Beazy’s Post

AI seems to be facing a slow-motion crisis. Whether it’s Gemini’s weirdness, or the increasing restrictions being placed on ChatGPT, there’s a broadening credibility gap. This credibility gap isn’t an aspect of the tech - it’s a reflection of creators that are addicted to the power and profit of central control. Whether it’s the web, social media, AI, or any other information collector - that credibility gap will settle in so long as the builders and operators of the tech don’t grow past this. We’ve seen this vividly across all our channels. It’s not about the particular beliefs of individual operators (be it Jack Dorsey or Elon Musk) - it’s about not trying to make peoples’ information consumption decisions for them. Hopefully this crisis will bring us more quickly off the AI hype mountain. Getting beyond cheap entertainment or novelty, and on to the plateau of usefulness will require freeing the tech and more importantly freeing its users to decide how they want to use it.

The global buzz around ChatGPT is undeniable, but how can it affect your business? Follow the link below for more on the capabilities of ChatGPT, the data privacy risks involved and how business owners can protect their confidential information. Please feel free to like, comment, or share this post with your friends and colleagues! Discover more: https://bit.ly/3za5bI0 #AI #DataPrivacy #Business #Tech #Innovation #RLBusiness

Multiple major AI providers, including OpenAI's ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Perplexity, experienced outages simultaneously, raising concerns about over-reliance on central systems. These outages, lasting several hours, disrupted services for users globally and prompted speculation about broader infrastructure issues or internet-scale problems. The inability to access AI services during these outages highlights the potential risks associated with centralizing AI systems, including issues of control, privacy, and resilience. Additionally, the lack of immediate responses from the AI providers underscores the need for transparency and accountability in managing such disruptions. These incidents coincide with other online disruptions, such as a zero-day spam attack on TikTok, highlighting the fragility of digital ecosystems. #aiforall #digitaltransparency #noncentral

CHATGPT UPDATE💥 This one is centred around privacy. I highly suggest this for teams and brokerages! Questions? Comment or DM me the word “partner” and lets talk about how we can implement AI into your business Safely! #aispeaker #aiexpert #aiforrealtors #aiconsulting #chatgptforbusiness

"Exciting yet alarming news: Gemini AI set to power every Google product and YouTube! 🚀 As AI continues to revolutionize tech, the implications raise crucial questions about privacy, ethics, and user experience. #AI #Google #YouTube #TechEthics #PrivacyConcerns #FutureTech"

If my photos and videos posted on social media are used to create new content by others using my voice or image, what's the legality? Let's face it, our digital personas are becoming valuable commodities, often exploited without our knowledge or consent. Should social media platforms implement default language that explicitly prohibits the use of our content without our explicit consent? Think about it: Your likeness, your voice, your moments – all being repurposed, often for profit or manipulation. Where's the line between inspiration and infringement? Shouldn't we have ironclad protections that safeguard our digital identities? What are your thoughts? Should platforms be held accountable for enabling unauthorized use, or is it on us to guard our digital footprints vigilantly? #AI #GenAI

Scarlett Johansson vs. AI "Move fast and break things"  a motto once emblematic of Silicon Valley's relentless ambition. But this week, it's brought to light a pressing issue: the clash between Scarlett Johansson and OpenAI. Johansson has accused OpenAI of using her voice likeness for its new ChatGPT product without her consent, despite explicit refusals from her and her agent. OpenAI denies any intentional imitation, but the incident has sparked a broader debate on ethical practices in tech. Scarlett Johansson found her unmistakable voice being used to personify an AI product, a move she never authorized. This highlights not just a breach of personal rights but also underscores the potential for AI to mimic human aspects so convincingly that it blurs the line between real and artificial. Why does this even matter to a common person like you and me? This situation is a stark reminder of Silicon Valley's sometimes reckless pursuit of innovation at the expense of ethical considerations. The creative industries are particularly vulnerable, where AI's ability to duplicate human attributes could lead to both economic and ethical dilemmas. This isn't just about a celebrity's voice; it's about how rapidly evolving technologies are outpacing our current ethical frameworks and regulations. It raises critical questions about copyright, consent, and the moral use of technology in fields beyond just entertainment. As technology continues to advance, the need for robust ethical standards and stronger accountability measures becomes increasingly urgent. The tech industry must balance innovation with responsibility, ensuring that advancements enhance society without compromising individual rights. We all agree that the rapid growth of tech cannot be stopped, but there are many questions left unanswered. Until new official laws and industry ethics are established, it is our duty to raise our voices or at least spread awareness. Social media is going to play a huge role in controlling AI! #ScarlettJohansson #AIethics #TechResponsibility #DigitalConsent #AIregulation #VoiceRights #InnovationVsEthics #FutureOfTech #OpenAI

There's a really dark side to LLMs and content moderation that big tech companies don't want you to know about. As someone who uses AI tools daily, I'm doing my best to educate myself and learn from thoughtful humans like Britney Muller who are on a mission to support a considered approach to the future of LLMs. I watched “Cleaners”, a documentary about the people who have to look at the most gruesome and awful content to label them so they never make it into social platforms. The best known AI company used Kenyan workers at less than $2/h to make their model less toxic. I asked Britney on Humans of Martech, what steps can the tech industry take to ethically manage and support content moderators who are exposed to harmful material? Should there be an industry-wide standard for the treatment and support of content moderators?

Forbes contributor Rob Toews wrote a fascinating Article titles “5 AI Predictions for the year 2030” Here is the Technology Narrative Group reaction to that. On that topic, did you know that when your staff start to experiment with ChatGPT they could accidentally create privacy and compliance issues.  Technology Narrative Group group has partnered up with PrivateAI as your line of defense against any issues. You can’t afford to ignore AI so make sure to protect yourself. Reach out to info@Narrative.group to schedule a demo today with the subject "Private AI Demo" #GenAI #AI #futurist #tech #Innovation #predictions #GenAI

From a newsletter yesterday, in the same issue: AI to Enable a One-Person Billion Dollar Company and ChatGPT goes temporarily “insane” with unexpected outputs, spooking users The irony obviously eluded the editor. The one-billion one-person company refers to a bet among Sam Altman's tech CEO friends about when the first such company occurs, not if. According to Altman, the 10-person one-billion company is just around the corner. This reminds me of a fad that occurred in the eighties, which claimed that the management of multinational corporations could be outsourced to part-time CEOs, or in modern jargon "fractional" CEOs. It took hold of such business luminaries as the Saatchi advertising brothers. No prize for guessing where this idea went. It seems the AI hype machine is itself going bonkers. But when a venture needs to make bigger and bigger promises and throw bigger and bigger numbers around to keep people interested (see Altman's 7 trillion dollar investment ask), that suggests desperation and a fundamentally flawed concept to me.