excellent review, HB - this is a dark comedy about the veniality of those in power - I very much liked that, I think you're spot on.


message 10: by HBalikov (new) - added it

HBalikov Fiona wrote: "Excellent review, HB - this is a dark comedy about the veniality of those in power - I very much liked that, I think you're spot on."

So glad that you are along for this ride, Fi. Hope to compare notes with you when we finish the trilogy.


message 11: by Diane (new)

Diane Wallace Compelling perspective, H! it's so good that you don't have a rating? :D


back to top