Will Byrnes's Reviews > In Cold Blood
In Cold Blood
by
Truman Capote - image from the NY Post
This is one of the great ones. Capote blankets Holcomb, Kansas with his curiosity. The root of this work is a ghastly crime. Two recently released convicts, seeking a fortune that did not exist, invade the Clutter family home, tie up the four family members present and leave no witnesses. It takes some time for the perpetrators to be identified, then tracked down. Capote looks at how the townspeople react to this. Many, fearful that one of their own was responsible, become withdrawn. How do people mourn? He looks at the sequence of investigation that leads ultimately to the capture of the suspects, focusing on one of the chief investigators. He looks in depth at the criminals. What makes them tick? How could people do such awful things? In reading this I was reminded of some of the great panoramic art works of a bygone age, works by Bosch, or Breughel, in which entire towns were brought together into one wide-screen image. This is what Capote has done. But even with all the territory he covers there is considerable depth. I was also reminded, for an entirely different reason of Thomas Hardy. Capote has an incredible gift for language. He writes beautifully, offering descriptions that can bring to tears anyone who truly loves language. It has the power of poetry. This is truly a classic, a book that defined a new genre of literature. If you haven’t read it, you must.
Murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith - image from ABC Australia
In case you are in the market and in the neighborhood, this 10/24/19 item from SF Gate by Clare Trapasso, might be of interest - The Untold Story Behind the Infamous 'In Cold Blood' Murder House—and Why It's for Sale
by
Will Byrnes's review
bookshelves: nonfiction, all-time-favorites-non-fiction, favorites, journalism, brain-candy
Oct 20, 2008
bookshelves: nonfiction, all-time-favorites-non-fiction, favorites, journalism, brain-candy
Truman Capote - image from the NY Post
This is one of the great ones. Capote blankets Holcomb, Kansas with his curiosity. The root of this work is a ghastly crime. Two recently released convicts, seeking a fortune that did not exist, invade the Clutter family home, tie up the four family members present and leave no witnesses. It takes some time for the perpetrators to be identified, then tracked down. Capote looks at how the townspeople react to this. Many, fearful that one of their own was responsible, become withdrawn. How do people mourn? He looks at the sequence of investigation that leads ultimately to the capture of the suspects, focusing on one of the chief investigators. He looks in depth at the criminals. What makes them tick? How could people do such awful things? In reading this I was reminded of some of the great panoramic art works of a bygone age, works by Bosch, or Breughel, in which entire towns were brought together into one wide-screen image. This is what Capote has done. But even with all the territory he covers there is considerable depth. I was also reminded, for an entirely different reason of Thomas Hardy. Capote has an incredible gift for language. He writes beautifully, offering descriptions that can bring to tears anyone who truly loves language. It has the power of poetry. This is truly a classic, a book that defined a new genre of literature. If you haven’t read it, you must.
Murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith - image from ABC Australia
In case you are in the market and in the neighborhood, this 10/24/19 item from SF Gate by Clare Trapasso, might be of interest - The Untold Story Behind the Infamous 'In Cold Blood' Murder House—and Why It's for Sale
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
In Cold Blood.
Sign In »
Quotes Will Liked
“Imagination, of course, can open any door - turn the key and let terror walk right in.”
― In Cold Blood
― In Cold Blood
Reading Progress
Started Reading
June 1, 2006
–
Finished Reading
October 20, 2008
– Shelved
October 20, 2008
– Shelved as:
nonfiction
November 5, 2008
– Shelved as:
all-time-favorites-non-fiction
January 28, 2011
– Shelved as:
favorites
July 12, 2012
– Shelved as:
journalism
November 2, 2012
– Shelved as:
brain-candy
Comments Showing 1-50 of 51 (51 new)
message 1:
by
Tom LA
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Oct 09, 2015 02:38PM
Want to read!
reply
|
flag
From what I understand, Capote created a whole new genre by writing a non-fiction book that read like fiction story. Gripping.
I read this in high school. I liked it. I liked how Capote told the story more though.
Willie, I'm finally finished. This book was GREAT, with capital letters great. I'm so glad you think so too and I totally agree with you about the language. I love you <3
Will, agreed. In my review, I refer to it as The Great American Literary Work. Sensational! Btw, nice review!
I finished this a while back as part of a group read - it was the liveliest group discussion I've ever participated in! Capote triggered so many thoughts/feelings with his story and words and the controversy of how it was written. I love your analogy: I was reminded of some of the great panoramic art works of a bygone age . . . And indeed, he is an amazing writer.
A classic that defined a new genre - the non-fiction novel!
A classic that defined a new genre - the non-fiction novel!
Will wrote: "This is definitely top-notch book group fodder."
Amen! If you have not seen this NYer article from 2013, I think you will enjoy it. https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-...
Amen! If you have not seen this NYer article from 2013, I think you will enjoy it. https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-...
Sadly, there is good cause to find real-world sociopathy chilling. There is so much of it all around us.
Terrific review Will. I read this one many years ago and several times since then. Capote was weird, an alcoholic but totally a genius.
Thanks, Glenda. An odd character, for sure, but an amazing writer, and his issues with alcohol are certainly common enough great writers.
I remember reading this when it first came out (I was in high school), and the genre was called "non-fiction fiction." 40+ years later, I still get chills remember some of Capote's descriptive passages.
Kathy wrote: "I remember reading this when it first came out (I was in high school), and the genre was called "non-fiction fiction." 40+ years later, I still get chills remember some of Capote's descriptive pass..."
It defined a new category of writing
It defined a new category of writing
Wonderful review and captures my feelings exactly. The first time I read this I was astounded by how Capote could make something so beautiful out of something so tragic.
Thank you for your terrific review, Will.
I read this so long ago, before college, so probably in the late 1960s. I can't remember whether I read the book or saw the movie first, but both were excellent, each complementing the other. Now merged completely in my mind. Truly a masterpiece.
I read this so long ago, before college, so probably in the late 1960s. I can't remember whether I read the book or saw the movie first, but both were excellent, each complementing the other. Now merged completely in my mind. Truly a masterpiece.
Thank you, William. For me it was seeing the film first, and some years before I got around to reading the book. The film was very well done. The book gave birth to a whole new literary genre.
The film biopic Capote (2005) with Philip Seymour Hoffman, about the case and the writing of the book, was terrific, too. Catherine Keener plays a young Nelle Harper Lee as well, quite wonderfully.
Deborah wrote: "Many think it's the second best thing Harper Lee ever wrote."
And Christopher Marlowe wasn't really killed by his best friends. He fled to Italy and co-wrote with Shakespeare.
Right?
And Christopher Marlowe wasn't really killed by his best friends. He fled to Italy and co-wrote with Shakespeare.
Right?
William wrote: "Deborah wrote: "Many think it's the second best thing Harper Lee ever wrote."
And Philip Marlowe wasn't really killed by his best friends. He fled to Italy and co-wrote with Shakespeare.
Right?"
You don't seem to know the history of Lee and Capote during the writing of this book. She went to Kansas with him, did most of the in-depth interviews, (as people were put off by Capote), and she contributed over 150 pages of notes. Much of the writing smacks of her trademark cadence. I'm not sure why you felt a snarky comment was necessary but I'll ignore it and assume you didn't know this.
And Philip Marlowe wasn't really killed by his best friends. He fled to Italy and co-wrote with Shakespeare.
Right?"
You don't seem to know the history of Lee and Capote during the writing of this book. She went to Kansas with him, did most of the in-depth interviews, (as people were put off by Capote), and she contributed over 150 pages of notes. Much of the writing smacks of her trademark cadence. I'm not sure why you felt a snarky comment was necessary but I'll ignore it and assume you didn't know this.
Deborah wrote: "William wrote: "Deborah wrote: "Many think it's the second best thing Harper Lee ever wrote."
And Philip Marlowe wasn't really killed by his best friends. He fled to Italy and co-wrote with Shakes..."
Although I do believe she never completely forgave Capote for not acknowledging her contributions. He dedicated the book to her, and to his longtime partner. Lee and Capote remained friends, however.
And Philip Marlowe wasn't really killed by his best friends. He fled to Italy and co-wrote with Shakes..."
Although I do believe she never completely forgave Capote for not acknowledging her contributions. He dedicated the book to her, and to his longtime partner. Lee and Capote remained friends, however.
Thank you Will for your great review. I read this book in 1969 four years after it was published. Saw the movie too. I will never forget either. Hope to reread it some day and hope I can get through it without anxiety.