We are pleased to inform you that we are organizing a session on functional genomics as part of the CRISPR Medicine News conference in Copenhagen (April 23–25, 2024)! Several industry and academic experts in functional genomics will present the challenges and opportunities of using CRISPR for functional genomics. We believe this conference will foster the connection between academic and industrial research and promote the application of CRISPR for drug discovery. We look forward to seeing you there. Please follow the link to register: https://lnkd.in/eM4N4bct#crispr#biotechnology#drugdiscovery
🟣 Market access & marketing specialist @GeneTiCA Group. I will 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐩 you to 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭 with my colleagues. Let's find the best solution in the NGS field together.
🟣 Štěpán Stočes, as you correctly mentioned, error rate variation also depends on the experimenter (quality of NGS library and sequencing setup). However, NovaSeq X has a lower error rate than NovaSeq 6000 and now even more, thanks to the new XLEAP-SBS chemistry.
We have XLEAP data for NextSeq platforms, illustrating how XLEAP-SBS chemistry improves the error rate. Here, you see data for XLEAP-SBS 600-cycle kits on NextSeq 1000/2000.
For those who are interested, write me a comment, and I will send you more info about XLEAP-SBS chemistry 😉
Why did the bioinformatician bring a ladder to the lab? To reach new heights in sequencing!
Researchers (2021) developed a method to retroactively determine error rates in public sequencing datasets by analyzing overlaps between reads.
They evaluated datasets from different Illumina instruments. Yet these values are closer to reality than the error rate of this platform. Expectedly, the high-end machines have lower error rates, although the variation still depends also on the experimenter.
The question is how the NovaSeq X stands up to it. Is its error rate the same as NovaSeq 6000 (error rate 0.109%+/-0.350%) or lower?
Knowing at least approximately the real error rate of NGS sequencing platforms is essential for the entire data analysis process and its proper setup.
https://lnkd.in/e-2um8Jc#Sequencing#Genomics#Biotech#Illumina#Research
🧬Happy DNA Day! A day to celebrate all DNA and genomics-related scientific breakthroughs!🔬
The 12th World DNA Day (WDD-2024) aims to promote the progress of biotechnology and industrial development in the world through the introduction of international advanced intelligence in large quantities. Explore how MilliporeSigma can support your scientific journey! #DNADay#MilliporeSigma
❗️Looking forward to seeing you tomorrow at 1:30 PM for the Spatial Opportunities Seminar at Aud ON5, Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium. 👋
In this seminar, we will present our comprehensive genomic solutions and one-stop #sequencing services, particularly to share our sub-cellular level spatial transcriptome sequencing service.
We are excited to work together and share our ideas with scientists in this field. 🔥🔥
#SpatialTranscriptomics#Bioinformatics#Subcellar#Biotechnology
Researchers (2021) developed a method to retroactively determine error rates in public sequencing datasets by analyzing overlaps between reads.
They evaluated datasets from different Illumina instruments. Yet these values are closer to reality than the error rate of this platform. Expectedly, the high-end machines have lower error rates, although the variation still depends also on the experimenter.
The question is how the NovaSeq X stands up to it. Is its error rate the same as NovaSeq 6000 (error rate 0.109%+/-0.350%) or lower?
Knowing at least approximately the real error rate of NGS sequencing platforms is essential for the entire data analysis process and its proper setup.
https://lnkd.in/e-2um8Jc#Sequencing#Genomics#Biotech#Illumina#Research