Bradley's Reviews > Dune

Dune by Frank Herbert
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4213258
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: sci-fi, fanboy-goes-squee, worldbuilding-sf, space-opera, transhumanism, top-one-hundred, top-ten-w-cheats, 2023-shelf
Read 15 times. Last read May 4, 2023 to June 27, 2023.

Update 6/27/23

Re-read, number 15.

This time, I read it with my daughter. Sure, it might be a bit too soon for her, but she DID insist because we'll be seeing Dune part 2 later this year. And she happens to know that I'm a rabid uberfan with no mercy or remorse.

PLUS, I was able to read from my gorgeous new hardcover copy gifted to me by my best friend and that really does make all the difference, no?


Update 9/15/21

Re-read. Number 14.

I cannot get over how beautiful this book is. Still my favorite after all these years. It only gets better with every re-read.


Update 8/28/17

Re-read. Number 13. :) I cry when Paul meets Gurney. I shiver when Jessica consoles Chani. I'm awestruck by the peaks and troughs of time, free-will, and the weakness in Paul even as he heroically strives against the evil that is about to be unleashed upon the universe.

*sigh*

Perfection. Easily the number one book I've ever read. :)

I waver, sometimes, but right now, it is my absolute favorite. :)



Original Review:

This is a phenomenal classic of literature.

It's not just science fiction. It transcends science fiction, as a fascinating discussion of free-will versus inevitability. Can the Jihad be denied? Can Paul ever really avoid his own death, despite seeing every time-line play out with him as the butt of every cosmic joke? Can even cruelty or mercy even remain comprehensible after such knowledge?

Yes, I think this work outdoes Nietzsche. It certainly does a great job of making us care about the question.

Is this all? Is this just a work that pays great justice to philosophy of action and inaction?

Or is the novel merely a clever play at turning the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle into the physical embodiment of a man? It is that, of course. The Kwisatz Haderach can be many places at once, and he can be both alive and dead at the same time just like that certain cat.

Is the novel a coming of age tale, first set as a mirror against his father Leto, only then to mirror the whole universe that had just turned against him? Yes, of course. He was, after all, both the product of all his upbringing and his genes, embodying the question of nature versus nurture. He was taught within many schools of martial arts and assassins, as well as training the mind in both the schools of the Mentats with their pure logic and that of the mystics, the Bene Gesserit, that allows complete control over the body down to the cellular level. And if this training wasn't enough, he was deeply schooled in politics, leadership, and the meaning of loyalty. The boy was raised right. Of course, that is nothing without ninety generations of genetic bloodline tampering from the Bene Gesserit, right? To become the fulcrum between cellular memory, tapping the minds and lives of all your genetic ancestors as well as tapping the ability to fold time and space, to become the eye of a storm of time.

What a damn brilliant setup for one tiny character, no? His training links to the unlocking of his genes and to the life-extending and enveloping spice, Melange, to make him not merely aware of time in a theoretical sense, but eventually to be unable to discern what was in the past, the present, or the future. Here's a true Super-Man, well beyond Nietzsche.

And don't believe for one second that this serious discussion about what would make a superior man makes for dull reading. No. We've got PLOT that's probably some of the most exciting and visceral in all of literature, driving us right into the web of intrigue, vengeance, treachery, and galactic politics.

To quote the text, we've got "Plans within Plans," and it hardly stops there. We know the House Atreides is falling into a trap laid by the Emperor and House Harkonnen, and yet free-will and pride prevents any chance to avoid it. The setup is brilliant and extremely political, giving us character sketches of some of the most brilliant and memorable characters of all time.

Duke Leto, the Red Duke, the most honorable and beloved leader.
Duncan Idaho, the emotional and intuitive hero.
Gurney Halleck, archetypal loyalist and troubadour.
Lady Jessica, the woman who ought to have had all honor in life, but was unjustly reviled and set aside for political necessity. (Chani being both her mirror and her eventual glory.)

And of course, my favorite character of all time, Paul Muad'dib Atreides, the one that would prevent the greater evils he foresaw, and went to enormous lengths and sacrifice to achieve, but who eventually failed in his task because even a god cannot overcome destiny. (Or the will of so many minds set as one.)

So damn brilliant.

Frank Herbert spent five years writing this treasure, working and reworking it until he published it at age 25. None of his other works come close to this masterpiece, and there's little wonder. It was birthed, fully-formed, like Athena from Zeus's head, with enormous forethought and care.

The worldbuilding was just as carefully formed, from the ecology of Arrakis and the life-cycles of the sandworms, to the history and the creation of the Fremen from their mild beginnings as Zensunni Wanderers, adherents to the Orange Catholic Bible, to their history of oppression so like those of those who are Jewish, to their settling and hardening of their bodies and souls in the wastes of Arrakis, also just like the Jewish who carved out a place for themselves in Israel. (Current politics aside, this was a very potent idea before 1965 when Herbert wrote this, and indeed, the core is still just as powerful when you turn it back to Muslims.)

The Galactic culture is rich and detailed. The CHOAM economic consortium, with their monopoly on space travel and their need for the Spice to allow them to see a short period into the future to plot a safe course before folding space. The Empire is caught on a knife's edge between a single power and every other House who sit in the possibility of putting aside all their squabbles for the sole purpose of checking the Emperor, if they so desired. (And Duke Atreides was such a possible popular leader among all the Great Houses, which was the primary reason the Emperor wanted him dead.)

And of course, we have our Villains.

The Baron Harkonnen has always been a crowd pleaser. Brilliant in his own right, devious and able to corrupt anyone with just the right sorts of pressure, including a certain absolutely trustworthy doctor we might mention.

"The Tooth! The Tooth!" -- You can't handle the Tooth!

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen is especially interesting for the question of nature versus nurture.

The Bene Gesserit had intended him to mate with Paul, who should have been Leto and Jessica's daughter, and that offspring should have been the cumulation of ninety years of a breeding experiment to recreate the Kwisatz Haderach which had come about almost by accident during the Butlerian Jihad in the deep past, to overthrow the AI overlords.

He was practically Paul's genetic twin, or at least, his potential to be the "One who can be many places at once" was on par with Paul. But instead of fulfilling the kind of destiny that we get with Paul, we see him grow up under the auspices of his Uncle the Baron, becoming as cruel and devious as he was deadly. He was the argument of nurture in the conversation, of course, and having so very little of it eventually cost him his life.

I often wonder about the directions that Dune could have taken, all those little paths in time and circumstance that could have been. What if Feyd had been brought to Arrakis earlier and overwhelmed with Spice the way that Paul had? Sure, he wouldn't have been able to convert the unconscious changes into conscious manipulation, but he might have had enough glimpses of the future, the way that the Fremen did, to have given him the edge he would have needed to kill Paul.

And then there's a relatively minor character, Hasimir Fenring, the Emperor's personal assassin, who was nearly the Kwisatz Haderach, himself. Unable to breed true, he was still potent enough to be completely hidden to Paul's time-sight in the same way that Paul was hidden from the Spacing Guild's weaker time-sight. His training as a skilled killer was also superior to Paul. He was, by all the hints and tricks in the tale, Paul's perfect downfall. It always gives me shivers to think about, and it was only in a single instant of both recognition and pity from Paul that stayed Fenring from killing our hero. It was just a moment of whim.

The setup was gorgeous. Paul's pity, had it been missing at his moment of greatest triumph over the Emperor, would have meant Paul's assured death. I still wonder, to this day, what stayed Frank Herbert's hand from killing his most wonderful darling. We knew the pressure of religion and politics was going to have its way upon all the oppressed peoples of Dune. The return of a monstrous religious Jihad was going to happen one way or another, sweeping across the galaxy and toppling the Empire, regardless of Paul's frantic plans and desires. Paul's own death would only mean a higher level of fanaticism, and Frank Herbert's warning against unreasoning devotion would have been made even clearer with Paul's death.

Perhaps it was pity that stayed his hand. Who are we to say who lives and who dies?

If you really think this review is overlong, then I apologize, but please understand that I could absolutely go on and on much longer than this. It is a symptom of my devotion to this most brilliant of all tales.

And yes, it still holds up very, very well after twelve reads. I am quite shocked and amazed.
590 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Dune.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
Finished Reading
Finished Reading
Finished Reading
Finished Reading
Finished Reading
Finished Reading
Finished Reading
Finished Reading
Finished Reading
Finished Reading
March 25, 2013 – Shelved
March 27, 2013 – Shelved as: sci-fi
June 22, 2013 – Shelved as: fanboy-goes-squee
June 22, 2013 – Shelved as: worldbuilding-sf
June 22, 2013 – Shelved as: space-opera
June 22, 2013 – Shelved as: transhumanism
September 18, 2015 – Shelved as: top-one-hundred
September 28, 2015 – Shelved as: top-ten-w-cheats
September 30, 2015 – Started Reading
October 2, 2015 – Finished Reading
August 23, 2017 – Started Reading
August 28, 2017 – Finished Reading
September 15, 2021 – Started Reading
September 15, 2021 – Finished Reading
May 4, 2023 – Started Reading
May 4, 2023 – Shelved as: 2023-shelf
June 27, 2023 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 124 (124 new)


message 1: by Trish (new) - added it

Trish I've seen the trilog when I was a teenager and was fascinated by the universe created. But I only found out this was a book (and a good one) a couple of months ago. I hope to be able to read it soon!


Bradley A very good argument can be made that this is the pinnacle of all SF. It's absolutely not Everything that SF can do, but it has probably the most impact on all of fandom.

For example: I never read anything before I was 13. Dyslexia. Taught myself how to get around it. I started learning to love books through Horror. It was the bomb. Nothing would ever supplant my Love.

Then I watched some crappy movie on Fox in two parts and it was pretty epic for being so craptastic. I thought to myself, "Hey, if I was going to try reading something outside of my terror zone, I might try this. I kinda like the power vacuum set up here and how this kid got himself set up so sweet. He has real power, too. How did he do that with his voice?"

So I cracked the book. My first SF.

I was never the same. It was upon reading this book that I decided that reading was probably one of the best things ever. It not only cemented my fate with books, but it also made me a convert to SF by way of a REALLY HARD SELL.

It was like I had built this impervious mountain of gore around me and then someone came along with the grandmother of all sandworms to scatter me and my preferences to the bone-etching wind.

*sigh*

Can you believe I even got an English Degree because of this bad boy? It's not even considered a classic by any snobby mainstreamer or even a part of cannon in any classroom I've ever heard of, and yet I always placed it there. It's just genius. :)

Am I a fanboy? Um. Yes, and probably embarrassingly so. :)


message 3: by Trish (new) - added it

Trish *lol*
Thanks for this detailed insight and a heartfelt congratulations for overcoming dyslexia!
It's always fantastic when someone has such a bond with a book (or with several)!

I actually heard a lot of people say that this book was the mother of all SF so although it might not be on any reading list at any university, it seems to have made quite a name for itself. :)

Since I unfortunately come from a family of non-readers, I never had any bookish background, no legacy so to speak, nobody to give me recommendations or tell me about old goodies. Which is why I'm such a fan of GR and all you guys! Thanks to my best friend, I at least got to see good movies and some of those led me to great books. It sparked my curiosity. This friend also introduced me to classic children literature (he's half American so his family had read those books to him when he was little) and I'm still reading up on those.

So I'll definitely read this one (and think of young Brad). xD


Bradley lol *grin*

My dad never reads anything but engineering manuals and my mom doesn't travel outside of romanceland, so I do understand. I know it's not quite the same thing, but absolutely none of my tastes were informed there! GR is a great late addition to my education, but it is still late.

God, what I wouldn't have given for it back in the late eighties.


message 5: by Trish (new) - added it

Trish And I in the nineties!
Back then I had to rely on what I saw when we were in certain stores or what I got for my birthday (or school, later). Nevertheless, I got curious about certain subjects and at least my grandfather sponsored me. But I missed out on sooooo many things! If I think about all the great books I could already know ... *sigh*

I also feel the pang of envy whenever people post about their experiences when growing up in a bookish household or having wonderful libraries.

We can't change the past so we just have to make sure we miss as little as possible now. ;)


Bradley Very true. And it's never too late to read great books NOW. :) I'm still discovering that I may never plumb the depths of great literature. :)


message 7: by Trish (new) - added it

Trish *lol*
I try to dip my toe into every literary water. Sometimes I get sucked in and dive in a particular genre for quite a while before resurfacing and going somewhere else. Sometimes I dip my toe and hate it so I move on very quickly.
*sigh*
So many books, so little time! xD


Sean Barrs twelve reads? Damn you must love this- nice review :)


Bradley Oh yes, I do indeed love this book. Ever since I was 14, I read it once a year until the eleventh, then I discovered that I could practically quote every single passage in the damn novel, so just reviewed it in my head until last year when I challenged myself to see if my memory was still correct. And it was. :) But who could be surprised at that point? lol

And thanks! :)


message 10: by Javi (new)

Javi wow...twelve reads, impressive. That's almost as many times as I've read The Catcher in the Rye. I know they have nothing to do with each other, but Salinger, just like Herbert in your case, kept calling out to me as I grew up and everytime I read the book I found different things I could relate to and nuances I had missed. I think I could also quote it if I wanted to.

That said, awesome review and I have to admit that, having studied philosophy, Dune might very well be up my alley so I will give it a try. I can assure that my review will not do it justice, but I'll try :)


message 11: by Javi (new)

Javi Brad wrote: "A very good argument can be made that this is the pinnacle of all SF. It's absolutely not Everything that SF can do, but it has probably the most impact on all of fandom.

For example: I never read..."


Whaaaaat? You were dyslexic? And you overcame it on your own? Wow, just when I thought you couldn't impress me anymore...see, you *really* are Super Brad!!!! :)) No wonder the book resonates so much with you.

Well done, man!


Bradley Heh don't worry, my review didn't, either. Btw, loved The Catcher in the Rye, too, but I think I loved Raise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters & Seymour: An Introduction slightly more. That was one hell of a family. ;)


Bradley Came really close to quitting school, too. I always wonder about others.

In the end, thought it's all crap. The anger, the depression, the confusion. It's not like any of us go through anything different, right? Dyslexia or no, we all need to find our balance, our bliss. :)


Melissa ♥ Dog/Wolf Lover ♥ Martin If only I could write a review as good as yours hon :-)


message 15: by Lyn (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lyn Love this review, I need to reread as well


Bradley So good. :)


Petrik Brad, I've been wondering, is Dune actually a standalone or not? I've heard from my friends it's an amazing sci-fi but the rest of the series sucks, which made me kinda reluctant to read.. :/


Bradley The first is quite good as a standalone and can be treated as such without any loss.

However, the second and third books follow soon after the events of the first even if they aren't quite the sublime quality of the first book. They *ARE* good SF. All six are really quite good, in fact, but when you compare them to this penultimate masterpiece, they fail.

If they were written by someone else and had no need to live up to such a standard, they'd be hailed as pretty fantastic works. The world-building is great, the ideas threaded throughout them are fantastic, and the characters are gorgeous and go through so many changes. Literally.

But they don't shine with the same brilliance as the first, and so people say they suck. Even I said that, once upon a time, and it took decades before I tried them again, trying to read them with a clear eye.

I'm glad I did. I really enjoyed them. :) They're dense with great ideas and some really shocking awesomeness if you're patient. :)


Petrik Brad wrote: "The first is quite good as a standalone and can be treated as such without any loss.

However, the second and third books follow soon after the events of the first even if they aren't quite the sub..."


Thank you so much for the awesome insights Brad! I'll get to the first book and see what I think about it first! :)


message 20: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Great review, Brad!


vonblubba Talking about being a fanboy, I bought the illustrated edition by folio society. Had to sell a kidney, but the illustrations are astounding. The definitive edition, IMHO.


message 22: by Trish (new) - added it

Trish vonblubba wrote: "Talking about being a fanboy, I bought the illustrated edition by folio society. Had to sell a kidney, but the illustrations are astounding. The definitive edition, IMHO."

I have the same one and agree: it's worth at least a kidney. ;)


Bradley *cry*

I already sold mine.


message 24: by Trish (new) - added it

Trish Brad wrote: "*cry*

I already sold mine."


That was a mistake, buddy. ;P


message 25: by Kubi (new) - added it

Kubi <3


message 26: by Stefanie (new) - added it

Stefanie MagMag I have never read this book before (or seen the movie) and I see there is a remake coming out starring Jason Momoa and Javier Bardem.
My question is...if I read it now will it still hold up? I see you have read it 13 times so my guess is EFF YES but wanted to hear your thoughts.


Bradley LOL, yeah, well, the novel is just as good today as it was back in the day. It has staying power. :) Ecology, jihad, prescience, epic family vendetta, and amazing worldbuilding. :)

I have no idea if the new movie will be good but the director has come out with some great films already so I have very high hopes.


message 28: by Stefanie (new) - added it

Stefanie MagMag Ok awesome! I was pretty positive that would be your answer...but wanted to hear your thoughts beforehand. I love that it still holds up!
Thanks! 👍🏻


Bradley I kinda wanted to re-read it AGAIN this year but I think I'll postpone it till right before the movie comes out.

SO EXCITED.


Grace Same, I'm planning my re-read to be just before the movie debut...Can't wait!


Bradley :) :)


Adrian Bradley wrote: "I kinda wanted to re-read it AGAIN this year but I think I'll postpone it till right before the movie comes out.

SO EXCITED."


And me, I think I've read it around 8 times over the (last 40 years) years and it is probably in my top 5 novels of all time (with LotR). I agree with you that the rest are still good but as you say, just not as truly stupendous as the original.
I remember my mother asking me why Sting was running around in silver underpants, and I also remember the fact that Patrick Stewart had no idea who Sting was on set, and thought he played "Double Bass" in a "police marching band" *lol


Bradley Quick question tho: if it's one of your top 5 novels of all time, why do you only give it a 4 star? lol

If anything, this one should always hit the 5 star category. :)


Nikki Fantastic review - Dune is definitely my favourite sci-fi novel of all time. I also love the prequels written by Herbert's nephew and his writing partner - their style is not Frank Herbert's but they manage to create a series of books that are hugely enjoyable in their own right.


Bradley I have to agree with you on all points. :)


Marco G omg this was a fantastic review. Thank you!


Bradley Thanks!


Ivana Books Are Magic If there is a book that deserves 12 rereads, it's this one. A masterpiece of science fiction for sure.


Bradley No doubt. :)


Ivana Books Are Magic :)


message 41: by Selena (new)

Selena Great review Bradley! I love how passionate you are about this book and the joy it has brought you more than one time. Wonderful!!!!


message 42: by Travis (new) - added it

Travis Williams I love sci-fi and claim to be fairly well read but have not picked up Dune. I can’t figure out why. I own 3 different copies. It’s bizarre. Maybe David Lynch put a bad seed in my mind? But then again I adore Twin Peaks. Maybe I’ve seen one to many reviews claiming it’s dated and slow?? Who knows. I do know that I’ve never been lead astray by one of your reviews so perhaps it’s time to just do it! I figure if I can read all four Hyperion novels back to back I should be able to manage Dune. Now… since I’ve waited this long, before or after the upcoming film??? Always some excuse.


message 43: by Trish (new) - added it

Trish I'll be finishing the re-read today - can't wait to see the movie. *squeals*


Bradley I think the people saying it's outdated are just trying to find something to pick on. The book is universal. I wouldn't be surprised if it remains at the top for many more generations, hundreds of years down the line. It's tight.

Judging a book by a movie is never the right way to go. Even judging Lord of the Rings by the films is wrong. Certain books have immense depth and complexity and forethought, like Dune or LotR, so even if they have the most brilliant movie ever, it still never really does more than scratch the surface.

I happen to be a Lynch fan, but even after re-watching the '84 movie, I can't help but make fun of it. The mini-series was meh. The reason ppl want it done right is because it was never done right.


message 45: by Trish (last edited Sep 16, 2021 05:47AM) (new) - added it

Trish The newest review was calling Villeneuve's adaptation "too complicated". Bwahahahahaha! Most audiences are too lazy/dumb to understand it, they mean. Fuck them, I'll see for myself tomorrow.


Bradley *crosses fingers*


Sud666 "The newest review was calling Villeneuve's adaptation "too complicated". Bwahahahahaha! Most audiences are too lazy/dumb to understand it, they mean. Fuck them, I'll see for myself tomorrow."

Ahh yes..the "intelligence" of the herd....
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/co...

Gee..I guess most people ARE borderline half-wits. That DOES explain a lot.


Bradley Literally, half the population is. lol It's all relative. That's what's funny about those scales.

Of course, if we added the entire ape world on the same scale, at least we'd have a really interesting distribution. :)


Sud666 Bradley wrote: "Literally, half the population is. lol It's all relative. That's what's funny about those scales.

Of course, if we added the entire ape world on the same scale, at least we'd have a really intere..."


"It's all relative. "
um no actually it's not. Most people aren't terribly bright at all, no matter what their parents say. The vast majority are some sort of fool, a few are absolutle cretins and a few, handful, are capable of higher order thought..which is not parroting Facebook or Tweets. Where are you finding all these supposedly smart people?


message 50: by Trish (new) - added it

Trish Most parents will be the firsts to tell you their children are imbeciles - at least where I come from. *snickers*


« previous 1 3
back to top