Chris Ash’s Post

Often, the survivors whose stories best fit the mainstream narrative, or whose stories are the most sensational, are the ones invited to share their stories. When this kind of echo chamber is reinforced, we lose access to the stories that might better inform our work to end trafficking. Who gets left out? Survivors who were trafficked by parents or other family members, survivors of forced criminality, survivors who don't regret having done sex work or felt like it saved their lives, those who were trafficked by government officials, and more. When we only hear the same stories over and over, we create incomplete or even harmful "solutions" and miss opportunities to have a meaningful impact. The survivors interviewed in this story largely agreed that education about trafficking was a primary motivator for their storytelling, but education to DISRUPT rather than expand on mainstream narratives. View my full report, as well as other insightful reports from my project colleagues, at https://lnkd.in/eTKvq2WM. #SurvivorLeadership #MeaningfulEngagement #LivedExperience

  • "Almost all interviewees noted that a key purpose [of survivor storytelling] would be to disrupt narratives about how trafficking happens and challenge stereotypes regarding who is involved in trafficking" -Whose story, whose benefit? Returning (to) the power of authentic narrative

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics