IPO lead advisors are paid a significant amount of money to value a company and recommend an IPO price to the board of the listing company. The valuation parameters of the IPO Valuation and Pricing Report should typically include important data such as the PE Ratio, Price to Book Value Ratio, and other relevant ratios. Additionally, peer valuation parameters of similar companies in the same industry, country, and Africa should also be disclosed if available.
A summary of the parameters above should typically appear in the prospectus with the disclosure that the report was available for inspection.
Not so, today.
Today, there is little transparency in the valuation reporting process for Lead Advisors in IPOs. No valuation reports are made available for inspection and no data point parameters are disclosed in the prospectus. Instead, advisors use the "average valuation methodology" figure to determine the IPO price and they include a general statement to say: "we did the valuation (which you can't see), we did very many complicated things (which you won't understand) and the average of all of those things approximately equates to the IPO price.
This is about as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike.
There is no such thing as "the average valuation methodology".
I am concerned about the lack of transparency in the valuation methodology presented by lead advisors in recent African IPOs. It seems that they are trying to avoid their responsibility by not presenting the underlying figures from which the valuation was derived. This raises questions about where stock exchange regulators stand on the issue. Obviously, they are not taking any action to address this issue.
It seems like a small thing. It's not. Retail investors rely on the reports they receive from their brokers and others, people who are able to understand valuation.
I believe that transparency in these matters at IPO is necessary to protect investors. It's a key part of investor relations: it's the core part. How is this relevant to online investor relations and what I do?
I have served as a lead advisor for more than 5 IPOs. During this time, I realized that it was crucial to ensure that the IPO structure was a win-win situation for both my client and the public. However, achieving this balance was tricky as it involved competing stakeholder interests. Knowing that my valuation would be under the scrutiny of the general public, everything presented had to be defensible with the result forming the basis around which competing stakeholder interests could be reconciled for a successful outcome.
#esg
#esgreporting
#ipo
#sustainability
#sustainabilityreporting
#investorrelations
Financial Analyst (Fixed Assets)| M.Tech in Construction Technology & Management | B. Tech in Civil Engineering.
1moProud to have been a part of the team that prepared this comprehensive report! The insights into the IPL's growing value and global impact are truly impressive. Kudos to everyone involved. For those interested in the details, be sure to check out the full report!