Russell's Reviews > Cryptonomicon

Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
544124
's review

liked it

** spoiler alert ** Arrgh! I don't remember a book that I both liked and didn't like this much!

Alright, a quick intro snipped from Amazon:

"Cryptonomicon zooms all over the world, careening conspiratorially back and forth between two time periods--World War II and the present. Our 1940s heroes are the brilliant mathematician Lawrence Waterhouse, cryptanalyst extraordinaire, and gung ho, morphine-addicted marine Bobby Shaftoe. They're part of Detachment 2702, an Allied group trying to break Axis communication codes while simultaneously preventing the enemy from figuring out that their codes have been broken. Their job boils down to layer upon layer of deception. Dr. Alan Turing is also a member of 2702, and he explains the unit's strange workings to Waterhouse. "When we want to sink a convoy, we send out an observation plane first.... Of course, to observe is not its real duty--we already know exactly where the convoy is. Its real duty is to be observed.... Then, when we come round and sink them, the Germans will not find it suspicious."

All of this secrecy resonates in the present-day story line, in which the grandchildren of the WWII heroes--inimitable programming geek Randy Waterhouse and the lovely and powerful Amy Shaftoe--team up to help create an offshore data haven in Southeast Asia and maybe uncover some gold once destined for Nazi coffers. To top off the paranoiac tone of the book, the mysterious Enoch Root, key member of Detachment 2702 and the Societas Eruditorum, pops up with an unbreakable encryption scheme left over from WWII to befuddle the 1990s protagonists with conspiratorial ties. "

Whew!

Stephenson takes 918 pages to spin his yarn and in the end I enjoyed most of the ride but I wondered what was the point. After 918 pages, that's not a good thing.

Pros:
1) It's a long book. If you like to settle down to a long book, this will do.
2) There is a strong pro-libertarian theme running throughout.
3) Some of his writing is quite good, entertaining, thoughtful, fun, thought provoking, well done.
4) He puts out some ideas that are really sharp. His discussion on Athena between Root and Randy got my little hamster wheels turning inside my head. He does this a few times.
5) Math. Not much but he uses actual math. And it fits with the story.
6) Cryptography. He uses actual cryptography and it also fits with the story.


Cons:
1) It's a freaking long book. If you like your books to be in the 200 - 300 page range, give this one a pass.
2) It just... ends. All the characters suddenly lose all the depth and charm Stephenson had imbued them with and it just stops. I think he should embarrassed that 900 pages weren't enough to end this in a satisfactory manner.
3) Was there a character not obsessed with sex? No? Right, right, I come from a Puritan background where I was beaten for having impure thoughts, but still, sex was a constant theme for just about every single character. It got really tiresome.
4) Potty mouths. The lot of them.
5) Sometimes his writing just sucked. Flat out bad. I wondered if he eschewed an editor.
6) Bobby Shaftoe's death. At the start of the scene where he dies, I thought "This would be the worst possible place to have him die after all the crap he went through" and, of course, he dies. Lamely.

So do I recommend this book? No, not really. It has some stellar moments, mired in dross. If you still want to read it, well, caveat lector.
33 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Cryptonomicon.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
August 1, 2007 – Finished Reading
October 16, 2007 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-13 of 13 (13 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Jason Quinn Tying together the families of the characters seemed forced and the ending felt as if the author had written himself into a corner. There's a lot of cool insight into the world of crypto, but the story could have been much more interesting.


Michael "Arrgh! I don't remember a book that I both liked and didn't like this much!"

My sentiments, exactly.


Jackmccullough Characters not obsessed by sex in Cryptonomicon:
Bobbie Shaftoe
Doug Shaftoe
America Shaftoe
Enoch Root
Alan Turing
Lawrence Waterhouse
Rudy Hacklheber
Bisschoff
Douglas McArthur
Goto Dengo
Avi
Andrew Loeb
The Dentist

Need I go on?


Russell Thanks for the list of characters, Jack, but I'm pretty sure you knew that I was being a tad facetious and used a bit of hyperbole for effect.


Jackmccullough Sure, but I really didn't think there was a single character who was obsessed with sex. Randy demonstrated an interest in sex, but I really didn't see an undue interest from any character. Thus, in my view you were exaggerating something that really wasn't part of the book.


Russell Fair enough, clearly I disagree. I'm reaching back in my memory since I read this about 3 years ago, but Waterhouse, for example, couldn't function without frequent sex. Also, wasn't there a multiple page internal dialogue about a stocking fetish followed by the same fellow realizing his wife could only get things going on while on top of old furniture? And Randy, well, was randy.

Enough of those types of scenes left enough of an impression that I did not care for, and expressed it in my review.

Seeing how my opinion has somehow failed to live up to your expectations, I wish you the best in luck in finding whatever you are searching for.

And I leave you with this: xkcd: Duty Calls. May it bring at least a small smile to you, or to whomever comes across it.


message 7: by Eric (new)

Eric aaarrrgggg spoilers!


Russell My apologies! I thought I had marked the review as containing spoilers, but I had not. Fixed.


Charles "Show some Fucken (sic) adaptability!" Shaftoe


Scribal Really agree with all points of your review (except I might have put the Libertarian streak in the con category!). As far as the sex goes goes, It bothered me no end because although it's not most of the characters, it is the Waterhouses who get most of the narrative pages. When the narrative vector takes constant page long dives into whether or not someone has ejaculated recently and what it would take to make them ejaculate....it's a significant time investment for the reader. And this reader got very weary of it.


Russell Thanks for the comment, Scribal. I was weary of that aspect as well.


message 12: by Kitap (new) - added it

Kitap "It just... ends."

Thanks for saving me the time and trouble of reading this book with that one phrase. I've wasted time on two of Stephenson's books and been disappointed by his inability to give them meaningful conclusions. I probably won't read this one, unless I am really desperate.


Russell Thom, if you need to kill time, this book is a better way than, for example, just watching paint dry, but the ending was weak. A bunch of great ideas, mixed with uneven writing, and a poor ending. Meh.


back to top