James Probst’s Post

Very much needed analysis, good to see top models across the measures.

🚀 Agentic AI Trends: Benchmarking and Innovation 🧠 📊 The AI solution space is seeing increased focus on agentic-specific frameworks and even model training. From newcomers like AgentOps to LangChain's new LangGraph cloud, the industry is evolving rapidly. Your solutions should be auditable not just for cost and standard metrics, but tools, like AgentOps are even getting into the metrics in the space of conversational context for multiple agents. (More on that in a upcoming post on Observability) (https://www.agentops.ai/) 🔍 A notable development: New benchmarking site for LLM API providers! This tool helps developers compare: • ⚡ Speed of different models • 💰 Cost-effectiveness • 🎯 Overall performance 🔗 Complements existing resources: • LMSYS Chatbot Arena • Hugging Face's open LLM leaderboards Each offering unique insights into model capabilities. 💼 At Agentic Insights LLC, we're tracking these developments to help businesses optimize their AI strategies. Subscribe for more updates! 📜 https://lnkd.in/gn8EPzrS #AgenticAI #AIBenchmarking #TechInnovation

In the age of AI, choosing the right language model can be critical. Performance benchmarking is essential for evaluating AI models. It allows comparing different models based on factors like quality and output speed. The findings of this analysis is quite interesting and there is a clear trade-off between model quality and output speed, with higher quality models typically having lower output speed.

Why we need to know the comparison between the quality, speed and the pricing of each model ? Answer can have a lot of details but as Aneignung, it’s for the consideration of the following factors. Sure, here are the key points: 1. Informed Decision Making 2. Cost-Effectiveness 3. Efficiency 4. Quality Assurance 5. Competitive Advantage 6. User Satisfaction 7. Scalability and Future-Proofing

You're right, benchmarks that focus on speed alongside existing quality-focused benchmarks like LMSYS, Hugging Face, and HELM are valuable for developers. Here's why faster token generation with LLMs is crucial for agentic workflows: **Reduced Latency:** * Faster token generation means quicker responses from the LLM, leading to a more natural and engaging user experience in chatbots and virtual assistants. Users won't perceive lags or delays between their prompts and the LLM's responses. **Improved Efficiency:** * Agentic workflows often involve real-time interactions where the LLM needs to process information and respond swiftly. Faster generation allows for handling more user requests within a shorter timeframe, improving overall efficiency. **Enhanced Realism:** * In agentic systems, the LLM acts as an agent or persona. Speedy generation helps maintain the illusion of a responsive and intelligent entity. Slow response times can break this illusion and make the interaction feel clunky. **Better Scalability:** * Faster token generation enables handling a higher volume of user interactions. This becomes crucial as agentic applications scale and serve a larger user base. Overall, faster token generation with LLMs paves the way for more fluid, efficient, and realistic agentic workflows. It allows for smoother interactions, improved user experience, and better scalability for real-time applications.

Best place to compare speed ,response , cost and many more for various LLMs

Incredibly useful! I just wonder whether bench marks are accurate. Ive seen pretty stark difference between benchmark results and real life results. Its a worrying difference. OpenAI may be benchmarked the most "intelligent" on a benchmark but get beat out by Flash 1.5 from google on a needle in a haystack style question. Or just be worse than even a Lamma 70B model. Kinda like the economy, the Real life numbers and Paper numbers just dont add up... This post from Andrew Ng made me consider using flash 1.5 and I can tell you i'm not going back to gpt4o. (for this use case)

LLM is for English language ONLY. There are six official UN languages, and many more other non-UN human languages. Is there any AI data products you know, that can interpret and answer the following humble but realistic Chinese-English multilingual questions? With our IP, a copyrighted multilingual metadata, we can provide real time answers. "Who, in the Ontario province of Canada, has new US patents granted on the nearest Tuesday, when the USPTO releases the newly granted US patents on a weekly basis?" "Who, in the "江蘇‘’ province of China, has new US patents granted on the nearest Tuesday, when the USPTO releases the newly granted US patents on a weekly basis?" Metadata is an enabler. Without metadata, NO data can be found/retrieved, even by the most advanced technologies, like AI, NVIDIA chips, supercomputers, etc. https://lnkd.in/g-aJFnXR Experiment results showed that, with our intellectual property (IP), a copyrighted multilingual metadata, we are doing what AI, like ChatGPT, can't do in data analytics. Our IP can also make your information service UNIQUE in the world. Do you or any of your contacts need our expertise and our IP? " Thanks. P.S. We wrote this post manually, NOT by AI.