Christian Rutzerโ€™s Post

View profile for Christian Rutzer, graphic

Deputy Head CIEB University of Basel - Analyzing the Swiss innovation landscape

๐’๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ณ๐ž๐ซ๐ฅ๐š๐ง๐, ๐Š๐ž๐ž๐ฉ ๐˜๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ฏ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐‹๐ž๐š๐: ๐๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ž ๐’๐œ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐…๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ! In response to recent plans to reduce federal funding for science in Switzerland, the CIEB Universitรคt Basel has launched the miniseries ๐ˆ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐’๐œ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ฏ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. The series aimed to highlight the critical role that scientific research plays for innovations. ย  Here are the key takeaways from our miniseries: 1.ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย A growing number of innovations are based on ideas from science. 2.ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย Ideas from science are important in all fields of technology. 3.ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย Science-based innovations have higher impact. 4.ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย Regional disparities in translating science into high-impact innovations. ย  ๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ž๐š๐ง ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐’๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ณ๐ž๐ซ๐ฅ๐š๐ง๐ ๐š๐ฌ ๐š๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ฏ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฅ๐ž๐š๐๐ž๐ซ? The results show that science is not only about discovering new concepts and phenomena, but also serves as a foundation for high-impact innovations that drive economies forward. Strong support for scientific research is therefore essential for Switzerland to maintain its position as a global leader in innovation. So, Switzerland should think twice before cutting science funding! #importance_of_science_for_innovation #Innovation #Science #Switzerland Dragan Filimonovic

  • No alternative text description for this image
Michele Salvi

Wirtschaftspolitik fรผr eine bessere Zukunft

1mo

I firmly believe in the role of science in driving innovation. However, the idea that there's no room for spending cuts in federal education and science budgets - despite their real growth of over 2% annually for the last 20 years, outpacing many other spending areas - is debatable 1๏ธโƒฃ Areas that have shown significant growth often present opportunities for efficiency gains. This holds also for science. Partially, as there is also governmental funding in infrastructure and buildings. 2๏ธโƒฃSupporting academic freedom is vital, yet the discussion around certain questionable projects suggests that there is room for prioritization when the aim is fostering innovation. We must remember that this involves taxpayer money. While politics should not dictate academic inquiries, a degree of accountability is necessary. 3๏ธโƒฃRelatedly, the effect of public science on innovation is an important area of research. The notion that more public research is automatically better is questionable: https://www.nber.org/papers/w31899 4๏ธโƒฃ... When debating science funding, it's crucial to consider various perspectives and ensure spending efficiency without hindering innovation. I am convinced that moderate spending cuts are worth discussing.

Markus Bisang

First Principles Thinking | Customer Value | Disruptive Digital Products for the Future | Digital Transformation | exCanon, exHP, exEFI

1mo

A few days ago, I was wondering how countries became successful in the past. And got the following via an AI. So you could deduce that countries became successful mainly with new ideas or approaches and thus research. So I don't really understand the move by our government. Here is a small excerpt from my research for those who are interested: Venice (13th-15th century): Advanced shipbuilding technology Innovative trade and financial systems Florence (14th-16th century): Development of banking and accounting Advances in architecture and engineering Netherlands (17th century): Advanced windmill technology Innovations in shipbuilding and navigation England (18th-19th century): Industrial revolution (steam engine, mechanical looms) Railroad technology USA (19th-20th century): Mass production and assembly line work Electrification and telecommunications Germany (late 19th - early 20th century): Chemical and pharmaceutical industry Precision engineering and optics 1/2

Dragan Filimonovic

Research Associate at CIEB Universitรคt Basel

1mo

This is a very important message, Christian Rutzer! Just to give some context to what exactly we were referring to: "The education, research and innovation (ERI) sector is facing a financial squeeze: according to the Federal Council's plans, fewer financial resources will be invested in the ERI sector in 2025 than in the current year 2024. [...] This will limit future-relevant investments in education, research and innovation." (SNSF, 22.04.2024)

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics