SOTI, Chris Cypert talks approvingly about revolvers as self-defense weapons:
I set out to learn all I could about revolvers, their strengths and weaknesses, and how to use them effectively for self-defense. Did I learn that revolvers are obsolete relics of the previous century? That’s what I expected, but instead I learned that revolvers are still more than sufficient for self-defense and can even be the optimal tool in certain contexts. Let’s examine the strengths of revolvers for armed citizens and self-defense.
And then he goes on to list all of them.
As most Readers know, I keep a S&W Mod 65 next to the bed — my “bedside” gun — because in any kind of bad situation, a revolver is like a fork: you pick it up, and it works.
No scrabbling for a safety, no racking of a slide, none of that. You get it in your hand and pull the trigger… bang! and it’s all over. (Okay, bang! bang! bang! etc. as the need arises.)
It’s that instinctive action that makes me do the above. Gawd knows that I have practiced for countless hours with my 1911, and its operation is by now about as automatic and instinctive as I could possibly get it. And it’s the reason I keep it under the revolver… as a backup, because I do believe that by the time I’ve emptied the Model 65’s cylinder, I’ll be awake enough to grab and operate my 1911 (which is always kept cocked and locked anyway), should I need more than six shots.
This is my way, and if yours is different, that’s fine — whatever works for you, works for you.
But just as Cypert learned about the excellence of the revolver as a self-defense piece, maybe my argument will help you, and perhaps at a time of the direst emergency.
Think about it.