Mrs Nina Macfie's Reviews > The Case Against the Sexual Revolution: A New Guide to Sex in the 21st Century

The Case Against the Sexual Revolution by Louise Perry
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
U 50x66
's review

really liked it

I have deducted one star because this book is a bit repetitive in places, but it’s well-written, reasoned and thought-provoking. As the author says, it should be compulsory reading for young women. I’m somewhat younger than the likes of Germaine Greer, but it depresses me that so many years after those ground-breaking early feminists, women are still willing to view their lives through the prism of what men dictate they should do/feel/think. We’ve been sold a pup, ladies! And now, trans women (mainly those who either still are, or formerly were, men - let’s not forget) are attacking our very identity. When will we gain the confidence to say “er, no, I’m not buying this”? And actually mean it? I don’t hate men. I’m happily married to one. Like Louise Perry, I acknowledge there are real differences between the sexes, and always will be. But I refuse to believe that having XY chromosomes automatically entitles a male to be my master. I hope all who read this book arrive at the same conclusion because only then will we achieve true equality … and respect for each other as human beings.
26 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Case Against the Sexual Revolution.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
May 30, 2022 – Shelved
May 30, 2022 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Charismatic (new)

Charismatic The problem, to me anyways -- a boomer-age feminist -- is that everything I was taught and believed for almost 50 years is NOW considered totally wrong. Women's spaces? the uniqueness of our bodies and our sisterhood? all gone, in just a few years. Now even to say "woman" is to invite controversy, because "anyone who says they are a woman ... IS AN ACTUAL WOMAN" and if you object, you are trounced on the internet, social media, etc. as a "hateful transphobic bigot".

Title 9? gone in a flash, because not only can't we define who is and is not a woman... new legislation says we can't even ask or set any parameters. So after 45 years, that's dead and gone.

I'm not at all sure where this "Brave New World" is headed, and it deeply troubles me.


Mrs Nina Macfie Too true, Charismatic. Tolerance of “different” people is basically a good thing, but the trans bullies will never be satisfied with that. Never forget though, that trans people, for all the noise they make, form only about 0.18% of the population, and Stonewall is roundly denounced by such gay warriors as Peter Tatchell. Well I’m old enough not to worry that I’ll be hounded out of my job for my beliefs, so if anyone wants to argue the toss with me, I won’t be chickening out! A hefty dose of perspective and that old virtue - courtesy to others - wouldn’t come amiss from the shrieking mob either.


message 3: by Allison (new)

Allison Sylviadotter Trans women are never "formerly men," they're *always* men, humans cannot ever change sex. If you're born male, you die male.


back to top