Jacob Jegher’s Post

Originally posted on X: https://lnkd.in/gQguaVDX starbeam.one Daily Status - A pretty awesome day yesterday, getting the model done as a first draft for v1.2. 😌👍 Everything is in place, and now is the tedious part of actually validating it. 😅 I took a sledgehammer to this and made a lot of changes. Hopefully, this will be the last time I have to do this, but this will allow us to grow the model with more events and activities as we progress here. I can already tell the migration story is going to be a major pain/challenge but we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. For now, it's about validating the model, getting it ready for development, and building a freaking wizard on it. 😄 #StarbeamOne #sb1 #DailyDeveloper #Startup #Status #azure #blazor #csharp #dotnet #buildinpublic #buildinginpublic

This is an idea that my son drew and I just put it together in digital form. Say hello to OCTO Brain!!!! This is also my first time doing something of this nature, so I hope you like it, and more to come. #CartoonCharacter #AdobePhotoshop

#DSA #Musk #COM #secret_deal Elon #Musk's dogfights on X with #Breton against "secret deals" offered by the Commission I have been in Gvmt teams holding similar talks with major online-platforms, here are just a few thoughts: We don't know so much what happened, but it seems that Musk is contradicting himself: He wrote on X: "The European Commission offered 𝕏 an illegal secret deal: if we quietly censored speech without telling anyone, they would not fine us. The other platforms accepted that deal. " Such talks might be slippery (more for the gvmt than company), but can be totally legal and good to provide right to be heard. In the DSA we even have an underpinning with Art. 71 (binding commitments). Of course, gvmt is facing restrictions in what they can say in such talks and so on. It is highly unlikely that COM offered "secret deal", as any "deal" to declare commitments binding (Art. 71 DSA) would be subject to rights of access to information (for the public as well as the press). Also, as I can say after 4 years in gvmt, I also find it highly unlikely that COM would try what Musk implies here (to demand sth very far away from the law). Not because regulators are angels but because we have institutional safeguards for this (the field of political/diplomatic "deals" which remain secret is also something different from regulatory process). Musk claims COM asked to "secretly" censor "speech". Some people say he was asked to censor "free speech", but not even Musk himself said so. But as it seems, what COM might have asked, is "𝕏 to hire a team of people in the eu that would unilaterally oversee the removal of 'misinformation'" as is rumored on X and which Musk commented as "accurate" himself (all quotes in the link below). And this, the obligation to hire an own(!) team to look after misinformation, would be (likely) in line with the DSA and miles away from what Musk claimed in the first place. An own team would in the first place do what Musk tells them to do. Think of someone opening a concert-venue and the regulator says: "First show me you have hired security personnel" ... this of course is much less critical then what Musk implies (that COM asked for specific moderation). Moreover, Musk claims that other platforms "accepted that deal". As his tweet is truth-bending in the first place, this claim then is also. What is he implying? Shall we ask the other platforms? For sure, Musk will benefit from this dogfight, and COM not (maybe they should think twice where settlement talks make sense). On another page: There are a lot of interesting (but less spectacular) DSA-questions in the whole proceedings, maybe to be discussed another day. https://lnkd.in/dh7iz4AT

🐝 Swarm: A method that involves the entire team focusing on a high-priority task until it is completed. 🐝 When should his tactic be used? When is there a better solution. Check out my latest article on the topic. Happy Tuesday, everyone.

Like any good story, #iac has its share of myths. Is it only for large-scale projects? Is it too complicated to implement? Does it really provide substantial cost savings? Excited to learn more and debunk these myths? Let's start a conversation. Because the only thing better than facts are facts that dispel myths. Ready to sort out the IaC facts from fiction? #personalstory #infrastructureascode #mythvsfact

ICYMI last week…Rock legends were honored while we were busy making waves at Conga 🎸 Inspired by A Tribe Called Quest's Hall of Fame entry, our team at Conga is on fire too! After wrapping my first #CongaConnect all I can say is WOW. Mind-blowing keynotes, customer tales, networking galore, and Tiffani Bova's brilliance. 🌟 #TimeForChange Curious about how Conga fuels top-line growth with complete revenue intelligence? Let's chat. Our solution is the *only* open Revenue Lifecycle Management platform. We're unlocking revenue velocity, predictability, quality, efficiency, lifetime value, and of course, innovation to give you the upper hand, and the revenue advantage. “Can I kick it?” The answer is YES with Conga. Learn more on our website and book a demo with our skilled team today. conga.com #Conga #RLM #RevenueLifecycleManagement

We need some of this technology here

Innovations

Quantum Computing, a real game changer Quantum Computing has the potential to accelerate scientific research and innovation across various disciplines.

Learn why Vortexa, Shuttle, and Arwen.AI chose #rustlang and how they use it in production in this panel discussion from #RustForTheWeb featuring Edward Wright, Nodar Daneliya, James Cole, and our Luca Palmieri! 🚀 ➡️ Watch here: https://lnkd.in/eHfJRMF7