David Alspaugh’s Post

View profile for David Alspaugh, graphic

CTO & Co-Founder of Inductive Robotics ⎸Ex-Amazon | All-in on Sustainable Ventures Only

Great perspective below. Fast charging serves a specific need for highway applications. It is NOT a viable solution for how most of us use transportation. This is a GOOD thing. Specific trips to charge your vehicle is a “gas station” mentality when in reality, EVs offer a better solution. Charging while at home, at work and on the go means no specific trips to fill your car. And it can be done with cheaper and easier Level 2 electronics that save everyone money and reduce stress on EV batteries. Inductive Robotics is working on this future.

View profile for Brendan Wallace, graphic
Brendan Wallace Brendan Wallace is an Influencer

CEO & CIO at Fifth Wall

Tesla slashing its Supercharger business is a massive momentum swing for the real estate industry's tug-of-war with the gas station industry. Tesla's Supercharger network suffered from a "functional fixedness" for the old way of doing things -- the gas station mindset. Gas stations are something you go to. They are something out in the world, along the way. It's a stop. Today, 80% of EV charging happens at home. Why not!? It's more convenient. Passive charging is the future, and it's an opportunity for the real estate industry to literally become the gas station industry for personal vehicles. For the charging that does not happen at home + fleet charging, Tesla's exit leaves space for non-Tesla developments...another real estate opportunity. #EVs

  • No alternative text description for this image

So what happens to those not living in a home and do not have direct access to an exclusive charger? Say people living in an apartment complex where there is only a limited amount of chargers. I agree with the gas station mentality comment because EVs do open other possibilities. We are working on a solution for those who will not have access to a dedicate home charger. And fast chargers will need to play a role.

Like
Reply
Tyler Rodgers

Sr. Program Manager of Pharmacy Automation at Amazon

3mo

This is false on two accounts. The original story states that "80% of EV charging [is done] at home" which can be directly tied to the reasoning that there aren't enough stations in mass transit areas. Then use this as a sales spin when trying to push a narrative.  The second spin is by Level 2; this is also false. Dovetailing into an already false first narrative - this is buying into the same "at-home" solutions as Account#1. EV energy supply location or their logistics and where they should be located is irrelevant. Look at any small town that has competing gas stations on the same corner. This is a concocting 1950s sales talk with 2000s evolution. Energy; whether gas or electric will be demanded by individuals seeking fun trips, escapes, or the need to get away. These above accounts are false for any person seeking the use of their "CapEx" investment in a vehicle for travel is absurd. Better and more supply of energy in any form in high transit areas with competitive pricing will win the market. Let's stop twisting ourselves in knots for something that has already been established for decades.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics