Adam Shlahet, a jury expert and professor at Fordham Law School, explains that this process is about eliminating jurors who may negatively impact your case. 📊
As detailed in a recent NPR discussion featuring the infamous cases of O.J. Simpson, Derek Chauvin, and the upcoming trial of Donald Trump, the goal is to form a jury that can objectively weigh evidence, irrespective of their personal views on the defendant.
This complexity is echoed by attorney Camille Vasquez, who leveraged jury consultants to pinpoint ideal jurors during Johnny Depp's defamation trial. The approach? To mix diverse personalities—leaders and followers—to form a balanced jury. Identifying potential biases, especially in politically charged cases like Trump's, is paramount.
Here at JuryAnalyst, we empower lawyers with advanced analytics and insights, aiding in the meticulous process of jury selection. Understanding the subtleties of each potential juror's background and predispositions is essential, and our tools are designed to provide that depth of analysis, ensuring lawyers can strategically build their case with the best possible jury. 👨⚖️👩⚖️
#JurySelection #LegalTech #TrialLawyers
Organization Psychologist at Leadership Consulting Associates
2moThis is a great!