How can you identify gaps in research literature with physicians?

1 Define your topic

The first step is to define your topic of interest and the scope of your research question. You can use the PICO framework to specify the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome of your topic. For example, you might want to compare the effectiveness of two types of pain management for elderly patients with osteoarthritis. You should also consider the context, setting, and timeframe of your topic. You can consult with physicians to refine your topic and align it with their clinical needs and priorities.

2 Search the literature

The second step is to search the literature for relevant studies that address your topic. You can use databases, journals, websites, and other sources that provide access to high-quality and up-to-date research. You can also use keywords, filters, and advanced search options to narrow down your results. You should keep track of your search strategy and the sources you use. You can ask physicians for recommendations on where to find the most reliable and relevant literature for your topic.

3 Evaluate the literature

The third step is to evaluate the literature for its quality, validity, and relevance. You can use critical appraisal tools and checklists to assess the methodology, results, and implications of each study. You should also compare and contrast the findings and conclusions of different studies. You should look for strengths and weaknesses, similarities and differences, and consistencies and inconsistencies in the literature. You can discuss with physicians how the literature relates to their clinical practice and experience.

4 Identify the gaps

The fourth step is to identify the gaps in the literature based on your evaluation. A gap can be a lack of evidence, a contradiction, a limitation, a controversy, or a new direction for research. You should look for questions that have not been answered, problems that have not been solved, or areas that have not been explored by the existing literature. You should also consider the implications and significance of the gaps for your topic and your practice. You can brainstorm with physicians to generate possible research questions that address the gaps.

5 Fill the gaps

The fifth step is to fill the gaps in the literature by conducting your own research or applying the existing evidence to your practice. Depending on your resources, time, and expertise, you can design and implement a research project that aims to answer your research question and fill the gap. You can also use the existing evidence to inform your decision making, improve your practice, or change your behavior. You should involve physicians in your research or practice process and share your findings and outcomes with them.

6 Review the literature

The sixth step is to review the literature periodically to keep up with the latest developments and trends in your topic. Research is an ongoing process that constantly produces new knowledge and evidence. You should monitor the literature for new studies, reviews, guidelines, and recommendations that might affect your topic and your practice. You should also update your research question and your search strategy accordingly. You should communicate with physicians regularly to exchange feedback and insights on the literature.

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?