Farmer's Footprint’s Post

(USA 26.06.24) #biologicals Western Growers & Wharf42 initiative Platform 10 launches global grower trial network to speed up adoption of biologicals. Western Growers https://www.wga.com/ and New Zealand company Wharf42 https://www.wharf42.co.nz/ have launched Platform 10 https://www.platform10.ag/, a global grower trial network aimed at accelerating the adoption of biological agricultural products. Announced at the Salinas Biological Summit https://lnkd.in/gCp_ENwB, the network will start trials in California before expanding to New Zealand, Australia, Denmark and the UK. The initiative addresses global challenges such as pest resistance to chemicals, consumer demand for cleaner produce, and regulatory restrictions on chemical use. Platform 10 will conduct field trials on five specialty crops to test the efficacy of biopesticides, aiming for rapid growth and adoption of biological solutions worldwide. https://lnkd.in/gMqsyF2w

Navigating the Nuances | The Need for Distinct Hemp Grain and Fiber Regulations In the emergent landscape of hemp agriculture, grain and fiber are often interlaced under one regulatory umbrella—an approach that overlooks their distinct cultivation cycles and economic footprints. 🌱 I want to start by emphasizing that the opportunity for BOTH grain and fiber is massive, and this is not intended to downplay or hinder the potential of hemp grain—quite the opposite. The separation of the two should lead regulators to understand each potential better. Let's delve into why hemp grain and fiber warrant separate consideration in the eyes of regulators: The co-regulation of fiber and grain is akin to regulating #corn and #cotton under the same regs. This requires farmers and processors to navigate a labyrinthine regulatory environment that aligns differently from the practicalities of their cultivation and harvesting timelines. The previously proposed legislative framework failed to differentiate between grain and fiber, causing confusion among regulators. This is especially problematic in the context of FDA and USDA oversight, which necessitates clear guidelines to ensure product safety and regulatory compliance. For #hempfiber, harvested as the plant enters flowering, THC levels are naturally negligible, mitigating concerns over psychoactive compounds. However, for grain, which must mature through full flowering, the risk of elevated THC levels looms larger. Right or wrong (and I will repeat it, I believe they are wrong), THC is what regulators are focused on. The complete flowering cycle required for grain production also introduces complexities such as potential bud rot and other crop threats, which will ultimately impact crop insurance parameters/premiums and place undue financial pressure on fiber cultivation. Furthermore, while #hempgrain is GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) by the FDA, which is promising for food-related applications, their involvement introduces an additional layer of complexity. As one product is considered food and the other an actual industrial crop, their conflation under the same regulatory measures leads to inefficiencies and confusion. For instance, the grain's end market in the food industry must adhere to different standards and practices than those required for the fiber market in #textiles and #construction. The path of least resistance to harness the full potential of hemp grain AND fiber is to advocate for separate regulatory considerations that acknowledge the nuances of each. This separation will clarify the legislative landscape, allowing farmers to optimize their practices and enabling the industry to meet regulatory demands without the undue burden of one-size-fits-all policies. The time is ripe for a paradigm shift that respects the distinct identities of hemp grain and fiber, fostering an environment where BOTH can thrive and contribute to the nation's agricultural and industrial renaissance.

Groundwork BioAg: Expanding across key LATAM growing regions, concentrating specifically on Rootella’s key benefits https://lnkd.in/gv4pR3Yr In Latin America, growers are ahead of the global curve in integrating biologicals as an important part of a more complete integrated crop treatment for pests, disease and nutrition. Many of the largest growers have adopted more sustainable farming practices using biologicals, making Brazil, in particular, an attractive market for biological companies. While LATAM growers now have many choices, they are looking for proven products with specific, high-value benefits, including helping to reduce their dependance on chemical fertilizers. Since 2018, Groundwork BioAg and its partner NovaTero BioAg, led by Bernad Arnaud, chairman, and Ricardo Stolf, chief executive officer, have been helping growers cost-effectively and sustainably improve yield by adding Rootella® BR mycorrhizal inoculant as the foundation of their fertility program. Contact Grace Yuan（[email protected]） to share your company's story

Biological companies like FUTURECO BIOSCIENCE, Certis Biologicals, and Valent U.S.A. LLC have seen success in Mexico’s biologicals market. The market may not be skyrocketing like Brazil’s, but it is maturing with opportunities. Mexican producers growing high-value specialty crops like table grapes, tomatoes, and peppers as well as greenhouse growers are using biologicals. With the U.S. market buying approximately 80% of Mexican agriculture exports according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service, Mexico’s producers are looking for products to make their yields more appealing to U.S. consumers. Read more from Editor Renee Targos: https://ow.ly/hThg50SoIII #CropProtection #Biologicals #Agribusiness #PlantHealth #ABGLATAM

ADAMA discussed the drivers, challenges, and trends of biologicals and launched or expanded the use of many biologicals https://lnkd.in/g5utyCf5 ″The most important trend is the coexistence of biologicals with chemical products where appropriate, creating formulations that allow farmers to enjoy the benefits of both so that they gain effective and environmentally friendly crop protection. These combined solutions support the principle of Integrated Pest Management, and often can be a more effective pest control method than biologicals alone, while still reducing the use of chemicals,″ said Alex Mills, Head of Global Fungicides at ADAMA in a recent interview with AgroPages.   He also shared his views on the drivers and challenges of biologicals; the regulatory landscape of biologicals; ADAMA’s biological lines and relevant facilities & capabilities, as well as the future development trend of biologicals etc. If you'd like to share your company's story and products/solutions. Please contact Grace Yuan via: [email protected]    

(USA 25.07.24) #growingproduce Ways Produce Growers Can Replace Multisite Chemical Fungicides With Biologicals [AG: Why Australia Needs a National Platform Like Growing Produce] Growers can replace multisite chemical fungicides with biopesticides by leveraging their multisite modes of action, utilizing disease forecasting for precise application, and maintaining well-designed, dry plantings to reduce disease pressure. This approach minimizes environmental impact and avoids resistance issues associated with single-site fungicides. ----- [AG: Australia's fresh produce industry lacks a centralized national platform like Growing Produce (growingproduce.com) for comprehensive, up-to-date information and resources. Such a platform could provide a centralized information hub, educational resources, community engagement and policy advocacy for Australian growers. The absence of this resource raises questions about barriers to its creation, potential initiators and how growers can collaborate to demand and support such a platform. A national fresh produce information hub could enhance the industry's efficiency, competitiveness and sustainability in domestic and global markets.] ----- https://lnkd.in/gPgEcmQW

Hey there it’s artificial grass and it’s greener and you never have to water it but you can’t plant stuff can’t grow stuff and it’s not good for you. It gives you cancer let’s take the kids to the park and let them play on it because that’s what they said was OK right it’s OK don’t do any research. It’s totally fine. Hemp seed meal was used prior to 1937. In the United States, hemp was widely grown from the colonial period into the mid-1800s and continued to be grown in the early 1900s and prior to the late 1950s, being considered as an agricultural commodity. The seeds of hemp grown for fiber production were considered a waste product and were mainly used as animal feed 4 . Additionally, hemp was transported to North America in the early 1600s and was widely grown in many parts of the country. Many mills pressed hempseed into oil, which was used in various products such as paints, ink, varnishes, and lamp oil 1 . Therefore, it is accurate to say that hemp seed meal was used prior to 1937. Mobile: Yes, hemp seed meal was used in the United States before 1937, mainly as animal feed and for pressing oil used in various products. Hemp was widely grown in the country from the early 1600s until the late 1950s.

Watermelon is one of my favorite fruits. I always reach for seedless varieties-I don't like having to pick through seeds to get to the good stuff on the inside. Seedless watermelons weren't popular in the U.S. until the 1980s when they were introduced, and today are still a new innovation in many countries around the world. As consumer preferences change, we'll likely see more seedless varieties used in countries that today lean toward the seeded types. Wherever they're grown around the world, the varieties the Syngenta Vegetable Seeds team is researching will be backed by science. Our experts actively conduct extensive research and maintain comprehensive quality control through the Syngenta trialing program. This collaboration with growers helps us to evaluate products on their farms over multiple years. Our main agronomic objectives are to optimize yield, enhance disease protection and provide the highest quality products possible – all while understanding and preparing for upcoming consumer trends. https://lnkd.in/gh-gvWtS

Global Blood Meal Market size was valued at USD 2.27 Bn in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 2.90 Bn by 2030, at a CAGR of 3.53 %. For a complimentary sample of the report, click here: https://lnkd.in/dSWwsyM3 The Blood Meal Market is experiencing notable growth, driven by a blend of dynamic factors and regional developments. As an essential organic fertilizer and animal feed ingredient, blood meal is gaining traction due to its high nitrogen content and eco-friendly attributes. This report delves into the market dynamics, highlighting key drivers such as the rising demand for sustainable agricultural practices and the expansion of the livestock industry. Regionally, North America and Europe are leading the market due to stringent environmental regulations and a strong focus on organic farming. Meanwhile, the Asia-Pacific region is emerging as a significant player, spurred by increasing agricultural activities and rapid industrialization. The introduction of innovative processing techniques and the integration of advanced technologies are enhancing product quality and expanding its application scope. The report provides a comprehensive overview, examining market trends, competitive landscape, and strategic developments by key players. For a quick summary of the report, click here: https://lnkd.in/dte8BbNZ Looking ahead, the future projection for the blood meal market appears robust, with expectations of steady growth driven by ongoing advancements in agricultural practices and the growing emphasis on sustainable development. The continued investment in research and development will further propel market expansion, making blood meal an indispensable component in the global agricultural ecosystem.

💡 𝐈𝐬 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐞'𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞-𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐬❓ Interestingly, in recent weeks, I have been approached by think tanks, UHNW individuals, and family offices—many of whom invest in the alternative protein sector—about the unusual quietness in this industry. I found the CNA article below particularly helpful in answering the questions, explaining the current situation and providing insights into the challenges faced by the industry. 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Singapore has been a leader in the cultivated meat space; what happened recently? "A mix of unrealistic optimism from investors and the realization that the science behind the product could not match consumer demand for low prices and higher production volumes has left the entire industry in limbo.” 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Why is the growth of cultivated meat facing a temporary setback? It’s about misalignment of expectations among startups, investors, and consumers. “One expert believes that the successful scaling and production of lab-grown meat will be necessary as current meat production methods could become unsustainable in future generations.” 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Why are investors still hopeful? “The truth is that the livestock industry is not sustainable. We need to acknowledge this, and so this science will progress when lab-grown meat is globally accepted,” said Associate Professor Alfredo Franco-Obregon from the National University of Singapore (NUS) Institute for Health Innovation and Technology. 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Do you think we will see mainstream acceptance of cultivated meat in our lifetime? Assoc Prof Franco-Obregon, who is in his 60s, mentione: ".. that mainstream acceptance may not occur in his lifetime, but he believes it is inevitable. ‘It will eventually be realized due to its urgency,’” 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: What have we learned about the disruption of conventional meat, and how should we frame cultivated meat? “Our goal is for cultivated meat to become an option, much like canned or minced meat. While it is a good start, we are not yet at the point where it can replace pork and beef,” he added. 𝐓𝐨 𝐬𝐮𝐦 𝐮𝐩: “As long as traditional meat is there, that will be mainstream,” said Dr Viknish. “Our goal is that cultivated meat becomes an option, just like how you have canned meat and minced meat. “That will be a very good start, but to say that it will replace pork and beef, we are not there yet.” Singapore and Singaporeans are known for their practicality and realism. I remain hopeful that I will see cultivated meat on store shelves and become a mainstream product in my life time. #cultivatedmeat #alternateprotein #sustainability #labgrown Source: https://lnkd.in/givP6-fU