Lars Karlslund’s Post

View profile for Lars Karlslund, graphic

Don't let a ransomware gang test your security - let me help you with it

Do you know why Microsoft (who owns LinkedIn) is "honoring" *you* by inviting you to answer "expert" questions that you're possibly not an expert on? First of all you should ask yourself whether the invitation was made by a computer or a person. With the scale of things on LinkedIn that question probably answers itself. The next question you should ask yourself is whether you think that the expert questions that are asked are generated a computer or a person. Well yes, it's fairly easy to also speculate that they are also automatically generated. If you agree so far, this is the kicker: why would one of the largest investors in the AI (machine learning) market automate the harvesting of human answers to generic automatically generated questions? You should have figured it out by now. You're simply food for the AI machine. Don't waste your time. You're being played for a fool.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Lars Karlslund

Don't let a ransomware gang test your security - let me help you with it

3w

I haven't answered this one, but one potential answer is probably "don't post critical articles." Couldn't care less though.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Like
Reply

There are a few issues with that. First is the Experts articles on LI preceeded the advent of ChatGPT grade available LLM's. They do use AI generated articles now, and the users add to them. However the original purpose was more around providing collated static sources(articles)of information to users. Second. Although you give your permission( by accepting LI terms and conditions), permission is only for them to use the data internally. I'm not saying that the curators of the data won't just steal any publically available data anyway, nor that LI( along with Microsoft) will find ways to make 'internal use'...apply to them providing said data to Microsoft...but legally it's a difficult one to determine( I know lawyers who have potificated on this). My view is exactly as you describe now, but the caveat is the data can't leave LI, but could be used to train a model, and provided to LI users. Anyway, this is all part of the reason why we started DataFair and in our model you are directly paid for your contribution. The types of contribution are also varied( different types of questions, multiple choice, comparrisons, image identifications and more) so it's not as dry and labour intensive for the user either. http://datafair.ai

Kaido Järvemets

Helping Companies Secure and Optimize Their IT Operations with Expert Azure Solutions

3w

I will not answer any of them.

Fergal Brennan

Senior Software Architect

4w

Déjà vu

  • No alternative text description for this image
Alexey Osin

Senior SAP ECC & S4/HANA SD/MM consultant | FMCG | Retail | Pharma | 15+ years in SAP consulting

3w

Image generated by AI and text probably with a little help from it. Irony as it is

😜😜😜😜😜😜😜 the AI can’t get meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Mirza Pašić

Full Stack Developer | Devops

4w

And what is exactly wrong with that? I will gladly help build better AI models, which will help me do my job better in the future, learn faster, run my business, and free up some of my time.

Dang, you mean I am not an expert!!!! My ego is hurting now.

Zack Tong

Data Analytics Engineer | ex-Tencent | Open Banking, Data Engineering, Business Intelligence | Singapore Citizen

3w

Also Linkedin users: Desperately putting 3x 5x Top Linkedin voice just for traction

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics