Clarigent Health’s Post

View organization page for Clarigent Health, graphic

1,686 followers

A post from our founder and leader. We recognize the need to replace the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Every day, we strive to develop better tools and support our partners in their efforts to do the same. This work is crucial to advancing our mission of suicide prevention. https://lnkd.in/geBTiapE #mentalhealth #mentalhealthawareness #mentalhealthmatters #suicideprevention #depression #anxiety #suicide #suicideawarness #ptsd #mentalillness #suicideawareness #endthestigma #youarenotalone #trauma #mentalhealthrecovery

View profile for Don Wright, graphic

Suicide Prevention Leader | CEO Clarigent Health | Formerly Founder at Assurex Health

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a widely used tool for assessing suicidal ideation and behavior. However, like any clinical tool, it has limitations and does not work effectively in all situations or with all individuals. It was NEVER intended to be used as a clinical tool but was instead created to be used in clinical trials to document participants that may be suicidal. The C-SSRS has been shown in peer reviewed journals to at best be accurate 50% of the time when used by a suicide prevention trained mental health professional. 1. Interviewer Skill and Training: The effectiveness of the C-SSRS depends heavily on the skill and training of the person administering it. Inadequate training or experience leads to inaccurate assessments. 2. Patient Honesty and Willingness to Disclose: The accuracy of the C-SSRS relies on the honesty and openness of the individual being assessed. If a person is not willing to disclose their true feelings or behaviors, the results will not be accurate. 3. Cultural and Language Barriers: Cultural differences and language barriers can affect the understanding and interpretation of the questions, leading to inaccurate assessments. 4. Variability in Interpretation: Different clinicians interpret responses differently, leading to variability in the assessment outcomes. 5. Complexity of Suicidal Behavior: Suicidal ideation and behavior are complex and multifaceted. A standardized tool like the C-SSRS does not capture all the nuances of an individual’s mental state and risk factors. 6. Lack of Follow-Up: The C-SSRS is a point-in-time assessment. Without adequate follow-up, changes in a person's mental state will not be detected, leading to missed opportunities for intervention. 7. Context-Specific Limitations: The C-SSRS is not suitable for all settings or populations. For instance, it is not as effective in non-clinical settings or with individuals who have certain cognitive impairments. We must stop using antiquated tools that have been used only because "we don't have anything better" and start using technology to provide the information necessary to inform professionals and help them to stop the growing tragedy of suicide in our society. Visit Clarigent Health (https://lnkd.in/gKm_9bkJ) to see how we can do better together. #mentalhealth #mentalhealthawareness #mentalhealthmatters #suicideprevention #depression #anxiety #suicide #suicideawarness #ptsd #mentalillness #suicideawareness #endthestigma #youarenotalone #trauma #mentalhealthrecovery https://lnkd.in/gjSRitxk

A Key Tool for Suicide Prevention Isn’t Working. What Would It Take to Get Something Better?

A Key Tool for Suicide Prevention Isn’t Working. What Would It Take to Get Something Better?

slate.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics